The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2 Mismatch Repair Protein Localizes to Recombination Intermediates In Vivo  Elizabeth Evans, Neal Sugawara, James E Haber,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Mre11 Complex Is Required for Repair of Hairpin-Capped Double-Strand Breaks and Prevention of Chromosome Rearrangements  Kirill S. Lobachev, Dmitry.
Advertisements

Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
Daniel Chi-Hong Lin, Alan D Grossman  Cell 
The INO80 Complex Removes H2A
Sherif Abou Elela, Haller Igel, Manuel Ares  Cell 
MEC1-Dependent Redistribution of the Sir3 Silencing Protein from Telomeres to DNA Double-Strand Breaks  Kevin D Mills, David A Sinclair, Leonard Guarente 
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Erik D. Larson, W. Jason Cummings, David W. Bednarski, Nancy Maizels 
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 86, Issue 6, Pages (September 1996)
The Small RNA IstR Inhibits Synthesis of an SOS-Induced Toxic Peptide
Volume 117, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 119, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 14, Issue 19, Pages (October 2004)
MEC1-Dependent Redistribution of the Sir3 Silencing Protein from Telomeres to DNA Double-Strand Breaks  Kevin D Mills, David A Sinclair, Leonard Guarente 
Regulation of CSF1 Promoter by the SWI/SNF-like BAF Complex
An Acetylation Switch in p53 Mediates Holo-TFIID Recruitment
Branden Wolner, Stephen van Komen, Patrick Sung, Craig L. Peterson 
Jung-Ok Han, Sharri B Steen, David B Roth  Molecular Cell 
DNA Transposition by the RAG1 and RAG2 Proteins
Xinyang Zhao, P.Shannon Pendergrast, Nouria Hernandez  Molecular Cell 
Components and Dynamics of DNA Replication Complexes in S
Sean D. Taverna, Robert S. Coyne, C.David Allis  Cell 
Recruitment of the INO80 Complex by H2A Phosphorylation Links ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodeling with DNA Double-Strand Break Repair  Haico van Attikum,
Neal Sugawara, Xuan Wang, James E. Haber  Molecular Cell 
Hideo Tsubouchi, G.Shirleen Roeder  Developmental Cell 
Regulation of Telomere Elongation by the Cyclin-Dependent Kinase CDK1
The INO80 Complex Removes H2A
The Fuss about Mus81  James E Haber, Wolf-Dietrich Heyer  Cell 
Progressive Structural Transitions within Mu Transpositional Complexes
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Rif1 and Rif2 Inhibit Localization of Tel1 to DNA Ends
Marie Frank-Vaillant, Stéphane Marcand  Molecular Cell 
Chromosomal Rearrangements Occur in S
Three-Site Synapsis during Mu DNA Transposition: A Critical Intermediate Preceding Engagement of the Active Site  Mark A Watson, George Chaconas  Cell 
Olivier Humbert, Nancy Maizels  Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids 
A CRISPR Approach to Gene Targeting
Olga Tsaponina, James E. Haber  Molecular Cell 
Hansen Du, Haruhiko Ishii, Michael J. Pazin, Ranjan Sen  Molecular Cell 
Brh2 Promotes a Template-Switching Reaction Enabling Recombinational Bypass of Lesions during DNA Synthesis  Nayef Mazloum, William K. Holloman  Molecular.
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 15, Issue 18, Pages (September 2005)
Allyson M Holmes, James E Haber  Cell 
Julien Soudet, Pascale Jolivet, Maria Teresa Teixeira  Molecular Cell 
Robin M. Ricke, Anja-Katrin Bielinsky  Molecular Cell 
Tagging of the endogenous Py03652 gene with the gfp gene in Plasmodium yoelii. Tagging of the endogenous Py03652 gene with the gfp gene in Plasmodium yoelii.
Template Switching by RNA Polymerase II In Vivo
Homology Requirements and Competition between Gene Conversion and Break- Induced Replication during Double-Strand Break Repair  Anuja Mehta, Annette Beach,
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
Volume 117, Issue 1, Pages (April 2004)
XRCC3 Controls the Fidelity of Homologous Recombination
At Loose Ends: Resecting a Double-Strand Break
Volume 88, Issue 2, Pages (January 1997)
Beyond Homing: Competition between Intron Endonucleases Confers a Selective Advantage on Flanking Genetic Markers  Heidi Goodrich-Blair, David A Shub 
Excision of the Drosophila Mariner Transposon Mos1
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
Scott J Diede, Daniel E Gottschling  Current Biology 
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
Simon W.-L Chan, Elizabeth H Blackburn  Molecular Cell 
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
Volume 134, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (March 2015)
Meiotic DNA Breaks at the S. pombe Recombination Hot Spot M26
Presentation transcript:

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2 Mismatch Repair Protein Localizes to Recombination Intermediates In Vivo  Elizabeth Evans, Neal Sugawara, James E Haber, Eric Alani  Molecular Cell  Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages 789-799 (May 2000) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80319-6

Figure 1 Diagram of Recombination Substrates Used in This Study and a Proposed Model for the Removal of Nonhomologous DNA Ends during Double-Strand Break Repair (A) Schematic diagram of plasmids. pFP122-H contains inverted repeats of E. coli lacZ sequences (black bars) that can undergo homologous recombination. One copy (the recipient) contains a HO endonuclease cleavage site (HOcs), while the donor has a single nucleotide change that prevents HO cleavage. In pFP120-TN, an internal 918 bp segment of the lacZ donor has been deleted (dashed line), resulting in a block of nonhomology in the recipient sequence flanking the HO cut site (hatched bars). In pFP125-N, the donor sequence has been removed (dashed line). Sites A–E represent the region amplified by primer pairs used in chromatin IP. Site C spans a unique junction in the donor copy of lacZ in pFP120-TN due to the deletion. (B) Model for removal of nonhomologous ends during double-strand break repair (Sugawara et al. 1997). (I) A DSB is formed in nonhomologous sequences embedded within a homologous region. (II) DSB ends are processed to form single-stranded tails that engage in a homology search. (III) Pairing of homologous sequences leads to extrusion of an unpaired tail. Msh2p-Msh3p binds and stabilizes the junction between homologous and nonhomologous DNA, allowing cleavage by Rad1p-Rad10p. (IV) Repair synthesis leads to completion of gene conversion with or without crossing over. Molecular Cell 2000 5, 789-799DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80319-6)

Figure 2 Msh2p Specifically Cross-Links to Plasmids Induced for DSBR by HO Endonuclease Cleavage EAY668 was transformed with pFP120-TN (EAY642), pFP125-N (EAY643), and pFP122-H (EAY673). The resulting strains were grown in selective media, transferred to YP + 2% lactate, and grown to mid log phase at 30°C. Formation of the double-strand break by HO endonuclease was induced by the addition of 2% galactose. At the indicated times, cell aliquots were treated with formaldehyde and subjected to chromatin IP with 12CA5 antibody. Input extract (no IP) was processed in parallel. Following reversal of the cross-links, purified DNA was used as the template for PCR with the indicated primer pair (see Experimental Procedures). Products were visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis, and reverse images of ethidium bromide stained gels are shown. (A) (Left) Products of 28 cycles of PCRs with primer pair A (recipient) and B (vector) using DNA from a time course of EAY642 (pFP120-TN) with IP for Msh2p (upper) or with no IP (lower). (Right) The top graph displays the relative increase in PCR product formed at site A (open squares) and site E (open circles) following chromatin IP of cells induced with galactose, or at site A for cells mock induced with glucose (closed circles). The bottom graph displays the results of PCR at site B (open squares) and site D (open circles) from chromatin IP after galactose induction. (B) (Left) Products of 28 cycles of PCR with primer pairs A and B using DNA derived from the time course of EAY643 (pFP125-N) with IP for Msh2p (upper) or with no IP (lower). (Right) The top graph displays the relative increase in PCR product formed at site A after chromatin IP (squares). The bottom graph displays the relative increase in PCR product at site B (squares). (C) (Left) Products of 27 cycles of PCR with primer pair A using DNA from a time course of EAY673 (pFP122-H) with IP for Msh2p (top) or with no IP (bottom). (Right) The graph displays the relative increase in PCR product formed after chromatin IP of cells induced with galactose at site A (squares). Molecular Cell 2000 5, 789-799DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80319-6)

Figure 3 Msh2p Interacts with Donor Sequences on pFP120-TN DNA derived from a EAY642 time course was analyzed as described in Figure 2A, using PCR primer pair A (recipient, open squares) and primer pair C (donor, closed circles). Molecular Cell 2000 5, 789-799DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80319-6)

Figure 4 Msh2p Cross-Linking Near the DSB Site Depends on Msh3p and Rad50p, but Not Msh6p or Rad1p Wild type (EAY642; see Figure 2B), and msh3Δ (EAY679), msh6Δ (EAY678), rad1Δ (EAY675), and rad50Δ (EAY676) deletion derivatives carrying pFP125-N were induced for DSB formation and analyzed by chromatin IP for Msh2p as described in Figure 2B using PCR primer pair A (recipient). Experiments were each repeated two to three times; representative data are shown. Molecular Cell 2000 5, 789-799DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80319-6)

Figure 5 Msh2p Localizes to DSBR Intermediates prior to the Requirement for Rad52p Experimental and PCR conditions were as described in Figure 2A (pFP120-TN) and 2C (pFP122-H). Purified DNA from no IP (input) and IP samples was subjected to PCR with primer pairs A (recipient), B (vector), and C (donor) as indicated. (A) Chromatin IP time course of a rad52Δ strain carrying pFP120-TN (EAY672). In the graph, open squares represent relative PCR amplification at site A (recipient) and closed circles represent site C (donor). (B) Chromatin IP time course of a rad52Δ strain carrying pFP122-H (EAY674). A short time course of a wild-type strain carrying pFP122-H (EAY673) is also shown (also see Figure 2C). The upper graph depicts the experiment shown to the right with PCR amplification at recipient site A for rad52Δ (open squares), and wild type (closed circles). The lower graph represents the same analysis of an independent time course. Molecular Cell 2000 5, 789-799DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80319-6)

Figure 6 Two Steps in Recombination in which the Msh2p-Msh3p Complex May Interact with Recombination Intermediates (A) Msh2p-Msh3p loads onto DSB sites at recessed ends (1) and/or plays an active role in scanning hDNA, interacting with mispairs formed during pairing of homeologous sequences (2), leading to their rejection from heteroduplex. (B) Msh2p-Msh3p binds at the junction of homologous and nonhomologous DNA allowing for cleavage of unpaired tails by Rad1p-Rad10p (3). Molecular Cell 2000 5, 789-799DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80319-6)