N fertilizer placements and greenhouse gas emissions from continuously

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Crop rotation and fertilizer type affect ammonia and
Advertisements

Nitrogen Loss Research
Downward Mobility of C 14 -labeled Simazine in Dormant and Actively Growing Bermudagrass and Fallow Soil H.D. Cummings, J.B. Weber, F.H. Yelverton, R.B.
Assessing Alternatives for Mitigating Net Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Increasing Yields from Rice Production in China Over the Next 20 Years Changsheng.
Introduction The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (Delta) is a large wetland that serves as the confluence of major California rivers, which supply the majority.
Factors influencing CH 4 and N 2 O emissions from Asian croplands and potential mitigation options Xiaoyuan Yan Frontier Research Center for Global Change,
Environmetal problems related to manure management Greenhouse gas emission from manure stores.
An integrated study of nutrient leaching and greenhouse gas emissions Tyson Ochsner and Rodney Venterea Soil and Water Management Research Unit Agricultural.
Walker River Basin Project Water PlantSoil Interactions Interactions.
Agriculture and Greenhouse Gases Jill Heemstra, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Building Environmental Leaders in Animal Agriculture (BELAA)
SOIL CO 2 AND N 2 O EMISSIONS FROM AN AGRICULTURAL WATERSHED AS INFLUENCED BY LANDSCAPE POSITION AND AGROFORESTRY CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Neal.
Oklahoma State University Department of Plant and Soil Sciences Oklahoma State University Department of Plant and Soil Sciences Nitrogen Loss from Urea.
Residue Biomass Removal and Potential Impact on Production and Environmental Quality Mahdi Al-Kaisi, Associate Professor Jose Guzman, Research Assistant.
Curtis Dell USDA-ARS-PSWMRU University Park, PA
Challenges and options John Couwenberg Hans Joosten Greifswald University Are emission reductions from peatlands MRV-able.
Soil Nutrient Availability Following Application of Biosolids to Forests in Virginia. Eduardo C. Arellano and Thomas R. Fox Department of Forestry, Blacksburg,
Evaluation of Effect of Combining SRI and UDP Practices on Performance of Lowland Rice in Kenya Wanjogu R.K, Machungo C, Owilla B. P, Njoka J.J. NIB RESEARCH.
Old Land (Sharkia) Project site. Zankalon Water Research Station Water Management Research Institute (NWRC)
Future atmospheric conditions increase the greenhouse-gas intensity of rice cultivation K.J. van Groenigen*,†, C. van Kessel ‡, B.A. Hungate* Discussion.
Nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency in rice. Contents  Introduction  Nitrogen dynamic in lowland rice soil  Methods of Nitrogen losses from rice fields.
Figure 1. Residue removal effects on corn yields as affected by N rate in 2009 and 2010 for poorly and well-drained soils. Asterisk indicates significant.
Soil Nitrogen Unit: Soil Science.
Gelfand, I. and G. P. Robertson Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in agricultural ecosystems. Pages in S. K. Hamilton, J. E. Doll,
Figure 3. Concentration of NO3 N in soil water at 1.5 m depth. Evaluation of Best Management Practices on N Dynamics for a North China Plain C. Hu 1, J.A.
Moisture Controls on Trace Gas Fluxes From Semiarid Soils Dean A. Martens and Jean E. T. McLain SWRC – Tucson and Water Conservation Laboratory – Phoenix.
THE CONSEQUENCES OF INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH ON GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS AND GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE L.V. Verchot, P. Grace, P. Sanchez, J. Ingram,
EMISSIONS OF NOx AND N 2 O FROM OXISOL CULTIVATED WITH COTTON IN THE CERRADO REGION, BRAZIL Êrika Fernandes (CEFET/BA - UnB) Mercedes Bustamante (UnB)
345.T1 Model Agricultural Core Curriculum: Supplement University of California, Davis Fertilizer Applications Factors that Affect the Type of Fertilizer.
N 2 O-It’s No Laughing Matter! Leilei Ruan and Sandy Erwin.
Locations Efaw Lake Carl Blackwell Haskell Years2005, 2006 Objectives: 1)To determine the minimum preplant N fertilizer needed to achieve maximum yield.
Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Biofuel Crops and Parameterization in the EPIC Biogeochemical Model Priya Pillai and Viney P. Aneja North Carolina State University.
Promising CSA Technologies and Their Potential Impacts Jawoo Koo and Cindy Cox IFPRI.
Compaction, Crop and Tillage Effects on Greenhouse Gases Emission From an Alfisol of Ohio David A.N. Ussiri and Rattan Lal Carbon Management and Sequestration.
Greenhouse Gases Emission and Carbon Sequestration in Agro-Ecosystems under Long-Term No-Till: Implications for Global Warming Mitigation Pierre-André.
Using TEMPO to Evaluate the Impact of Ozone on Agriculture
Sustainable Farming & PepsiCo
By: Matt Brooks, Chris Mills, Mia Harris
5th Annual Meeting of MIRSA-2 project
Updating research works on GHG emission from Paddy Rice in China
Summary of Paper Submitted to Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition Japan, 2017.
NDVI Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.
Site-specific feasibility of alternate wetting and drying as a greenhouse gas mitigation option in irrigated rice fields in Southeast Asia: a synthesis.
Greenhouse gas emissions from paddy rice in Chile
Greenhouse Gas Emission from Paddy Rice Production Systems in Brazil
Merle Anders, Arlene Adviento-Borbe, Daniela Carrijo, Gabriel LaHue
HOW CAN WE REDUCE VOLATILIZATION LOSSES?
Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in Irrigated Rice Paddies in Southeast Asia/ Part 2: Field Demonstration 2017 Dry Season Report (7th Season Field Experiment)
An Agriculture Perspective
14.8 NOTES Greenhouse Gases
Are emission reductions from peatlands MRV-able
Does crop rotational diversity increase soil microbial resistance and resilience to drought and flooding? Jörg Schnecker1, A. Stuart Grandy1, D. Boone.
Topsoil Depth at the Centralia Site
Supervising Science Research Specialist
Strategies for mitigating ammonia emissions from agroecosystems
Dhurba Neupane1, Juan Solomon2 and Jay Davison3
Climate Change – Human Factors
C. Kallenbach1. , W. Horwath1, Z. Kabir1, J. Mitchell2, D
Sara Parr Kellogg Biological Station
Percent of Global GHG Emissions 14%
Gary M Pierzynski, P.V.V. Prasad, C.W. Rice, B. Lynn, and R. Lollato
Overview of the Paddy Rice Research Group
Influence of soil-urea ratio on N2O emissions and nitrite
Flagship Project on Reducing GHG Intensity of Rice Systems
Saturday, 24 November 2018 Nitrogen Management Selecting a suitable N fertiliser type David P. Wall Teagasc, Johnstown Castle, Co Wexford.
Moisture Controls on Trace Gas Fluxes From Semiarid Soils
DIPLOMA THESIS Project “Biochar for carbon sequestration in soils: Analysis of production, biological effects in the soil and economics” (Klima und Energiefonds.
Percent of Global GHG Emissions 14%
HOW CAN WE REDUCE VOLATILIZATION LOSSES?
GLOBAL EFFECTS.
Modern Soil Health.
Presentation transcript:

N fertilizer placements and greenhouse gas emissions from continuously flooded rice systems M. Arlene Adviento-Borbe1 and Bruce Linquist2 1Delta Water Management Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Jonesboro, AR 2Dept. of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 3rd PRRG-GRA Americas meeting, July 13-15, 2016 DBNRRC Stuttgart, AR Delta Water Management Research Unit

Emissions of CH4 and N2O produced from agricultural activities (1961-2011) (20-40 Mt of CH4 per year) Source: FAOSTAT Delta Water Management Research Unit

CH4 Processes causing emissions of CH4 from flooded rice fields O2 CH4 Rice Roots Rice Plant Rhizosphere Bulk soil Floodwater Atmosphere CH4 O2 CH4 O2 CH4 CH4 + 2O2 CO2 + H2O CH3COOH CO2 + CH4 CO2 + 4H+ 2H2O + CH4 CH4 + 2O2 CO2 + H2O O2 , H+ Delta Water Management Research Unit

Processes causing emissions of N2O from flooded rice fields Rice Roots Rice Plant Oxidized soil Reduced soil Atmosphere O2 N2O N2O O2 NH3 NH4+ N2O N2O NO3- NO2- NO + N2O NH3 NH4+ NO3- N2 O2 , H+ Delta Water Management Research Unit

US Nitrous oxide emissions by source (1990-2014) Delta Water Management Research Unit

Current default N2O emission factor for direct emissions EN2O = 1 + 0.0125*F 0.21 to 0.40% fertilizer-induced N2O emission Source: Bouwman 1996. Nutrient Cyc. Agroeco.52, 165-170. Delta Water Management Research Unit

Management practices for reducing GHG emissions Water management Alternate wetting & drying Rice selections Hybrids vs conventional Placement of N fertilizer Subsurface application Forms of N Ammonium sulfate Urease inhibitor Time of N application Multiple application Amount of fertilizer N Suboptimal rates Optimal rates Delta Water Management Research Unit

Management practices for reducing GHG emissions Water management Alternate wetting & drying Rice selections Hybrids vs conventional Placement of N fertilizer Subsurface application Forms of N Ammonium sulfate Urease inhibitor Time of N application Multiple application Amount of fertilizer N Suboptimal rates Optimal rates Delta Water Management Research Unit

Mitigating CH4 emissions in flooded rice fields Rice Roots Rice Plant Rhizosphere Bulk soil Floodwater Atmosphere O2 CH4 O2 CH3COOH CO2 + CH4 CO2 + 4H+ 2H2O + CH4 CH4 + 2O2 CO2 + H2O O2 , H+ Delta Water Management Research Unit

Management practices for reducing GHG emissions Water management Alternate wetting & drying Rice selections Hybrids vs conventional Placement of N fertilizer Subsurface application Forms of N Ammonium sulfate Urease inhibitor Time of N application Multiple application Amount of fertilizer N Suboptimal rates Optimal rates Delta Water Management Research Unit

Influence of N fertilizer on N2O emissions in flooded rice fields Rice Roots Rice Plant Oxidized soil Reduced soil 18% increase in N2O emission Atmosphere O2 N2O NH3 NH4+ Fertilizer N N2O O2 N2O N2O NO3- NO2- NO + N2O NH3 NH4+ X NO3- N2 O2 , H+ Delta Water Management Research Unit

Influence of N fertilizer on CH4 emissions in flooded rice fields Rice Roots Rice Plant Rhizosphere Bulk soil Floodwater N-rate dependent CH4 emissions: Low-to-moderate vs. high N rates Atmosphere Deep-placed fertilizer N = 40% reduction of CH4 emission O2 CH4 O2 NH3 NH4+ Fertilizer N (band) CH4 CH4 + 2O2 CO2 + H2O CH3COOH CO2 + CH4 CO2 + 4H+ 2H2O + CH4 CH4 + 2O2 CO2 + H2O O2 , H+ Delta Water Management Research Unit

Field experiments Locations: Field 1 – Agricultural Research Farm, University of California, Davis, CA Field 2 – California Rice Research Experimental Station, Biggs, CA Field 3 - Commercial rice grower’s field, Marysville, CA N treatments: Broadcast N – surface applied N fertilizer Banded N– injected/applied 7.5 cm below soil surface Delta Water Management Research Unit

Objectives 1. To asses various N fertilizer placements in reducing methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from irrigated rice systems, and 2. To quantify grain yield under different N fertilizer management practices Delta Water Management Research Unit

N fertilizer treatments Delta Water Management Research Unit

Measurements of CH4 and N2O emissions 30.5 cm diameter vented flux chamber with 17 CFM/5800 RPM fan daily to weekly gas sampling (90+ sampling dates) varying chamber height (13 - 122 cm; 8-90 L) based on height of growing rice 12 mL gas vial double sealed with silicon Multi-point valves GC-2014 gas chromatograph with a 63NI ECD and FID detectors Delta Water Management Research Unit

N fertilization affects grain yield Significant at 95% confidence level Delta Water Management Research Unit

N fertilization affects grain yield Fertilizer N placements Grain Yield, Mg ha-1 Relative % increase to surface application Relative Yield change to surface application   Field 1 N0 4.05b F1-BR 11.1a F1-BA 12.2a 10 1.1 Field 2 3.66b F2-BR 10.3a F2-BA 12.1a 17 1.8 Field 3 10.9b 12.5a 2.5 0.3 Delta Water Management Research Unit

N fertilizer placements and CH4 emissions, kg CH4-C ha-1 d-1 Delta Water Management Research Unit

N fertilizer placements and N2O emissions, g N2O-N ha-1 d-1 Delta Water Management Research Unit

Global warming potentials and Fertilizer-induced N2O emissions in different N treatments and sites Fertilizer N placements CH4 emissions kg CO2 eq ha-1 season-1 N2O emissions Fertilizer-induced N2O emissions, %   Field 1 N0 210a -6.6a F1-BR 409a -23a (0.02) F1-BA 453a -12a (0.01) Field 2 2,085b -30a F2-BR 4,438a -33a F2-BA 3,834a -50a (0.04) Field 3 8,994a 4.7a 9,910a -35a (0.06) 7,711a -6.0a Delta Water Management Research Unit

Global warming potentials in different N treatments and sites Fertilizer N placements GWP, kg CO2 eq ha-1 season-1 Relative % decrease to surface application GWPY, kg CO2 eq Mg-1 season-1   Field 1 N0 204a 46a F1-BR 385a 33a F1-BA 440a (14) 35a (6) Field 2 2,055b 574a F2-BR 4,405a 449a F2-BA 3,784a 14 311a 31 Field 3 8,999a 824a 9,875a 808a 7,705a 22 616a 24 Delta Water Management Research Unit

Influence of N fertilizer on CH4 emissions in flooded rice fields Rice Roots Rice Plant Rhizosphere Bulk soil Floodwater N-rate dependent CH4 emissions: Low-to-moderate vs. high N rates Atmosphere Deep-placed fertilizer N = 40% reduction of CH4 emission O2 CH4 O2 NH3 NH4+ Fertilizer N (band) CH4 CH4 + 2O2 CO2 + H2O CH3COOH CO2 + CH4 CO2 + 4H+ 2H2O + CH4 CH4 + 2O2 CO2 + H2O O2 , H+ Delta Water Management Research Unit

Form of fertilizer N; pellets vs granular Summary Band application of urea fertilizer below the soil surface had no effect on the total seasonal CH4 and N2O emissions. Fertilizer addition increased grain yield in all study sites but the lack of yield response to N fertilizer placements is likely due to N was applied at optimal rates. More research is needed to evaluate if N placement can be an effective management practice to reduce GHG emissions in flooded rice systems. soil depth (20 cm) Form of fertilizer N; pellets vs granular Delta Water Management Research Unit

Delta Water Management Research Unit

Thank you! Delta Water Management Research Unit