The Ongoing Assessment Project (OGAP). Impact Findings

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Core at CPS Scope and Sequence Implementation Plan
Advertisements

Navigating the Common Core State Standards through History-Social Science What.
CCSSM Implementation Plan: Improving Math Teaching at Scale Karen Prigodich, District Math Specialist Centennial School District, Portland North West Math.
ECE–12 Mathematics Promising Practices in Denver Public Schools
Mathematics Learning Communities (MLC) MLC Facilitator Training Overview Regional Science Resource Center Regional Science Resource Center University of.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
The Long and Winding Road The Relationship Between Leadership Practice and Student Performance Jonathan Supovitz Philip Sirinides University of Pennsylvania.
Kansas accreditation is:  1.A school improvement plan  2.An external assistance team  3.Local assessments aligned with state standards  4.Teachers.
© 2004 Michigan State University PROM/SE: Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Math and Science Education Overview, Fall 2004.
It’s About Time: A Model for Transformative Professional Development Presented by Ivan Cheng and Mary Olson National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
1 Developing an Evaluation Plan _____________________ The Mathematically- Connected Communities MSP Developed for the February, MSP Conference Dr.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Data for Student Success Regional Data Initiative Presentation November 20, 2009.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
1 © KJ Learning Partners, Inc. Identifying Student Errors to Align Teaching and Learning KJ Learning Partners, Inc.
San José Unified School District Principal’s Coffee: Booksin Elementary SBAC Results September 11,
Elementary & Middle School 2014 Mathematics MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 September 16, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
+ Is your School's Instructional Program Ready for Common Core? Reach Institute for School Leadership.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
DeAnn Huinker, UW-Milwaukee MMP Principal Investigator 26 August 2008 This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
K-12 Mathematics in Rapid City Longitudinal Findings from Project PRIME Ben Sayler & Susie Roth November 5, 2009.
IES Evaluations and Data Collection Instruments Lauren Angelo National Center for Education Evaluation and Sally Atkins-Burnett Mathematica Policy Research.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Lessons Learned about Going to Scale with Effective Professional Development Iris R. Weiss Horizon Research, Inc. February 2011.
1 Leadership for the Improvement in Mathematics Instruction Mary Kay Stein The Learning Policy Center Learning Research and Development Center University.
Horizonte Instruction and Training Center Salt Lake City School District School Community Council Meeting November 14, 2012.
A Guide for Professional Development Planning for Implementation of the CCSS November 2011 Updated February 2012
Governor’s Teacher Network Action Research Project Dr. Debra Harwell-Braun
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the FY2006 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
The Evaluation of Mathematics and Science Partnerships Program A Quasi Experimental Design Study Abdallah Bendada, Title II Director
Rochester Area Math Science Partnership Our Mission: To support high student achievement through world class standards in math and science Continuous.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Moon Area School District.  tml tml 
SD Math Partnership Project An Overview Marcia Torgrude and Karen Taylor.
MSP Program Evaluation Carol L. Fletcher, Ph.D. TRC Project Director Meetings 1/27/09 and 2/5/09 Carol L. Fletcher, Ph.D. TRC Project Director Meetings.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
Background CPRE brings together education experts from renowned research institutions to contribute new knowledge that informs K- 16 education policy &
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
TAP Math: Teachers and Administrators Partnering for Mathematics Learning Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Department of Education funded through.
MSP Summary of First Year Annual Report FY 2004 Projects.
The Planning Period and Beyond…
A Productive Partnership
Personalized Learning Digital Centers
INRP Seminar The Strategic Challenges Behind the Implementation of
Huntsville City Schools
Evaluation of An Urban Natural Science Initiative
Melanie Taylor Horizon Research, Inc.
21st Century Learning Environments Phase 1 Professional Development
Jonathan Supovitz Abigail Gray
April 2017 School Board Report
Shelton School District
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Jonathan Supovitz Consortium for policy research in education
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Spatial STEM - C Evaluation of a Model Spatial Thinking Curriculum for Building Computational Skills in Elementary Grades K-5 A collaboratvive project.
Mathematics Leadership to support instruction and learning
Continuous Assessment Establishing Checkpoints
Team Goal Setting Karen Meyers, Director and
Presented to the Springfield School Board of Directors June 17, 2019
Presentation transcript:

The Ongoing Assessment Project (OGAP). Impact Findings The Ongoing Assessment Project (OGAP) Impact Findings Implementation Puzzles & Next steps Jonathan Supovitz Caroline Ebby Janine Remillard Consortium for policy research in education University of Pennsylvania This presentation is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DRK-12 1316527.

Study Overview The OGAP study is an NSF-funded two-year RCT and implementation study of a mathematics formative assessment initiative in two Philadelphia-area school districts

What is OGAP? A formative assessment system Supplements existing curriculum Ongoing professional development Multiplication and fractions 4 days of PD on how students learn math and how to analyze student work to guide instruction Ongoing support through PLC meetings facilitated by trained teacher leaders

Underlying Theory of OGAP: Formative Assessment and Learning Progressions Teacher Assessment Learner Goal Learning Progression

OGAP: Analysis of Student Work One tricycle has three wheels. How many wheels do 29 tricycles have? Non- Multiplicative Additive Transitional Multiplicative Sam’s Response Samir’s Response Ava’s Response

OGAP: Classification of Student Work Samir’s Response Non-Multiplicative Strategies Additive Strategies Transitional Strategies Multiplicative Strategies Ava’s Response Sam’s Response

Study of OGAP in Philadelphia Area Treatment (n=30) Control (n=30) School District of Philadelphia Schools 18 19 Philadelphia Charter Schools 7 6 Upper Darby Schools 5 Teachers in grades 3-5 314 286 Students in grades 3-5 ~7,000

Implementation and Impact Study: Data Implementation Data Teacher Log Teacher Survey Qualitative data from fieldwork in schools State test data Teacher Outcome Data CPRE’s Teacher Analysis of Student Knowledge (TASK) Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching (Ball & Hill) Set of Scales (trust, comfort with technology, formative assessment practice, etc.) Student Outcome Data Project-developed assessment scores State Test Data

Impacts on Teachers Measure of Teacher Analysis of Student Thinking (TASK) Authentic assessment of teacher ability to analyze student work, assess their developmental levels, and plan responsive instruction Seven-item open-ended assessment, each item on a 4 point scale ~ 600 teachers Difference between treatment and control teachers on TASK’s four point scale. *** p < .001

Impact on Students OGAP Aligned Assessment Vertically scaled 7 item open-ended assessment on multiplicative reasoning developed & piloted by CPRE Scored for both correctness and sophistication Pre-test: Fall, 2014, Post-test, Spring 2015 ~14,000 assessments scored by trained raters in Summer, 2015 Correctness (2 point scale) Sophistication (5 point scale) *** p < .001 * p < .05

Posttest Score Distribution: 4th Grade Correctness Percent of Students Score Range

Posttest Score Distribution: 4th Grade Solution Sophistication Percent of Students Non- Multiplicative Early Additive Additive Early Transitional Transitional (Models) Multiplicative

Variation in Implementation Implementation correlated with: Regular PLCs Principal support Teacher Leader support Interactions with Peers around math μ = 2.4 s.d. = .60 5 item OGAP Implementation Scale School

What we are learning about deepening implementation: Operating at Two Levels Simultaneously Organizational Shifts Regular PLC meetings Math Leaders Principal Support & Press Conceptual Shifts Seeing data as insight into student thinking rather than performance levels. Shift from an achievement to a learning perspective.

Summary We see impacts on: a. Teacher knowledge of formative assessment practices b. Student outcomes on OGAP-aligned assessment There is tremendous variation in school-level implementation Next Steps Lots of additional analyses to do. OGAP is moving this summer from an external program to district-sponsored implementation in 40 schools. We are embarking on a research-practice partnership with the district to strengthen leadership support to deepen implementation.

The Ongoing Assessment Project (OGAP). Impact Findings The Ongoing Assessment Project (OGAP) Impact Findings Implementation Puzzles & Next steps Jonathan Supovitz Caroline Ebby Janine Remillard Consortium for policy research in education University of Pennsylvania June 2, 2016 This presentation is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DRK-12 1316527.