Radar Methods – General Overview

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Basic Ground Penetrating Radar Theory
Advertisements

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
TRANSMISSION FUNDAMENTALS Review
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II
GG450 April 22, 2008 Seismic Processing.
Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) GPR technology can be used to determine depth to bedrock and or water table, locate buried ordinance at gunnery ranges,
electromagnetic method
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown,
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Chapter 9 Electromagnetic Waves. 9.2 ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 26 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Fri 28 Feb: Burger (§8.4–8.5) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation.
Ground Penetrating Radar for Utilities mapping and Detection ์
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 28 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Last Time: Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Radar = electromagnetic radiation (light)
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Needs to be more interactive Radar Methods - An Overview
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown,
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
Dipping layer reflection events and the common midpoint gather
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown,
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Coincident Source receiver Concepts
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
SCM x330 Ocean Discovery through Technology Area F GE.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 29 Feb 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 Last Time: Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Radar = electromagnetic radiation (light)
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 26 Feb 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 For Mon 29 Feb: Burger (§8.4) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation Seismic.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown,
Geology 490M 3D Seismic Workshop tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV Demo, Wave.
Active Microwave Remote Sensing
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I
GPR Simulations for pipeline oil drainage
Ground-Penetrating Radar
Single fold vs. Multi-fold CMP seismic profiling
Technologies to model Ground water
Applied Geophysics Fall 2016 Umass Lowell
Magnetic Methods- continued
GPR Keren Engoltz and Semion Polinov Prof. Ammatzia Peled
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II
Lecture 4: Wave Propagation Concept
Ground Penetrating Radar
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I
The radar band is loosely taken to extend from approximately 0
The Wave Equation Modeled
Coincident Source receiver Concepts
Static Anomalies and Energy Partitioning
Energy Loss and Partitioning
Waves: Phase and group velocities of a wave packet
Dipping layer reflection events and the common midpoint gather
Energy Loss and Partitioning
Ground-Penetrating Radar
Estimation of Subsurface Moisture Variation in Layered Sediments Using Ground Penetrating Radar By Matthew Charlton King’s College London Ground Penetrating.
Antenna Theory Chapter.4.7.4~4.8.1 Antennas
PH0101 Unit 2 Lecture 4 Wave guide Basic features
Normal Incidence (coincident source-receiver) Ray-Tracing
Presentation transcript:

Radar Methods – General Overview Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II Radar Methods – General Overview tom.h.wilson tom.wilson@mail.wvu.edu Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV

The radar band is loosely taken to extend from approximately 0 The radar band is loosely taken to extend from approximately 0.1cm to 100cm. The microwave region is often used for surface imaging from airborne or satellite platform.

Radar image of the earth’s surface at 5.4cm or 20 GHz.

Ground penetrating radar (GPR) systems often operate in the tens of MHz to GHz region of the spectrum. 25MHz = 12m wavelength (40ns) 50MHz = 6m (20ns) 100MHz = 3m (10ns) 1GHz = 0.3m (1ns) Times in nanoseconds represent the time it takes light to travel through 1 wavelength in a vacuum.

Visual wavelength image Shuttle Imaging Radar - SIR A  ~ 25cm Sabins, 1996

Sabins, 1996

Ground Surveys GPR mono-static and bi-static transmitter-receiver configurations. Note similarity to coincident source-receiver and offset source receiver configurations discussed in the context of seismic methods Daniels, J., 1989 & Sensors and Software

Spectral and temporal characteristics of the GPR wavelet. Sensors & Software Inc. - Ekko Updates

As with seismic data, reflection arrival times are 2-way times and depth equals ½ the two-way time x average velocity. Velocity in air is approximately equal to the velocity of light in a vacuum: c. c = 3 x 108 m/sec = 9.84 x 108 f/s or approximately 1 foot per nanosecond. 1 nanosecond is 10-9th seconds. Thinking in terms of two-way times, it takes 2ns to travel 1 ft.

In general the velocity of the radar wave is defined as where c is the velocity of light in a vacuum (or air), and r is the electric permitivity of the material through which the radar wave travels. Examples of r (see Daniels) are 81 for water 6 for unsaturated sand 20 for saturated sand The presence of water has a significant effect on velocity.

Typical velocities c ~ 1ft/ns in air v ~ 1/2 to 1/3rd ft/ns in unsaturated sand v ~ 1/3rd to 1/5th ft/ns in saturated sand  is proportional to conductivity  - materials of relatively high conductivity have slower velocity than less conductive materials.

In our discussions of seismic we recognized absorption as an important process affecting the ability of the seismic wave to penetrate beneath the earth’s surface. High attenuation coefficient  produces rapid decay of seismic wave amplitude with distance traveled (r). The same process controls the ability of electromagnetic waves to penetrate beneath the earth’s surface. The expression controlling attenuation is a function of several quantities, the most important of which are conductivity and permitivity.

Attenuation of electromagnetic waves is controlled by the propagation factor which has real and imaginary parts. The real part  (the attenuation coefficient) illustrates the influence of permitivity and conductivity on absorption. Note in this equation that increases of  translate into increased attenuation. Also note that increases of angular frequency (=2f) will increase attenuation.

The display of radar waves shows considerable similarity to that of seismic data

Diffraction events are commonly produced by heterogeneity in the electrical properties of subsurface materials

The diffraction response can be used - as you would have guessed – to determine velocity. How would you do that?

Remember the ray path geometry for the diffraction event? * Z X d For coincident source and receiver acquisition

* Z X d

Average Velocity = 1/2 the reciprocal of the slope

Sensors & Software Inc. - Ekko Updates Note that the 0.2 m/ns velocities in the sand dune complex is pretty high compared to the above. Sensors & Software Inc. - Ekko Updates

Direct “air-wave” arrival Direct arrival through surface medium Reflection hyperbola Smith and Jol, 1995 The characteristics of a common midpoint gather from a GPR data set look very similar to those from a seismic CMP gather.

Thinning layer response and resolution considerations. Daniels, J., 1989

Horizontal Resolution: The Fresnel Zone

The Fresnel Zone Radius Rf An approximation

Topographic variations must also be compensated for. Daniels, J., 1989

West Pearl Queen Field Area

Dune surface topography Surface along the GPR line shown below was very irregular so that apparent structure in the section below is often the result of relief across features in the surface sand dune complex. Dune surface topography

GPR data is often collected by pulling the GPR unit across the surface GPR data is often collected by pulling the GPR unit across the surface. Subsurface scans are made at regular intervals, but since the unit is often pulled at varying speeds across the surface, the records are adjusted to portray constant spacing between records. This process s referred to as rubbersheeting. Daniels, J., 1989

Smith and Jol, 1995, AG

Smith and Jol, 1995, AG

Increased frequency and bandwidth reduce the dominant period and duration of the wavelet

Comparison of the 25MHz and 100 MHz records Smith and Jol, 1995, AG

We also expect to see decreased depth of penetration (i. e We also expect to see decreased depth of penetration (i.e. increased attenuation) for higher frequency wavelets and components of the GPR signal. Smith and Jol, 1995, AG

Sensors & Software Inc. - Ekko Updates

In the acquisition of GPR data one must worry about overhead reflections. Daniels, J., 1989

…. and tree branches! Daniels, J., 1989

Sensors & Software Inc. – Smart Cart GPR unit Sensors & Software Inc. – Smart Cart Visit http://www.sensoft.ca/

Sensors & Software Inc. – Salt Water Infiltration

Pulse EKKO bistatic

Sensors and Software - Locating underground storage tanks

Sensors and Software - Locating unexploded ordnance

Sensors and Software - forensic applications

Time slice map from 3D data volume of radar data Time slice map from 3D data volume of radar data. This is a surface of equal travel time. Disruptions in the reflection pattern are associated with the waste pit. Green et al., 1999, LE

Bright red areas define the location of the landfill; the orange objects represent gravel bodies. The brownish-pink lobes are high reflectivity objects of unknown origin. The view at bottom profiles the underside of the landfill and gravel bodies. Green et al., 1999, LE

Sensors and Software - Avalanche Assessment

Sensors & Software Inc. – Glaciers, Ice and Snow

Sensors & Software Inc. – Plastic and metal pipes

Sensors & Software Inc. - Ekko Updates