Litao Zhao Liaoning University&IHEP

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Developing Event Reconstruction for CTA R D Parsons (Univ. of Leeds) J Hinton (Univ. of Leicester)
Advertisements

TeVPA, July , SLAC 1 Cosmic rays at the knee and above with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav for The IceCube Collaboration South Pole 4 Feb 2009.
Characterization of Orbiting Wide-angle Light-collectors (OWL) By: Rasha Usama Abbasi.
MP BACH MultiPixel Balloon-borne Air CHerenkov Detection of Iron Cosmic Rays Using Direct Cherenkov Radiation Imaged with a High Resolution Camera 1.
A neural network approach to high energy cosmic rays mass identification at the Pierre Auger Observatory S. Riggi, R. Caruso, A. Insolia, M. Scuderi Department.
MP BACH MultiPixel Balloon-borne Air CHerenkov Detection of Iron Cosmic Rays Using Direct Cherenkov Radiation Imaged with a High Resolution Camera University.
Leroy Nicolas, HESS Calibration results, 28 th ICRC Tsukuba Japan, August Calibration results of the first two H·E·S·S· telescopes Nicolas Leroy.
Konstantin Belov. GZK-40, Moscow. Konstantin Belov High Resolution Fly’s Eye (HiRes) Collaboration GZK-40. INR, Moscow. May 17, measurements by fluorescence.
Size and Energy Spectra of incident cosmic radiation obtained by the MAKET - ANI surface array on mountain Aragats. (Final results from MAKET-ANI detector)‏
EAS Reconstruction with Cerenkov photons Ching-Cheng Hsu, Jan Ching-Cheng Hsu National Taiwan Univ. Dept of physics Feb Shower Simulation.
The measurement of the average shower development profile 高能所:张丙开 导师:曹臻、王焕玉 南京 Apr. 28, 2008.
EAS Reconstruction with Cerenkov Photons Shower Simulation Reconstruction Algorithm Toy MC Study Two Detector Configuration Summary M.Z. Wang and C.C.
Atmospheric shower simulation studies with CORSIKA Physics Department Atreidis George ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI.
Geomagnetic Spectroscopy: An Estimation of Primary Mass of Cosmic Rays Rajat K Dey 1,2 Arunava Bhadra 2 Jean-No ë l Capdevielle 3 1 Department of Physics.
Moon shadow analysis -- Using ARGO experiment Wang Bo, Zhang Yi, Zhang Jianli, Guo Yiqing, Hu Hongbo Apri for NanJing Meeting
Response of AMANDA-II to Cosmic Ray Muons and study of Systematics Newt,Paolo and Teresa.
Analysis chain for MAGIC Telescope data Daniel Mazin and Nadia Tonello Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München D.Mazin, N.Tonello MPI for Physics, Munich.
Gus Sinnis Asilomar Meeting 11/16/2003 The Next Generation All-Sky VHE Gamma-Ray Telescope.
Multi-TeV  -ray Astronomy with GRAPES-3 Pravata K Mohanty On behalf of the GRAPE-3 collaboration Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai Workshop.
XXXI International Cosmic Ray Conference, ICRC 2009 Lodz, Poland, July 7-15, 2009 Time structure of the Extensive Air Shower front with the ARGO-YBJ experiment.
Detection of electromagnetic showers along muon tracks Salvatore Mangano (IFIC)
Hybrid measurement of CR light component spectrum by using ARGO-YBJ and WFCTA Shoushan Zhang on behalf of LHAASO collaboration and ARGO-YBJ collaboration.
1 João Espadanal, Patricia Gonçalves, Mário Pimenta Santiago de Compostela 3 rd IDPASC school Auger LIP Group 3D simulation Of Extensive Air.
June 6, 2006 CALOR 2006 E. Hays University of Chicago / Argonne National Lab VERITAS Imaging Calorimetry at Very High Energies.
The KASCADE-Grande Experiment: an Overview Andrea Chiavassa Universita’ di Torino for the KASCADE-Grande Collaboration.
Cosmic Rays from to eV. Open Problem and Experimental Results. (KASCADE-Grande view) Very High Energy Phenomena in the Universe XLIV th Rencontres.
Study of VHE Cosmic Ray Spectrum by means of Muon Density Measurements at Ground Level I.I. Yashin Moscow Engineering Physics Institute,
Z. Cao, H.H. He, J.L. Liu, M. Zha Y. Zhang The 2 nd workshop of air shower detection at high altitude.
Preliminary Profile Reconstruction of EA Hybrid Showers Bruce Dawson & Luis Prado Jr thanks to Brian Fick & Paul Sommers and Stefano Argiro & Andrea de.
MP BACH MultiPixel Balloon-borne Air CHerenkov Detection of Iron Cosmic Rays Using Direct Cherenkov Radiation Imaged with a High Resolution Camera 1.
Workshop on AstroParticle Physics, WAPP 2009 Bose Institute, Darjeeling, December 2009 Extensive Air Showers and Astroparticle Physics Observations and.
Detecting Air Showers on the Ground
NEVOD-DECOR experiment: results and future A.A.Petrukhin for Russian-Italian Collaboration Contents MSU, May 16, New method of EAS investigations.
Lingling Ma IHEP China Measurement of Cosmic rays with LHAASO at 10PeV~100PeV 4th Workshop on Air Shower Detection at High Altitude Institute of High Energy.
Shoushan Zhang, ARGO-YBJ Collaboration and LHAASO Collaboration 4 th Workshop on Air Shower Detection at High Altitude Napoli 31/01-01/ IHEP (Institute.
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
Measurement of the CR light component primary spectrum B. Panico on behalf of ARGO-YBJ collaboration University Rome Tor Vergata INFN, Rome Tor Vergata.
A Method of Shower Reconstruction from the Fluorescence Detector M.Giller, G.Wieczorek and the Lodz Auger group GZK-40 Moscow Workshop, May 2006.
Background rejection methods for tens of TeV gamma-ray astronomy applicable to wide angle timing arrays.
An update on ECAL simulations
Future Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes:
Measurement of high energy cosmic rays by the new Tibet hybrid experiment J. Huang for the Tibet ASγCollaboration a a Institute of high energy physics,
On behalf of the ARGO-YBJ collaboration
Daniel Mazin and Nadia Tonello Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München
L.L.Ma for LHAASO collaboration Beijing China
Expectation of Cosmic Ray Energy Spectrum with LHAASO
Direct Measurement of the Atmospheric Muon Spectrum with IceCube
Andrea Chiavassa Universita` degli Studi di Torino
Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS
Newt Ganugapati and Teresa Montaruli
Systematic uncertainties in MonteCarlo simulations of the atmospheric muon flux in the 5-lines ANTARES detector VLVnT08 - Toulon April 2008 Annarita.
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
Ultra High Energy Cosmic Ray Spectrum Measured by HiRes Experiment
Pierre Auger Observatory Present and Future
Hadron Production Measurements
Response of AMANDA-II to Cosmic Ray Muons and study of Systematics
Detector Configuration for Simulation (i)
Comparison Of High Energy Hadronic Interaction Models
08/27/04 Strategies for the search for prompt muons in the downgoing
observations of the muon bundles with IceCube
Comparison Of High Energy Hadronic Interaction Models
Preliminary Profile Reconstruction of EA Hybrid Showers
Multicore Cosmic Shower in the ARGO-YBJ experiment
Latest Results from the KASCADE-Grande experiment
Karen Andeena, Katherine Rawlinsb, Chihwa Song*a
Anisotropy of Primary Cosmic Rays
Estimation of Sensitivity to Gamma Ray point Sources above 30TeV
The Aperture and Precision of the Auger Observatory
ICRC2011, 32ND INTERNATIONAL COSMIC RAY CONFERENCE, BEIJING 2011
Studies and results at Pierre Auger Observatory
Presentation transcript:

Litao Zhao Liaoning University&IHEP 2017.9.21-2017.9.23 A new method study the improvement of the resolution of reconstructed heavy nuclei spectrum Litao Zhao Liaoning University&IHEP 2017.9.21-2017.9.23 Weihai ShanDong

Outline The state of comic rays measurements Characteristics of DC-light Simulation and analysis Summary and prospect

Independent on the hadronic interaction models? The state of comic rays measurements Measurements of energy spectrum for individual elements are very important to resolve the questions of the origin and the acceleration of cosmic rays. energy<100TeV,space experiments PAMELA、ATIC、CREAM、RUNJOB advantage :Precise measurements of individual elements of comic rays disadvantage : limited collection area(~ 1𝑚 2 ) 、limited measuring time energy>100TeV,ground-based arrays experiments ARGO-YBJ、 Tibet Asγ advantage: larger effective area、longer measuring  time disadvantage : the uncertainty of energy calibration the uncertainty of resolution of energy dependent highly on the hadronic interaction models. Independent on the hadronic interaction models?

Challenge :Discern the DC-light against the EAS-light. Characteristics of DC-light DC-light: is emitted by the primary incoming nucleus prior to its first interaction with the atmosphere. Radiation Height: 30km~ 60km The radius of light cone:100m The angle of Cherenkov photons : 0.1 ° ~ 0.3 ° Intensity of Cherenkov photons : weaker EAS-light :is emitted by the secondary particles in the shower Radiation Height: lower 30km The radius of light cone: wider The angle of Cherenkov photons :> 0.4 ° Intensity of Cherenkov photons : stronger Challenge :Discern the DC-light against the EAS-light.

Characteristics of DC-light EAS-light increases approximately linearly with the primary energy of cosmic rays. DC-light is emitted by primary cosmic rays must exceed the Cherenkov threshold , independent of the energy of cosmic rays . DC-light is proportional to square charge of primary particle. DC-light to EAS-light ratio is increase with the distance to the core position and decrease with energy. The different fragmentation process case large fluctuations under the range of Rm 90m~120m. EAS-light DC-light

Characteristics of DC-light iron proton Simulated of emitted angle of DC-light and EAS-light relative to parameter Rm. The significantly difference of the two plots is the right plot has filamentary structure under the main structure, which is contributed by DC-light. The DC-light can be detected by the Cherenkov telescopes which can detect the photons with highly direction resolution. R= 𝑰 𝒅𝒊𝒓 𝑰 𝒄𝒐𝒈 discriminate the iron events from cosmic rays

Simulation and analysis introductions of WFCTA reflector mirrors spherical aluminized mirror:25 the area of mirrors :5.29 m 2 radius of curvature:5800mm Camera array: 32×32 the resolution of pixel: 0.5 ° the total field view: 14 ° × 16 ° focal length: 2870mm Winston Cone

Simulation and analysis The set of events software :CORSIKA; Nuclei :iron, proton; The number of events: QGSJET-II 314400 , EPOS LHC 232800 The zenith of events : 18 ° ~ 38 ° ; The azimuth of events: 35 ° ~ 55 ° ; range of energy :30TeV~500TeV; Index of energy spectrum:-2; The sample area: 300m× 300m. The set of WFCTA The zenith of telescopes: 28 ° ; The azimuth of telescopes: 45 ° ; The events number is normalized to the expectation of H 𝒐 rdanel model.

Simulation and analysis select iron events by the DC-light New array with 64×64 and the pixel resolution 𝟎.𝟐𝟓 ° are simulated. iron The new array of pixel The set of WFCTA proton The difficulty of selecting the DC-light pixel against the much larger background of Cherenkov light that use the parameter of R is increased with the pixel size

Simulation and analysis select iron events by the DC-light reconstructed of Rp (WCDA) shower core reconstruction resolution: 5m arriving direction reconstruction resolution : 𝟎.𝟏 ° The resolution of the reconstructed Rp is nearly 3.3m First selection of events were sampled for the process of select iron events 30% events are survived QGSJET-II:94682 EPOS LHC:69992 Rp :0m~𝟏𝟎𝟎𝒎 Second selection of events abs(MeanX)<300mm, abs(MeanY)<300mm Dist>0 , Dist<200mm Length/Width<7 , Length/Width>0 Rp>50m,Rp<100 R>0,R<2 10% events are survived QGSJET-II:33389 EPOS LHC: 22306

Simulation and analysis select iron events by the DC-light Rp :0m~𝟏𝟎𝟎𝒎 The new array of pixel The set of WFCTA 𝑹 𝑪 indicates the R after Rp correction As the energy increase, the difficulty of selecting iron events that use the parameter of R is increased. The camera of the pixel size 𝟎.𝟐𝟓 ° is better than the camera of WFCTA at the whole energy range.

Simulation and analysis select iron events by the DC-light One-dimensional distribution of 𝑹 𝑪𝟏 Rp :0m~𝟏𝟎𝟎𝒎 𝑹 𝑪𝟏 =1.92 𝑹 𝑪𝟏 =2.64 The new array of pixel The set of WFCTA 𝑹 𝑪𝟏 indicates the R after Rp and energy correction Purity:>80%

Simulation and analysis Duty cycle :15% energy bins width: 0.2 select iron events by the DC-light The err in each energy bin is at the range of 3%~𝟔% Selection efficiency Aperture Event rate The selection method by parameter R is independent of hadronic interaction models. Along with the rise of energy, the trigger efficiency is getting smaller influence on the selection process of iron events, and the advantages of small pixel size of telescope camera has become obvious.

The depth of the shower maximum ( 𝑿 𝒎𝒂𝒙 ) of iron should be about Simulation and analysis improvement of selection efficiency by the DC-light Hillas Parameters Length and Width are the second moments of the light distribution along the major and minor axes of the image. The Dist is the angular distance between arrival direction of the shower and the center of gravity (COG) of the image. The depth of the shower maximum ( 𝑿 𝒎𝒂𝒙 ) of iron should be about 70 𝒈 𝒄𝒎 𝟐 higher than that of proton with the same energies. So the parameters of Dist and Length/Width also can be used MVA in the process of discrimination of iron events.

Simulation and analysis Improvement of selection efficiency by the DC-light QGSJET-II 𝑅 𝐶1 、 𝐷 𝐶 、 𝑃 𝐶 indicates the Rp and energy correction for R、Dist、Length/Width, respectively . Three parameters has a satisfactory performance in the process of discriminate iron events EPOS LHC

Simulation and analysis improvement of selection efficiency by the DC-light Purity: >80% MVA Two parameters :Length /Width、Dist 。 Three parameters:Length /Width 、Dist、R。 The cuts values 𝑹 𝑪𝟏 、 𝑫 𝑪 、and 𝑷 𝑪 of in a select sample of iron showers for different hadronic interaction models and steps. parameters Models DIST LENGTH /WIDTH R Two parameters QGSJET-II -140~−180 -3~−1.98 EPOS LHC -138~−180 -3.5~−2.38 Three parameters 2.89~3.2 -3.5~−2.34 2.70~3.2

Simulation and analysis improvement of selection efficiency by the DC-light Duty cycle :15% energy bins width: 0.2 The err in each energy bin is at the range of 2.5%~𝟓% Aperture Event rate Selection efficiency The improvement of selection efficiency in each energy bin is independent of hadronic interaction models. The event rate of iron obtained by R, Dist and Length/Width is 27% higher than that obtained only by the Dist and Length/Width.

Simulation and analysis purity the contamination from other nuclei Selection of iron events 80% nuclei contamination MgAlSi&He&CNO iron 50% The contamination from the MgAlSi and helium bring a negative effect to the final result. Selection of heavy events purity contamination 80% 78% Heavy nuclei Proton&He&CNO proton The method of DC-light could help achieve the better performance in the process of select heavy nuclei.

Summary and Prospect Summary Compared the parameters of Length /Width and Dist , the R is independent of hadronic interaction models. In addition , the R improve significantly of selection efficiency of iron events in the process of MVA. In the near future, this method could be applied to the LHAASO project, and will improves the resolution of reconstructed heavy nuclei spectrum.

Summary and Prospect Prospect DC-light methods combine with 1221 muon detectors of LHAAASO will help us to check the hadronic interaction model. Future improvements of the DC-light technique could extend the energy range of the measurement to energy of 1 PeV. HESS could not check the fact , and it can be checked by LHAASO in the future. A small pixel size array in the telescope camera will improved separation power of the DC-light from the EAS-light. Extra separation power is also be achieved by time structure of the DC-light.

Thanks for your listening