Dr. Niamh Lenahan November 2016

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The School Research Ethics Committee Welsh School of Architecture.
Advertisements

An Introduction to the Ethics Review Procedure Lindsay Unwin: Research & Innovation Services, UREC Secretary.
A Guide. Why is writing an ethics application NOT a waste of time? It helps you to... clarify your research questions. limit your research questions.
EHS Ethics Briefing Session January 13 th EHS Ethics Briefing Session. Dr. Barry Coughlan Assistant Director of Clinical Psychology Department.
Guidelines for honors theses for Computer Science, Computer Systems Engineering, and Informatics March 2013.
University Research Ethics Committee Workshop on procedure and data protection issues 30th May 2008.
IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR PROSPECTIVE RESEARCHERS.
Good Clinical Research Practice Guidelines For Informed Consent Presented by Catherine May Acting Research Practice Development Officer The Office of Research.
Research Involving Human Subjects All research involving the participation of human subjects must be submitted for review by the IRB (Institutional Review.
TODAY’S TOPIC: Ethics – deconstructing consent and participation with “vulnerable” populations.
HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS. TRI-COUNCIL POLICY The University has adopted the Tri-Council Policy Statement on the Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans.
Recent Changes to HDR Policy and Procedures Felicity Roddick Associate Dean Research and Innovation.
1 The Path to the Ph.D. in IS: Part 4, The Dissertation.

Research Ethics Western University Health Sciences Research Ethics Board Tri-Council Policy Statement 2 Grace Kelly Ethics Officer
An Overview of Research Ethics & The Tri-Council Policy Statement 2
Research Ethics Western University Non-Medical Research Ethics Board Tri-Council Policy Statement 2 Grace Kelly Ethics Officer
Research Ethics A guide to principles and procedures
Psychology Departmental Research Ethics Board (Psych-REB) October 2013 Dr. Carlin J. Miller, Chair.
Psychology 291 – Lab 4 Ethics October 9, 2012
Human Research Ethics and Obtaining Ethics Approval
IRB AND HUMAN SUBJECTS REVIEW Kris Clarke, Ph.D..
University of Western Sydney Comments on your HREC Application.
The Office of Research Ethics October 11, 2013 Office of Research Ethics.
Discovery Phase: where do we go from here? Co-directors contact information: Dr. Maureen Powers, Department of Cell Biology,
Canadian English LING 202, Fall 2007 Dr. Tony Pi Research Ethics.
Psychology Departmental Research Ethics Board (Psych-REB) October, 2007 Dr. Pascual-Leone, Chair.
Research Ethics Research Methods Grace Kelly Ethics Officer Health Sciences Research Ethics Board.
Research Ethics Board (REB)
SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.
 The IRB: Why, what and how  Core Concerns: Subject selection, subject consent to participate, confidentiality  IRB Protocol Forms  Contact Information.
HUMAN SUBJECTS PROTECTION PROGRAM Office Location: 1350 N. Vine Ave. (one block west of Cherry Ave. & three blocks north of Speedway) PO Box Phone:
Module 5: Data Collection. This training session contains information regarding: Audit Cycle Begins Audit Cycle Begins Questionnaire Administration Questionnaire.
Graduate Degree Progress & Clearance Graduate School Office Amy Gillett and Amy Corr.
Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs
SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.
Research Seminars in IT in Education (MIT6003) Research Methodology II Dr Jacky Pow.
Institutional Review Board Procedures and Implications After the applied dissertation committee has approved the proposal and the IRB package, the student.
Research Ethics Western University & University of Windsor Grace Kelly Ethics Officer
LEO: LSHTM Ethics Online Patricia Henley Quality & Governance Manager Research Governance & Integrity Office London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.
Graduate Student Academic Services (GSAS) would like to present An introduction to GradPath.
MHA Receipt & Scrutiny Training for Qualified Nurses & MHPs Presented by: Sharon Long Deputy MHA Manager Version 1.
Application for Ethics Approval for BEd/BSSc Honours Projects Tianyuan Li, Chairperson of the PS Departmental Ethics Committee (June 2015)
The research ethics review process Hazel Abbott, Chair University Research Ethics Committee.
Application for Ethics Approval for MSocScP(SCS) Research Projects Tianyuan Li, Chairperson of the PS Departmental Ethics Committee (May 2015)
Slide 1 Standard Operating Procedures. Slide 2 Goal To review the standard operating procedures Creating the informed consent document Obtaining informed.
Research & Professional Ethics. Objectives Understand the ethical considerations for social science research. Understand the elements that must be included.
Applying for ethical approval
COCE Institutional Review Board Academic Spotlight
Final Year Project Guidelines
Disclaimer The information provided in this presentation is consistent with the current policies and guidelines laid out within our office, the Research.
Procedures for seeking YSJU Research Ethics Approval
MAINTAINING THE INVESTIGATOR’S SITE FILE
TCP LIMS – Animal Use Protocol Management
Process for reviewing Masters and UG student ethics applications
FBK5989: RESEARCH PROJECT (PJJ)
Research Ethics: a short guide for Staff 2017/18
Research Ethics: a short guide for PhD students 2017/18
Registration and Assessment
Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS): Proposal Development
© 2016 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
3rd Year Psychology Project PSY600
Preparation for a Major Paper
KOM5989: PROJECT PAPER (PJJ)
Dr. Sarah Quinton, UREC Chair,
Vascularized Composite Allograft Transplantation Committee Fall 2014
UL Research Ethics & Research Integrity
Human Participants Research
BWHS Science Research Project Guidelines for
Multijurisdictional FAQs (Workshop Stream 3)
Presentation transcript:

Dr. Niamh Lenahan November 2016 UL Research Ethics Dr. Niamh Lenahan November 2016

What is Research Ethics? Research Ethics is defined as the ethics used in the planning, conducting and reporting of research. It should provide protection for the subjects of research, i.e., humans and animals.

Who requires ethics approval? All students who are engaged in research which involves any of the following will require ethics approval Human participants Interviews, surveys or questionnaires administered to individuals Use of data derived from individual records where individuals might be identified Animal experimentation (UL Animal ethics, 3R’s, reduction, refinement & replacement) Other areas include (e.g. high level biohazard, military technology research, nuclear reactions) Exceptions: Research on patients (i.e. people who are receiving treatment as a result of an illness) should be referred to the Mid-Western Regional Hospital Research Ethics Committee. For further information, please see www.ul.ie/researchethics

Research Ethics and Governance structure within UL

How to apply Research Ethics application forms, submission dates and ethical approval guidelines are available within each Faculty: Faculty of Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences Research Ethics Faculty of Education & Health Sciences Research Ethics Kemmy Business School Research Ethics Faculty of Science & Engineering Research Ethics Animal Research Ethics Committee Code of Practice Animal Research Ethics Application Form

Timeline Submit applications 2 months before planned start date of this aspect of your research Check your Faculty for Ethics meeting dates (once a month) Many applications require minor revisions, build this into your project timeline There is a typically 2-week turn-around time for minor amendments You should carry out your research within 12 months of date approval otherwise you must resubmit another application

Route of FAHSS Ethics application

Considerations within your application Anticipate ethical dilemmas likely to be encountered in the research and indicate how they will be surmounted The application form must be discussed and reviewed with your supervisor(s) Include an information letter for your informants and a consent form If participants are under 18, consult UL’s child protection policy, Garda Clearance form Include posters/email you may use for recruiting participants Interview/surveys/questionnaires must be included if required Safety issues likely to be encountered in the course of fieldwork Project's data storage needs.

Information Letter Explain in plain English what is required of the participants A title of the study Time involved, location of study & any risks involved Rights to anonymity Freedom to withdraw Correct UL logo Contact details of student & supervisor, (name & UL address) Include – “This research study has received Ethics approval from (Faculty) ….”

Consent form Title of study Space for both student and participant to sign Space for name(s), date and location of the interview Optional; offer transcript/recording of the interview Inform the participants they may edit/amend the interview afterwards They may withdraw their interview (up to the submission of the thesis) Ask if anonymity is required? Inform them of possible outcomes of the study, i.e. publications

Reasons for Provisionally approved Application form not completed correctly Insufficient information when describing what the participants will be required to do for the study Required signatures not present Paper or electronic copy not submitted Required information not submitted – information letter/consent form/Garda clearance form Incorrect UL logo, student email address Electronic and hardcopy does not contain the same information Section 7, storage information insufficient.

Declined application Right to appeal In writing to the Chair of ULREG Decision of ULREG is final