EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos, PhD

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment In P.E. A Backward Design.
Advertisements

Classroom Assessment (1)
Classroom Assessment (1)
Understanding the EPC Rating rubrics
The mere imparting of information is not education. Above all things, the effort must result in helping a person think and do for himself/herself. Carter.
1 Peer Review of Teaching K.P. Kwan & J. Jones, EDU etkpkwan etjjones x 6287 x6320 EDU Seminar 7 May 1999 (Friday)
National Center on Educational Outcomes N C E O What the heck does proficiency mean for students with significant cognitive disabilities? Nancy Arnold,
Characteristics of Sound Tests
Understanding Validity for Teachers
JOHN F. SHEEHAN, PH.D. EVIDENCE-BASED OBSERVATIONS.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Performance Management. Performance Management Defined The means through which managers ensure that employees’ activities and outputs are congruent with.
Validity and Reliability
Growth Mindset & Attribution Theory EDU 330: Educational Psychology Dr. Daniel Moos, PhD.
Motivation (1) EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos.
Clarifying the problem, Proposing some solutions 10/14/2015 CBMS Forum on the Content and Assessment of School Mathematics 1 What Are the Features of Coherent.
College of Education Faculty Meeting October 2, 2009.
Motivation (2) EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos.
Primary Purposes of the Evaluation System
Classroom Assessment (1) EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos.
EDU 330: Educational Psychology Dr. Daniel Moos
Digital Images for the Web Team ASKA. Aaron Krieger Scot Uhl Kathryn Hawk Ahmad Ghashmari Team Members.
MY HIGH SCHOOL AND BEYOND PLAN Naviance Family Connection
Session 1 Introduction: Assessment & Evaluation Assessment & Evaluation.
Steps to Creating Standards-Based Individualized Education Programs The following highlights the major steps Committees on Special Education (CSEs) can.
Would you rather…. Go 0 for 9 in a basketball game OR Go 0 for 30 in a basketball game? Kobe Bryant would rather go 0 for 30 Video… Kobe’s view:
Goal Orientation Theory
EVALUATION OF AN ASSESSMENT BY SUSAN MAVRELIS-LAI 802.
“Excuse Me Sir, Here’s Your Change”
EVALUATING EPP-CREATED ASSESSMENTS
Measuring Growth Mindset in the Classroom
Interview Responses: Job Satisfaction
Lakeland Middle School Professional Learning Communities (PLC)
Smartphone questionnaire
Lesson 4 Cognitive Psychology.
Intermediate Small Business Programs, Part B SBP 202 Lesson 1: Introduction February 2017 Lesson 1: Introduction.
COURSE QUESTIONS Understanding what makes a “good” questionnaire:
Validity.
UbD backwards Mapping Resources
Does Research Support Differentiated Teaching Methods?
What asks but never answers?
Classroom Assessment (1)
RtI Innovations: Evaluation Anna Harms & Jose Castillo
Using Data to Inform Instruction
Goal Orientation Theory
Dr. Chin and Dr. Nettelhorst Winter 2018
” روان شناسی تربیتی ” Educational Psychology
Pathways to Scientific Teaching
EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos, PhD
تكملة الوحدة الاولى الفصل الثاني بالكتاب للاطلاع ثم الفصل الثالث التخطيط لبناء الاختبارات التحصيلية الفصل الثالث من الكتاب (87-164)
RESEARCH METHODS Lecture 18
Welcome to EDU 330: Developmental & Educational Psychology
Consider alternative perspectives Critically reconsider your view
EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos, PhD
Closing Thoughts and Reflection
Consider alternative perspectives Critically reconsider your view
Classroom Assessment (1)
Goal Orientation Theory
Does the board perform all of its duties?
Formative Assessment Summit III
Monitoring Children’s Progress
Prejudice: Assessment
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Validity.
Understanding by Design (UbD) & Differentiated Instruction (DI)
Survey Taker Name: Question Survey Taker Name:
Unit 2 Lesson 1: Introduction to Evaluating Gender Roles in Society
5 minute lesson plan Learning Episodes Class: Date: Topic:
Doug Glasshoff Greg Gaden Darin Kelberlau
Presentation transcript:

EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos, PhD Classroom Assessment EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos, PhD

What do you see? Please do not say it out loud…

How Should We Assess Student Learning? Differentiate between reliability and validity Evaluate lesson plan based on validity and reliability Scaffolding (direct instruction, group application, individual appplication) How do we ensure alignment between “desired results”, “acceptable evidence” and “learning experiences? 3

How Should We Assess Student Learning? continued Reliability: Consistency of measurement Example #1 with a scale I weigh a bag of potatoes on a scale in the morning and the scale indicates that the bag weighs 5 pounds. If I were to weigh the same bag of potatoes later in the day, a reliable scale would indicate that the bag weighs how many pounds? Example #2 with a classroom (reliability = holding students to the same assessment criteria I design an essay for one of my tests. How can I ensure reliability when evaluating my students’ responses to this essay? 3

How Should We Assess Student Learning? continued Validity: Accuracy of assessment Example #1 with a scale I weigh a bag of potatoes on a scale in the morning and the scale indicates that the bag weighs 5 pounds. I weigh the bag on the same scale later in the day and the scale again registers that the bag weighs 5 pounds. The scale is reliable because it provide consistent measurement But, is it valid???? In other words, does the bag actually weigh 5 pounds? 3

Classroom Assessment: Validity & reliability

Application #1: 4 Corners Discussion Topic #1: Effort should be assessed and used to evaluate students Commit to a position: A (strongly agree), B (agree), C (disagree), D (strongly disagree) Discuss: Reliability, Validity, Growth/Fixed mindset, Controllable/Uncontrollable attributions Does content and/or developmental factors matter? Topic #2: Class participation should be assessed and used to evaluate students Commit to a position: A (strongly agree), B (agree), C (disagree), D (strongly disagree) Discuss: Reliability, validity, content, developmental factors?