Interreg South Baltic Programme

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Baltic Sea Region INTERREG III B Neighbourhood Programme
Advertisements

Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Transnationality and locally implemented pilot actions in the BSR.
The political framework
Introduction of participants / project ideas (PI) Presentation: What makes a good partnership? Presentation: Which projects is NWE looking for? Speed dating.
EuropeAid European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument Cross Border Co-operation within the Baltic Sea Region Programme Hamburg, May 2007 Martin.
New opportunities for regional development through cross-border cooperation Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development November 16,
Arrangements regarding ECP 2014–2020 implementation 1.Implementation of the Republic of Slovenia Budget Act Specific section for the period:
1 MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTORATE GENERAL PROGRAMMING OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT Operational Programme Regional Development.
Samuel Cantell European Commission Delegation to Thailand 29 May 2008 EU-Thai Cooperation on Environment.
INTERREG IVA 2 Mers Seas Zeeën Crossborder Cooperation Programme Part-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) Green: Going.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Event – date, place About INTERREG EUROPE INTERREG EUROPE INTERREG IVC Joint Technical Secretariat Iruma Kravale, The.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND INTERREG EUROPE 2014 – 2020 Perspectives & possibilities Petra POLASKOVA Joint Technical Secretariat INTERACT on article.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND GreenInfraNet/Smart Europe final conference, 4 November 2014, Almere EU Interregional Cooperation State of play and.
Regional Policy Managing Authorities of the ETC programmes Annual Meeting W Piskorz, Head of Unit Competence Centre Inclusive Growth, Urban and.
Igor Kaniecki | Joint Secretariat Interreg South Baltic Programme
Current and future cooperation opportunities in CENTRAL EUROPE GovernEE Final Event, Hódmezővásárhely, 3 July 2013 Viera Slavikova, JTS CENTRAL EUROPE.
16 September 2009, Ryn EUROREGION BALTIC – NEW CHALLENGES.
1 South Baltic Cross-border Co-operation Programme Presentation of the Programme. The projects supporting entrepreneurship.
Contribution of the Territorial Cooperation Programmes to the EU Strategy for the Danube Region Kiril Geratliev, Director General “Territorial Cooperation.
European Union | European Regional Development Fund From INTERREG IVC to Interreg Europe Info day in Tullamore Akos Szabo| Project Officer Interreg Europe.
Prevention and Remediation in Selected Industrial Sectors, June 2005, Ottawa NATO’s Scientific Programme Thomas Strassburger Ottawa, Canada NATO’s.
The Future of Transnational Cooperation in Central Europe ( ) Claudia Pamperl JTS INTERRREG IIIC East.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND RECOMMEND Final Event, 11 September 2014, Varna EU Interregional Cooperation State of play and perspectives Jason Martinez.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Event – date, place About INTERREG EUROPE INTERREG EUROPE INTERREG IVC Joint Technical Secretariat.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden A Community Initiative concerning Transnational co-operation on spatial.
The Perspectives and Challenges of Transnational Cooperation in the next European Funding Period Fontwell Park, 17 October 2006 Julia ERIPRET,
Preparatory projects and funding opportunities 21 st April 2010 – Portrush, Northern Ireland Teresa Lennon and Michael O’Brien European Union European.
│ 1│ 1 What are we talking about?… Culture: Visual Arts, Performing Arts, Heritage Literature Cultural Industries: Film and Video, Television and radio,
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Community-led local development Articles of the Common Provisions Regulation.
Russian National Sub-Committee BSR Interreg III B Neighbourhood Programme Baltic Sea Region INTERREG III B Neighbourhood Programme: Russian Perspective.
March 2007, Smolyan Angelos SANOPOULOS, Euroconsultants SA CROSS BORDER COOPERATION Bulgaria-Greece Experiences, Framework and New Operational.
Baltic 21 Project Proposal for INTERREG strategic project on bioenergy.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Stakeholder Workshop Brussels – 5 February 2014 INTERREG EUROPE Nicolas Singer | Senior Project Officer INTERREG IVC.
Future outlook and next steps for ESPON The ESPON 2013 Programme OPEN DAYS Bruxelles, 10 October 2007.
Interreg IIIB Trans-national cooperation: Budget comparison : 440 million EURO 420 m EURO (Interreg IIC prog.) + 20 m EURO (Pilot Actions)
The 7th Framework Programme for Research: Strategy of international cooperation activities Robert Burmanjer Head of Unit, “International Scientific Cooperation.
URBACT IMPLEMENTATION NETWORKS. URBACT in a nutshell  European Territorial Cooperation programme (ETC) co- financed by ERDF  All 28 Member States as.
THE NORTHERN BEAUTY: Barents visual arts in – Anne Ihalmo project manager University of Lapland.
Preparatory projects and funding opportunities 17 th June 2010 – Copenhagen, Denmark Christopher Parker and Rachel Burn European Union European Regional.
Karelia ENPI CBC September the 6th 2011 St. Petersburg Document EG Chairs and ITAs 12/4.4/Info 1.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND CLUE final conference, 24 September 2014, Turin EU Interregional Cooperation State of play and perspectives Johanna.
Interreg Europe Elena Ferrario
On the second call Jason Martinez Policy Officer | Interreg Europe JS
Interreg IIIB Tacis Phare
Interreg V B Adriatic-Ionian Seminar for Applicants
CaSYPoT project structure
Annex III to BS/SC/PDF/A(2003)1
ATLANTIC STRATEGY and EU Cohesion Policy
Interreg Baltic Sea Region: Introduction to the Programme
The ENI CBC MED Programme Strategy and functioning
INTERREG IV A 2 Seas Programme An efficient framework to boost crossborder cooperation and the economic development of the territories BERISUAS Cluster.
TERRITORIAL COOPERATION PROGRAMMES FOR EUSDR - PA 8
ESPON post 2013 Programme Kristīne Rasiņa
From INTERREG IVC to Interreg Europe
Preparatory projects and funding opportunities th August 2010 – Copenhagen, Denmark Christopher Parker and Rachel Burn European Union European.
PROJECT MANUAL Galina Georgieva Project Officer
South-East European Space
Thematic platform 1 Competitiveness & Attractivness
URBACT III LAUNCH EVENT Brussels, 16 March 2015
Territorial Co-operation
SOCIAL DIALOGUE WITHIN EUPAN
ENI CBC Joint Operational Programme Black Sea Basin
DG ENV/MSFD 2018 call for proposals
Dr. Katja Šnuderl, Contract manager
Juan Gonzalez eGovernment & CIP operations
Expert Group on Natura 2000 Management
SMATH project kick-off meeting
The approved ESPON 2013 Programme
The Active Citizens Fund in Bulgaria Programme Priorities and Measures for Support Short version of the presentation delivered at the Official Launch.
Presentation transcript:

Interreg South Baltic Programme 2014-2020 Edmunds Sniķeris Joint Secretariat of the Interreg South Baltic Programme 2014-2020

Programme eligible area Suggestion: two main messages per slide (plus title)

2007-2013 Involvement of partners from Kaliningrad - associated partners in 12 projects out of 69 regular projects in South Baltic 2007-2013. Recommendations not binding The proposed budgets will be assessed against the proposed activities and expected results (value for money) bigger or smaller projects can also be approved, i.e. projects containing small-scale pilot investments launch of a seed money facility to be decided by the Monitoring Committee and managed through separate Terms of Reference

BalticMuseums 2.0 / BalticMuseums 2.0 Plus The BalticMuseums 2.0 project and its follow-up BalticMuseums 2.0 Plus aimed to establish a network between oceanographic museums in the South Baltic region, thereby strengthening intercultural dialogue, promoting mutual understanding and creating a common identity based upon a shared maritime history and heritage. The projects successfully launched a multilingual online platform and an eGuide for their consortium of oceanographic museums. Recommendations not binding The proposed budgets will be assessed against the proposed activities and expected results (value for money) bigger or smaller projects can also be approved, i.e. projects containing small-scale pilot investments launch of a seed money facility to be decided by the Monitoring Committee and managed through separate Terms of Reference

BalticMuseums 2.0 / BalticMuseums 2.0 Plus The Museum of the World Ocean (MWO) in Kaliningrad contributed to the project as an associated partner in the following capacities: Online content - contribution to the online platform balticmuseums.net; Translation - Russian translations for online platform and adjacent kids’ website kids.balticmuseums.net Input - recommendations and advice during the project’s development; Marketing and promotion - distributing flyers and posters, publishing articles and providing reports to media, including radio and television; Event hosting - hosted project meetings. Recommendations not binding The proposed budgets will be assessed against the proposed activities and expected results (value for money) bigger or smaller projects can also be approved, i.e. projects containing small-scale pilot investments launch of a seed money facility to be decided by the Monitoring Committee and managed through separate Terms of Reference

MOMENT The Modern Water Management (MOMENT) project and its extension MOMENT UP, developed under Euroregion Baltic, used modern water management methods to reduce the discharge of nutrients and hazardous substance to the Baltic Sea, which was classified by the HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan as a key issue requiring action. Recommendations not binding The proposed budgets will be assessed against the proposed activities and expected results (value for money) bigger or smaller projects can also be approved, i.e. projects containing small-scale pilot investments launch of a seed money facility to be decided by the Monitoring Committee and managed through separate Terms of Reference

MOMENT Kaliningrad Regional Duma was involved as Associated Organisation, Regional Duma). In addition, the Department of Water Affairs of Kaliningrad Regional Government, research institutions such as the Atlantic Branch of the P.P. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology of Russian Academy of Sciences, and the Institute of Spatial Planning, Development and Foreign Relations provided assistance to the project: Consulting; Fieldwork - conducted scientific work; Networking - assisted in the establishment of the Primorskaya River Water Users Partnership. Recommendations not binding The proposed budgets will be assessed against the proposed activities and expected results (value for money) bigger or smaller projects can also be approved, i.e. projects containing small-scale pilot investments launch of a seed money facility to be decided by the Monitoring Committee and managed through separate Terms of Reference

Strategic orientation of the Programme cross-border cooperation between local and regional actors maritime and „soft” cooperation emphasis on the joint development and testing of innovative solutions increased result-, impact- and change- orientation contribution to the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region active project development support by the Joint Secretariat and Contact Points Suggestion: two main messages per slide (plus title)

Programme overall objective To increase the blue and green growth potential of the South Baltic area through cross-border cooperation Suggestion: two main messages per slide (plus title)

Priority Axis 1 Strengthening international activeness and innovation capacity of the South Baltic blue & green economy – EUR 9,97m 1.1 Increase the presence of blue and green sector SMEs from the South Baltic area in international markets through joint cross- border actions 1.2 Improve the transfer of innovation for the benefit of blue and green sector SMEs through joint cross-border actions Suggestion: two main messages per slide (plus title)

Priority Axis 2 Exploiting the environmental and cultural potential of the South Baltic area for blue and green growth – EUR 39,77m 2.1 Increased development of the South Baltic area’s natural and cultural heritage assets into sustainable tourist destinations 2.2 Increased use of green technologies in order to decrease the pollution discharges in the South Baltic area Suggestion: two main messages per slide (plus title)

Priority Axis 3 Improving cross-border connectivity for a functional blue and green transport area – EUR 15,7m 3 Improve the quality and environmental sustainability of transport services in the South Baltic area Suggestion: two main messages per slide (plus title)

Priority Axis 4 Boosting human resource capacities for the area’s blue and green economy – EUR 8,3 m 4 Increase the share of skilled labour force working in blue and green economy sectors of the South Baltic area through joint cross-border actions Suggestion: two main messages per slide (plus title)

Priority Axis 5 Increasing cooperation capacity of local actors in the South Baltic area for blue and green growth – EUR 4,16m Improve the cooperation capacity of local South Baltic area actors through participation in cross-border networks Suggestion: two main messages per slide (plus title)

Partnership [1] Lead Partner principle Minimum: 2 partners from 2 Member States, but European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC) if set by at least 2 public bodies across the border can implement project individually Bilateral projects eligible in other ETC programmes only with a high model value and/ or extended partnership consortium Multilateral partnerships are an asset Recommendations not binding The proposed budgets will be assessed against the proposed activities and expected results (value for money) bigger or smaller projects can also be approved, i.e. projects containing small-scale pilot investments launch of a seed money facility to be decided by the Monitoring Committee and managed through separate Terms of Reference

Partnership [2] Associated partners important stakeholders / key target groups / end users of the project results e.g. SMEs, organisations outside Programme area or outside EU cannot claim ERDF co-financing cannot be subcontracted by the project partners to carry out parts of their activities in the project Recommendations not binding The proposed budgets will be assessed against the proposed activities and expected results (value for money) bigger or smaller projects can also be approved, i.e. projects containing small-scale pilot investments launch of a seed money facility to be decided by the Monitoring Committee and managed through separate Terms of Reference

Kaliningrad Participation as associated partners No ERDF co-financing for institutions from Kaliningrad contribution of own resources reimbursement of travel and accommodation costs through EU partners (budgeted and justified in the Application Form) letter of commitment to be submitted with the Application Form no subcontracting by project partners 20% rule for project activities outside the Programme area Recommendations not binding The proposed budgets will be assessed against the proposed activities and expected results (value for money) bigger or smaller projects can also be approved, i.e. projects containing small-scale pilot investments launch of a seed money facility to be decided by the Monitoring Committee and managed through separate Terms of Reference

Geographical location of the project’s activities in general, activities should be implemented in the Programme eligible area exceptional cases - if for the Programme benefit - some activities may be implemented outside the Programme eligible area and on the territories of other EU Member States 20% eligibility rule – activities implemented outside Programme eligible area (monitored at the Programme level) Recommendations not binding The proposed budgets will be assessed against the proposed activities and expected results (value for money) bigger or smaller projects can also be approved, i.e. projects containing small-scale pilot investments launch of a seed money facility to be decided by the Monitoring Committee and managed through separate Terms of Reference

Calls for proposals 2nd Call: 9 May – 17 June 2016 Project consultations: May 2016 Assessment of the projects: 20 June – 27 September 2016 MC meeting and decisions on the projects: 18 – 19 October 2016

Thank you! Edmunds Sniķeris | Project Officer and Cross-Programme Coordinator | edmunds.snikeris@southbaltic.eu