Maintenance Rating Program Training

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gerald L. Ullman, Ph.D., P.E. Texas Transportation Institute Designing and Maintaining a Pedestrian-Friendly Work Zone.
Advertisements

Maintenance Rating Program Training 2014 KYTC Division of Maintenance Tracy Nowaczyk, P.E.
CR 236 Resurfacing from US 441 to I-75 30% Plans Alachua County Board of County Commissioners September 28, 2010.
TRAILS AS TRANSPORTATION Design & Construction Michael J. Kubek, P.E. Ohio Department of Transportation, District 12 Production Administrator.
Highway Maintenance Performance Measurement Annual Report September 2004.
Welcome to Inspecting Maintenance of Traffic Items on Projects
Hardin County Engineering Department September 12, 2006.
Design of Highway Vertical Alignment Chapter 16
Mississippi DOT Roadsides, Drainage & Vegetation Management Standards.
Chap 4 Cross Section Elements (pp.4-1 – 4-66 ) The following topics (pages) are covered in this lecture: Pavement (p.4-1 – 4-7) Pavement (p.4-1 – 4-7)
EXAM 2 REVIEW. 1. Drainage problem (25 pts) Below you see a cross-section of a ditch. It runs parallel to a 200-acre field consisting of permanent pasture.
MAINTENANCE RATING PROGRAM Allen Mattox District Five Technical Support Manager.
Describe difference between a shared left-turn lane and a left turn lane. Describe what actions to take with pedestrian signals and traffic control officers'’
Chapter 2 Signs, Signals, and Roadway Markings
CHAPTER 3 SIGNS, SIGNALS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS
GDOT Maintenance Overview Eric C. Pitts, P.E. State Maintenance Engineer June 28, 2013.
"The Use of Condition Assessments to Improve Maintenance Level of Service in Texas" Joe S. Graff, P.E. Texas Department of Transportation.
Texas Maintenance Assessment Program (TxMAP). Background Developed by TxDOT’s Maintenance Division in 1999 to document the condition of the highway system.
Urban Storm Drain Design: Typical urban roadway characteristics
Vegetation Control For Safety Russ Johnson – Maintenance Supervisor - WSDOT Don Petersen – Safety/Design Engineer - FHWA.
PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE 1:
SR 1 BLUFFTON Public Hearing September 25, INDOT Mission: INDOT will plan, build, maintain and operate a superior transportation system enhancing.
Customers and Their Expectations The Mn/DOT Maintenance Perspective By Mark Wikelius MQA Peer Exchange, October 12 th, 2004.
ODOT. Taking Care of What We Have. Asset Management, Life Cycle Analysis : A Three-Pronged Approach September 9th, 2015 Andrew Williams, Ohio DOT.
BIM Bridge Inspection and Maintenance Technical Standards Branch Class B Bridge Inspection Course Grade Separation Inspection & Ratings Grade Separation.
Mike McColeman, P.E. Assistant Maintenance Administrator Ohio Department of Transportation Defining Desired Outcomes Defining Desired Outcomes.
Entrances (PE – 300) PRIVATE ENTRANCE - An entrance that serves a single-family residence, farm or other noncommercial or non-industrial property as determined.
1 Performance measurement data are displayed for 10 individual survey cycles, including 3 cycles for each of the fiscal years 2001 through 2003 and the.
Complete Streets Training Module 10 – Street Elements: Design & Safety Considerations for Context-Based Solutions.
The Highway Fund – Planning, Measuring, and Reporting Mike Holder, PE, Chief Engineer 2015 CAPA / DOT Workshop February 24, 2015.
Lesson Plan For Day Two Power point presentation 30 min Video– AAA- signs, signals, etc. 20 min Quiz- Signs Etc 10 min Correct 10 min H/O- Signs 10 min.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MAINTENANCE RATING PROGRAM.
1 Section III Day 2. 2 In this picture are a pedestrian, an inline skater, and a cyclist. They are all going the same way. Which roadway user has right.
Moloto Road (R573) Safety Investigations
Montana Driver Education and Training Traffic Control Devices and
Signs, Signs, Everywhere Signs
Roadway Pavement Management Plan
Walking and Working Surfaces
Rating Grade Separations
Learning Outcomes Describe ways to incorporate and implement practical safety solutions during projects and maintenance. Identify potential sources of.
Drive Right Chapter 2 Unit 1
Profile Leveling.
Interdisciplinary teams Existing or new roadway
Signs, Signals, and Roadway Markings
Approach Road Inspection and Rating
Investigation of Road Project
Signs, Signals, Markings & Speed Limits
Review of Revised SP 150 – Traffic Control Dated February 01, 2017
From Channelization, Islands and Turning Roadways (p ~ p
HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE Failures in flexible pavement.
Grade Separation Inspection and Rating.
Highway Geometric Design Combination of Vertical and Horizontal Alignment.
Rules of the Road.
Longitudinal Joint Construction – Why Straightness Matters
Chapter 15: Driving in Rural Areas
Maintaining a Safer Roadway
PASER Ratings for TwinCATS Planning Area
Safety Audit Components
Village of Sherwood Stumpf Subdivision Paving and Drainage Improvements November 7, 2018.
Traffic Study Presented by Keith Wenners, pe, ptoe
Signs, Signals, and Road Markings
Grade Separation Inspection and Rating.
Design Criteria CTC 440.
Grade Separation Inspection and Rating.
3R Standards Resurfacing, Restoration, & Rehabilitation Note: Need to update based on revisions to Ch 7 of HDM (freeway and non-freeway now covered in.
School of Civil Engineering
lesson 2.3 ROADWAY MARKINGS
Grade Separation Inspection and Rating.
Chapter 2 Signs, Signals, and Roadway Markings
SAFE DRIVING RULES AND REGUALTIONS
Presentation transcript:

Maintenance Rating Program Training 2014 KYTC Division of Maintenance Tracy Nowaczyk, P.E.

MRP Data Purpose Maintenance Quality Assurance Program Identifies level of service delivered to the general public Communicates value of maintenance work Helps determine budgets

Roadway Sampling Between 300 and 400 roadway segments per district Sample four road types: Interstates, Other NHS, Other SP SS, Rural Secondary Randomly selected by software program Provides snap shot of existing conditions

MRP Format Annual data collection June-September Inspections performed with mobile GIS application Performed by district personnel

Quality Assurance Program and mobile application training offered each spring Mini manuals available for each inspector Central office inspects 10% of completed sections

Procedure Each roadway section is 500 feet Inspect pavement and right of way Sections should be free of bridges, intersections, or construction zones.

Current Data Collection

General Aesthetics General appearance of roadway and roadside Includes potholes, cracking, grass, weeds, patching, striping, signs, litter, guardrail, shoulders, etc. 1=Excellent 2=Good 3=Acceptable 4=Poor 5=Unacceptable

Roadway/Shoulder Obstructions Is there roadway or shoulder with less than 15’ vertical clearance? Should be free of canopy (tree or other vegetation) or other obstructions for minimum height of 15’

Visual Obstructions Are there visual obstructions of intersections, curves or signs, etc.?

Fence Not Providing Barrier Is there fence not providing a positive barrier? Fences should deny access to roadways Check for breaks, holes, rusting out, downed fence, or missing fence Covered in vines may still be effective

Guardrail Outside Specification Is there guardrail outside height specifications (25” to 29”)? Measured with respect to near edge of road or shoulder Outdated end treatments do not count

Guardrail With Damage Is there guardrail with post or accident damage? Due to vehicular hits or other factors Structural integrity or functionality is lost

Damaged Attenuators/Rail Ends Count and record the total number of attenuators/rail ends that are damaged Due to vehicular hits or other factors Structural integrity or functionality lost

Pavement Potholes Bowl shaped hole or depression in surface Broken into smaller pieces due to cracking or localized disintegration Count each pothole that measure 6”x6”x1” or larger Record 20 as max

Rutting (p2)Outside wheel path at 0 feet Surface depression of pavement in wheel path Lay straight edge across wheel path and measure rut depth Circle closest measurement

Pavement Drop Off to Shoulder Is there pavement drop off to shoulder greater than or equal to 1.5”? Decrease in elevation between traffic lane and shoulder or absence of shoulder

Shoulder Drop Off to Ground Is there shoulder drop off to ground greater than or equal to 3.0”? Elevation decrease between improved shoulder and adjacent ground at outside edge of shoulder Due to consolidation, erosion or run-off Measure at edge of shoulder

High Shoulder Is there high shoulder? Opposite of pavement drop off to shoulder Due to frost heave, swelling soils, unmowed grass Creates ponding of water on pavement

Shoulder Potholes Bowl shaped hole or depression in surface Broken into smaller pieces due to cracking or localized disintegration Count each pothole that measure 6”x6”x1” or larger Record 20 as max

Drainage Structures Inhibited Count and record the number of drainage structures with 25% or greater flow inhibited Should be free of obstruction and in good working order

Ditches With Flow Inhibited Are there ditches with flow inhibited? Water flow should be unobstructed by blockages or damage Blocked entrance pipes along the ditch should be included as a ditch obstruction

Curbs and Gutters Inhibited Are there curbs and gutters with flow inhibited? Water flow should not be obstructed by blockages or damage

Striping Reflectivity Reflectivity provides positive guidance to motorists at night Take 3 readings per section per color with LTL 2000 Reflectometer Priority order edge line, center line, lane line Solid lines ten pace intervals Skip lines have 3 readings, one per skip

Signs Not Conforming Count and record the number of signs not conforming to face specifications Damaged sign face, faded, vandalized, etc. Free from obvious visible defects that would detract from effectiveness at night

Sign Assemblies Not Conforming Should not be leaning more than 22.5 in any direction No bolts or rivets missing No sign face turned more than 45 from the line of sight of traffic flow Sign posts should not extend from top of sign face Min height from pavement edge extended to bottom of lowest sign face should be no less than 5’ in rural areas or 7’ in urban areas and fully controlled access highways

County Level Data Analysis Combine inspection data with rideability data Features evaluated with importance weight Combine three years MRP data Statistical validity varies with size of samples (min 80% +/- 10%)

Customer Survey Calibrates importance weights and performance goals Highest perceived maintenance: signs, guardrail, striping Lowest perceived maintenance: pavement surfaces, shoulders, drainage Customer priorities: pavement surfaces, signs and markings, roadside drainage

County Level Report Produced on odd years Level of service graphic Report cards with feature scores RURAL SECONDARY

Contact Tracy Nowaczyk Operations and Pavement Management Branch Division of Maintenance tracy.nowaczyk@ky.gov 502-782-5595 Reports available http://transportation.ky.gov/Maintenance/Pages/Pavement-and-Operations.aspx