Project Name: Project No.: XXX ESCo Addition Model XXX Insert image here Project Name: Project No.: XXX ESCo Addition Model XXX Insert image here A presentation to: Eskom IDM Project Evaluation Committee Insert image here Presented by: XXX IDM Project Manager: XXX Date: XXX ESCo/PD Name: XXX Insert image here

Template Identifier: 240-55244916 Rev 1 Overview Decision Required ESCo/Developer Background ESCo/Developer Performance Customer Background Letter of Intent Site Information Scope of Work Technology Overview Schematic Diagram Daily Load Profile Load Reduction Calculation Cost breakdown Risks and Mitigations Environmental Impacts Employment Opportunities 2018/11/22 2018/11/22 Template Identifier: 240-55244916 Rev 1 2

Template Identifier: 240-55244916 Rev 1 Decision Required Request the Project Evaluation Committee’s (PEC) recommendation to take the project under ESCO addition model to the next level for approval of the implementation of (technology ------) EE/LM project to reduce by XXX MW (XXX GWh) at ----sites). Total Project Costs R XXXX MW Savings XXXX MW saving Annual total energy (GWh) savings XXXX GWh saving Rm/MW XXXX Eskom to pay Customer to pay Implementation period Estimated savings to customer 2018/11/22 2018/11/22 Template Identifier: 240-55244916 Rev 1 3

PEC Re-submission History The previous PEC decision being presented are stated below. Previous Submission Current Submission Submission Date Funding Model Decision outcome Demand (MW) Energy (MWh) Cost of Project (R) Delivery Time (months) 2018/11/22 2018/11/22 Template Identifier: 240-55244916 Rev 1 4

ESCo/Developer Background 2018/11/22 2018/11/22 Template Identifier: 240-55244916 Rev 1 5

ESCo/Developer Performance Previous Project Date completed Measured Performance(%) 2018/11/22 2018/11/22 Template Identifier: 240-55244916 Rev 1 6

Template Identifier: 240-55244916 Rev 1 Customer Background 2018/11/22 2018/11/22 Template Identifier: 240-55244916 Rev 1 7

Template Identifier: 240-55244916 Rev 1 Letter of Intent 2018/11/22 2018/11/22 Template Identifier: 240-55244916 Rev 1 8

Template Identifier: 240-55244916 Rev 1 Site Information Site information XXXX Name of company XXX (Pty) Ltd Type of operation XXXXX Postal address 2018/11/22 2018/11/22 Template Identifier: 240-55244916 Rev 1 9

Template Identifier: 240-55244916 Rev 1 Scope of Work 2018/11/22 2018/11/22 Template Identifier: 240-55244916 Rev 1 10

Template Identifier: 240-55244916 Rev 1 Technology Overview The proposed technology, SABS Approval Standards & specifications 2018/11/22 2018/11/22 Template Identifier: 240-55244916 Rev 1 11

Template Identifier: 240-55244916 Rev 1 Schematic Diagram 2018/11/22 2018/11/22 Template Identifier: 240-55244916 Rev 1 12

Template Identifier: 240-55244916 Rev 1 Daily Load Profile 2018/11/22 2018/11/22 Template Identifier: 240-55244916 Rev 1 13

Individual Site Proposed Savings Existing [kW] Proposed [kW] Savings [kW] Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 Site 4 Site 5 Total Savings: 2018/11/22 rev 1

Load Reduction Calculations Show how savings were calculated against the existing 2018/11/22 2018/11/22 Template Identifier: 240-55244916 Rev 1 15

Template Identifier: 240-55244916 Rev 1 Cost Breakdown Project cost elements Amount [R] MW Savings Actual R’m/MW Cost of Equipment & Installation R XXXX Consulting and Project Management Transport & Accommodation Total Cost Excl. VAT XXXX MW XXXX 2018/11/22 2018/11/22 Template Identifier: 240-55244916 Rev 1 16

Risks and Mitigation Strategies Risk impact (1 – 10) (A) Probability (B) Risk Level (AxB) Mitigation Low (30) (27) (10) (6) Ranking Criteria 1 – 39 Low Risk 40 – 69 Medium Risk 70 – 100 High Risk 2018/11/22 2018/11/22 Template Identifier: 240-55244916 Rev 1 17

Risks and Mitigation Strategies Risk impact (1 – 10) (A) Probability (B) Risk Level (AxB) Mitigation SHE incident occurring Low (30) SHE plan to be compiled, reviewed by Eskom SHE Function and implemented during project execution SD & L targets not met SD & L performance to be tracked throughout project execution and submitted Quality requirements not complied with Project Quality Plan (PQP) to be compiled, reviewed by Eskom Quality and implemented during project execution Ranking Criteria 1 – 39 Low Risk 40 – 69 Medium Risk 70 – 100 High Risk 2018/11/22 2018/11/22 Template Identifier: 240-55244916 Rev 1 18

kWh Savings Projected per year Environmental Impact Item Factors1 [/kWh] kWh Savings Projected per year Reductions per year Coal use  (kilogram) 0.54 Water use (litre) 1.37 Ash produced  (gram) 155 Particulate emissions  (gram) 0.31 CO2 emissions (kilogram) 0.99 SOx emissions (gram) 7.93 NOx emissions (gram) 4.19 Factors as cited in the Eskom 2012 Annual Integrated Report (http://financialresults.co.za/2012/eskom_ar2012/fact-sheets/006.php) 2018/11/22 2018/11/22 Template Identifier: 240-55244916 Rev 1 19

Employment Opportunities through IDM Projects ESCo/Developer Feedback The number of new employment opportunities that will created due to the IDM Funded project Training that will offered to the new employees Characterise the new employees (a) by ages i.e. youth 18-35 years (b) (female or male) Duration of the employment of these new employees 2018/11/22 2018/11/22 Template Identifier: 240-55244916 Rev 1 20

Template Identifier: 240-55244916 Rev 1 Decision Required Request the Project Evaluation Committee’s (PEC) recommendation to take the project to the next level for approval of the implementation of (technology -- ----) EE/LM project to reduce by XXX MW (XXX GWh) at ----sites). Total Project Costs R XXXX MW Savings XXXX MW saving Annual total energy (GWh) savings XXXX GWh saving R/MW XXXX Eskom to pay Customer to pay Implementation period Estimated savings to customer 2018/11/22 2018/11/22 Template Identifier: 240-55244916 Rev 1 21

Insert image here Insert image here Thank you