Cost Allocation review – CoMC update July 18

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Application of User Pays Principles to Existing Service Lines 22nd November 2006.
Advertisements

A DNO Perspective by Stephen Parker for Structure of Charges Workshop 15 July 2003.
Data Logger/ Daily Meter Reading Processes. New Daily Metered Site  DM Service Provider receives a request from Gas Shipper for installation of daily.
Gas Consumer Forum Project Nexus xoserve update 27th July 2009
1 Project Smart Metering Portfolio Foundation Updates June 2013.
Implementation of Non Effective Days Nexus Workgroup – March
IS 466 ADVANCED TOPICS IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS LECTURER : NOUF ALMUJALLY 3 – 10 – 2011 College Of Computer Science and Information, Information Systems.
A layman’s guide to the structure of LDZ gas charges 27 July 2009 Please note – in the interests of clarity and accessibility, simplifications have been.
Shipperless & Unregistered site working group Recommendations to address the Unregistered Sites Collectively establish & execute activities to correct.
Governance and Charging Methodology for User Pays Services 10 th January 2007.
1 v1 iGT CSEP Billing Solution ScottishPower Proposals April 08.
Customer Charge On behalf of all DNs 25 October 2010.
PN UNC Workgroup Invoicing 24 th October Objectives of the Workgroups To determine detailed business requirements Consider/review comments made.
1 UNC Review Group 175 – Encouraging Participation in the Elective Daily Metered Regime 26 th June 2008.
PN UNC Workgroup Invoicing 10 th January Objectives of the Workgroups To determine business principles for future Invoicing processes –Consider/review.
Enterprise Processes and Systems MIS 2000 Instructor: Bob Travica Updated 2016 Class 16.
Setting Up a New Recharge Center
User Pays User Committee 12th November 2013
Background Current balance of LDZ System and Customer charges
Why use Marketplace to Achieve Greater Control & Efficiency
FGO: ASA Service Line Review
Trail Manager Trail Asset Management System
David Addison / Steve Deery
Supply Point Register 7th December 2011
Supply Point Register 21st November 2011
Supply Point Register 10th January 2012
Distribution and components
Mitel Pricing Tool - MPT Overview of MPT. SX-200 ICP Sales Training2 Mitel Pricing Tool - MPT  The Mitel Pricing Tool (MPT) consolidates various tools.
PN UNC Workgroup Invoicing 4th October 2011.
Identify Controlling-Close Settlements
Weekly Progress Update 3rd Aug 2018
ITD Service Catalog October 20th, 2009
Order-to-Cash (Project-Based Services) Scenario Overview
Nexus Meter Read Performance April 2018
Content Suggestions for the BP19 Customer Class Packs
Must Read Process Guide For Shippers
Modification Proposal 0192 – Draft Business Rules.
Weekly Progress Update 13 July 2018
Order-to-Cash (Project-Based Services) Scenario Overview
Connected System Exit Points Administration Options
Connected System Exit Points Administration Options
Cost Allocation review – CoMC update August 18
Ofgem Switching Programme: Central Switching Service consequential change update 9th May 2018.
Requirements Document
Transporter Initiated SPA Confirmations on behalf of User Potential Impact Discussion with UK Link Committee.
Current situation The submission of AQ Appeals and AQ Amendments using two alternative dates and reads that provide a more realistic indication of the.
Software Cost Estimation
The IT Services Helpdesk
Project Nexus Workgroup
PN UNC Workgroup (Settlement topic)
Ofgem Switching Programme: Central Switching Service consequential update 16th May 2018.
SPA Processes for DM Sites
Supply Point Information Services Post-Nexus update
Project Nexus Workgroup
User Pays Principles and Governance
Gas Customer Forum Project Nexus xoserve update (as of 19th July 2010) 26th July 2010 Final.
GT Response to Action AMR014 Project Nexus AMR Workgroup 20th July | Energy Networks Association.
DN Interruption Phase II
COR1000 Telecoms Project UK Link Committee
Modification 440 Project Nexus iGT Single Service Provision
PN UNC Workgroup (AQ topic)
Customer Issue Management CoMC Update
Customer Issue Management CoMC Update for April & May 2019
Municipal systems act:
Customer Issue Management CoMC Update for June 2019
Enabling Large Scale Utilisation of Class 3
OBSERVER DATA MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES AND BEST PRACTICE (Agenda Item 4)
Customer Issue Management Dashboard CoMC
Customer Issue Management Dashboard CoMC
Project Certification Planning Phase August 27, 2014
Presentation transcript:

Cost Allocation review – CoMC update July 18

Recap from BP19 Principles presentation

Management Summary People Updated cost centre allocation across General Services, Investment and Support activities (based on the new organisation structure) Additional granularity allows us to allocate Investment resource costs more accurately thus reducing the common sharing pool Resource allocations to General Service Lines are still under review we expect to see some adjustments resulting from this (E.g. Switching & Reporting) Systems Costs Updated the allocation of input costs across applications / shared products Challenges on how to split and allocate new UK Link costs Property & Other Bought in Services Initial review suggests there are no changes required to current allocation rules This presentation covers principles not £ or FTE values Any agreed changes to the allocations are not retrospective and will apply 2019/20 onwards

High Level Principles The overall principle for cost allocation will not change – the detail will give rise to an opportunity for realignment to known cost bases. General Service (Maintain the Business) Service Lines Direct allocation from appropriate cost centres Investment and Change Dedicated people cost Support people cost Allocated by proportion of dedicated FTE resource measured above Property and other BIS Allocated by proportion of dedicated FTE resource measured above or directly Systems Allocated to General Service and Investment and change by internal service user For the purposes of concept illustration only. Inferred allocations are indicative.

Current state General Services - People Current allocations of people costs to the 21 service lines are based on pre DSC and Project Nexus allocations of personnel. Support allocations are also based on these FTE allocations Operations Direct People Cost Customer Department Reporting team A C D A B D A B C D Operations Support People Cost Customer Department Reporting team A C D A B D A B C D Total General Service People Cost For the purposes of concept illustration only. Inferred allocations are indicative. A B C D

Proposed future state General Services -People We have changed our ways of working following Nexus go live. This will reflect in the FTE allocation for the individual service lines, respecting the current cost allocation principles Operations Direct People Cost Customer Department Reporting Team A D A D A B C D Operations Support People Cost Customer Department Reporting Team A D A D A B C D Total General Service People Cost For the purposes of concept illustration only. Inferred allocations are indicative. A B C D

Current state Investment and Change - People Costs allocated to constituencies where possible on a usage basis. Where this is not possible, people costs are currently allocated on a basis of adjusted MTB charge (taking into account dedicated constituency MTB spend) Constituency a Constituency b Constituency c Constituency d Direct Investment 1 Direct Investment 2 Direct Change 3 Common investment and change people costs For the purposes of concept illustration only. Inferred allocations are indicative. These people costs are fully loaded, including support services

Proposed Investment and Change - People Costs will continue to be allocated to constituencies where possible on a usage basis. We have more visibility of these costs. Where this is not possible, our reporting structure has improved to give a more reliable allocation for project resource Constituency a Constituency b Constituency c Constituency d Direct Investment 3 Direct Investment 7 Direct Change 8 Common investment and change people costs For the purposes of concept illustration only. Inferred allocations are indicative. These people costs are fully loaded, including support services

Systems - Input costs to applications & shared services System Input cost component “New” UK Link Gemini CMS IX Support Component Shared Desktop / Network -  Environment & Code Mgmt UK Link Hosting Other Hosting (inc helpdesk) Telecoms & IX Connections S/W Licence - SAP S/W Licence - Oracle S/W Licence – Application Specific S/W Licence – Other System Maintenance Application Support Application descriptions have been updated and there is a more distinct allocation of Input costs

Challenges Support Component costs We propose to allocate the costs of support components across those applications they support using total cost. There doesn’t appear to be a quick win for allocating costs of “New” UKLink between:- “Old” UK Link and subsequently to SPA, Invoicing, Sites & Meters functionality Information Provisioning and Data Enquiry We would be interested in understand if you have similar issues and how you resolved them.

Applications / Shared to Service Lines Current Service Line Allocation Method Review Conclusion UK Link - SPA 100% to SL 1 Manage the Supply Point register No change UK Link – S&M Database Multiple SLs To be reviewed UK Link - Invoicing 100% to SL 7 Invoicing UK Link – Information Provisioning 100% to SL 18 Provision of User reports and Information UK Link – Data Enquiry Specific Service Gemini 100% to SL 20 Gemini System Services CMS 100% to SL 2 Provide Query Management IX 100% to UK Link Services Connections – Specific Service Other shared Prorata based on FTE 1:1 Application to Service Line relationships are still fit for purpose, Sites & Meters database element of UK Link may need to be revisited

Property & Other Bought In Services Current Service Line Allocation Method Review Conclusion M Numbers 100% to SL16 – Provision of Supply Point Info… No change Lansdowne Gate Property Prorated to Direct FTE by SL Data Recorders 100% to SL15 – Demand Estimation AUGE 100% to SL3 – Record, Submit Data in Compliance with UNC PAFA Others (Finance, Insurance, HR etc) The current Service Line allocation method is still fit for purpose