European Urology Oncology

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date of download: 6/2/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of MR/Ultrasound Fusion–Guided Biopsy With.
Advertisements

Prostate cancer update Suresh GANTA Consultant urological surgeon Manor Hospital.
Volume 64, Issue 5, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages (September 2006)
74-year-old man with stage T2a Gleason score prostate cancer (prostate specific antigen = ng/mL) in right transition zone (TZ) with history.
The PSA Era is not Over for Prostate Cancer
Results of Targeted Biopsy in Men with Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesions Classified Equivocal, Likely or Highly Likely to Be Clinically Significant Prostate.
Volume 71, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 69, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 70, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 72, Issue 6, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 62, Issue 5, Pages (November 2012)
Potential and Limitations of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Kidney, Prostate, and Bladder Cancer Including Pelvic Lymph Node Staging:
Volume 67, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 199, Issue 1, (January 2018)
Volume 62, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
Practice Patterns and Impact of Postchemotherapy Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection on Testicular Cancer Outcomes  Solomon L. Woldu, Joseph A. Moore,
Volume 54, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
Natural History of Pathologically Benign Cancer Suspicious Regions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Following Targeted Biopsy  Darren J.
Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Preoperative Identification of Localised Prostate Cancer  Arnauld Villers, Philippe Puech, Xavier Leroy, Jacques Biserte,
Volume 63, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 72, Issue 3, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 64, Issue 5, Pages (November 2013)
Assessing the validity of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI- RADS v2) scoring system in diagnosis of peripheral zone prostate cancer 
Volume 69, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
European Urology Oncology
Towards Early and More Specific Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal.
European Urology Oncology
Prostate Cancer Detection: A View of the Future
Ongoing Gleason Grade Migration in Localized Prostate Cancer and Implications for Use of Active Surveillance  Adam B. Weiner, Ruth Etzioni, Scott E. Eggener 
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 62, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
PD06-07 AGGRESSIVENESS OF PROSTATE CANCER: CORRELATION BETWEEN PROSPECTIVELY ASSIGNED APPARENT DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT VALUES AND ISUP GRADE GROUP  Daniel.
Volume 67, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System Steering Committee: PI-RADS v2 Status Update and Future Directions  Anwar R. Padhani, Jeffrey Weinreb, Andrew.
Volume 59, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
The PSA Era is not Over for Prostate Cancer
Cytoreductive Radical Prostatectomy in Men with Prostate Cancer and Skeletal Metastases  Axel Heidenreich, Nicola Fossati, David Pfister, Nazareno Suardi,
Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Tillmann Loch, Pat Fox Fulgham  European Urology 
Volume 68, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Clinical Utility of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging as the First-line Tool for Men with High Clinical Suspicion of Prostate Cancer  Valeria.
European Urology Oncology
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Is It Necessary to Detect All Prostate Cancers in Men with Serum PSA Levels
Volume 66, Issue 3, Pages (September 2014)
European Urology Oncology
European Urology Oncology
European Urology Oncology
Prostate Cancer Nomograms: An Update
Volume 75, Issue 4, Pages (April 2019)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Guided Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy: An Initial Experience in a Community Hospital  Paul Friedman, DO, Sean Enis, MD, Jeremy.
Trend of Adverse Stage Migration in Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer  Felix Preisser, Michele Marchioni, Sebastiano.
European Urology Oncology
Volume 65, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 75, Issue 4, Pages (April 2019)
Nandita M. deSouza, Veronica A. Morgan, Elizabeth Bancroft, S
European Urology Oncology
Volume 69, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
The Role of Systematic and Targeted Biopsies in Light of Overlap on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy  Neal Patel, Eliza Cricco-Lizza,
Not All Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging–targeted Biopsies Are Equal: The Impact of the Type of Approach and Operator Expertise on the Detection.
Does PSA Testing Influence the Natural History of Prostate Cancer?
European Urology Oncology
European Urology Oncology
European Urology Oncology
Assessing a Patient’s Individual Risk of Biopsy-detectable Prostate Cancer: Be Aware of Case Mix Heterogeneity and A Priori Likelihood  Jan F.M. Verbeek,
European Urology Oncology
Presentation transcript:

European Urology Oncology Magnetic Resonance Imaging–guided In-bore and Magnetic Resonance Imaging- transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsies: An Adjusted Comparison of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Rate  Daniel N. Costa, Kenneth Goldberg, Alberto Diaz de Leon, Yair Lotan, Yin Xi, Muhammad Aziz, Yuval Freifeld, Vitaly Margulis, Ganesh Raj, Claus G. Roehrborn, Brad Hornberger, Neil Desai, Aditya Bagrodia, Franto Francis, Ivan Pedrosa, Jeffrey A. Cadeddu  European Urology Oncology  DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.08.022 Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 Eligibility and patient cohorts. n=number of men; MRI=multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; PCa=prostate cancer. European Urology Oncology DOI: (10.1016/j.euo.2018.08.022) Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 Steps of an in-bore biopsy. In a 69-yr-old man with previous negative 12-core biopsy and PSA of 10ng/ml, multiparametric MRI revealed a 15mm PI-RADS 5 lesion in the right apex peripheral zone. (A) The in-bore biopsy begins with images to re-identify the known lesion (arrow), (B) then the region of interest is chosen (green circle), and (C) the targeting software indicates the changes necessary to move the needle guide to a position aligned with the suspicious area. (D) After needle guide is repositioned, images along the long axis of the needle guide are obtained to verify the needle guide (arrows) and lesion (yellow circle) alignment. (E) Finally, biopsy is performed and images are obtained with the needle in place to confirm adequate sampling. PCa grade group 2 was detected in three of three cores, with up to 100% of the core length containing tumor. MRI=magnetic resonance imaging; PI-RADS=Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System; PSA=prostate-specific antigen. European Urology Oncology DOI: (10.1016/j.euo.2018.08.022) Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 Per-patient biopsy yields according to PI-RADS score and biopsy strategy adjusted for confounding variables using propensity score weighting. Nonadjusted data are shown in Table 1. ISUP=International Society of Urological Pathology; PI-RADS=Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System. European Urology Oncology DOI: (10.1016/j.euo.2018.08.022) Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions

Fig. 4 Precise needle-lesion location verification offered by in-bore biopsy. (A and B) A 65-year-old biopsy-naïve man with PSA of 5.6ng/ml and a 5mm PI-RADS score 4 lesion in the right mid gland peripheral zone. (A) Prefiring image shows needle guide (yellow arrows) properly aligned with the lesion (white arrow), (B) which is properly sampled by the core biopsy needle. PCa grade group 3 was detected in three of three cores with up to 50% of the core length containing tumor. (C–E) A 66-yr-old man with PSA of 3.7ng/ml, previous negative saturation biopsy, and a 10mm PI-RADS score 4 lesion in the left base transition zone. (C) Prefiring images confirm proper alignment of the needle guide and the lesion (white arrow); however, (D) needle insertion results in anatomical changes, and sampled area does not correspond to the suspicious region. (E) Such unexpected needle trajectory is compensated for on the subsequent core, and adequate sampling is confirmed. Core obtained in Figure 4D was negative and that in Figure 4E revealed grade group 2 PCa in 70% of the core length. PCa=prostate cancer; PI-RADS=Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System; PSA=prostate-specific antigen. European Urology Oncology DOI: (10.1016/j.euo.2018.08.022) Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions