Improving Outcomes for Children and Youth: Foster Care Redesign

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Continuous Quality Improvement Process Empowering staff to develop local level solutions.
Advertisements

Foster Care Redesign: Region 3b
Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs). 2 Child Welfare Final Rule (excerpt from Executive Summary) The child and family services reviews … [focus]
CW/MH Learning Collaborative First Statewide Leadership Convening Lessons Learned from the Readiness Assessment Tools Lisa Conradi, PsyD Project Co-Investigator.
1 Child and Family Services Review Program Improvement Plan Kick-Off Division/Staff Name Date (7/30/07)
1 THE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES REVIEW (CFSR) PRACTICE PRINCIPLES: Critical Principles for Assessing and Enhancing the Service Array The Service Array.
1 CFSR STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT LESSONS LEARNED (State) CFSR Kick Off (Date)
Seeing the Forest and the Trees National Title IV-E Roundtable June 2-4, 2015, MN Collaboration with Private Partners Andrea Hightower Strategic Partnerships.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
Promoting Increased School Stability & Permanence
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
AB490 + San Francisco County’s Interagency Agreement.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
1 What does your Provider Organization need to know and get ready for DFCS Opportunities?
Family Team Meeting Policy Updates Presented by Mitzie Smith August 10, 2009.
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
204: Assessing Safety in Out-of-Home Care Updates.
Single Source Continuum Contractor For Foster Care Redesign.
Georgia Georgia’s Lead Agency Plan Georgia 2 KVC Behavioral Healthcare The lead agency in the North East Region of Kansas and Metro Kansas City, Kansas.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
1 Executive Summary of the Strategic Plan and Proposed Action Steps January 2013 Healthy, Safe, Smart and Strong 1.
Improving the Lives of Mariposa County’s Children and Families System Improvement Plan October 2008 Update.
1 1 Child Welfare Policy and Practice for Supervisors.
State Steering Committee
New Hanover County Schools
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
OACCA Residential Transformation Conference
No Place Like HOME Texas Kick Off Meeting
VCU Strategic Plan 2025: Excellence and Access
Bruce Grey Child and Family Services
Health Promotion We will improve the health and wellbeing of at-risk populations through targeted health promotion initiatives : Develop an approach to.
RECOGNIZING educator EXCELLENCE
Descriptive Analysis of Performance-Based Financing Education Project in Burundi Victoria Ryan World Bank Group May 16, 2017.
APS Strategic Plan Steering Committee
Florida Institute on Homelessness & Affordable Housing Input Session
Youth Participatory Evaluation in a Public School District
What IS a Collaborative?
Texas Homeless Network Conference
Continuum of care for the homeless
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
CASA of Adams and Broomfield Counties
Opportunities for Growth
House Human Services Committee Interim Charge: Foster Care Redesign
Care Coordination Work Group Meeting December 12, 2017
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
FSCD Policy Changes and Practice Shift
Foster Care Redesign: Improving Child/Youth Placement Outcomes
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
Presentation to the Senate Finance Committee
Roles and Responsibilities
DFPS Stakeholder Meeting on: Strategic Plan for FY and Potential Exceptional Items for FY April 27, 2010.
Key Stakeholders are aware of the Coalitions activities
Kuali Research Organizational Change Management
House Human Services Committee
Lecturette 1: Leveraging Change through Strategic Planning
Improving Child/Youth Placement Outcomes: A System Redesign
Looking Ahead and the Texas Need…
Lecturette 1: Leveraging Change through Strategic Planning
Presentation relating to monitoring the implementation of Foster Care Redesign House Committee on Human Services July 16, 2012 Howard G. Baldwin, Jr.,
Agenda Introductions What is a Unified Shelter Model?
Howard G. Baldwin, Jr. Commissioner
Permanency Planning Modified Manual
Performance and Quality Improvement
1915(c) WAIVER REDESIGN 2019 Brain Injury Summit
Improving Outcomes for Children and Youth: Foster Care Redesign
Legislative update 83rd Legislature
Ambulance RFP Process Town Hall March 2019 Jim Clark EMS Administrator
CBC Implementation Updates
Budgeting Conversation
Child Abuse and Neglect Institute
Presentation transcript:

Improving Outcomes for Children and Youth: Foster Care Redesign Public Private Partnership Meeting November 30, 2012

Agenda Welcome, Introductions and Opening Remarks Update on Foster Care Redesign Lessons Learned and Issues for Future Procurements Roles and Responsibilities of PPP FCR Evaluation Next Steps

Update On Foster Care Redesign Why the PPP Has Not Been Meeting Pending Contract Tentative Award Discussion Constraints DFPS Remains Committed to Stakeholder Involvement DFPS Remains Committed to Model and Implementation as Proposed By The PPP, Adopted by DFPS and Required by Senate Bill 218

Goal of Foster Care Redesign To improve outcomes for children and families by creating sustainable placement resources in communities that will meet the service needs of children and youth in foster care, using the least restrictive placement settings.

Quality Indicators Quality Indicators: First and foremost, all children and youth are safe from abuse and neglect in their placement. Children and youth are placed in their home communities. Children and youth are appropriately served in the least restrictive environment that supports minimal moves. Connections to family and others important to the child are maintained. Children and youth are placed with their siblings. Services respect the child’s culture. To be fully prepared for successful adulthood, youth are provided opportunities, experiences and activities similar to those experienced by their non-foster care peers. Youth are provided opportunities to participate in decisions that impact their lives

Benefits of a Community-Based Approach to Foster Care Children and youth receive services in their home communities Provides the opportunity for more frequent communication between the child, their family, friends, caseworker, CASA, attorney ad-litem, etc. SSCC is responsible for improving outcomes for local children, youth and families who originate from within the designated catchment area Allows flexibility in the design of a localized service delivery system based on the individual needs of the community

Today’s Meeting…. Future Focused Cannot Revisit Previous Procurement Decisions Cannot Discuss Proposals Submitted Want to Hear Your Ideas and Recommendations for Future Procurements DFPS – Ideas Regarding Future Procurements

DFPS: Future Procurements Additional Information In RFP On Resource Issues Resources to be Transferred and/or Include Methodology for Determining Resources to be Transferred Whether Startup Funding is Available To The SSCC and Specify Amount

DFPS: Future Procurements Licensing Bidders must be fully licensed as a CPA in Texas at the time that proposal is submitted Single branch license for catchment area

DFPS: Future Procurements Additional Information Regarding Expectations and Timing of Transfer of Legacy Children and DFPS Foster Homes SSCC Administrative Functions are to be Supported by the Resource Transfer and Other Funds Not Intended for Services to Children, Youth and Families Strengthen Model-specific RFP Evaluation Components

DFPS: Future Procurements Require SSCC Presence and Reinforce the Importance of SSCC Responsibility in Assessment, Placement of Children and In Developing Services Capacity Consider Including Exceptional Rate Funds in Blended Rate

Issues From Stakeholders

Conflict Of Interest If The SSCC Provides Services Response PPP Recommended Model Allow For Maximum Flexibility And Innovation Model should fit community Model should allow current providers to become SSCC Without Abandoning Primary Mission Limiting Model Limits Ability/Options to Develop Needed Capacity SSCC is Solely Responsible for Contract Performance Outcomes Regardless of Whether They Deliver Them Directly or Through a Sub-contractor

FAD Resources Should Be Pulled From Rate Response Blended Rate Developed Based on CPA Rate Inclusion in Rate Ensures Resource Growth and Foster Care Population Growth Stay in “Sync” Inclusion in Rate Provides Opportunity to Address Rising Costs

Catchment Area Should Be Smaller PPP Groups of counties in rural areas Groups of zip codes, school districts, etc., or counties in urban area Metro and non metro areas Sufficient size to be fiscally viable – 500 as determined by Chapin Hall DFPS Sufficient Size for Efficient Transfer of Resources Sufficient Size for Efficient Administration of Program

Break!

Feedback What is your response to what you just heard? What Issues and concerns do you have? What suggestions for improving future procurements do you have that have not yet been addressed? What kind of data needs to be included in RFP or procurement library? What could be done to encourage the maximum number of qualified bidders in the next procurement? 

Public-Private Partnership FCR Refine the Model Advocacy Quality Improvement Champion FCR Testimony Presentations Interviews Represent and communicate with constituent groups Keep DFPS apprised of constituency opinions, feelings and trends Assist in judicial and community level change activities Gather, review, evaluate and synthesize stakeholder input Review, research alternative foster care models Identify and recommend foster care improvements Advise DFPS re: provider and other stakeholder perspectives Participate in formulating evaluation questions Review, provide input on evaluation results Identify and recommend necessary model improvements

FCR Evaluation Collaboration & Survey of Employee Engagement UT Institute for Organizational Excellence Assess Organizational Climate and Collaboration Assess Changes Over Time Assessments to Include DFPS Staff and SSCC Staff

FCR Evaluation Process Evaluation of Phases I and II UT Child and Family Research Institute Evaluation of Implementation Two Waves of Data Collection Start Up Period Initial Months of Stage 1 Wave 1 90 days: start data collection 150 days: Finish data collection 180 days: preliminary report Wave 2 6 months: start data collection 9 months: finish data collection Report

FCR Evaluation Continuous Quality Improvement Chapin Hall (affiliate of the University of Chicago) B-T-A Process Focus on Outcomes Permanency Placement Stability Placement Proximity Re-Entries*

Next Steps

Adjourn