HEALTHY SYSTEMS: A diagnostic tool for your toolkit

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

Fostering A Positive School Culture Through Collaborative Administrative Practices A Framework for Excellence: The Role of Administration.
The Baldrige Model of Performance Excellence A framework for continuous improvement.
WELCOME! SB 191 Pilot and Integration Summit Katy Anthes Executive Director of Educator Effectiveness.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
1 The Nebraska Leadership Initiative Overview of Rationale and Research A Collaboration between NCSA, NDE, and ESUs.
Academic Alignment CROSBY TURNAROUND COMMITTEE
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Superintendent Goals Update. District Level Leadership Research McRel Internationally recognized private, non-profit organization in Denver,
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
Gifted and Talented: Self review Presented 28 Sept 4.15 – Webinar 3 of a series of 4 Carolyn English LEARNING MEDIA.
University of Virginia School Turnaround Program.
Name Workshop Facilitator Instructional Leadership: Creating Demand.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Teacher Quality Standards Beginning of The Year Self-Assessment.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
WCPSS Coaching Framework Strengthening Consistency, Cohesion, and Clarity for Coaches in WCPSS.
Have you downloaded WSSDA 2014? Search for the app in iTunes or Google Play Store and join the conversation. WELCOME. 1.Tap Agenda 2.Locate this session.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Effective Professional Learning Communities (PLC) Where do we begin at Myers Middle School? (Adapted from Professional Learning Communities at Work Robert.
You ARE the Leader of Learning Frederick Brown Learning Principal Supervisor Summit Ft. Lauderdale, FL May 12-13,
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Instructional Leadership: Building Consensus Name Workshop Facilitator.
Equity and Deeper Learning:
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
Using Data to Drive Decision-Making
THE ADVANCED LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE
Learning and Development Developing leaders and managers
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
February 8, 2017.
Program Review For School Counseling Programs
RECOGNIZING educator EXCELLENCE
Coaching for Math GAINS
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
THE NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Dolores Esposito, Executive Superintendent of Leadership Developing Social and Emotional Skills in our Schools.
What’s the connection to Ohio’s other initiatives?
Smarter School Spending Community of Practice
Learning and Development Developing leaders and managers
Curriculum and Instruction BOOTCAMP! CCRS Session
Priming the Next Generation
Differentiated Supports in Special Education
Local Control Accountability Plan Input
OLAC Beliefs/Assumptions
Collaborative Leadership
From Compliance to Impact: Utilizing the School Systems Review as part of a Continuous Improvement Process Ann LaPointe, Educational Improvement Consultant.
Filling Your Buckets: Aligning it ALL!
Chicago Public Schools
Succession/Replacement Planning
Increasing Success in Life for All
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
February 21-22, 2018.
Dave Scott – Middle School Principal – Kristin School
Troy School District External Review Exit Report April 21-24, 2013.
“Read by Grade Three” Law
New Prospect Elementary School
Strategic Planning Final Plan Team Meeting
GCSD Leadership Academy Mission
Whose Job Is It? Part Two At the Board Table Discussion Tool
Sylvan Hills Middle School
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Dave Scott – Middle School Principal – Kristin School
Presentation transcript:

HEALTHY SYSTEMS: A diagnostic tool for your toolkit ONWARD Education Consulting Cindy Ward, Leadership Coach & Consultant www.ONWARDconsulting.org

To reflect about what makes a system healthy. Today’s objectives To reflect about what makes a system healthy. To understand how to evaluate the health of the five key systems that contribute to the health of the overall system. To identify priorities for AUs. To identify priorities for low performing schools or districts within AUs.

The situation With the implementation of Results Driven Accountability, Administrative Units are being asked to ensure systems are healthy as a way to address the need for dramatically improved student outcomes. 

What are the systems we need to be looking at? The situation What are the systems we need to be looking at? How do we know whether or not those systems are healthy?

Two part series Day Two 11:15 – 12:45 Differentiated Supports in Special Education Day One 10:30 – 12:00 Healthy Systems Concepts & Theory Introduction to Self-Assessment Tool Prioritization Case Study of Centennial BOCES’ Journey Application

In small groups, discuss what kinds of things you look for Healthy systems In small groups, discuss what kinds of things you look for when you are evaluating the health of your systems. Write each individual idea on a separate sticky note. 1 2 Please be ready to share your thinking.

Current research Research consistently points to a set of five key systems that, when implemented purposefully, promote the continuous improvement of instruction and dramatically improved outcomes for students. 

What is systems thinking? “The ability to see the big picture, and to distinguish patterns instead of conceptualizing change as isolated events. There must be a paradigm shift - from being unconnected to interconnected to the whole, and from blaming our problems on something external to a realization that how we operate, our actions, can create problems.” – Peter Senge

Key Systems in administrative units Culture of Performance Academic Systems Talent Management Differentiated Supports for Schools or Districts Board and Community Relationships

Context & disclaimer The systems we will discuss today are the intellectual property of the Colorado Department of Education. The research that led to the identification of these key systems began in 2013 and was undertaken in an effort to name key systems for underperforming districts. Two years later, it was hypothesized that the same systems identified as critical to success of Colorado’s underperforming districts were critical to the success of Colorado’s Administrative Units.

CULTURE OF PERFORMANCE Key systems CULTURE OF PERFORMANCE Systems and approaches to promote a positive culture at the AU level, resulting in high expectations for all schools and ensuring shared accountability for improved AU performance.

CULTURE OF PERFORMANCE key systems CULTURE OF PERFORMANCE Shared Vision Leader Accountability Strategic Resource Allocation Systems to Support Continuous Improvement

Self-Assessment And discussion: 10 minutes Assess the health of your AU’s culture using the Culture of Performance self-assessment tool. 1 In small groups, discuss what you notice about the health of this system in your AU and the potential impact it has on student achievement. 2

key systems ACADEMIC SYSTEMS Systems to ensure a standards-aligned guaranteed and viable curriculum paired with assessment tools that facilitate effective data-driven instruction.

Defined Instructional Framework Multi-Tiered System of Supports Key systems ACADEMIC SYSTEMS Defined Instructional Framework Multi-Tiered System of Supports Assessment Strategy Use of Data

Self-Assessment And discussion: 10 minutes Assess the health of your AU’s academic systems using the Academic Systems self-assessment tool. 1 In small groups, discuss what you notice about the health of this system in your AU and the potential impact it has on student achievement. 2

TALENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS key systems TALENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS Systems to support a strategic approach to hiring, developing, retaining and compensating teachers and leaders aligned with AU needs and the AU’s vision for school performance.

TALENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS key systems TALENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS Talent Strategy Professional Development Performance Incentives Teacher Leadership

Self-Assessment And discussion: 10 minutes Assess the health of your AU’s talent management system using the Talent Management self-assessment tool. 1 In small groups, discuss what you notice about the health of this system in your AU and the potential impact it has on student achievement. 2

DIFFERENTIATED SUPPORTS FOR SCHOOLS OR DISTRICTS Key systems DIFFERENTIATED SUPPORTS FOR SCHOOLS OR DISTRICTS A systemic approach to differentiating supports for schools or districts through the use of data and ongoing progress monitoring in order to foster a culture of shared ownership of student outcomes.

DIFFERENTIATED SUPPORTS FOR SCHOOLS OR DISTRICTS key systems DIFFERENTIATED SUPPORTS FOR SCHOOLS OR DISTRICTS Prioritized Support for Schools or Districts of Greatest Need Prioritized Hiring in Schools or Districts of Greatest Need Prioritized Performance Management for Schools or Districts of Greatest Need

Self-Assessment And discussion: 10 minutes Assess the health of your AU’s differentiated supports using the Differentiated Supports for Schools or Districts self-assessment tool. 1 In small groups, discuss what you notice about the health of this system in your AU and the potential impact it has on student achievement. 2

BOARD AND COMMUNITY RELATIONSHIPS Key systems BOARD AND COMMUNITY RELATIONSHIPS Systems to ensure the Board(s), Superintendent(s), and AU leadership present a unified vision for success that includes stakeholder voice, clear strategy and goals, and an effective progress monitoring process.

BOARD AND COMMUNITY RELATIONSHIPS key systems BOARD AND COMMUNITY RELATIONSHIPS Family and Community Engagement Board Adopted Goals Aligned Board Policy Stakeholder Voice in AU Strategy

Self-Assessment And discussion: 10 minutes Assess the health of your AU’s board and community relationships using the Board and Community Relationships self-assessment tool. 1 In small groups, discuss what you notice about the health of this system in your AU and the potential impact it has on student achievement. 2

Deep dive into priority systems 1 Identify the system that presents itself as your highest priority based on the self-assessment. 2 In groups, use the rubrics and questions provided to do a “deep dive” into that system. 3 Please be ready to share your thinking.

Deep dive into priority systems: low performing schools or districts Revisit the self-assessment and rubrics thinking about a low performing school or district you serve. 1 Think about the magnitude of the issues you identified earlier. How does the magnitude compare for the low performing school or district? Are their needs the same as the needs of the overall system? 2 3 Please be ready to share your thinking.

How does this information impact your work? The big question How does this information impact your work?

Part Two: Differentiated supports in Special education Friday, 11:15 – 12:45 As a follow up to the Healthy Systems break-out session, participants will go into a deeper dive of one anchor discussed, Differentiated Supports.  Learn how one AU is differentiating their practice to meet the needs of schools and districts as well as addressing a variety of stakeholders’ needs using one framework. Participants will brainstorm an initial framework they can take back to their teams to implement the following school year.

Questions & discussion ONWARD Education Consulting Cindy Ward, Leadership Coach & Consultant www.ONWARDconsulting.org Thank you for your time today and for all you do for kids.