Discourse Measurement

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol
Advertisements

GUIDED GROUP WORK IN MATHEMATICS
Checking For Understanding
Wesnesday, January 30, 2013 PS 153 Paul Perskin CFN 204.
Mathematics Framework: Instructional Strategies and Modeling June 26, :30-3:30.
Common Core Planning for Content & Practice Preparing Los Angeles Students for College and Career.
TEAM-Math and AMSTI Professional Mathematics Learning Communities Building Classroom Discourse.
Mathematics Instructional Strategies In the Age of Common Core State Standards.
Productive Math Talk Math Alliance April 3, 2012.
Big Ideas and Problem Solving in Junior Math Instruction
Classroom Discussions: Math Discourse in Action
Reading Comprehension
Instructional Elements Key Components to the Lesson.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Functions A Close Look at Grade 9 Module.
Making Group Work Productive PowerPoints available at Click on “Resources”
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Grade 5 Module 2.
Do Now Table Dilemma Square tables at Giovanni’s Pizza seat 4 people each. For bigger groups, square tables can be joined. Tables can be pushed together.
Universal Access/SDAIE Session 3: Lesson Planning Protocol - Language Objectives Title III Access to Core Professional Development Office of.
Instructional Strategies That Support Mathematical Problem Solving Janis FreckmannBeth SchefelkerMilwaukee Public Schools
Elementary Formative Assessment Re-engagement Lessons Using Student Work.
Based on the work of Dr. M.S. Smith, University of Pgh. Key Ingredients to Developing Mathematical Understanding: Anticipating, Monitoring, Selecting,
Math Fellows January 22, Setting Goals and Selecting Tasks 1.Anticipating 2.Monitoring 3.Selecting 4.Sequencing 5.Connecting The Five Practices.
Strategic Teaching Planning Activities Presented by: Jennie Barrett-Middle School Literacy Coach Sandy Luster-High School Literacy Coach Department.
On Going Support Training October 13, 2015 Grades 6-8 Presenters: Doug Mitzel, Deb Stetson, Pat Gibson, Fran Gibson.
1 Learning to Lead Mathematics Professional Development.
On Going Support Training October 22, 2015 Grades 4-5 Presenters: Julie Villeneuve, Fran Gibson, and Kami Cadeaux.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental I: Core Curriculum & Instruction Session 3.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
TEACHER RESPONSIBILITY STUDENT RESPONSIBILITY Focus Lesson Guided Instruction “I do it” “We do it” “You do it together” Collaborative Independent “You.
On Going Support Training November 12, 2015 Grades 2-3 Presenters: Julie Villeneuve, Fran Gibson, and Pat Gibson.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus- Grade 3.
VIDEO ANALYSIS OF TEACHING ASSESSMENT OF CLINICAL PRACTICE ECE Spring 2014 By: Megan McGuire.
5 Practices for Orchestrating productive math discussions
Expanding and Factoring Algebraic Expressions
Math 6-8: The Standards in Practice: A Common Core Lesson
Welcome!! Please sit in teams of 4
Big Ideas & Problem Solving A look at Problem Solving in the Primary Classroom Lindsay McManus.
Discourse Measurement
CHAPTER 4 Planning in the Problem-Based Classroom
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 7
On Going Support Training October 22, 2015 Grades 4-5
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Measuring Polygon Side Lengths
Discourse Measurement
Mathematics and Special Education Leadership Protocols
Submitted by Amy Mullin March 12, 2014
On Going Support Training October 13, 2015 Grades 6-8
Module 4 Planning for Peer Coaching Peer Coach Training
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Discourse Measurement
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Common Core State Standards Standards for Mathematical Practice
Discourse Measurement
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Effective Learning Environment Video
Teaching for Understanding
Group Talk Feedback – A focus on the individual
CCSS 101: Standards for Mathematical Practice
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Discourse Measurement
Discourse Measurement
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Discourse Measurement
Tiered Instruction.
New York City Mathematics Project Tammy La Guarina October 28, 2017
Bellwork: Student Engagement Chart
PRIME+ Day 1 September 24, 2013 Welcome to PRIME+
SUPPORTING THE Progress Report in MATH
Shake, Rattle, and Roll: Using Games in Math Workshop, Grades 3-5
Conceptual Understanding in Mathematics Grades 3-5
Presentation transcript:

Discourse Measurement Scale 0 - No opportunity given 1 - Opportunity provided, but students were off task 2 - One proficient characteristic observed 3 – Two proficient characteristics observed 4 – Three proficient characteristics observed 3 Characteristics: Focused 3+Turns Turns build Review characteristics Provide discourse form

Discourse Quality 2.5 1.5 2 min

Peer Dependent Talk Time 32% 22% 1 min Fall average: 22% Spring average: 32%

Goals for 2016 - 17 2.75 40% Discourse Quality: Peer Dependent Talk Time: 2.75 40%

The Five Practices Anticipating Monitoring Selecting Sequencing Connecting The five practices are: Anticipating likely student responses to mathematical tasks While students working on the tasks (in pairs or small groups), Monitoring students’ actual responses to the tasks Selecting particular students to present their mathematical responses during the whole class discussion Purposefully sequencing when these student responses are shared during the discussion Helping the class make mathematical connections between different students’ responses As you can see, each of these has been discussed separately by various authors; our contribution here is to integrate them into a single package. 4 min

Anticipating What strategies are students likely to use to solve the math task? Where will students get stuck (potential misconceptions)? What strategies are likely to be most useful in addressing the math goal? 2 min

Monitoring Keep the mathematical goal in mind. Roaming while observing and listening. Keep track of what you are seeing and hearing. Ask questions to help make students thinking visible, to help students clarify their thinking, and to make sure students are engaged. Obviously we can’t monitor student work here, but there are strategies we can use while monitoring. There is a misconception that students must work on this on their own and we remove ourselves from interacting with them. This is a time to listen in on conversations, to see what strategies students are using, to pull out the shepherding questions to assist students who are stuck. 3 min

Selecting Keep the mathematical goal in mind. Determine which ideas (what) and students (who) the teacher will focus on during the discussion. Selecting gives the teacher the control over what the whole class will discuss to guide the discussion toward the math goal. 1 min

Sequencing Keep the mathematical goal in mind. Sequencing is the process of determining the order in which to present student work. Order the work in such a way as to make the math accessible to all students and to build a mathematically coherent story line (more concrete and move to more abstract). 1 min

Connecting This practice is the most challenging and is embedded within the other practices. Teachers craft questions that will make the mathematics visible and understandable. End your lesson with direct instruction using student work and ideas to solidify the learning goal. This is not linear.

Grade Eight Derrick’s Dog Sitting and Darlene’s Dog Sitting are competing for business. Derrick’s company charges an initial fee of $9 plus $5 per hour. Darlene’s charges $3 per hour with an initial fee of $15. Find the number of hours for which the total cost will be the same for the two services. Math goal: Solve linear equations with the variable on both sides (8.EE.7). Silent read first Close eyes to visualize while presenter reads it

Anticipate Derrick’s Dog Sitting and Darlene’s Dog Sitting are competing for business. Derrick’s company charges an initial fee of $9 plus $5 per hour. Darlene’s charges $3 per hour with an initial fee of $15. Find the number of hours for which the total cost will be the same for the two services. With your elbow partner, anticipate the solution pathways students might take to solve this problem as well as potential misconceptions. Then discuss as an entire table. Independent / Partner / Table

Anticipate/Select/Sequence As a table group, select three or four possible solution pathways. Work together to sequence the order in which you might share the pathways with your class. Partner –work together to sequence their anticipated approaches

Derrick’s Dog Sitting and Darlene’s Dog Sitting are competing for business. Derrick’s company charges an initial fee of $9 plus $5 per hour. Darlene’s charges $3 per hour with an initial fee of $15. After first piece of info: What is some more information that you want to know? After second piece of info: What math question could we ask? Find the number of hours for which the total cost will be the same for the two services.

Table Talk Curiosity Engagement Sense making How would engaging in the Prediction Lines Strategy change the way students experience and think about a problem? Curiosity Engagement Sense making Curiosity, engagement, sense making

Selecting/Sequencing Student Work With your elbow partner, examine the student work provided. Determine how you might sequence the solution paths. Collaborate with your table to come to a consensus regarding the most powerful way to sequence these student examples. Partner then table Facilitate discussion – have participants show on their whiteboards the symbol corresponding to the piece of student work they sequenced first, next ….

Questioning/Connecting Work with your table group. Create a question you might pose based on the student work on the doc cam. Write the question on your white board. Student work under camera – partners One person from each table stands and reads question.

Connecting How might we best connect the thinking shown in the selected pieces of student work? What might be our next step in the lesson to best emphasize our math goal? Math goal: Solve linear equations with the variable on both sides (8.EE.7). Connecting Setup for present to connect the student ideas

Application Continue utilizing the 5 Practices to support mathematical discourse in your classroom. Pay special attention to questioning and connecting. Be prepared to share your experiences at our next meeting.

Remember… Standards don’t teach, teachers teach Processes are as important as content This work is difficult and unlikely to be done alone!