BART Overview Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Excerpts from a Presentation Given to the WRAP Market Trading Form on Recommended Approaches to the Stationary Source NOx and PM Report Lee Alter Western.
Advertisements

RH Requirement for BART  §308 (e) contains BART requirements for regional haze visibility impairment…. The State must submit an implementation plan containing.
Regional Haze Update & Current Results Michele Notarianni Brenda Johnson EPA Region 4.
WRAP Stationary Source (SS) NOx and PM Report Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association WRAP IOC NOx Issues Meeting Denver, CO July 28, 2003.
Identification of BART-Eligible Sources in the WRAP Region A Summary of the April 4, 2005 Draft Report.
The Impact of Greenhouse Gas Regulation on Energy Production: Legal Framework for Greenhouse Gases Standards for Fossil-Fuel Fired Electric Generating.
IOWA Department of Natural Resources Air Quality Program Development Jim McGraw Environmental Program Supervisor  8 hr Ozone and PM2.5 NAAQS Implementation.
1 WRAP Fire Tracking Systems Draft Intent of WRAP FTS Policy – Assist states/tribes to address emissions inventory and tracking associated with fire in.
1 WRAP Policy Fire Tracking Systems Draft December 9, 2002 FEJF Meeting December 10-11, 2002 Jackson, WY.
1 EPA’s Proposed Interstate Air Quality Rule Consideration of Issues Associated with Possible Expansion of IAQR to the West Patrick Cummins, WGA Background.
The Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) WRAP formed in 1997 as the successor organization to Grand Canyon Visibility Transport Commission (GCVTC) –
Final Amendments to the Regional Haze Rule: BART Rule Making June 16, 2005.
Fire Emissions Joint Forum –Section 308 Strategies for Fire Coordinating efforts of states changing or developing smoke management strategies for regional.
Regional Haze Rule Best Available Retrofit Technology Government to Government Consultation Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency.
Stationary Sources Joint Forum Update Eric Massey Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Lee Alter and Patrick Cummins Western Governors’ Association.
Next Steps in Regional Haze Planning in the Western U.S. Prepared by the WESTAR Planning Committee for the Fall Business Meeting, Tempe, AZ October 31,
BART Guideline Overview WESTAR August 31, 2005 EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Todd Hawes
REGIONAL HAZE BART – Key Issues For Consideration Eric Massey, Arizona DEQ Lee Alter, WGA SSJF Meeting June 3, 2004 Denver, Colorado.
Regional Haze SIP Development Overview AQCC Presentation July 2005.
0 DRAFT WRAP Offroad Retrofit Program : Overview & Status Update February
Best Available Retrofit Technology Rule - Colorado David R. Ouimette Colorado Air Pollution Control Division.
Proposed Reasonable Progress Rule Workshop Brief Background and Procedure Public Workshop June 14, 2007.
Fugitive Dust Project Phase One The WRAP Emissions Forum contracted with a team of contractors lead by ENVIRON to produce regional PM 10 and PM 2.5 emissions.
1 Conducting Reasonable Progress Determinations under the Regional Haze Rule Kathy Kaufman EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards January 11,
BART SIP Development: Example from Colorado Rocky Mountain National Park WRAP IWG Meeting, Denver, CO August 29, 2007 Presented by: Ray Mohr and Curt Taipale.
Air Quality Policy Division D P A Q 1 Regional Haze Update WESTAR September 17-19, 2007 EPA Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards.
EPA – Regional Haze Issues IWG Meeting April 17 th Keith Rose and Laurel Dygowski.
BART Identification Project Update Lee Alter, WGA Stephanie Finn, ERG SSJF Meeting June 2-3, 2004 Denver, CO.
Reproposal of the Regional Haze Rule and BART Guidelines.
Recommendations from Regional Haze Workgroup Core Issue 1: 5- Year Progress Reports The RHR requires Comprehensive SIP revision every 10 years (first in.
Weight of Evidence Discussion AoH Meeting – Tempe, AZ November 16/17, 2005.
Alternatives to BART Rule Discussion with WRAP Nov , 2006.
Summary of June 15, 2005 Revisions to RH BART and BART Guidelines.
WRAP Regional Modeling Center, Attribution of Haze Meeting, Denver CO 7/22/04 Introduction to the the RMC Source Apportionment Modeling Effort Gail Tonnesen,
VISIBILITY SIPS The Regional Haze Rule Requirements for Fire The Role of the RPOs Opportunities for Participation US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Dennis Haddow.
The West is different August 14, 2013 OAQPS. Aerosols causing Worst Visibility Days – East vs. West 2.
Implementation Workgroup Meeting December 6, 2006 Attribution of Haze Workgroup’s Monitoring Metrics Document Status: 1)2018 Visibility Projections – Alternative.
2018 Emission Reductions from the Base 18b Emission Inventory Lee Gribovicz Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting San Diego, California February 22-23, 2007.
2005 Progress on Emissions Inventories Attribution of Haze Workgroup Meeting January 24, 2006.
Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard For New Power Plants Presented by Kevin Culligan Office of Air Quality Planning And Standards Office of Air and Radiation.
Summary of WRAP Stationary Source (SS) NOx and PM Report Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT October 15, 2003.
Work Items for §309 SIPs WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 19, 2002 Tom Moore & Brian Finneran.
AoH Work Group Weight of Evidence Framework WRAP Meeting – Tucson, AZ January 10/11, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
308 Outline (a) Purpose (b) When are 1st plans due (c) Options for regional planning (d) Core requirements (e) BART requirements (f) Comprehensive periodic.
WRAP WORK PLAN UPDATE NOVEMBER 2001 Submitted to WRAP Board for Approval Andy Ginsburg ODEQ, Co-Chair IOC Forum Mike George ADEQ, Co-Chair TOC Forum.
Proposed Rulemaking: Additional RACT Requirements for Major Sources of NO x and VOCs (25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 129) Environmental Quality Board November.
Significance of Mobile Source Emissions for the Purposes of Section 309 of the Regional Haze Rule Patrick Cummins Western Governors’ Association WRAP Board.
A Basis for Control of BART Eligible Sources
Clean Air Act Glossary.
CAIR Replacement Rule and Regional Haze
Species Specific Reasonable Progress Analysis
Visibility Coordinator’s Report
Adjusting the Regional Haze Glide path using Monitoring and Modeling Data Trends Natural Conditions International Anthropogenic Contributions.
Status of Regional Haze Rule
Western Regional Haze Planning and
WRAP Overview and Role of Dust Forum
Identification of BART-Eligible Sources in the WRAP Region
RHPWG – Control Measures Subcommittee Oil & Gas Source Coordination
Status Report: “Significant Impact” from Mobile Sources and Road Dust
Stationary Source NOx and PM Report: An Update Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association WRAP Market Trading Forum Meeting September 19-20, 2002 Snowbird,
WRAP Stationary Sources Forum Meeting November 14-15, 2006
Stationary Sources Joint Forum: Next Steps
Workshop Technical and Policy Studies to Support the Annex
Summary of RH-LTS Requirements (d)(3)
Defining “Significant Impact” from Mobile Sources and Road Dust
Presented to WRAP November 15, 2001 John Kowalczyk & Bob Neufeld
RA BART Overview Deb Wolfe 8/9/2019.
Regional Modeling for Stationary Source Control Strategy Evaluation
Status of Preliminary Reasonable Progress Analysis
Presentation transcript:

BART Overview Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association WRAP SSJF Meeting Denver, CO February 18, 2004

WRAP Emissions (13 Contiguous States) SO2 NOx PM10 1996 2018 Note: Emissions do not include wind-blown dust or EPA’s proposed Tier IV off-road engine standards. Natural gas compressors span the point and area source categories.

WRAP Point Source Emissions (1996) Not all these categories are BART-eligible.

What Is BART? An emission limitation based on the degree of reduction achievable through the application of the best system of available continuous emission reduction for each pollutant. When determining BART, states and EPA must take into consideration: The costs of compliance, The energy and nonair quality env. impacts of comp., Any existing controls at the source, The remaining useful life of the source, and The degree of visibility improvement which may reasonably by anticipated to result.

To Whom Does It Apply? To BART-eligible sources emitting any pollutant which may reasonably be anticipated to cause or contribute to any impairment of visibility in any mandatory Class I Federal area. A BART-eligible source is that portion of a facility which: Belongs to any one of 26 source categories, Was in “existence” on 8/7/77, Was not in “operation” before 8/7/62, and Has the potential to emit > 250 tpy of any visibility impairing pollutant (SO2, NOx, PM, VOC, NH3).

Alternatives to BART within the RHR Must include all BART-eligible sources Must provide for greater reasonable progress Emissions analysis (tonnage and distribution) If significant change in distribution, then a dispersion modeling analysis to show that: On average, areas show greater progress, and No area experiences a decrease in visibility May phase in reductions over the entire planning period (2018) rather than 5 years May contain elements to address geographic enhancements

WRAP BART Efforts Help identify BART-eligible sources ($100,000) Objectives Provide direct assistance to some states and tribes to identify BART-eligible sources Coordinate approach among all states and tribes Identify and track status of sources in the region Challenges Operation and existence dates Reconstructed and modified units Data availability Proposals due today

WRAP BART Efforts Resources available to help determine which BART-eligible sources should be subject to BART ($100,000) Not necessary if pursuing an alternative to BART Possibly ... Determine emission reductions attributable to BART Can be done on a category-wide basis if pursuing an alternative to BART Develop an alternative to BART Review EPA revisions to BART regulations and guidance and comment where appropriate

IMPROVE Monitoring Data (2002) Percent Light Extinction Due to Ammonium Sulfate on the 20% Worst Days

IMPROVE Monitoring Data (2001) Percent Light Extinction Due to Ammonium Nitrate on the 20% Worst Days Percentages are higher when natural sources of haze are excluded On some of the hazy days on the CP, nitrate is 40 - 60 %

IMPROVE Monitoring Data (2002) Percent Light Extinction Due to Ammonium Nitrate on the 20% Worst Days

Point Source NOx Emissions (1996) 763 plants > 100 tpy These account for 94% of SS emissions ~150 are power plants