Servo Tuning for Path Applications

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SINAMICS drive Commissioning Workshop
Advertisements

Discrete Controller Design
Qball-X4 Simulator Seang Cau February 16, 2011.
Loop Shaping Professor Walter W. Olson
Introduction: Eccentricity and Cogging. Motor Model.
Modeling, Simulation, and Control of a Real System Robert Throne Electrical and Computer Engineering Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology.
PID Control and Root Locus Method
ME 270 Final Project Presentation Operational Amplifiers.
MODEL REFERENCE ADAPTIVE CONTROL
Compensation Using the process field G PF (s) transfer function.
Sliding Mode Control of PMSM Drives Subject to Torsional Oscillations in the Mechanical Load Jan Vittek University of Zilina Slovakia Stephen J Dodds School.
Chapter 11 - Simple Harmonic Motion
Professor Walter W. Olson Department of Mechanical, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering University of Toledo Loop Shaping.
Start Presentation September 27, nd Homework Problem In this homework problem, we wish to model a mechanical system. The problem deals with a simple,
Power PMAC Tuning Tool Overview. Power PMAC Servo Structure Versatile, Allows complex servo algorithms be implemented Allows 2 degree of freedom control.
Modern Control System EKT 308
Professor Walter W. Olson Department of Mechanical, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering University of Toledo Sensitivity.
DC-DC Fundamentals 1.5 Converter Control. What is Converter Control? A converter can provide a constant voltage output at various condition because of.
Modern Control System EKT 308 Root Locus and PID controllers.
Chapter 4 A First Analysis of Feedback Feedback Control A Feedback Control seeks to bring the measured quantity to its desired value or set-point (also.
Disturbance rejection control method
LINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS Ali Karimpour Assistant Professor Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.
7/9/2016 HANSABA COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, SIDDHPUR.
LLRF regulation of CC2 operated at 4˚K Gustavo Cancelo for the AD, TD & CD LLRF team.
Process Control. Feedback control y sp = set point (target value) y = measured value The process information (y) is fed back to the controller The objective.
SNS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
A few illustrations on the Basic Concepts of Nonlinear Control
Last Comments on Control
Chapter 1: Overview of Control
Salman Bin Abdulaziz University
PID Control Systems (Proportional, Integral, Derivative)
Figure Types of compensation. (a) Cascade compensation
Optical PLL for homodyne detection
MECH 373 Instrumentation and Measurements
Chapter 7 The Root Locus Method The root-locus method is a powerful tool for designing and analyzing feedback control systems The Root Locus Concept The.
Time Domain and Frequency Domain Analysis
Electronic Devices Ninth Edition Floyd Chapter 12.
Automatic control systems II
Digital Communications Chapter 13. Source Coding
MECH 373 Instrumentation and Measurements
Journal of Vision. 2009;9(9):9. doi: /9.9.9 Figure Legend:
DNT Control Principle Steady-State Analysis DNT Control Principle.
Chapter 2 Motion Along a Straight Line
Design via Root Locus (Textbook Ch.9).
A First Analysis of Feedback
DNT Control Principle Frequency Response Techniques DNT Control Principle.
Frequency-Domain Analysis and stability determination
Chapter 11 Electrical Generators
University of Bridgeport
Automatic Generation Control (AGC)
Control System Analysis and Design by the Frequency Response Method
Basic Design of PID Controller
Interactive Basic Tuning for the SERVOSTAR 300
Chapter 9 Design via Root Locus <<<4.1>>>
Chapter 9 Design via Root Locus <<<4.1>>>
Interactive Basic Tuning for the SERVOSTAR 600
System type, steady state tracking, & Bode plot
NC,CNC machines and Control Programming.
ЧПУ Delta Electronics G-коды. Примеры
Root-Locus Analysis (1)
NC and CNC machines and Control Programming
Digital Control Systems (DCS)
Root Loci Analysis (3): Root Locus Approach to Control System Design
Compensators.
CONTROL SYSTEM AN INTRODUCTION.
Find the closed-loop transfer function in terms of Gİ.
LINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS
LINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS
Introduction to Motor Drives
IntroductionLecture 1: Basic Ideas & Terminology
Presentation transcript:

Servo Tuning for Path Applications

Introduction The purpose of this power point to show the effects of servo gains when performing path motions. The desired path is the result of multiple axes. There are two requirements that must be met to be successful. The System bandwidths of the individual axes must be meet the performance requirements of the process. The two primary requirement being velocity regulation and position loop performance . Process parameters such cut feedrate on plasma cutter will determine velocity regulation requirements. The position loop performance will be determined by the actual path to generated and system throughput. System bandwidths must be matched to minimize error of actual path and Desired path Simulated Test System Simple Axis model using ; Kp position proportional gain Ki velocity loop Integrator Kv velocity loop proportional gain Mechanical Plant (including current loop) assumed to be ideal Path motion 20 mm 45 degree angle in X and Y, Motion time 100 ms; In this presentation term gain matching will be used, this really means the bandwidths corresponding to the respective gains are the same. Due to the simple models used the gain Kp directly controls position loop bandwidth, and Kv and Kvfff directly effect velocity bandwidth. In an actual system the gain values may not be identical due to different loads and drives used in the system. Two systems with matched or equal bandwidth will have the same open crossover frequency on the bode plot, or will have the identical error signal when given the same input.

X and Y Axis Model

Test Simulation Diagram

Matched Kp,Kvff,Kiv Nominal Gains

Matched Kp,Kvff,Kiv Nominal Gains Summary Nominal Gains All gains set to nominal. The gains Kp, Kiv, and Kvff are matched between the to systems. Slight mismatch in Kv to simulate Y and X mechanical difference; Path Motion , Figure(50) Excellent Path Error Figure(69) Axis Error Figure(34) X and Y Axis signatures match Axis motion Figure(40) X and Y complete motion in require time (100 ms) Conclusion Path Motion Acceptable Axis Motion Acceptable

Matched Kp,Kvff,Kiv Kp extremely low

Matched Kp,Kvff,Kiv Kp extremely low Summary Nominal Gains The gains between Kp, Kiv, and Kvff are matched between the to systems. Kp gains are set way below nominal Slight mismatch in Kv to simulate Y and X mechanical difference; Path Motion , Figure(50) Acceptable Path Error Figure(69) Not as good as with Nominal Kp could be acceptable depending on process Axis Error Figure(34) X and Y Axis shapes match sligh variation in amplitude Axis motion Figure(40) X and Y complete motion in require time (100 ms) Conclusion Path Motion Acceptable Axis Motion Acceptable

Matched Kp, Kvff=0 Kp Extremely Low

Matched Kp, Kvff=0 Kp Extremely Low Summary Nominal Gains The gains between Kp, Kiv, and Kvff are matched between the to systems. Kp gains are set way below nominal. Kvff=0 Slight mismatch in Kv to simulate Y and X mechanical difference; Path Motion , Figure(50) Excellent Path Error Figure(69) Axis Error Figure(34) X and Y Axis error signatures match Axis motion Figure(40) X and Y do not complete motion in require time (100 ms) Conclusion Path Motion Acceptable Axis Motion Unacceptable

Matched Kp Kvff=0 Kp set below Nominal

Matched Kp Kvff=0 Kp set below Nominal Summary Nominal Gains The gains between Kp, Kiv, and Kvff are matched between the to systems. Kp gains are set below nominal. Kvff=0 Slight mismatch in Kv to simulate Y and X mechanical difference; Path Motion , Figure(50) Excellent Path Error Figure(69) Axis Error Figure(34) X and Y Axis error signatures match Axis motion Figure(40) X and Y do not complete motion in require time (100 ms) Conclusion Path Motion Acceptable Axis Motion Unacceptable

Mismatched Kp Kvff=0 Kp lower than Nominal

Mismatched Kp Kvff=0 Kp lower than Nominal Summary Nominal Gains The gains between Kiv, and Kvff are matched between the to systems. Kp gains are set below nominal and do not match. Kvff=0 Slight mismatch in Kv to simulate Y and X mechanical difference; Path Motion , Figure(50) Failed Path Error Figure(69) poor Axis Error Figure(34) X and Y Axis error shape match but not amplitude does not. Axis motion Figure(40) X and Y do not complete motion in required time (100 ms) Conclusion Path Motion Unacceptable Axis Motion Unacceptable

Mismatched Kp, Kvff=1 Kp Lower than Nominal

Mismatched Kp, Kvff=1 Kp Lower than Nominal Summary Nominal Gains Kiv, and Kvff are matched between the to systems. Kp gains are set way below nominal and mismatched. Kvff=1 this compensates for low Kp Slight mismatch in Kv to simulate Y and X mechanical difference; Path Motion , Figure(50) Excellent , Not as good as nominal Path Error Figure(69) Excellent, Not as good as nominal Axis Error Figure(34) X and Y Axis signatures match Axis motion Figure(40) X and Y complete motion in require time (100 ms) Conclusion Path Motion Acceptable Axis Motion Acceptable

Mismatched Kp Kvfff Kp lower than nominal

Mismatched Kp Kvfff Kp lower than nominal Summary Nominal Gains Mismatched Kp and Kvff Kp gains are set way below nominal. Slight mismatch in Kv to simulate Y and X mechanical difference; Path Motion , Figure(50) Fail Path Error Figure(69) Excellent Axis Error Figure(34) X and Y Error Axis signatures do not match Axis motion Figure(40) X complete motion in require time (100 ms) Y does not complete motion in require time (100 ms); Conclusion Path Motion Not Acceptable Axis Motion Not Acceptable

Matched Kp Kvff=0 Kp set to nominal

Matched Kp Kvff=0 Kp set to nominal Summary Nominal Gains Matched Kp and Kvff Kp gains are nominal. Kvff=0 Slight mismatch in Kv to simulate Y and X mechanical difference; Path Motion , Figure(50) Excellent not as as good as nominal Path Error Figure(69) Axis Error Figure(34) X and Y Error Axis signatures match Axis motion Figure(40) X and Y complete motion in require time (100 ms) Conclusion Path Motion Acceptable Axis Motion Acceptable

Mismatched Kp Kvff=0 Kp at nominal

Matched Kp, Kvff, Kiv Nominal Gains Summary Nominal Gains MisMatched Kp Kp gains are nominal. Kvff=0 Slight mismatch in Kv to simulate Y and X mechanical difference; Path Motion , Figure(50) Good, not as as good as nominal, acceptance based on process requirements Path Error Figure(69) Axis Error Figure(34) X and Y Error shape match, Amplitude does not. Axis motion Figure(40) X and Y complete motion in require time (100 ms) Conclusion Path Motion Acceptable subject to process requirements Axis Motion Acceptable subject to process requirements