LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Marbury vs. Madison (1803) Essential Skill:
Advertisements

Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Mr. Blough Academic Civics.
Other Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Supreme Court Cases Continued Civics. Furman V Georgia 1972 William Henry Furman convicted on Murder and Sentenced to Death – Supreme Court hears his.
Objective 29L Analyze he rights of the accused as set forth in the 4 th,5 th,6 th,8 th, and 14 th Amendments, including but no limited to such cases as.
Supreme Court Cases. U. S. v. Nixon Background: Background: Watergate Hotel; burglars break into Democratic Party headquarters. White House staff are.
Objective 29l-Analyze the rights of the accused Kelsey McLaughlin and Kelsey Bois Kelsey McLaughlin and Kelsey Bois.
8 Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Judicial Branch Test Review. Supreme Court What is the highest court in the Country?
Korematsu Writ of Habeas Corpus Executive Order 5 th amendment due process.
Issue: Equality Issue: Civil Liberties Issue: Rights of the Accused Issue: The Judicial Branch
Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Mr. Blough Academic Civics.
SUPREME COURT CASES CASES EVERY POLITICAL SCIENCE STUDENT NEEDS TO KNOW.
Supreme Court Cases EOC Review Becky Griffith. Marbury v. Madison, 1803 Judicial Review.
III. Rights of the Accused. A. Exclusionary Rule Exclusionary Rule – Supreme Court ruled any evidence collected illegally cannot be used in federal court.
 1803  DECISION  Established the concept of Judicial Review: the Supreme court has the final authority to find acts of government unconstitutional.
Miranda vs. Arizona Right to Remain Silent.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v. Madison  1803  Article III – Judicial Powers  Establishment of Judicial Review – the power of the Supreme.
Important Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v. Madison Does the Judiciary Act of 1789 allow Marbury to take his case directly to the Supreme Court? Does the.
Look over all the cases in the powerpoint and select only one of the cases. Open the Supreme Court Cases Reading file on Edmodo and read about the case.
Supreme Court Cases The Supreme Court came about with the Judiciary Act of 1789, which established the federal court system in the United States.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases: American History. Marbury v. Madison Essentials: Essentials: Established JUDICIAL REVIEW Established JUDICIAL REVIEW 1803.
Bell Ringer!!! You have 10 minutes to complete any questions and summary portions of yesterday’s Cornell Notes. You have 10 minutes to complete any questions.
How have the decisions of the Supreme Court protected people accused of crimes? What rights are accused people guaranteed? Landmark Supreme Court Cases.
Supreme Court Cases of the 60s. Mapp v. Ohio, 1961 What happened? - illegal search of home found “obscene materials”. Mapp was convicted. Brought to court.
Objective: To examine the importance of the Supreme Court case of Brown v. Board of Education.
Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v Madison Issue: Should the Constitution be very strictly interpreted or is there room for interpretation? If there.
Quote of the Day: “School officials do not possess absolute authority over their students. Students in school as well as out of school are "persons" under.
DUE PROCESS. Procedural Due Process v. Substantive Due Process Procedural follows a set procedure, the same for all the accused Such as counsel, unreasonable.
Court Cases. Court Case Assignment In groups you will research the major landmark court cases relative to this unit. The cases will be randomly selected.
Defendants’ Rights Characterize defendants’ rights and identify issues that arise in their implementation.
Supreme Court Cases continued…
Court Cases that Protect the Individual Citizen
Landmark Supreme Court Cases:
Landmark Supreme Court Cases:
Landmark Supreme Court Cases:
Supreme Court Landmark Cases.
The Judicial Branch and The Law Day 4
Landmark Supreme Court Cases:
Court Cases that set very important precedents.
John F. Kennedy
Landmark Cases Mapp v. Ohio Tinker v. Des Moines Miranda v. Arizona
Judicial Branch Famous Trials.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
By Michael Cleary Period 8 10/3/13 College Business Law Mr. Como
Rights of Criminal Suspects
Important Court Cases of the 20th Century
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
"I would like the Court to be remembered as the people's court"
Landmark Supreme Court cases
Important Supreme Court Cases
Liberalism vs. Conservatism
Landmark Supreme court cases
Gov Review Video #50: Important Supreme Court Cases To Know
Landmark Supreme Court Cases:
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
DUE PROCESS.
Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court formed the basis for the exercise of judicial.
GOVERNMENT UNIT 5 REVIEW.
Landmark Supreme court cases
Defendants’ Rights Edgenuity Lessons 3.4 and 3.5.
Appeals Courts Losing party may be able to appeal the decision to an appeals (appellate) court Losing party will ask the court to review the decision.
Important Court Cases and the United States Constitution
The Warren Court AP US History.
Constitutional Rights: Protections and Limitations
Do Now: a) Finish up Rights Movement Packet b) Earl Warren Background
DUE PROCESS.
The 4th, 5th, and 6th Amendments
Presentation transcript:

LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES:

Marbury v. Madison (1803): William Marbury was appointed justice of the peace by John Adams the day before he left office. Thomas Jefferson (the new president), cancelled Marbury’s appointment. Marbury asked the Supreme Court rule on the case based on the Judiciary Act, which enabled him to take his case directly to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court ruled that the Judiciary Act itself was unconstitutional and Marbury lost his case.

The decision established “judicial review”: the evaluation of federal laws’ constitutionality as a power of the Supreme Court The Supreme Court has the ability to review laws, cases, decisions, etc. and judge their constitutionality.

Plessy v. Fergusson (1896): A Louisiana law required separate seating for white and African Americans on public railroads (segregation). --Herman Plessy said his 14th Amendment rights (Equal Protection Clause) had been violated. --The Supreme Court ruled that his rights were not violated, and segregated public facilities were permitted until 1954.

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954) 10-year-old, Linda Brown, was not allowed to attend her neighborhood school because she was African American. --Linda Brown said her 14th Amendment rights (Equal Protection Clause) had been violated. --The Supreme Court ruled that “separate but equal” segregation was a violation of the Equal Protection Clause. This decision overturned the precedent established by Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896.

Mapp v. Ohio (1962): Dollree Mapp was convicted of having obscene materials in her home. Mapp appealed the conviction, saying that the police had violated her rights by entering her house without a warrant. The Supreme Court overturned the lower court’s decision, saying that the police had acted improperly, this excluding the evidence that they had found. “Exclusionary Rule”: excludes all evidence that is found in illegal police searched.

Gideon v. Wainwright (1963): Clarence Gideon was found guilty of breaking and entering and sentenced him to 5 years in prison. Gideon appealed claiming that he had been unconstitutionally denied counsel during trial due to Florida’s policy of only providing legal counsel in capital areas. Gideon received a new trial (with a court-appointed attorney) and was found not guilty. “The Gideon Rule”: guarantees counsel to all poor persons facing a felony charge (6th Amendment).

Miranda v. Arizona (1966): Ernesto Miranda was arrested for kidnapping and sexual assault – he signed a full confession including a statement that he “had full knowledge of his legal rights.” Miranda appealed claiming that he had not received warning or legal council to guide his decision to confess. The Supreme Court agreed with Miranda, saying that all suspects must be forewarned that they have the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney. “Miranda Rule”: before a suspect is questioned by police, he/she must be:

The Miranda Rights: 1. Told of their right to remain silent. 2. Warned that whatever they say may be used in court. 3. Informed of their right to an attorney. 4. Informed that an attorney will be provided if they cannot afford one. 5. Told that they can stop police questioning at any time.

Gregg v. Georgia (1976): Troy Gregg was sentenced to death after being found guilty of 2 counts of armed robbery and 2 counts of murder. Gregg appealed claiming that the sentence violated the “cruel and unusual punishment” clause of the 8th Amendment. The Supreme Court denied the appeal, stating for the first time that “the death penalty does not invariably violate the Constitution”.

New Jersey v. T.L.O. (1985): T.L.O. (a New Jersey high school student) was sentenced to probation by juvenile court after a vice-principal searched her purse and found cigarettes and marijuana. T.L.O. appealed the ruling saying the principal’s search was unreasonable. The Supreme Court denied the appeal, saying that schools are allowed more leeway when conducting searches. The Court created a “reasonable suspicion” rule for schools conducting searches, instead of the “probable cause” rule that exists for the rest of society.

SC Case Review What were the main arguments/outcomes of each of the following cases? Miranda v. Arizona Plessy v. Fergusson Brown v. Board of Education Gregg v. Georgia Mapp v. Ohio TLO v. New Jersey Marbury v. Madison