Wave equation migration of VSP data

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Traditional practice separates seismic data processing and further interpretation. However the most efficient processing methods utilize a-priori information.
Advertisements

Adaptive Grid Reverse-Time Migration Yue Wang. Outline Motivation and ObjectiveMotivation and Objective Reverse Time MethodologyReverse Time Methodology.
Riemannian Wavefield Migration: Wave-equation migration from Topography Jeff Shragge, Guojian Shan, Biondo Biondi Stanford.
Chapter Fang Li 《 Quantitative Seismic Interpretation 》
LES Continuity Equation Residual Stress Residual Stress Tensor Anisotropic residual stress tensor Residual kinetic energy Filtered pressure.
Reverse-Time Migration
Wave-equation migration velocity analysis beyond the Born approximation Paul Sava* Stanford University Sergey Fomel UT Austin (UC.
Imaging Multiple Reflections with Reverse- Time Migration Yue Wang University of Utah.
Wave-Equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Data Ruiqing He Dept. of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah.
Wave-Equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Data Ruiqing He Dept. of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah.
Wave-equation migration velocity analysis Paul Sava* Stanford University Biondo Biondi Stanford University Sergey Fomel UT Austin.
Wave-equation common-angle gathers for converted waves Paul Sava & Sergey Fomel Bureau of Economic Geology University of Texas.
Time-shift imaging condition Paul Sava & Sergey Fomel Bureau of Economic Geology University of Texas at Austin.
Continuous String Take limit of h→0 and m/h→ r Wave Equation.
1 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. VSP modeling, velocity analysis, and imaging in complex structures Yue Du With Mark Willis, Robert Stewart May.
3D Wave-equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Free-surface Multiples Ruiqing He University of Utah Feb., 2006.
VostokVostok José M. Carcione (OGS, Italy). Location in Antarctica.
Passive Seismic ImagingStanford Exploration Project passive seismic imaging Brad Artman.
1 Riemannian Wavefield Migration: Imaging non-conventional wavepaths and geometries Jeff Shragge Geophysics Department University.
Brad Artman undergraduate: Colorado School of Mines, Geophysical Engineer graduate: Stanford University, Ph.D. candidate work experience: –Western Atlas.
Seismic reflections. Seismic waves will be reflected at “discontinuities” in elastic properties A new ray emerges, heading back to the surface Energy.
1 OBS->OBS Extrapolation Interferometry Shuqian Dong and Sherif Hanafy Coarse OBS Virtual SWP.
Migration In a Nutshell Migration In a Nutshell Migration In a Nutshell D.S. Macpherson.
© 2005 Paulsson Geophysical Characterization of the San Andreas Fault at Parkfield Using a Massive 3D VSP J. Andres Chavarria, Alex Goertz, Martin Karrenbach,
The main instrument used is called the sonde. A basic sonde consists of a source and two receivers one-foot apart. The sonde is lowered down the borehole.
Wave-equation migration Wave-equation migration of reflection seismic data to produce images of the subsurface entails four basic operations: Summation.
Brad Artman 1, Deyan Draganov 2, Kees Wapenaar 2, Biondo Biondi 1 1 Stanford Exploration Project, Geophysics, Stanford University, 94305, USA 2 Department.
Ultrasonic reflectivity imaging with a depth extrapolation algorithm Ernesto Bonomi, Giovanni Cardone, Enrico Pieroni CRS4, Italy.
Wave-equation migration velocity analysis Biondo Biondi Stanford Exploration Project Stanford University Paul Sava.
Direct Migration of Passive Seismic Data Brad Artman 1, Deyan Draganov 2, Kees Wapenaar 2, Biondo Biondi 1 1 Stanford Exploration Project, Geophysics,
Least squares migration of elastic data Aaron Stanton and Mauricio Sacchi PIMS 2015.
Writing a direct variation equation. write a direct variation problem when y = 20 and x = 10 y = kx 20 = k·10 k = 2 y = 2x.
Seismic interferometry: a comparison of approaches Kees Wapenaar Deyan Draganov Joost van der Neut Jan Thorbecke Delft University of Technology.
Shot-profile migration of GPR data Jeff Shragge, James Irving, and Brad Artman Geophysics Department Stanford University.
Least Squares Natural Migration (LSNM) of Surface Waves Zhaolun Liu
1.1 Seismic Interferometry Optical interferometry.
PROCESSING FOR SUBSALT IMAGING: A NEW AND FIRST TWO WAY MIGRATION METHOD THAT AVOIDS ALL HIGH FREQUENCY ASYMPTOTIC ASSUMPTIONS AND IS EQUALLY EFFECTIVE.
Lee M. Liberty Research Professor Boise State University.
Optical Metamaterials
Seismic Methods Geoph 465/565 ERB 5104 Lecture 7 – Sept 16, 2015
Perturbation Approach to Derive Born Approximation, Frechet Derivative, and Migration Operator Bowen Guo.
Estimation of True (Amplitude-Dependent) Reflection Coefficients in 3-D Prestack Depth Migration of Seismic Data George A. McMechan, Center for Lithospheric.
WAVEFIELD PREDICTION OF WATER-LAYER-MULTIPLES
Zero-Offset Data d = L o ò r ) ( g = d dr r ) ( g = d
Rigorous Derivation of LSM (& FWI)
HOCIGs and VOCIGs via Two-way Reverse Time Migration
Imaging conditions in depth migration algorithms
Multi-dimensional depth imaging without an adequate velocity model
Passive seismic imaging
Virtual Shear Checkshot with Airguns
17-Nov-18 Parallel 2D and 3D Acoustic Modeling Application for hybrid computing platform of PARAM Yuva II Abhishek Srivastava, Ashutosh Londhe*, Richa.
Passive Seismic Imaging
Paul Sava: WE seismic imaging
Acoustic Reflection 2 (distance) = (velocity) (time) *
The Wave Equation Modeled
Wave-Equation Migration Research at Los Alamos National Laboratory
The FOCI method versus other wavefield extrapolation methods
Wavelet estimation from towed-streamer pressure measurement and its application to free surface multiple attenuation Zhiqiang Guo (UH, PGS) Arthur Weglein.
Find the inverse of the matrix
Haiyan Zhang and Arthur B. Weglein
Prestack Depth Migration in a Viscoacoustic Medium
Some remarks on the leading order imaging series
Notes Over 7.4 Finding an Inverse Relation
Passive seismic imaging
Depth imaging using slowness-averaged Kirchoff extrapolators
1-6: Absolute Value Equations
Prestack depth migration in angle-domain using beamlet decomposition:
The nice looking seismic sections you’re used to seeing in text books are compiled from field data which is collected in the form of shot records. The.
Bogdan G. Nita *University of Houston M-OSRP Annual Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Wave equation migration of VSP data Brad Artman Jeff Shragge brad@sep.stanford .edu jeff@sep.stanford.edu

brad@sep.stanford .edu jeff@sep.stanford.edu “Geologic complexity” Time migration Kirchhoff migration Wave equation migration Inversion “Imaging operator complexity” brad@sep.stanford .edu jeff@sep.stanford.edu

brad@sep.stanford .edu jeff@sep.stanford.edu Wavefield extrapolation Shot-profile migration Surface reflection VSP experiment Scattering modes Reflection Transmission Deviated well geometries brad@sep.stanford .edu jeff@sep.stanford.edu

Wavefield extrapolation data = W(x, z, w) W(x, z+Dz, w) = W(x, z, w) e – i k Dz z kz2 = w2s2 – kx2 brad@sep.stanford .edu jeff@sep.stanford.edu

Wavefield extrapolation data = W(x, z, w) W(z, x+Dx, w) = W(x, z, w) e – i k Dx x kx2 = w2s2 – kz2 brad@sep.stanford .edu jeff@sep.stanford.edu

brad@sep.stanford .edu jeff@sep.stanford.edu Wavefield extrapolation Shot-profile migration Surface reflection VSP experiment Scattering modes Reflection Transmission Deviated well geometries brad@sep.stanford .edu jeff@sep.stanford.edu

Shot-profile migration Seed source and receiver wavefields x t Extrapolate to all model levels Compare wavefields via an Imaging Condition t z I (x, z)=Σ U (w, x, z) D (w, x, z) ω IFT & zero lag extraction correlation Reflectors are imaged when energy in both U and D is co-located in x and z, at t=0. D U brad@sep.stanford .edu jeff@sep.stanford.edu

brad@sep.stanford .edu jeff@sep.stanford.edu X or Z * Dz or Dx e + i k Dz e - i k Dx z x brad@sep.stanford .edu jeff@sep.stanford.edu

brad@sep.stanford .edu jeff@sep.stanford.edu Wavefield extrapolation Shot-profile migration Surface reflection VSP experiment Scattering modes Reflection Transmission Deviated well geometries brad@sep.stanford .edu jeff@sep.stanford.edu

* Reflection imaging V (x, z) Back-scattered P to P reflection p brad@sep.stanford .edu jeff@sep.stanford.edu

Converted reflection imaging V (x, z) and V (x, z) p s * p-wave s-wave Back-scattered P to S mode conversion brad@sep.stanford .edu jeff@sep.stanford.edu

Converted transmission imaging V (x, z) and V (x, z) p s * Forward-scattered P to S mode conversion brad@sep.stanford .edu jeff@sep.stanford.edu

brad@sep.stanford .edu jeff@sep.stanford.edu Image spaces Forward scattering Compressional down – shear down Backscattering Compressional down – compressional up Compressional down – shear up Shear down – shear up (?) brad@sep.stanford .edu jeff@sep.stanford.edu

brad@sep.stanford .edu jeff@sep.stanford.edu Wavefield extrapolation Shot-profile migration Surface reflection VSP experiment Scattering modes Reflection Transmission Deviated well geometries brad@sep.stanford .edu jeff@sep.stanford.edu

Deviated well geometries * brad@sep.stanford .edu jeff@sep.stanford.edu