Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages e3 (July 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Advertisements

Xuan Li, Carrie M. Stith, Peter M. Burgers, Wolf-Dietrich Heyer 
Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages e3 (October 2017)
Volume 62, Issue 2, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Phage Mu Transposition Immunity: Protein Pattern Formation along DNA by a Diffusion- Ratchet Mechanism  Yong-Woon Han, Kiyoshi Mizuuchi  Molecular Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Saving the Ends for Last: The Role of Pol μ in DNA End Joining
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Bacteriophage T4 Proteins Replicate Plasmids with a Preformed R Loop at the T4 ori(uvsY) Replication Origin In Vitro  Nancy G Nossal, Kathleen C Dudas,
Volume 139, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Jerzy Majka, Anita Niedziela-Majka, Peter M.J. Burgers  Molecular Cell 
Rad54 Functions as a Heteroduplex DNA Pump Modulated by Its DNA Substrates and Rad51 during D Loop Formation  William Douglass Wright, Wolf-Dietrich Heyer 
Ben B. Hopkins, Tanya T. Paull  Cell 
Characterization of a Triple DNA Polymerase Replisome
The Unstructured C-Terminal Tail of the Clamp Subunit Ddc1 Activates Mec1/ATR via Two Distinct Mechanisms  Vasundhara M. Navadgi-Patil, Peter M.
Reconstitution of the B
Single-Stranded DNA Cleavage by Divergent CRISPR-Cas9 Enzymes
Tanya T. Paull, Martin Gellert  Molecular Cell 
A Rad51 Presynaptic Filament Is Sufficient to Capture Nucleosomal Homology during Recombinational Repair of a DNA Double-Strand Break  Manisha Sinha,
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Stephen Schuck, Arne Stenlund  Molecular Cell 
Nayef Mazloum, William K. Holloman  Molecular Cell 
Volume 47, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 1, Issue 7, Pages (June 1998)
The Control Mechanism for Lagging Strand Polymerase Recycling during Bacteriophage T4 DNA Replication  Jingsong Yang, Scott W. Nelson, Stephen J. Benkovic 
Polynucleotide Ligase Activity of Eukaryotic Topoisomerase I
RNA Polymerase Pausing Regulates Translation Initiation by Providing Additional Time for TRAP-RNA Interaction  Alexander V. Yakhnin, Helen Yakhnin, Paul.
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages (August 2010)
Yasunori Aizawa, Qing Xiang, Alan M. Lambowitz, Anna Marie Pyle 
Nature of the Nucleosomal Barrier to RNA Polymerase II
Base Excision Repair of Oxidative DNA Damage Activated by XPG Protein
A Hand-Off Mechanism for Primosome Assembly in Replication Restart
Jesse Easter, James W Gober  Molecular Cell 
Volume 69, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2018)
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (December 1997)
Jesse Easter, James W Gober  Molecular Cell 
Mikhail Grigoriev, Peggy Hsieh  Molecular Cell 
Volume 59, Issue 6, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
The Mammalian RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Interacts with RNA to Suppress Transcription-Coupled 3′ End Formation  Syuzo Kaneko, James L. Manley 
Helena Celesnik, Atilio Deana, Joel G. Belasco  Molecular Cell 
Chromatin Constrains the Initiation and Elongation of DNA Replication
DEAD-Box Proteins Unwind Duplexes by Local Strand Separation
Brh2 Promotes a Template-Switching Reaction Enabling Recombinational Bypass of Lesions during DNA Synthesis  Nayef Mazloum, William K. Holloman  Molecular.
DNA-Induced Switch from Independent to Sequential dTTP Hydrolysis in the Bacteriophage T7 DNA Helicase  Donald J. Crampton, Sourav Mukherjee, Charles.
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Nbs1 Converts the Human Mre11/Rad50 Nuclease Complex into an Endo/Exonuclease Machine Specific for Protein-DNA Adducts  Rajashree A. Deshpande, Ji-Hoon.
Single-Stranded DNA Orchestrates an ATM-to-ATR Switch at DNA Breaks
Volume 57, Issue 4, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 117, Issue 1, Pages (April 2004)
Excision of the Drosophila Mariner Transposon Mos1
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
Jachen A. Solinger, Konstantin Kiianitsa, Wolf-Dietrich Heyer 
Volume 57, Issue 4, Pages (February 2015)
Single-Stranded DNA Orchestrates an ATM-to-ATR Switch at DNA Breaks
Volume 122, Issue 5, Pages (September 2005)
An SOS Inhibitor that Binds to Free RecA Protein: The PsiB Protein
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e4 (March 2017)
H3K4me3 Stimulates the V(D)J RAG Complex for Both Nicking and Hairpinning in trans in Addition to Tethering in cis: Implications for Translocations  Noriko.
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
A RecA Filament Capping Mechanism for RecX Protein
Presentation transcript:

Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages 19-29.e3 (July 2017) Rad52 Inverse Strand Exchange Drives RNA-Templated DNA Double-Strand Break Repair  Olga M. Mazina, Havva Keskin, Kritika Hanamshet, Francesca Storici, Alexander V. Mazin  Molecular Cell  Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages 19-29.e3 (July 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.019 Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2017 67, 19-29.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.019) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Rad52 Promotes Inverse DNA Strand Exchange with High Efficiency (A) Top: the scheme of inverse strand exchange. Asterisk represents 32P-label. Oligonucleotide sequences are shown in Table S1. hRad52 (900 nM) was incubated with the 3′-tailed DNA (no. 1/no. 117; 68.6 nM) followed by addition of ssDNA (no. 2; 68.6 nM). Bottom: analysis of the reaction products by electrophoresis in a polyacrylamide gel. (B) Top: the scheme of the forward DNA strand exchange. hRad52 (900 nM) was incubated with ssDNA (no. 2; 68.6 nM) for 15 min at 37°C, and then the reaction was initiated by adding the 3′-tailed DNA (no. 1/no. 117; 68.6 nM). Bottom: analysis of the reaction products by electrophoresis in a polyacrylamide gel. (C) Data from (A) and (B) were plotted as a graph. In “no protein” control, hRad52 was substituted by storage buffer. (D) hRad52 promotes inverse DNA strand exchange more efficiently than hRad51. The reaction conditions were as in (A), except that a 3-fold excess of ssDNA (205.8 nM) and 7-fold excess of ssDNA (480.2 nM) were used in reactions with Rad52 and Rad51, respectively. (E) yRad52 promotes inverse DNA strand exchange. The DNA substrates and conditions for forward and inverse reactions were the same as for hRad52 in (B) and (D), respectively. In “no protein” or “sp” reactions, Rad52 was substituted with storage buffer. The experiments were repeated at least three times; error bars indicate SD. See also Figure S1. Molecular Cell 2017 67, 19-29.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.019) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Rad52 Promotes Inverse Strand Exchange between 3′-Tailed dsDNA and Homologous ssRNA (A) The reaction with hRad52 was conducted as in Figure 1D, except that ssDNA was replaced with ssRNA (no. 2R; 205.8 nM). The reaction products were analyzed by electrophoresis in a polyacrylamide gel. (B) Data from (A) are plotted as a graph. The DNA inverse exchange graph from Figure 1D is shown for comparison. (C) yRad52 promotes inverse strand exchange with ssDNA or ssRNA. The reaction conditions were as in (A), except that a 10-fold excess of ssRNA (no. 2R; 686 nM) was used. (D and E) hRad52 R55A has low inverse (D) DNA and (E) RNA strand exchange activity. All reactions were carried out in the presence of hRad52 R55A (900 nM), 3′-tailed DNA (no. 117/no. 1; 68.6 nM), and ssDNA (no. 2; 205.8 nM) or RNA (no. 2R; 205.8 nM) as described in Figure 1D and (A). The inverse DNA and RNA strand exchange graphs for WT hRad52 from (B) are shown for comparison. The experiments were repeated at least three times; error bars indicate SD. See also Figure S2. Molecular Cell 2017 67, 19-29.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.019) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Different Specificity in Inverse Strand Exchange Promoted by hRad521-209 NTD and yRad59 (A) The reactions were carried out in the presence of hRad521-209 (1 μM), 3′-tailed DNA (no. 117/no. 1; 68.6 nM), and ssRNA (no. 2R; 686 nM) or ssDNA (no. 2; 686 nM) for 1 hr at 37°C; the products were analyzed by electrophoresis in polyacrylamide gels. (B) Graphical representation of the data from (A). (C) Rad59 promotes inverse strand exchange with ssDNA, but not with RNA. To form nucleoprotein complexes, Rad59 (3.5 μM) was incubated with 32P-labeled 3′-tailed DNA (68.6 nM) for 15 min at 37°C. The reactions were initiated by addition of free ssDNA (no. 2, 63-mer; 686 nM) or ssRNA (no. 2R, 63-mer; 686 nM) and carried out for 1 hr; the products were analyzed by electrophoresis in a polyacrylamide gel. (D) The data from (C) are shown as a graph. (E) Rad59 promotes annealing between ssDNA and ssRNA. Top: experimental scheme. Asterisk represents 32P-label. Rad59 (125 nM) was incubated with a 48-mer 32P-labeled ssDNA (no. 65; 5 nM) for 10 min at 30°C. To initiate annealing reactions, complementary 48-mer ssDNA (no. 64; 5 nM) or ssRNA (no. 64R; 5 nM) were added. In controls, protein storage buffer was added instead of Rad59. The products of annealing reactions were analyzed by electrophoresis in polyacrylamide gels. In (A) and (C), asterisks mark traces of ssDNA in tailed dsDNA preparation. The experiments were repeated at least three times; error bars indicate SD. See also Figure S3. Molecular Cell 2017 67, 19-29.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.019) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 RPA Stimulates Rad52-Promoted Inverse RNA Strand Exchange in a Species-Specific Manner (A) Experimental scheme. Asterisk represents 32P-label. (B and C) Human RPA (B) inhibits inverse DNA strand exchange, but (C) stimulates inverse RNA strand exchange promoted by hRad52. (D) Yeast RPA does not stimulate inverse RNA strand exchange promoted by hRad52. (E) Yeast RPA stimulates inverse RNA strand exchange promoted by yRad52. (F) hRPA does not stimulate inverse RNA strand exchange promoted by hRad5210-209 NTD (1.4 μM). All reactions were initiated by adding either ssDNA (no. 2; 205.8 nM) or ssRNA (no. 2R; 205.8 nM) that were pre-incubated with RPA (500 nM) to the hRad52-tailed dsDNA (no. 117/no 1; 68.6 nM) complexes. In “no Rad52” or “no protein” controls, Rad52 and RPA were substituted with their storage buffer. The experiments were repeated at least three times; error bars indicate SD. Molecular Cell 2017 67, 19-29.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.019) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Rad52 Promotes Inverse RNA or DNA Strand Exchange with Blunt-Ended dsDNA (A) Experimental scheme. Asterisk represents 32P-label. (B) The kinetics of inverse RNA strand exchange promoted by hRad52 (900 nM) between labeled 63 bp dsDNA substrates (68.6 nM) containing either no ssDNA tail (no. 1/no. 2) or 3′ ssDNA tails of different lengths: 10-nt tail (no. 1/no. 518), 20-nt tail (no. 1/no. 519), and 31-nt tail DNA (no. 1/no. 117). The reactions were initiated by adding ssRNA (no. 2R; 205.8 nM). (C) hRPA (432.2 nM) stimulates inverse strand exchange promoted by hRad52 between blunt-ended dsDNA (no. 1/no. 2; 68.6 nM) and ssRNA (no. 2R; 205.8 nM). (D) The kinetics of inverse DNA strand exchange promoted by hRad52 (900 nM) between dsDNA (68.6 nM) containing either no ssDNA tail (no. 1/no. 2), or 10-nt tail (no. 1/no. 518), 20-nt tail (no. 1/no. 519), and 31-nt tail DNA (no. 1/no. 117) and ssDNA (no.2; 205.8 nM). The experiments were repeated at least three times; error bars indicate SD. Molecular Cell 2017 67, 19-29.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.019) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Proposed Mechanism of RNA-Dependent DSB Repair via Rad52 Inverse RNA Strand Exchange Rad52 forms a complex with DSB ends either blunt ended or minimally processed by exonucleases/helicases, and then promotes inverse RNA strand exchange with homologous RNA transcript. The RNA transcript provides a template for guiding end joining or for a short gap filling synthesis (bridging template mechanism). Short DNA synthesis on RNA templates can be carried out by DNA polymerases, which have limited reverse transcriptase activity, or by reverse transcriptases (Keskin et al., 2014). The single-stranded tails are removed by flap nucleases, the gaps are filled in, and any remaining nicks are sealed by DNA ligases, restoring the original DNA sequence in an error-free manner. Molecular Cell 2017 67, 19-29.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.019) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions