INSPIRE Sub-GROUP VALIDATION

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Project Meeting Content Group Part 1: Usability Testing.

Advertisements

The NATURE–SDIplus project Best Practice Network for SDI in Nature Conservation Co-funded by the Community Programme eContentplus ECP-2007-GEO Co-funded.

INSPIRE and MSFD Examples of using spatial data within MSFD context Darja Lihteneger, European Environment Agency,

INSPIRE - how to use? Spatial data from diverse data sources INSPIRE and reporting data flows Example: spatial data sets related to MSFD, water and INSPIRE.

Update on INSPIRE: INSPIRE maintenance and implementation and INSPIRE related EEA activities on biodiversity CDDA/European protected areas technical meeting.

Project “European CDDA and INSPIRE”: scope, transformation workflow and mapping rules INSPIRE Conference 2014 Workshop: Implementing Existing European.

Framework service contract Lot 4 Project: CDDA in conformity with INSPIRE Project status and overview of main issues Meeting Darja Lihteneger.

INSPIRE Conference 2014 – Aalborg Implementing CDDA Based on the INSPIRE Protected Sites – Transformation Workflow María Cabello Pedro Mendive INSPIRE.

Status of INSPIRE implementation in EU Member States. INSPIRE conference – Lisbon, 26/05/2015 Paul Hasenohr, European Environment Agency.

Co-funded by the European Community eContentplus programme The NATURE-SDIplus Validation methodology.

Implementing air quality e-Reporting Data deliverables in 2013 and 2014 and the process of reporting Tony Bush ETC/ACM AQ e-Reporting task leader 18th.

XIth International Congress for Mathematical Geology - September 3-8, 2006 – Liège, Belgium Contribution of GeoScienceML to the INSPIRE data harmonisation.

Update on INSPIRE CDDA/European protected areas technical meeting 2015 Darja Lihteneger Project manager - Data centres and INSPIRE implementation IDM -

1 - DG ENV Brussels, 5 March 2003 Draft INSPIRE Legislative proposal The key issues 9th INSPIRE Expert Group Meeting Brussels.

Co-funded by the European Community eContentplus programme The NATURE-SDIplus Solution for Data Harmonisation.

Darja Lihteneger, November 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark INSPIRE Data Modelling for Reporting Data Flows – WISE SoE Monitoring Stations Eionet NRC.

Testing - an essential aspect of establishing an SDI Clemens Portele, Anders Östman, Michael Koutroumpas, Xin He, Janne Kovanen, Markus Schneider, Andriani.

Project: Conceptual data model design based on the INSPIRE specifications for the reporting of the Common Database on Designated Areas (CDDA) Project Meeting.

INSPIRE Data validation: the eENVplus experience --- Extension of the INSPIRE DS: the GeoSmartCity experience NRC EIS meeting Copenhaghen Nov 26 th, 2015.

European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity EIONET NRC Meeting on Biodiversity October 2011, Copenhagen Progress.

Making the CDDA data model INSPIRE compliant Project information and status 2015 Eionet Biodiversity Ecosystems, Indicators and Assessments NRC Workshop.

Framework service contract Lot 4 Project: CDDA in conformity with INSPIRE CDDA – INSPIRE PS mapping conclusions Meeting Darja Lihteneger.

GeoSciML meeting April 24th-28th 2006 INSPIRE Drafting teams.

Darja Lihteneger, November 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark INSPIRE Data Modelling for Reporting Data Flows – CDDA conceptual data model and INSPIRE Eionet.

Common Database on Designated Areas vs. INSPIRE Martin Tuchyňa, Darja Lihteneger INSPIRUJME SE, , Bratislava.

CDDA data model according INSPIRE Protected sites specification Tools used in the project.

Darja Lihteneger, 19 January 2016 CDDA data model and INSPIRE (EEA pilot project) – information and status Webinar for Eionet NRC Bodivesity data and information.

WP3 Task 3.2 Adaptation of the Training Material.

Workflow on publishing monitoring data using INSPIRE

CDDA 2018 new reporting re-using INSPIRE services

NATURE-SDIplus Infrastructure.

Data set series Michael Lutz 44th MIG-T meeting, Ispra

MIWP 5 – Validation and conformity testing

INSPIRE supporting activities for IED/ E-PRTR

Geospatial Knowledge Base (GKB) Training Platform

Austrian Statistical Datawarehouse (sDWH)

WISE and the future of WFD reporting

Validation and Conformity testing – Status & next steps

Robert Tomas INSPIRE Thematic clusters coordinator MIWP Action

The Re3gistry software and the INSPIRE Registry

On behalf of the EEA/EC INSPIRE team

Martin Tuchyňa Towards an INSPIREd e-reporting & INSPIRE priority datasets in Slovakia INSPIRE conference ,

© umweltbundesamt.at Bringing the LCML and EAGLE CONCEPTS TOGETHER STANDARDs FOR THE LAND COVER and LAND USE DOMAIN ISO TC211 - STANDARDS in ACTION Workshop,

INSPIRE Implementation Austria

INSPIRE Thematic Cluster on Biodiversity

MIG-T meeting, 19th April 2016, Ispra List of priority data sets

[draft] Conclusions, actions & next steps

MIWP Action ”Priority List of E-Reporting Datasets”

CDDA 2018 reporting Mette Lund Biodiversity group, EEA

Priority List of Data Sets for eReporting Proposal for extension, Issues Gabriele Vincze, 23 November 2017.

Meeting of Working Group Data & Information Sharing (DIS)

JRC INSPIRE team INSPIRE MIG-T Meeting Ispra, October 2016

Implementation of INSPIRE in EIONET Core Data Flows

CDDA & INSPIRE work of EEA - preliminary lessons learnt

WFD Article 8 Schemas Yvonne Gordon-Walker.

WP 4 - Revision of Natura 2000 dataflow

INSPIRE Development of Annex II&III Data specifications Robert Tomas – JRC INSPIRE Team (EC-JRC Contact point for Geology & Mineral Resources, Soil,

Article 13 RBMP reporting testing 2009

Modelling INSPIRE based data specifications for NatureSDIplus

INSPIRE Development of Implementing Rules

CDDA & INSPIRE work of EEA - lessons from implementation so far

[draft] Conclusions, actions & next steps

Priority list of datasets for eReporting (Priority Datasets) INSPIRE

… Two-step approach Conceptual Framework Annex I Annex II Annex III

Final Version (after MS revision)

CDDA alignment with INSPIRE

- Plans on the revision of reporting schemas/guidance -

BIODIVERSITY BREAK-OUT SESSION

Feasibility study on data harvesting using INSPIRE infrastructure

Presentation transcript:

INSPIRE Sub-GROUP 2017.4 VALIDATION DI Roland Grillmayer 16. März 2018, ISPRA

Reported Shortcomings PS Validation Background: Current CDDA-Reporting – Deadline 30.April CDDA Reporting obligations are now using the so called “Linked Approach” INSPIRE PS site datasets are used for the reporting obligations Protected sites are referenced by the INSPIRE ID

CDDA Reporting – The Linked Approach Mette Lund, EEA Biodiversity group, NRC Biodiversity data & information, 15 June 2017

Austrian WORKFLOW CDDA ReportinG Protected Site DB EA-Vienna WS-D: Synchronisation process ID-Matching & CDDA properties enrichment WS-E: Generation of Excel-sheet template – CDDA data type 2 WS-F: HALE Transformation CDDA data type II AT_CDDA2018_datatype2.xml WS-A: Download via INSPIRE Atom-Feed 9++ GML-Files - depending on the data structure of INSPIRE datasets WS-G: Final deliverables AT_CDDA2018_datatype2.xml + 9 ++ GML files: AT_ID.gml 8 x INSPIRE Download Services - Atom Feed 1 x INSPIRE Download Service - WFS Regional governments WS-C: Feedback cycle Quality improvement and clarification about the used INSPIRE localID WS-B: Dataset validation according data specification for protected site http://inspire-sandbox.jrc.ec.europa.eu/etf-webapp/

Reported Shortcomings PS Validation Uniqueness of the INSPIRE localID? GML-File examples PS from the regional governments in Austria:

Reported Shortcomings PS Validation Uniqueness of the INSPIRE localID? GML-File examples PS | regional government Austria

Reported Shortcomings PS Validation Uniqueness of the INSPIRE localID? GML-File examples PS | regional government Austria : No specific validation according the uniqueness of the INSPIRE localID?

Reported Shortcomings PS Validation Proposal for revision of assertion for extended codelist values DesignationValue and DesignationSchemeValue Upper Austria additional encode the national designation type which is suggested by EAA. Assertion is incomprehensible Poposal – possible to use the text as formulated in the introduction?

USABILITY Aspects ETF-Validator Regional government are overwhelmed to find all the conformance classes which must be used for the validation of data specifications. Expert user interface as now available important for explicit testing of certain conformance classes. Feedback form our regional governments: Is it possible to provide a interface (non-expert interface) with DS specific aggregated conformance classes? absolutely positive feedback from regional governments!!

USABILITY Aspects ETF-Validator Absolutely positive feedback from regional governments! Preference according the implementation priority of the working group (Metadata | Services | DS) Comment: Implementation of Annex II and III as soon as possible to be able to test harmonised datasets in a early stage

ContaCt & Information Roland Grillmayer T: +43-(0)1-313 04/3331 M: +43 676 9410850 Email: roland.grillmayer@umweltbundesamt.at www: roland.grillmayer.eu Environment Agency Austria www.umweltbundesamt.at Sub-GROUP 2017.4 Validation Meeting ISPRA  16.03.2018