: 2018.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture 3a Clause functions Adapted from Mary Laughren.
Advertisements

The Structure of Sentences Asian 401
BBN-ANG-253 Advanced Syntax Lecture Course Autumn, 2014/15
Lecture 4: The Complementiser System
NP Movement Passives, Raising: When NPs are not in their theta positions.
Chapter 4 Syntax.
Elliptical, gapping, null spellout, silent AUX
Chapter Two Syntactic Categories Syntactic categories are of two types: Lexical categories (N, V, P, A, AdP) and functional categories (IP, CP, DP)
Dr. Abdullah S. Al-Dobaian1 Ch. 2: Phrase Structure Syntactic Structure (basic concepts) Syntactic Structure (basic concepts)  A tree diagram marks constituents.
Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 2 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 4.
Grammatical Relations and Lexical Functional Grammar Grammar Formalisms Spring Term 2004.
SYNTAX Introduction to Linguistics. BASIC IDEAS What is a sentence? A string of random words? If it is a sentence, does it have to be meaningful?
Week 10a. VP-internal subjects and ECM CAS LX 522 Syntax I.
WH movement 2 Oct. 17, 2012 – Day 20 Introduction to Syntax ANTH 3590/7590 Harry Howard Tulane University.
Week 11. Interim summary and some things to do in class. CAS LX 522 Syntax I.
Week 9b. A-movement cont’d
Matakuliah: G0922/Introduction to Linguistics Tahun: 2008 Session 11 Syntax 2.
Week 13a. QR CAS LX 522 Syntax I. Quantifiers We interpret Bill saw everyone as We interpret Bill saw everyone as For every person x, Bill saw x. For.
Week 14b. PRO and control CAS LX 522 Syntax I. It is likely… This satisfies the EPP in both clauses. The main clause has Mary in SpecIP. The embedded.
Week 6a. Case and checking (with a little more  -Theory) CAS LX 522 Syntax I.
CAS LX 522 Syntax I Week 11a. Wh-movement.
LEL 1 Syntax 8: Wh-movement. Outline Questioned constituents in English undergo movement to first position of the sentence. This movement can lead to.
Extending X-bar Theory DPs, TPs, and CPs. The Puzzle of Determiners  Specifier RuleXP  (YP) X’ – requires the specifier to be phrasal – *That the book.
Chapter 4 Syntax Part II.
Lecture Four Syntax.
Introduction to Linguistics
IV. SYNTAX. 1.1 What is syntax? Syntax is the study of how sentences are structured, or in other words, it tries to state what words can be combined with.
Chapter 4: Syntax Part V.
Syntax III November 19, Sentences The basic phrase types include: NP, VP, AP, PP A basic sentence is an “inflectional phrase” (IP). The head of.
Review of basic concepts.  The knowledge of sentences and their structure.  Syntactic rules include: ◦ The grammaticality of sentences ◦ Word order.
Revision.  Movements leave behind a phonologically null trace in all their extraction sites.
Rules, Movement, Ambiguity
Linguistic Theory Lecture 5 Filters. The Structure of the Grammar 1960s (Standard Theory) LexiconPhrase Structure Rules Deep Structure Transformations.
1 LIN 1310B Introduction to Linguistics Prof: Nikolay Slavkov TA: Qinghua Tang CLASS 16, March 6, 2007.
 Chapter 8 (Part 2) Transformations Transformational Grammar Engl 424 Hayfa Alhomaid.
ACTL 2008 Syntax: Introduction to LFG Peter Austin, Linguistics Department, SOAS with thanks to Kersti Börjars & Nigel Vincent.
SYNTAX.
◦ Process of describing the structure of phrases and sentences Chapter 8 - Phrases and sentences: grammar1.
8 Split Projections 8.1 Overview CP: Force Phrase, Topic Phrase, Focus Phrase TP: Tense Phrase, Aspect Phrase, Mood Phrase VP: headed by a lexical verb.
3.3 A More Detailed Look At Transformations Inversion (revised): Move Infl to C. Do Insertion: Insert interrogative do into an empty.
Principles and Parameters (II) Rajat Kumar Mohanty Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Bombay.
X-Bar Theory. The part of the grammar regulating the structure of phrases has come to be known as X'-theory (X’-bar theory'). X-bar theory brings out.
Lec. 10.  In this section we explain which constituents of a sentence are minimally required, and why. We first provide an informal discussion and then.
Week 12. NP movement Text 9.2 & 9.3 English Syntax.
Chapter 4 Syntax a branch of linguistics that studies how words are combined to form sentences and the rules that govern the formation of sentences.
Lecture 6: More On Wh-movement
The structure of sentences
Lecture 2: Categories and Subcategorisation
Lecture 4: The Complementiser System
An Introduction to the Government and Binding Theory
English Syntax Week 12. NP movement Text 9.2 & 9.3.
Lecture 3 Krisztina Szécsényi
Statistical NLP: Lecture 3
Lecture 7: Missing Subjects of Non-finite Clauses
Lecture 12: Summary and Exam
4.3 The Generative Approach
Lecture 10 Krisztina Szécsényi
Lecture 9 Krisztina Szécsényi
Lecture 8: Verb Positions
: 2018.
ENG 3306 Raising and Control I.
: 2018.
X-bar Schema Linguistics lecture series
:.
:.
:.
:.
Principles and Parameters (I)
Syntax.
Presentation transcript:

: 2018

Syntax: A First Encounter Marcel den Dikken Department of English Linguistics ELTE

SAFE Savings → our main savings from this course are these: • a generative syntax is a formal system that is capable of deriving (or ‘generating’) all and only those sentences of human natural language that are grammatical • sentences are formed by combining heads and phrases into X-bar projections in accordance with (a) the Projection Principle (all lexical information, for category, subcategorisation, and thematic (or θ-) roles, must be syntactically represented) (b) the θ-Criterion (θ-role↔argument biuniqueness) (c) the UTAH (correspondence between thematic and structural relationships)

SAFE Savings → our main savings from this course are these: • verbs project their internal arguments within VP but need a ‘little v’ to get their external θ-role and accusative Case assigned (cf. Burzio’s Generalisation) • finite I, which projects outside the v–VP core, entertains a Spec-Head relationship with its specifier under which (a) person/number agreement between the finite verb and the structural subject is checked (b) nominative Case is assigned to the subject • on top of IP a projection of the functional head C can be included in the structure of the sentence (a) C serves as the locus for lexical complementisers and as the landing-site for Subject–Aux Inversion (b) SpecCP serves as the host for wh-operators (incl. whether) and the null operator

SAFE Savings → our main savings from this course are these: • heads and phrases can undergo movement; all occur- rences of movement leave a trace behind

SAFE Savings → our main savings from this course are these: vP DP she V-to-v head movement DP she v′ v VP Vi put v Ø DP them V′ V PP on the floor ti

phrasal movement to SpecIP SAFE 13 SAFE Savings → our main savings from this course are these: IP phrasal movement to SpecIP DPj she I′ I vP do I -ed DP tj v′ put them on the floor

phrasal movement to SpecCP phrasal movement to SpecIP SAFE 13 SAFE Savings → our main savings from this course are these: phrasal movement to SpecCP CP I-to-C head movement whatk C′ C phrasal movement to SpecIP IP In C DPj I′ did [Q] she I vP tn tj put tk on the floor

SAFE Savings → our main savings from this course are these: • heads and phrases can undergo movement; all occur- rences of movement leave a trace behind • the nominal phrase has a structure broadly similar to that of the clause, featuring the functional categories Q (for quantifiers) and D (for determiners) • the D-head of possessive nominal phrases is occupied in English by the genitival marker ’s, which, like person/ number marking in finite I, entertains a Spec-Head agree- ment relation with its specifier

SAFE Savings DP DP D′ D QP D′ ’s Q′ D NP the library Q NP many/few books

SAFE Savings IP DP I′ I vP D′ -s hold many/few books D NP the library

SAFE Savings → our main savings from this course are these: • heads and phrases can undergo movement; all occur- rences of movement leave a trace behind • the nominal phrase has a structure broadly similar to that of the clause, featuring the functional categories Q (for quantifiers) and D (for determiners) • the D-head of possessive nominal phrases is occupied in English by the genitival marker ’s, which, like person/ number marking in finite I, entertains a Spec-Head agree- ment relation with its specifier • the structural parallelism between clauses and nominal phrases is further enhanced by the binding asymmetries (involving reflexives, pronouns, and names) found between subjects/possessors, on the one hand, and hierarchically lower constituents, on the other

Syntax: A First Encounter Marcel den Dikken Department of English Linguistics ELTE

: 2018