Yenn-Jiang Lin et al. JACEP 2016;2:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Line detection Assume there is a binary image, we use F(ά,X)=0 as the parametric equation of a curve with a vector of parameters ά=[α 1, …, α m ] and X=[x.
Advertisements

Chapter 9 Vector Calculus.
Curl and Divergence.
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol
Oana Dickinson et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Lilian Mantziari et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Adil Rajwani et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Masatoshi Yamazaki et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Hanney Gonna et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Daniel Frenkel et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Sigfus Gizurarson et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Shadi Al Halabi et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Lilian Mantziari et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Kenshi Hayashi et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Lilian Mantziari et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Chin-Yu Lin et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Fu Siong Ng et al. JACEP 2016;j.jacep
Jong Sung Park et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Lilian Mantziari et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Jacob S. Koruth et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Simon W. Rabkin et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep
Michael G. Klein et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Samuel H. Baldinger et al. JACEP 2016;2:14-23
Junaid A.B. Zaman et al. JACEP 2017;3:
Adam B. Greenbaum et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Junaid A.B. Zaman et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep
Masatoshi Yamazaki et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Philippe Maury et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Muhammad Shahreyar et al. JACEP 2016;j.jacep
Patrick M. Boyle et al. JACEP 2018;4:
Junjie Zhang et al. JACEP 2017;3:
Ammar M. Killu et al. JACEP 2016;j.jacep
Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Jacob S. Koruth et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Konstantin Krieger et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep
Mark E. Josephson, and Elad Anter JACEP 2015;1:
Peter F. Aziz et al. JACEP 2015;1:62-70
Mark E. Josephson, and Elad Anter JACEP 2015;1:
Michael G. Klein et al. JACEP 2016;j.jacep
Federico Migliore et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Eran Leshem et al. JACEP 2018;j.jacep
Eran Leshem et al. JACEP 2018;j.jacep
Vivek Y. Reddy et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Faisal F. Syed et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Marwan Badri et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Vittorio Calzolari et al. JACEP 2017;3:
Kenshi Hayashi et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Eran Leshem et al. JACEP 2018;j.jacep
Eran Leshem et al. JACEP 2018;j.jacep
Eran Leshem et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep
Patrick M. Boyle et al. JACEP 2018;4:
Mintu P. Turakhia et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Simon W. Rabkin et al. JACEP 2017;3:
Simon W. Rabkin et al. JACEP 2017;3:
K.R. Julian Chun et al. JACEP 2017;3:
Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Noboru Ichihara et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Philippe Taghji et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep
Matthew M. Zipse et al. JACEP 2015;1:94-102
Bernard Lim et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Eran Leshem et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep
Daniele Muser et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep
Hussam Ali et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Miyako Igarashi et al. JACEP 2018;4:
Valeria Calvi et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep
Eran Leshem et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep
Stavros Stavrakis et al. JACEP 2015;1:1-13
Lilian Mantziari et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Waqas Ullah et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep
Henry Chubb et al. JACEP 2017;3:89-103
Presentation transcript:

Yenn-Jiang Lin et al. JACEP 2016;2:667-678 Quantifying Rotors in the High-Similarity Electrogram Region The vector field (A), showing averaged waveform propagation, was used to quantify the rotors in the high-similarity electrogram region. The quantifying physical parameters were the divergence ([B] Div) and curvature force ([B] Curl). The rotor identification index ([B] RI) was mathematically defined as the product of the divergence and curl. The curl, divergence, and maximum RI values (B) were dependent on the integrating path radius and distance to the rotor center. The regional distribution of the RI was integrated into an automatic algorithm to define the rotors in a demonstrative model (C). The relationships among the RI, rotor size, and the distance between the attached site and rotor center (deviations) are shown. By attaching a double-spiral catheter to the simulated substrates, 5 different curves show the functions of RI for different sizes of rotors when positioning the catheter at the sites deviated from the center of the rotor (deviations of 0 [circle] to 5.0 mm [solid circle]) (D). According to D, a rotor with a deviation toward the center could be detected only if its size was 1.3 to 2 times larger than the diameter of the catheter (i.e., ≈26 to 40 mm) with an RI value of 0.5. In contrast, if the catheter was on the center of the rotor, we could detect a rotor dimension ranging from 0.5 to 2.5 times the diameter of the catheter dimension (i.e., ≈10 to 50 mm) with an RI value of 0.5. Also see Online Video 1. Yenn-Jiang Lin et al. JACEP 2016;2:667-678 American College of Cardiology Foundation