Evaluating Dynamic CCA/Receiver Sensitivity Algorithms

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Improved CCA for 80 and 160 MHz BSSs
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE /0859r0 July 2014 Hakan Persson, Ericsson ABSlide 1 Proposing a Stadium Scenario Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0849r1 Submission July 2013 Brian Hart (Cisco Systems) Slide 1 New Technique: Enabling Real World Improvement By Exposing Internal.
Dynamic Sensitivity Control V2
Doc.: IEEE /0855r0 Submission July 2014 Brian Hart (Cisco Systems) Slide 1 Techniques for Short Downlink Frames Authors: NameAffiliationPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /1225r1 Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax Date: Slide 1Huawei Authors:
Discussion on The Receiver Behavior for DSC/CCAC with BSS Color
Submission doc.: IEEE /0085r1 Jan 2015 John Son, WILUS InstituteSlide 1 Legacy Fairness Issues of Enhanced CCA Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0856r1 Submission July 2014 Brian Hart (Cisco Systems) Slide 1 Evaluating Dynamic CCA/Receiver Sensitivity Algorithms Authors: NameAffiliationPhone .
Discussion on OFDMA in IEEE ax
Submission doc.: IEEE /1208r1 September 2014 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MAC considerations on ax OFDMA Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1303r5 Submission November 2010 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Overlapping BSS Co-Existence Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE r0 Amin Jafarian, Newracom 1 CCA Revisit May 2015 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Amin
Doc.: IEEE /1110r0 Amin Jafarian, Newracom 1 September 2015 BSS-TXOP NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Amin
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1398r0 Nov 2013 Akira Yamada, NTT DOCOMO, Inc.Slide 1 Requirements for HEW Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0161r1 Submission doc.: IEEE /1032r0 Slide 1 Simulation Scenario for OBSS in Home Network Date: Authors: September.
Overview of Channel Usage Change
MAC calibration results comparison
Considerations on HEW Evaluation Methodology
802.11ax in 2.4 GHz Date: Authors: July 2015
Channel Sensing in UL-OFDMA
Results for Beacon Collisions
Full-Duplex based MAC enhancements
Overlapping coverage issues with n BSSs
TXOP Considerations for Spatial Reuse
TXOP Considerations for Spatial Reuse
Channel Access Efficiency
Consideration on Interference Management in OBSS
Discussion on detection schemes and thresholds
Stadium Measurements Authors: Name Affiliation Phone Brian Hart
Enterprise Simulation Scenario
TGax Functional Requirement Discussion
WLAN Frame Collision Information
The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator
Results for Beacon Collisions
Channel Sensing in UL-OFDMA
TGax Functional Requirement Discussion
Simulation Results for Box 5 Calibration
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Considerations for Spatial Reuse
Stadium Measurements Authors: Name Affiliation Phone Brian Hart
Adaptive CCA for 11ax Date: Authors: September 2014 Name
Performance evaluation of Real Time Communication over Wi-Fi
Channel Access Efficiency
Simulation of 20/40 MHz CCA Unfairness
Overlapping coverage issues with n BSSs
Performance evaluation of Real Time Communication over Wi-Fi
Efficient Frequency Spectrum Utilization
Performance evaluation of Real Time Communications over Wi-Fi
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Increased Network Throughput with Channel Width Related CCA and Rules
Uplink MU Transmission and Coexistence
Performance evaluation of Real Time Communications over Wi-Fi
Channel Access Efficiency
RTS&CTS Exchange in wideband transmission
TXOP Considerations for Spatial Reuse
TXOP Considerations for Spatial Reuse
Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Enterprise Simulation Scenario
Enterprise Simulation Scenario
Reserving STA Date: Authors: January 2011 January 2011
D2D Technology for HEW Date: Authors: January 2010
Uplink MU Transmission and Coexistence
Discussion on Multi-band/Multi-channel Access Method
July 2010 doc.: IEEE /0xxxr0 NR-U’s definition of success for LBT needs to be realigned with & European rules 1 July 2019 Authors: Name.
LC MAC submission – follow up
Consideration on System Level Simulation
Enhanced Resource Allocation Schemes for 11be
LC MAC submission – follow up
Presentation transcript:

Evaluating Dynamic CCA/Receiver Sensitivity Algorithms July 2010 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0903r0 Evaluating Dynamic CCA/Receiver Sensitivity Algorithms Authors: Name Affiliation Phone email Brian Hart Cisco Systems brianh@cisco.com Reza Hedayat rehedaya@cisco.com Sigurd Schelstraete Quantenna sschelstraete@quantenna.com Tomo Adachi Toshiba Corp. tomo.adachi@toshiba.co.jp Andrew Myles, Cisco

Overview Situation: 802.11 “just works”. By virtual of the MAC’s use of physical/virtual carrier sense, back-off and MAC protection, 802.11 can tolerate odd AP deployments and unusual propagation. The 802.11 MAC is not perfect (hidden nodes, exposed nodes) In 802.11ax we have many proposals for optimizing CCA thresholds and/or receiver sensitivities Problem: A poorly chosen dynamic CCA or receiver sensitivity control algorithm may degrade the “it just works” property of 802.11 in important scenarios (for instance, Service Provider Wi-Fi) Solution: In simulations and presentations, give primary weight to simulation scenarios where dynamic CCA/receiver sensitivity proposals might fail, and secondary weight to simulation scenarios where dynamic CCA/receiver sensitivity proposals are likely to succeed. Accordingly focus on algorithms that are both As robust as the status quo in non-ideal deployments More efficient in ideal deployments

Service Provider Wi-Fi Case That Should Be Checked The Home AP and client are very close. If they can select a degraded CCA threshold, they can transmit over the top of the SP AP’s transmissions and impair the SP downlink. If they can select a degraded receiver sensitivity, they can ignore frames (including RTS/CTS) from the SP AP, transmit over the top of the SP AP’s transmissions and impair the SP downlink. The large coverage of the SP AP overlaps with many home APs (so channel selection cannot help) Very similar case arises with multiple small Wi-Fi Direct BSSs and a larger infrastructure BSS Multi-tenant office/mall or apartment building Tenant1 Home AP Client Tenant2 Service Provider AP (“Outdoor hotspot”) Client

Summary It is easy to design dynamic CCA or dynamic receiver sensitivity algorithms that work well in a network of similarly sized / relatively non-overlapping BSSs To preserve Wi-Fi’s “it just works” property, we need something better – something that works even in overlapping BSSs with very different sizes and geometries This is not a pipe-dream – such ideas are available