Maryland State Coaches’ Meeting AM Session

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The NDPC-SD Intervention Framework National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University © 2007 NDPC-SD – All rights reserved.
Advertisements

Targeted & Individual Systems of Support Lori Newcomer, Ph.D. Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri – Columbia OSEP Center for Positive Behavior Interventions.
School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports & Students with Autism Jointly developed by the above organizations with funding from the U.S.
Sustained Implementation of School-wide PBIS for All Students George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of.
Responsiveness to Intervention & School-wide Positive Behavior Support George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Aligning Resource for School Improvement: Getting Everyone on Same Page George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Overview of SW-PBIS Cohort 10 ( ) Metro RIP (Regional Implementation Project) November 6, 2013 Shoreview Community Center T. J. Larson, MAT Barack.
Coaching for Implementation: Best Practices Perspective George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
SWPBS: Preventing & Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Optional PBIS Coaches Meeting November 15, 2010 Tier 2 and Tier 3 Interventions and Supports.
Welcome! October VTPBiS Regional Coordinators Meeting.
Preventing & Responding to Problem Behavior: Review of Best Practice
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports CCSD
SWPBS: Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
School Discipline Institute “Meeting the Challenge” 2012 Safe & Healthy Students Conference Washington DC George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral.
Establishing Multi-tiered Behavior Support Frameworks to Achieve Positive School-wide Climate George Sugai Tim Lewis Rob Horner University of Connecticut.
John Carter Project Coordinator PBIS Idaho: Menu button: Idaho PBIS Presentations and Webinars.
CT PBS Coaches’ Meeting Coaching SWPBS Basics December 9, 2008 Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu, & George Sugai.
Multi-tiered Behavior Frameworks Developing Implementation Capacity OSEP & OSHS Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports.
Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports: School-based Prevention George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership George Sugai & Susan Barrettt OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut February 14,
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Outcomes, Data, Practices, & Systems George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University.
Preparing for End & Beginning SWPBS Year: Evaluation & Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Training/Coaching Meeting & Team Training Debriefing George Sugai Center for Behavioral Education & Research Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions.
SWPBS: Implementing with Accuracy & Durability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut May.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Supporting and Evaluating Broad Scale Implementation of Positive Behavior Support Teri Lewis-Palmer University of Oregon.
V 2.1 Tier II Critical Features Building the Infrastructure to Support Tier 2.
Intensive Positive Behavior Support -- Secondary and Tertiary Behavioral Interventions Bruce Stiller, Ph.D.; Celeste Rossetto Dickey, M.Ed.
Coordinator Orientation for PBIS at the Universal Level April 9, 2015.
RTI: Reasons, Practices, Systems, & Considerations George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut December 6,
SWPBS Coaching: More than Reminders Donald H. Eichhorn Middle School Team & Coaches George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education &
A Framework for Making a Difference Rob Horner, University of Oregon Deputy Director of the Research to Practice Division for the U.S. Department of Education’s.
Sustained Implementation of Tiered System of Behavior Support George Sugai Center for Behavioral Education & Research Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions.
SWPBS: Sustainability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut March.
SWPBS: Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
School-Wide PBIS: Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut August 11, 2008.
Systems Logic for Sustained Large Scale Implementation George Sugai National Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports UConn Center for Behavioral.
“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett Cyndi Boezio,
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 SRIP – Cohort 9 August 2014.
SWPBS Fidelity & Sustainability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
Coaching for Implementation: Best Practices Perspective George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut May 9,
Introduction to PBIS Forum George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut October
Systems, Data, & Practices to Move PBIS Forward in Ravenswood City School District Sheldon Loman, Ph.D.
Coaches Corner: Kathryn Schallmo MiBLSi Director.
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 Continuum of Support *
Coaching for Implementation: Best Practices Perspective George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
Coaching PLC April 5, 2011 Pat Mueller
District Leadership SCCOE October,  How are things going with this first SW-PBIS cohort? What has worked? What are challenges? What tangible outcomes.
SWPBS: Implementation Fidelity & Durability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut Apr 7,
School Climate Transformation Grants SEA Session October
RDQ 5 District Coaching Capacity Discussion Leader: George Sugai, University of Connecticut.
Impacting Students with Autism through All 3 Tiers of PBIS
IL PBIS 2008: Leadership Lucille, Holly, Kelly, Diane, Brandi, Seth, Rob & George OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University.
SWPBS: Sustainability
Coordinator Orientation for PBIS at the Universal Level
SWPBS Overview: Establishing Continuum of Support for All
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support
PBIS PRACTICES.
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
Reaching All Students: RtI & SWPBS
Evidence-Based Intervention Practices
Adapted from Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu,& George Sugai, 2008
Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports Implementation
DW Leadership: Sustainable & Scalable SWPBS
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS)
MN SW Positive Behavior Support Initiative
District Leadership SCCOE
Presentation transcript:

Maryland State Coaches’ Meeting AM Session Participants will: Share and review experiences with teams with classroom strategies to improve behaviors Review Basic Behavior Principles Participate in analysis of coaching issues

General Considerations Who’s coaching? Who’s being coached? Who directly & indirectly benefits from coaching? What is being coached? Where does coaching occur? How are coaches prepared? Who coaches the coaches? How is coaching provided? How is coaching implementation fidelity evaluated? How is coaching effectiveness evaluated? Are practice implementation benefits meaningful?

Planning Questions 1. What elements, structures, activities, etc. define implementation approach of your organization? 2. What is purpose of coaching in implementation approach of your organization? 3. How are coaching functions or activities conducted within your implementation approach? 4. Who engages in above coaching functions within your implementation approach? 5. What are expected outcomes of effective coaching for your organization? 6. How does your organization evaluate implementation integrity of your coaching approach? 7. What resources are needed to implement sustainable & scalable coaching capacity?

Other implementation supports or drivers? 2. What is purpose of coaching in implementation approach of your organization? Who is “coached?” Why needed? Other implementation supports or drivers?

Coaching or Facilitation System capacity to organize personnel & resources to enhance….. Implementation approach Progress through implementation stages Implementation fidelity Student outcomes

Coaching Set of responsibilities, actions, activities …..not person Bridge between training & implementation ……not administrative accountability Positive & supportive resource & facilitation ….not nagging

3. How are coaching functions or activities conducted within your implementation approach? Internal v. external coaching Classroom Grade School District Regional State Continuum of intensity based on responsiveness Data-based, reporting, decision making, evaluation

COACHING FUNCTIONS(enabling) Guidance for team startup Technical assistance Resource access Problem solving Data-based decision making Positive reinforcement Prompting & reminding Communications network

23 ALL SOME FEW Tertiary Prevention: Specialized CONTINUUM OF Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT FEW ~5% Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior ~15% SOME Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings 23 ALL ~80% of Students

23 Continuum of Support for ALL Intensive Few Targeted Some Universal NOTICE GREEN GOES IS FOR “ALL” All Dec 7, 2007

Continuum of Support for ALL Universal Targeted Intensive Math Science Spanish Reading Soc skills NOTICE GREEN GOES IS FOR “ALL” Soc Studies Basketball Label behavior…not people Dec 7, 2007

Continuum of Support for ALL Universal Targeted Intensive Anger man. Prob Sol. Ind. play Adult rel. Attend. NOTICE GREEN GOES IS FOR “ALL” Baker, 2005 JPBI Coop play Peer interac Label behavior…not people Dec 7, 2007

ESTABLISHING CONTINUUM of SWPBS TERTIARY PREVENTION TERTIARY PREVENTION Function-based support Wraparound Person-centered planning ~5% ~15% SECONDARY PREVENTION Check in/out Targeted social skills instruction Peer-based supports Social skills club SECONDARY PREVENTION PRIMARY PREVENTION Teach SW expectations Proactive SW discipline Positive reinforcement Effective instruction Parent engagement PRIMARY PREVENTION ~80% of Students

4. Who engages in above coaching functions within your implementation approach? Content fluency Experience w/ practice implementation On going coaching opportunities Established engagement skills

Continuum of Coaching Functions * SchPsy * SW * SCoun * SpEd * Admin * BehSpc * Anyone w/ opportunity to coach State District School Classroom Student

5. What are expected outcomes of effective coaching for your organization? Implementation accuracy & fluency of evidence-based practice Maximum student outcomes Durable & generalizable implementation Implementaiton-outcome accountability

“Easier to coach what you know & have experienced.” Coaching linked to implementation team Coaching training linked with team training Coaches participate in team training New teams added with increased coaching fluency Coaching capacity integrated into existing personnel Supervisor approved & endorsed District agreements & support given Coaches experienced with team implementation District-wide coordination provided Regularly meetings for prompting celebrating, problem solving etc.

6. How does your organization evaluate implementation integrity of your coaching approach? Specified outcomes Formative self-assessments & checklists Data-based supervision & integrated professional development Reporting, monitoring, performance feedback

7. What resources are needed to implement sustainable & scalable coaching capacity? Professional development Supervision & coordination Time & scheduling Performance monitoring & informative feedback