Water Quality Restoration Challenges

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TMDLs and the NACD TMDL Task Force TMDLs NACD TMDL Task Force TMDL Draft Policy Trading and TMDLs.
Advertisements

Prioritization Workgroup Summary. Workgroup Topics Nutrient results What is a watershed? What is a TMDL? Prioritization methods Basin framework and management.
Agriculture Best Management Practices Overview LEAD Workshop October 19, 2011 Darrell Smith.
Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool William Lazarus Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota David Mulla Department of.
Imperial River: Water Quality Status and Basin Management Action Plan.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
Lee County Government Division of Natural Resources TMDL/BMAP Update TMDL/BMAP Update November 30, 2010 Roland Ottolini, Director Lee County Division of.
Developing a Nutrient Management Plan for the Napa River Watershed Group Members Vinod Kella  Rebecca Kwaan  Luke Montague Linsey Shariq  Peng Wang.
Incorporating the 9-Elements into a WMP Lindsey PhillipsMike Archer Source Water CoordinatorState Lakes Coordinator (402) (402)
Water Policy in the US and the EU K H Reckhow and C Pahl-Wostl Part I: US Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Watershed Assessment 2015 Strategic Monitoring in the Florida Keys DEAR- Water Quality Assessment Program.
WEKIVA BASIN ONSITE SEWAGE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL SYSTEM STUDY Bureau of Onsite Sewage Programs Division of Environmental Health Florida Department of.
Tom Singleton Associate VP, Director, Integrated Water Resources an Atkins company Linking TMDLs & Environmental Restoration.
Alternative Onsite Sewage Systems: New Regulations & Issues for Localities Potomac Watershed Roundtable January 7, 2011 Thomas E. Crow, Director Division.
Watershed Planning: Current Status and Next Steps
Watershed Assessment and Diagnosis of Condition for August 20, 2007 Joe Magner and Greg Johnson MPCA.
Laila Racevskis 1, Tatiana Borisova 1, and Jennison Kipp 2 1 Assistant Professor, Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida 2 Resource.
Proposed Adaptive Management Plan Presented by the Great Bay Municipal Coalition Dover, Exeter, Newmarket, Portsmouth, and Rochester Dean Peschel
Orange Creek Basin Management Action Plan Alachua County Commission December 11, 2007 Fred Calder, FL DEP (850)
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program Status Update and Needs Assessment Presented by the Environmental Protection Division March 18, 2008.
Deployment of Microbial Source Tracking to Identify Sources of Fecal Pollution in Water C. Hagedorn, A. Hassall, M. Saluta, J. Dickerson, and T. Wade 1.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Upper Ocklawaha River DRAFT Basin Management Action Plan For the Implementation of Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) Adopted by the Florida Department.
Orange County Board of County Commissioners Update on USEPA Rulemaking for Numeric Nutrient Criteria Utilities Department January 26, 2010 Utilities Department.
Lake Jesup BMAP Adoption Environmental Protection Division February 23, 2010.
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
A Pivotal Moment for Leaders Across the Gulf Coast States and Connected Communities Throughout the Country.
Nutrient Effects on Springs Biota Synthesis: Springs Management and Research Needs Mark Brown & Richard Hamann.
Some Context behind the Implementation of Numeric Nutrient Criteria or Why do we have these Water Quality Regulations? Mark W. Clark and Thomas Obreza.
Tidal Monitoring and Analysis Workgroup (TMAW) Meeting February 7, 2013 Annapolis, MD Katie Foreman and Liza Hernandez University of Maryland Center for.
VACo Environment and Agriculture Steering Committee VML Environmental Policy Committee June 2, 2010 Charlottesville, VA Chesapeake Bay Watershed Roanoke.
Kentucky Growth Readiness for Water Quality Does your water quality matter?
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program Lake Jesup Basin Management Action Plan (BMAP) Environmental Protection Division September 1, 2009.
Maryland Association of Counties Conference August 12, 2009 Bob Koroncai USEPA Region III The Chesapeake Bay TMDL.
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
St. Johns River Water Management District Central Florida Water Initiative Water Supply Plan Mike Register, P.E., Director Division of Water Supply Planning.
Katherine Antos, Water Quality Team Leader Water Quality Goal Implementation Team Coordinator U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Chesapeake Bay Program.
Request approval to proceed to EMC with 2014 Tar-Pamlico River Basin Plan.
TMDL for Diazinon in Chollas Creek Watershed TMDL for Diazinon in Chollas Creek Watershed Linda Pardy (858) Jimmy.
Integrated Approach for Assessing and Communicating Progress toward the Chesapeake Bay Water-Quality Standards Scott Phillips USGS, STAR May 14, 2012 PSC.
Modeling Fecal Bacteria Fate and Transport to Address Pathogen Impairments in the United States Brian Benham Extension Specialist and Associate Professor,
Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,
IOWA NUTRIENT REDUCTION STRATEGY A science and technology-based framework to assess and reduce nutrients to Iowa waters and the Gulf of Mexico James Gillespie.
April 4, 2011 Princesa VanBuren Hansen Environmental Quality Board.
Fred Noble, P.E. State NPDES Administrator Florida Department of Transportation NPDES MS4 Permit Overview 2016 Maintenance Conference.
1 Staff Public Workshops Fall 2011 Policy for Siting, Design, Operation and Management of Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems San Luis Obispo: October.
K. Bruce Jones EPA Office of Research and Development U.S. EPA Science Advisory Board Regional Vulnerability Assessment Advisory Panel Meeting October,
Mary Apostolico Potomac Watershed Manager. Current Authorities for TMDL Process Federal Clean Water Act, § 303(d) - TMDL List & TMDL Development §303(e)
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Agriculture Initial Inspections Update
Project Schedule Final SWIM Plans GEBF Funding Request
CBP Update: Climate Change and the Chesapeake Bay TMDL
Bacteria SW-WLA Implementation Plans
SEPTIC TO SEWER Guidance Tool
Mulberry Watershed Management Plan
Fitting the pieces together
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Review of 20 Years of UOWN Data Trouble-Spots and Trends Todd Rasmussen UGA Hydrology & Water Resources.
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Jon Capacasa, Director Water Protection Division U.S. EPA Region III
The Nine Elements that Must Be Included in a 319 Watershed Based Plan
Upper Clark Fork Watershed Restoration and TMDLs
San Francisco Bay Water Board
SMR Nutrient Initiative Group Background Information Review
Agricultural Order 4.0 Discussion
Best Management Practices (BMP) Program
Central District overview and the 2016 Water Bill
Presentation transcript:

Water Quality Restoration Challenges Tom Frick, Director Division Environmental Assessment and Restoration April 2016

Water Quality Framework Set water quality standards Monitor water quality Determine pollution problems Establish restoration goals (TMDLs) Work with community leaders Develop and implement restoration plans (BMAPs) Measure success and adapt

Water Quality Restoration Watershed Restoration Act (403.067 F.S.) Enacted in 1999, amended in 2006 Gives DEP clear legal authority for TMDLs & BMAPs Requires “Good Science” - DEP to adopt methodology for determining impaired waters = Impaired Waters Rule (62- 303, FAC) Requires “Public Participation” 303(d) lists and BMAPs are adopted by DEP secretary TMDLs are adopted by rule Requires “equitable allocation” of load reductions

The Springs Challenge

Estuary Challenge 11/22/2018

OSTDS Initiative Objectives Plan Evaluate and collect scientific information Develop education plan Identify and develop projects to reduce loading Plan Prioritize areas where greatest risk exists Determine areas of opportunity (cost/benefit ratio) Identify and develop an OSTDS Plan that includes Cost-effective and financially feasible projects that targets the reduction of nutrients from OSTDS systems as needed. 11/22/2018

Septic Tank Study Objectives Better understand: Attenuation and leaching of nitrogen from existing septic systems into the soil and ground water Conditions that may influence nitrogen attenuation local to this area Soil characteristics Geology, ground water recharge and flow pathways Septic system construction, age and usage Influence from other nitrogen sources Findings can be used to help us all understand how to best prioritize efforts and money spent to reduce nitrogen loads to the system. 7410

Septic Tank Study 11/22/2018

Tom Frick Thomas.frick@dep.state.fl.us (850) 245-7518 Contact Tom Frick Thomas.frick@dep.state.fl.us (850) 245-7518