Clarissa A. Henry, Sharon L. Amacher  Developmental Cell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Single-cell internalization during zebrafish gastrulation
Advertisements

Fate Restriction in the Growing and Regenerating Zebrafish Fin
Federica Bertocchini, Claudio D. Stern  Developmental Cell 
Reena Shakya, Tomoko Watanabe, Frank Costantini  Developmental Cell 
VEGF Gene Delivery to Muscle
Tony DeFalco, Nicole Camara, Stéphanie Le Bras, Mark Van Doren 
Martin Gering, Roger Patient  Developmental Cell 
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 2004)
Distinct Origins of Adult and Embryonic Blood in Xenopus
Wnt/β-Catenin and Fgf Signaling Control Collective Cell Migration by Restricting Chemokine Receptor Expression  Andy Aman, Tatjana Piotrowski  Developmental.
The Neural Plate Specifies Somite Size in the Xenopus laevis Gastrula
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Benjamin L. Martin, David Kimelman  Developmental Cell 
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Direct fusion lines allow fluorescent visualization of plasmatocyte nuclei, the cytoplasm, or the cytoskeleton in embryos from stage (St) 8 onwards. Direct.
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages e3 (December 2017)
Muscle Building Developmental Cell
Planar Cell Polarity Genes Regulate Polarized Extracellular Matrix Deposition during Frog Gastrulation  Toshiyasu Goto, Lance Davidson, Makoto Asashima,
Vagus Motor Neuron Topographic Map Determined by Parallel Mechanisms of hox5 Expression and Time of Axon Initiation  Gabrielle R. Barsh, Adam J. Isabella,
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Metabolic Regulation of Cellular Plasticity in the Pancreas
Calcium signaling during convergent extension in Xenopus
The Conserved Immunoglobulin Superfamily Member SAX-3/Robo Directs Multiple Aspects of Axon Guidance in C. elegans  Jennifer A Zallen, B.Alexander Yi,
Act up Controls Actin Polymerization to Alter Cell Shape and Restrict Hedgehog Signaling in the Drosophila Eye Disc  Aude Benlali, Irena Draskovic, Dennis.
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Canonical Wnt Signaling Dynamically Controls Multiple Stem Cell Fate Decisions during Vertebrate Body Formation  Benjamin L. Martin, David Kimelman  Developmental.
Regulation of Temporal Identity Transitions in Drosophila Neuroblasts
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Guillaume Halet, John Carroll  Developmental Cell 
A Crucial Interaction between Embryonic Red Blood Cell Progenitors and Paraxial Mesoderm Revealed in spadetail Embryos  Laurel A. Rohde, Andrew C. Oates,
Le A. Trinh, Didier Y.R Stainier  Developmental Cell 
BMP Signaling Protects Telencephalic Fate by Repressing Eye Identity and Its Cxcr4- Dependent Morphogenesis  Holger Bielen, Corinne Houart  Developmental.
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Christian Schröter, Andrew C. Oates  Current Biology 
Petra Haas, Darren Gilmour  Developmental Cell 
Katie S. Kindt, Gabriel Finch, Teresa Nicolson  Developmental Cell 
Benjamin L. Martin, David Kimelman  Developmental Cell 
Sonic hedgehog and vascular endothelial growth factor Act Upstream of the Notch Pathway during Arterial Endothelial Differentiation  Nathan D. Lawson,
Volume 15, Issue 15, Pages (August 2005)
The BMP Signaling Gradient Patterns Dorsoventral Tissues in a Temporally Progressive Manner along the Anteroposterior Axis  Jennifer A. Tucker, Keith.
The Chemokine SDF1a Coordinates Tissue Migration through the Spatially Restricted Activation of Cxcr7 and Cxcr4b  Guillaume Valentin, Petra Haas, Darren.
Anne Pelissier, Jean-Paul Chauvin, Thomas Lecuit  Current Biology 
Reinhard W. Köster, Scott E. Fraser  Current Biology 
Zebrafish pea3 and erm are general targets of FGF8 signaling
RNAi of the receptor tyrosine phosphatase HmLAR2 in a single cell of an intact leech embryo leads to growth-cone collapse  Michael W. Baker, Eduardo R.
Bmp2 Signaling Regulates the Hepatic versus Pancreatic Fate Decision
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Independent assignment of antero-posterior and dorso-ventral positional values in the developing chick hindbrain  Horst Simon, Amata Hornbruch, Andrew.
Won-Suk Chung, Didier Y.R. Stainier  Developmental Cell 
Tilak Das, Bernhard Payer, Michel Cayouette, William A. Harris  Neuron 
Volume 15, Issue 15, Pages (August 2005)
Yu-Chiun Wang, Zia Khan, Eric F. Wieschaus  Developmental Cell 
Julie E. Cooke, Hilary A. Kemp, Cecilia B. Moens  Current Biology 
Multiple Muscle Cell Identities Induced by Distinct Levels and Timing of Hedgehog Activity in the Zebrafish Embryo  Christian Wolff, Sudipto Roy, Philip.
Distinct mechanisms regulate slow-muscle development
The REF-1 Family of bHLH Transcription Factors Pattern C
Autonomous Modes of Behavior in Primordial Germ Cell Migration
Cell Movement Patterns during Gastrulation in the Chick Are Controlled by Positive and Negative Chemotaxis Mediated by FGF4 and FGF8  Xuesong Yang, Dirk.
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (April 2013)
Temporally Regulated Asymmetric Neurogenesis Causes Left-Right Difference in the Zebrafish Habenular Structures  Hidenori Aizawa, Midori Goto, Tomomi.
Islet Coordinately Regulates Motor Axon Guidance and Dendrite Targeting through the Frazzled/DCC Receptor  Celine Santiago, Greg J. Bashaw  Cell Reports 
Single-cell internalization during zebrafish gastrulation
prdm1a is co-expressed with foxd3 and tfap2a at the NPB
Numb Antagonizes Notch Signaling to Specify Sibling Neuron Cell Fates
Cell-autonomous migration of gata5/smarcd3b-expressing cells to the heart. Cell-autonomous migration of gata5/smarcd3b-expressing cells to the heart. (A-E)
Lefty-Dependent Inhibition of Nodal- and Wnt-Responsive Organizer Gene Expression Is Essential for Normal Gastrulation  William W. Branford, H.Joseph.
An epithelial cell destined for apoptosis signals its neighbors to extrude it by an actin- and myosin-dependent mechanism  Jody Rosenblatt, Martin C.
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 2001)
Volume 10, Issue 17, Pages (September 2000)
Presentation transcript:

Zebrafish Slow Muscle Cell Migration Induces a Wave of Fast Muscle Morphogenesis  Clarissa A. Henry, Sharon L. Amacher  Developmental Cell  Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages 917-923 (December 2004) DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.09.017

Figure 1 Zebrafish Muscle Cell Elongation Proceeds Anteriorly to Posteriorly and Medially to Laterally All panels (side views, anterior left) are confocal micrographs of 17 hpf embryos stained with β-catenin as previously described (Henry et al., 2001; Topczewska et al., 2001); panels were inverted in Adobe Photoshop so that cells are outlined in black. Arrows denote long cells, green arrows denote elongating cells, and arrowheads denote short cells. Cells denoted as “elongating” are narrower in the dorsal-ventral dimension and longer in the anterior-posterior dimension when compared with epithelial or mesenchymal cells in recently formed somites, but are intermediate in length when compared with fully elongated muscle cells in more mature somites. The numbers in (A), (B), and (C) designate the somite number along the anterior-posterior axis. The prime (′, middle) and double prime (″, lateral) panels are different medial to lateral focal planes of the somites in (A), (B), and (C). The “cell traces” panels are identical to the panels above them, but approximately every other cell has been traced and color coded: light blue cells are fully elongated, medium blue cells are elongating, and dark blue cells are still rounded and have not yet begun to elongate. Anteriorly (A, A′, A″), most medial cells are long (arrows), but laterally there is a mix of long cells and elongating cells (green arrows). This same trend of long cells medially and elongating cells laterally is also observed in the midtrunk (B, B″). In the most recently formed posterior somites, many cells are elongating medially (C), but more laterally (C′), most cells are round (arrowhead). Even more laterally (C″), no cells are elongating and somites are comprised of rectangular epithelial border cells (arrowhead) and rounded internal mesenchymal cells (red arrowhead). For this and subsequent figures, embryos were obtained by spawning adult fish grown at 28.5°C on a 14 hr light/10 hr dark cycle and were staged according to Kimmel et al. (1995), and confocal images were taken on a Zeiss microscope and processed using Zeiss LSM Image Analyzer and Adobe Photoshop. Developmental Cell 2004 7, 917-923DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2004.09.017)

Figure 2 Hedgehog Signaling Is Necessary for Normal Fast Muscle Cell Elongation and Fast Fiber Organization All panels (side views, anterior left) are confocal micrographs. To visualize all cells (phalloidin, in white) and slow muscle fibers (F59, in red), embryos were fixed in 4% PFA, rinsed, incubated in 2% triton for 1.5 hr, incubated in 1:20 Alexa Fluor 546 phalloidin for 1 hr, rinsed overnight in PBT, and then processed for F59 as previously described (Devoto et al., 1996). F59-negative somitic cells are fast muscle cells in both wild-type and smu- embryos (Barresi et al., 2000). Thus, phalloidin-positive, F59-negative somitic cells are fast muscle cells. Arrows denote elongated cells and arrowheads denote rounded cells. The number 7 in (A) and (B) indicate the position of somite 7. The prime (′, middle) and double prime (″, lateral) panels are different focal planes of the panels in (A) and (B). (A–A″) Fast muscle cells (white) are clearly elongated medially, middle, and laterally (4, 7, and 10 μm lateral to the notochord, respectively). (B–B″) In smu- embryos, there are no slow muscle fibers as seen by lack of F59 (red) expression. Fast muscle cells at the same somitic level as in (A) are clearly rounded instead of elongated, and this defect is seen throughout the medial to lateral axis (B, B′, B″). (C–E) Although fast fibers do eventually elongate in smu- (D) and cyclopamine-treated (E) embryos, these fibers are disorganized compared to wild-type embryos (C) and there are frequently gaps between somites (white asterisk). Cyclopamine treatment (100 μM) was performed as previously described (Barresi et al., 2001), and in each experiment, a subset of control and treated embryos were processed to verify absence of myoD-expressing adaxial cells but presence of myoD-expressing fast muscle precursors upon cyclopamine treatment. Developmental Cell 2004 7, 917-923DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2004.09.017)

Figure 3 Genetic Mosaic Analysis Indicates that Fast Muscle Cells Do Not Need to Perceive the Hedgehog Signal in Order to Elongate All panels are side views, anterior left (except C″, D″). Donor cells were isochronically transplanted into host embryos at the blastula stage as previously described (Amacher and Kimmel, 1998). The genotype of donors and hosts was determined at the 18- to 24-somite stage. (A and B) Wild-type cells do not elongate normally in a smu- background. Panels are confocal micrographs (4 μm from the notochord, somite number on the right) of wild-type cells transplanted from the same donor at the blastula stage and analyzed at the 24-somite stage. β-catenin staining outlines cells in green; transplanted cells are red. In a wild-type host embryo (A), transplanted wild-type cells are long like their neighbors. In a smu- host embryo (B), wild-type cells and their neighbors are aberrantly short. (C and D) Wild-type (C–C″) and smu- (D–D″) cells transplanted into the wild-type fast muscle domain elongate normally. Green F59 expression denotes slow muscle; transplanted cells are red. There is some “bleed through” of F59 fluorescence signal into the red channel. (C) and (D) are side views of 3D reconstructed slow muscle (green) and transplanted fast muscle cells (red); (C′) and (D′) are the same respective projections lacking the green slow muscle marker. The numbered cells in (C′) and (D′) are also indicated in (C″) and (D″), which are projections reconstructed 90° perpendicular to the original data to generate a transverse view (medial is to the right, lateral is to the left). (C–C″) Fast muscle cells medial to or directly adjacent to migrating slow muscle are long (cells 1, 4, and asterisk [asterisk cells are medial and long but cannot be distinguished from one another in the transverse view]), whereas lateral fast muscle cells are rounded (cells 2, 3). (D–D″) smu- cells medial to migrating slow muscle are elongated (cells 1–4), whereas smu- cells lateral to migrating slow muscle are rounded (cells 5, 6, and asterisk [asterisk cells are lateral and short, but cannot be distinguished from one another]). Cell 3 is yellow because it is in the same medial to lateral focal plane as a slow muscle fiber, not because it has differentiated into a slow muscle fiber. Developmental Cell 2004 7, 917-923DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2004.09.017)

Figure 4 Slow Muscle Cell Migration Induces Fast Muscle Cell Elongation All panels are confocal micrographs, side views, anterior left, except for (B), which is a dorsal view with anterior toward the top. Red F59 expression denotes slow muscle cells and phalloidin outlines all cells in white. The dextrans used to label donor cells are the same color as phalloidin. Thus, wild-type donor cells that did not become slow muscle are visible as filled white cells (blue arrows in A″ and B). (A′) and (A″) are more lateral focal planes of (A). Wild-type donor cells were transplanted into smu- hosts as described in Figure 3 legend. At the 22-somite stage, smu- hosts were screened for transplanted wild-type slow muscle cells to examine whether slow muscle fibers can rescue smu- fast muscle cell elongation. (A) Medial to the wild-type slow muscle fiber (which is shown in A′), many smu- fast muscle cells have elongated (green arrow). In the adjacent somite, there are no transplanted cells and no cells have elongated (yellow arrowhead). (A′) The more lateral focal plane in which the wild-type slow muscle fiber (red) resides. (A″) Lateral to the slow muscle fiber, presumptive fast muscle cells are round (white arrowhead, as would be the case in wild-type embryos). (B) Dorsal view, anterior top, of a different embryo in which a wild-type slow muscle cell has induced fast muscle cell elongation medial to its location (green arrow denotes a medial long fast muscle cell, white arrowhead denotes a lateral short fast muscle cell). Developmental Cell 2004 7, 917-923DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2004.09.017)