Kristen Olsen and Yang Zhang

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VISTAS Modeling Overview May 25, 2004 Mt. Cammerer, Great Smoky Mtns. National Park.
Advertisements

A PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE ETA - CMAQ AIR QUALITY FORECAST MODEL FOR THE SUMMER OF 2004 CMAS Workshop Chapel Hill, NC 20 October, 2004.
N emissions and the changing landscape of air quality Rob Pinder US EPA Office of Research and Development Atmospheric Modeling & Analysis Division.
COMPARATIVE MODEL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF CMAQ-VISTAS, CMAQ-MADRID, AND CMAQ-MADRID-APT FOR A NITROGEN DEPOSITION ASSESSMENT OF THE ESCAMBIA BAY, FLORIDA.
Photochemical Model Performance for PM2.5 Sulfate, Nitrate, Ammonium, and pre-cursor species SO2, HNO3, and NH3 at Background Monitor Locations in the.
Dynamical Downscaling of CCSM Using WRF Yang Gao 1, Joshua S. Fu 1, Yun-Fat Lam 1, John Drake 1, Kate Evans 2 1 University of Tennessee, USA 2 Oak Ridge.
Incorporation of the Model of Aerosol Dynamics, Reaction, Ionization and Dissolution (MADRID) into CMAQ Yang Zhang, Betty K. Pun, Krish Vijayaraghavan,
Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA
The AIRPACT-3 Photochemical Air Quality Forecast System: Evaluation and Enhancements Jack Chen, Farren Thorpe, Jeremy Avis, Matt Porter, Joseph Vaughan,
Li ZHANG, Hong LIAO, and Jianping LI Institute of Atmospheric Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences Impacts of Asian Summer Monsoon on Seasonal and Interannual.
The AIRPACT-3 Photochemical Air Quality Forecast System: Evaluation and Enhancements Jack Chen, Farren Thorpe, Jeremy Avis, Matt Porter, Joseph Vaughan,
The Sensitivity of Aerosol Sulfate to Changes in Nitrogen Oxides and Volatile Organic Compounds Ariel F. Stein Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.
Background Air Quality in the United States Under Current and Future Emissions Scenarios Zachariah Adelman, Meridith Fry, J. Jason West Department of Environmental.
Simulating diurnal changes of speciated particulate matter in Atlanta, Georgia using CMAQ Yongtao Hu, Jaemeen Baek, Bo Yan, Rodney Weber, Sangil Lee, Evan.
A Modeling Investigation of the Climate Effects of Air Pollutants Aijun Xiu 1, Rohit Mathur 2, Adel Hanna 1, Uma Shankar 1, Frank Binkowski 1, Carlie Coats.
National/Regional Air Quality Modeling Assessment Over China and Taiwan Using Models-3/CMAQ Modeling System Joshua S. Fu 1, Carey Jang 2, David Streets.
Importance of Lightning NO for Regional Air Quality Modeling Thomas E. Pierce/NOAA Atmospheric Modeling Division National Exposure Research Laboratory.
1 Using Hemispheric-CMAQ to Provide Initial and Boundary Conditions for Regional Modeling Joshua S. Fu 1, Xinyi Dong 1, Kan Huang 1, and Carey Jang 2 1.
Partnership for AiR Transportation Noise and Emission Reduction An FAA/NASA/TC-sponsored Center of Excellence A Comparison of CMAQ Predicted Contributions.
Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5 Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture Megan Gore, D.Q. Tong, V.P. Aneja, and M. Houyoux Department of.
WRAP Experience: Investigation of Model Biases Uma Shankar, Rohit Mathur and Francis Binkowski MCNC–Environmental Modeling Center Research Triangle Park,
Preliminary Study: Direct and Emission-Induced Effects of Global Climate Change on Regional Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter K. Manomaiphiboon 1 *, A.
Rick Saylor 1, Barry Baker 1, Pius Lee 2, Daniel Tong 2,3, Li Pan 2 and Youhua Tang 2 1 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Air Resources Laboratory.
GEM/AQ Simulations on Intercontinental Transports Science and Technology Branch Environment Canada.
Operational Evaluation and Comparison of CMAQ and REMSAD- An Annual Simulation Brian Timin, Carey Jang, Pat Dolwick, Norm Possiel, Tom Braverman USEPA/OAQPS.
TEMIS user workshop, Frascati, 8-9 October 2007 TEMIS – VITO activities Felix Deutsch Koen De Ridder Jean Vankerkom VITO – Flemish Institute for Technological.
Source Attribution Modeling to Identify Sources of Regional Haze in Western U.S. Class I Areas Gail Tonnesen, EPA Region 8 Pat Brewer, National Park Service.
Evaluation of the VISTAS 2002 CMAQ/CAMx Annual Simulations T. W. Tesche & Dennis McNally -- Alpine Geophysics, LLC Ralph Morris -- ENVIRON Gail Tonnesen.
U.S. EPA and WIST Rob Gilliam *NOAA/**U.S. EPA
1 Impact on Ozone Prediction at a Fine Grid Resolution: An Examination of Nudging Analysis and PBL Schemes in Meteorological Model Yunhee Kim, Joshua S.
GEOS-CHEM Modeling for Boundary Conditions and Natural Background James W. Boylan Georgia Department of Natural Resources - VISTAS National RPO Modeling.
Evaluation of Models-3 CMAQ I. Results from the 2003 Release II. Plans for the 2004 Release Model Evaluation Team Members Prakash Bhave, Robin Dennis,
Diagnostic Study on Fine Particulate Matter Predictions of CMAQ in the Southeastern U.S. Ping Liu and Yang Zhang North Carolina State University, Raleigh,
THE MODELS-3 COMMUNITY MULTI- SCALE AIR QUALITY (CMAQ) MODEL: 2002 RELEASE – NEW FEATURES Jonathan Pleim, Francis Binkowski, Robin Dennis, Brian Eder,
DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF MADRID: A NEW AEROSOL MODULE IN MODELS-3/CMAQ Yang Zhang*, Betty Pun, Krish Vijayaraghavan, Shiang-Yuh Wu and Christian.
Evaluating temporal and spatial O 3 and PM 2.5 patterns simulated during an annual CMAQ application over the continental U.S. Evaluating temporal and spatial.
Extending Size-Dependent Composition to the Modal Approach: A Case Study with Sea Salt Aerosol Uma Shankar and Rohit Mathur The University of North Carolina.
Impact of the changes of prescribed fire emissions on regional air quality from 2002 to 2050 in the southeastern United States Tao Zeng 1,3, Yuhang Wang.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division October 21, 2009 Evaluation of CMAQ.
Evaluation of CMAQ Driven by Downscaled Historical Meteorological Fields Karl Seltzer 1, Chris Nolte 2, Tanya Spero 2, Wyat Appel 2, Jia Xing 2 14th Annual.
VISTAS Modeling Overview Oct. 29, 2003
W. T. Hutzell 1, G. Pouliot 2, and D. J. Luecken 1 1 Atmospheric Modeling Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling.
Evaluation of CAMx: Issues Related to Sectional Models Ralph Morris, Bonyoung Koo, Steve Lau and Greg Yarwood ENVIRON International Corporation Novato,
Response of fine particles to the reduction of precursor emissions in Yangtze River Delta (YRD), China Juan Li 1, Joshua S. Fu 1, Yang Gao 1, Yun-Fat Lam.
MRPO Technical Approach “Nearer” Term Overview For: Emissions Modeling Meteorological Modeling Photochemical Modeling & Domain Model Performance Evaluation.
Sensitivity of PM 2.5 Species to Emissions in the Southeast Sun-Kyoung Park and Armistead G. Russell Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of PM.
A study of process contributions to PM 2.5 formation during the 2004 ICARTT period using the Eta-CMAQ forecast model over the eastern U.S. Shaocai Yu $,
Using Linked Global and Regional Models to Simulate U.S. Air Quality in the Year 2050 Chris Nolte, Alice Gilliland Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division,
Robin L. Dennis, Jesse O. Bash, Kristen M. Foley, Rob Gilliam, Robert W. Pinder U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Exposure Research Laboratory,
Daiwen Kang 1, Rohit Mathur 2, S. Trivikrama Rao 2 1 Science and Technology Corporation 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division ARL/NOAA NERL/U.S. EPA.
Preliminary Evaluation of the June 2002 Version of CMAQ Brian Eder Shaocai Yu Robin Dennis Jonathan Pleim Ken Schere Atmospheric Modeling Division* National.
ADAGIO (Atmospheric Deposition Analysis Generated by optimal Interpolation from Observations): Project plans and status A.S. Cole1, A. Robichaud2, M.D.
Improving an Air Quality Decision Support System through the Integration of Satellite Data with Ground-Based, Modeled, and Emissions Data Demonstration.
Development of a Multipollutant Version of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System Shawn Roselle, Deborah Luecken, William Hutzell,
A Performance Evaluation of Lightning-NO Algorithms in CMAQ
Simulation of primary and secondary (biogenic and anthropogenic) organic aerosols over the United States by US EPA Models-3/CMAQ: Evaluation and regional.
Nitrogen Deposition: Measurement Techniques and Field Studies
Impact on Recent North American Air Quality Forecasts of Replacing a Retrospective U.S. Emissions Inventory with a Projected Inventory Michael Moran1,
Impact of GOES Enhanced WRF Fields on Air Quality Model Performance
10th CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC 2010 October 11-13
Chris Misenis*, Xiaoming Hu, and Yang Zhang
Deborah Luecken and Golam Sarwar U.S. EPA, ORD/NERL
Simulation of Ozone and PM in Southern Taiwan
7th Annual CMAS Conference
M. Samaali, M. Sassi, V. Bouchet
Improving an Air Quality Decision Support System through the Integration of Satellite Data with Ground-Based, Modeled, and Emissions Data Demonstration.
Update on 2016 AQ Modeling by EPA
REGIONAL AND LOCAL-SCALE EVALUATION OF 2002 MM5 METEOROLOGICAL FIELDS FOR VARIOUS AIR QUALITY MODELING APPLICATIONS Pat Dolwick*, U.S. EPA, RTP, NC, USA.
Evaluation of Models-3 CMAQ Annual Simulation Brian Eder, Shaocai Yu, Robin Dennis, Alice Gilliland, Steve Howard,
Presentation transcript:

Impact of Reduced Nitrogen on Air Quality: Fine Scale Simulation, Evaluation, and Sensitivity Study Kristen Olsen and Yang Zhang Department of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences, NC State University, Raleigh, NC John Walker Division of Air Pollution Prevention and Control, US EPA, RTP, NC Wayne Robarge Department of Soil Science, NC State University, Raleigh, NC The 7th Annual CMAS Conference Chapel Hill, NC, October 6-8, 2008

Monthly Mean NH3 Emission Motivation Monthly Mean NH3 Emission Ammonia (NH3) emissions from large number of animal feeding operations in southeast U.S., particularly in eastern North Carolina (NC) Impact of NH3 An alkaline species with odors Modulation of soil nutrient and nitrogen cycles Neutralization of acids in the air Formation of fine particulate matter (PM2.5)

Objectives Intercompare the performance of two air quality models in simulating the fate and transport of reduced nitrogen (NHx = NH3 + NH4+) at fine grid scales Evaluate the sensitivity of air quality predictions to a 50% reduction of emissions of agricultural livestock NH3 (AL-NH3) Examine model sensitivity to horizontal grid resolution (12-, 4-, and 1.33-km)

Model Setup Period: January and July 2002 Horizontal/Vertical Resolutions: 4- and 1.33-km / 19 layers Air Quality Models: CMAQ v4.51, CAMx v4.42 Meteorology Model: MM5 v3.7 with FDDA Emission Inventory: developed by VISTAS, processed through SMOKE v2.1 IC/BC: VISTAS 12-km simulations Dataset for Evaluation: NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources NC CRONOS NC Climate Retrieval and Observations Network of the Southeast Database CASTNET Clean Air Status and Trends Network NADP National Acid Deposition Program STN Speciation Trends Network SEARCH Southeastern Aerosol Research and Characterization IMPROVE Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments AIRS – AQS Aerometric Information Retrieval System – Air Quality Subsystem CMAQ – Community Multiscale Air Quality model, CAMx – Comprehensive Air Quality Model with extensions, MM5 – the 5th generation Mesoscale Model, FDDA – Four Dimensional Data Assimilation, VISTAS – Visibility Improvement State and Tribal Association of the Southeast, SMOKE – Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emission

Model Treatments CMAQ CAMx Version 4.51 with ENVIRON’s revised SOA module 4.42 Gas-Phase Chemistry CB-IV Horizontal Advection PPM Vertical Advection Yamartino PM2.5 Size Representation 3 lognormal modes 2 sections Aerosol Chemistry AE4 / ISORROPIA CF / ISORROPIA Aqueous Chemistry RADM Dry Deposition M3Dry / RPM Wesely Wet Deposition Aerosol and gas scavenging; Henry’s Law; accumulation/coarse PM in cloud water, Aitken slowly absorbed all PM in cloud water CB-IV – Carbon Bond IV, PPM – Piecewise Parabolic Method, RADM – Regional Acid Deposition Model, CF – Coarse/Fine, RPM – Regional Particulate Model

Meteorology Evaluation Jan. Jul. Variable Network Data # MB NMB (%) T2 (°C) CASTNET 5157 -0.9 -11.0 7410 1.0 4.4 STN 60 0.6 8.9 134 -0.5 -1.7 SEARCH 1360 -3.0 -30.2 1393 -2.5 -8.8 RH2 (%) 6857 6.3 6741 -5.7 -7.4 1455 10.7 15.3 1164 -3.4 WSP10 (m s-1) 4877 1.1 18.7 3251 31.0 1067 0.4 3.5 571 0.8 22.8 WDR10 (°) 7098 12.1 6.0 7140 0.9 0.5 0.3 1182 -6.5 -2.9 Prec (mm) NADP 72 -3.2 84 45.6 151.3 T2 – Temperature at 2-m, RH2 – Relative humidity at 2-m, WSP10 – Wind speed at 10-m, WDR10 – Wind direction at 10-m, Prec – Precipitation, MB – Mean Bias, NMB – Normalized Mean Bias

O3 and PM2.5 Normalized Mean Bias CMAQ CAMx Jan. Jul.

PM2.5 Temporal Variation Jan. Jul. Atlanta, GA Raleigh, NC Kinston, NC

% Conversion of NH3 to NH4+ (NH4+/NHx) CMAQ CAMx Jan. Jul.

Impacts of NH3 Control in July 2002 Base Case - Monthly Mean Impact of NH3 Control – Abs. Difference PM2.5 AdjGR AdjGR = ([NO3-]+[NH3]) / ([NO3-]+[HNO3]) NO3-

Sensitivity to Grid Resolution (CMAQ, July)

NH4+/NHx Sensitivity to Grid Resolution (CMAQ, July) 12-km 4-km 1.33-km

Summary MM5 performance is reasonably good, except for precipitation in July. CMAQ and CAMx perform similarly for O3 but differently for PM2.5 and composition, with worse performance for NO3- and OC by CMAQ in both months, others better by CMAQ in Jan. but by CAMx in Jul. Compared to CMAQ, CAMx gives similar conversion rates of NH3 to NH4+ in Jan., but higher rates in Jul., possibly due to differences in vertical mixing, deposition, and aerosol treatments. 50% AL-NH3 emission reduction in Jul. leads to lower PM2.5 by up to 8% via decreasing NH4NO3 and an increased role of transport via increasing ratios of NH4+/NHx near the source. The use of 4- and 1.33-km resolutions without adequate NH3 source treatments does not improve model performance in Jul.

Acknowledgments This project is supported by National Research Initiative Competitive Grant no. 2008-35112-18758 from the USDA Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service Air Quality Program Pat Brewer, Mike Abraczinskas, George Bridgers, Bebhinn Do, Chris Misenis, Hoke Kimball, and Wayne Cornelius, NCDENR Don Olerud, Baron Advanced Meteorological Systems Dennis McNally and Cyndi Loomis, Alpinephysics, Inc. Ryan Boyles, NC State Climate Office Alice Gilliland, Steve Howard, and Shao-Cai Yu, U.S. EPA Shiang-Yuh Wu, Clark County Department of Air Quality and Environmental Management

Extras

Wet Deposition of NH4+/NHx Jan. Jul. CMAQ CAMx

Impacts of NH3 Control in July 2002: AdjGR Base Case Reduction of AL-NH3 AdjGR = ([NO3-]+[NH3]) ([NO3-]+[HNO3])

Impacts of NH3 Control in July 2002: NH4+/NHx Base Case Reduction of AL-NH3 % Difference

Impacts of NH3 Control in July 2002

Impacts of NH3 Control in July 2002

[NH3]emis, 50% AL-NH3 / [NH3]emis, base

Sensitivity to Grid Resolution (CMAQ, July) Variable Network Data # Mean Obs Mean Sim NMB (%) 12-km 4-km PM2.5 IMPROVE 55 15.8 7.9 6.7 -50.1 -57.8 STN 127 19.3 10.3 9.7 -46.1 -49.6 NH4+ CASTNET 40 2.3 1.1 -50.3 -52.4 9 1.7 0.9 0.7 -48.4 -57.3 135 2.0 1.3 1.2 -37.3 -41.2 SO42- 8.3 7.3 6.3 -12.3 -23.9 56 7.1 5.4 4.3 -23.6 -39.1 7.2 5.9 4.7 -18.0 -34.3 NO3- 0.2 0.0 0.1 -81.4 -73.4 -80.2 -61.8 -89.9 -86.9 BC 43 0.3 -42.5 -46.6 134 0.4 0.5 20.8 37.6 OC 0.6 -70.3 -72.5 4.8 1.4 -74.1 -71.6

Sensitivity to Grid Resolution (CMAQ, July) Variable Network Data # Mean Obs Mean Sim NMB (%) 12-km 4-km O3 (1-hr max) AIRS 3216 71 65 62 -8.6 -12.6 CASTNET 300 66 61 60 -7.0 -8.8 (8-hr max) 3215 63 56 -3.4 -10.1 58 -1.0 -5.0 WD_NH4 NADP 69 0.3 0.2 -45.0 -23.2 WD_SO4 2.2 1.7 3.0 -18.9 38.3 WD_NO3 1.6 0.5 0.9 -69.6 -43.5 Prec 84 30.1 63.8 75.7 111.9 151.3 WD_NH4 – Wet deposition of NH4+, WD_SO4 – Wet deposition of SO42-, WD_NO3 – Wet deposition of NO3- 12-km 4-km

PM2.5 Sensitivity to Grid Resolution (CMAQ, July) 12-km 4-km 1.33-km