MHSA Full Service Partnership (FSP) For YOUTH (Ages 0-15) and TAY (Transition-Age Youth) (Ages 16-25) Santa Clara County Mental Health Board System Planning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accessing Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services in Washtenaw County Barrier Busters Presentation July 24, 2013.
Advertisements

1 NM Behavioral Health Collaborative New Mexico Behavioral Health Plan for Children, Youth and Their Families March 2007.
MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES ACT (MHSA) “THE NEXT STEP” PREVENTION EDUCATION INTERVENTION (PEI)
JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
MHSA Full Service Partnership (FSP) For YOUTH (Ages 0-15) and TAY (Transition-Age Youth) (Ages 16-25) Santa Clara County Mental Health Board System Planning.
Building a Foundation for Community Change Proposed Restructure 2010.
RFP Youth Homelessness: Supporting Healthy and Successful Transitions to Adulthood February 13, :00 a.m.-10:00 a.m. Location: McDougall Centre.
Mental Health Needs: Meeting the Challenge Marsha G. Ansel, LCSW-C Howard County Mental Health Authority.
Sacramento County RBS Reform Structure and Process March 2009.
Comprehensive Children’s Mental Health Act
Wraparound Milwaukee was created in 1994 to provide coordinated community-based services and supports to families of youth with complex emotional, behavioral.
Services and Resources Available for Families & Children.
Youth Empowerment Services (YES) A Medicaid Waiver Program for Children with Severe Emotional Disturbances Clinical Eligibility Determination Texas Department.
Outpatient Services Programs Workgroup: Service Provision under Laura’s Law June 11, 2014.
Missouri’s Primary Care and CMHC Health Home Initiative
Children’s System of Care Collaborating to Serve the Children and Families of New Jersey.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH ADULT SYSTEMS OF CARE – JAIL MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES ACT Full Service Partnership.
WRAPAROUND MILWAUKEE “Never doubt that a small group of committed citizens can change the world: indeed, it’s the only thing that ever does.” Margaret.
Hamilton County Mental Health and Recovery Services Board Provider Meeting Transforming the Hamilton County System of Care and Community for Transitional.
NW Minnesota Council of Collaborative’s: “Our Children Succeed Initiative” Overview 2/7/07.
ERIE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH Children’s Behavioral Health.
Region IV Behavioral Health Adult and Children. Population: 430,000 Employees: approx. 460 How many people do we serve? In October in SR alone: Processed.
A New Narrative for Child Welfare February 16, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on Children, Youth & Families.
KENTUCKY YOUTH FIRST Grant Period August July
Carver County and Scott County February Children’s Mental Health Case Management seeks to improve the quality of life for children with severe emotional.
A Framework to Guide Full Service Partnerships for Adults Maria Funk, Ph.D. Mental Health Clinical District Chief ASOC Countywide Programs Los Angeles.
Connecticut Department of Children and Families Agency Overview.
Background Wraparound Milwaukee was created in 1994 to provide a coordinated and comprehensive array of community-based services and supports to families.
What is a Family Connections Program? An Overview of a New Service Approach Being Developed by the Bay Area Residentially Based Services Consortium.
Children’s Mental Health & Family Services Collaboratives ~ Minnesota’s Vision ~
Important Considerations When Building an OA FSP Diane Dworkin, L.C.S.W. San Mateo County Mental Health Steven Pickard, PSC Telecare OA, FSP Kathy Craig,
The Children’s Aid Society of Brant Preliminary Findings Crown Ward Review 2011 February 28-March 10, 2011.
Accessing Services for Youth with Developmental Disabilities through the Children’s System of Care Clarence Whittaker Manager, Community Services Children’s.
An Outpatient Service Continuum Approach to Addressing and Reducing Mental Health Crises CBHDA All Members Meeting August 11, 2016 Debbie Innes-Gomberg,
Housing for persons with mental illness
NYS Health Home 101.
Maria Fuentes, MSW Senior Services Manager
Connecticut Youth Services
CRISIS RESOLUTION / HOME TREATMENT - DEFINITION
Mental Health Authority
Health Care for Homeless Veterans Programs (HCHV)
Reneé Stewart Hannah/MSW, LCSW Region V Child REACH Conference
Behavioral Health DATA BOOK A quarterly reference to community mental health and substance abuse services Fiscal Year 2012  Quarter 2  April.
Maryland Healthy Transition Initiative
SAN DIEGO HOUSING FEDERATION WEAVING TOGETHER A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO WELLNESS October 13, 2016.
Loudoun County Mental Health, Substance Abuse and Developmental Services Lynn Blycher, M.Ed., LPC.
The Children’s Aid Society of Brant
Family Preservation Services
Eighth Judicial District Court Mental Health Court Program
Therapeutic Behavioral Services (TBS)
Developing an Effective Assisted Outpatient Treatment Program
USING DATA TO INFORM OUR ADVOCACY EFFORTS
Addictions Developmental Disabilities Mental Health
Behavioral Health Integration in Centennial Care
4 Domains Child Welfare, Juvenile Education and Mental/Health
Santa Clara County Mental Health Board System Planning & Fiscal Committee Meeting September 6, 2012 Mental Health Services Act ~ Community Support Services.
FIRST PLACEMENT IS THE RIGHT PLACEMENT
Children’s Mental Health
Comprehensive Youth Services
Presented to the System Leadership Team July 9, 2010 Robin Kay, Ph.D.
Forsyth County Daymark Recovery Services
The Success of IPS in Oklahoma
RISE T4T Child Welfare Curriculum
Individual Placement and Support in Oklahoma
Assertive community treatment webinar
Beaver County Single Point of Accountability
Behavioral Wellness Community Housing and Support Services
Can be personalized to individual group needs.
Priorities Discussed in July
Youth to Adult Transition Program
Presentation transcript:

MHSA Full Service Partnership (FSP) For YOUTH (Ages 0-15) and TAY (Transition-Age Youth) (Ages 16-25) Santa Clara County Mental Health Board System Planning and Fiscal Committee January 5, 2012

Full Service Partnership (FSP) Target Populations Full service partnership addresses the needs of specific population disparities: Adults with co-occurring mental health/substance abuse disorders Individuals with co-occurring health/development disability TAY aging out of the child service systems Jail/Justice System-Involved, Homeless and/or Dual Diagnosed Un-served and Underserved ethnic and cultural groups (specifically Latino, African American, Asian/Pacific Islander, Native American and LGBTQ populations) with serious mental illness (SMI)

Youth/TAY FSP Target Populations The FSP program serves both Youth / TAY meeting the program criteria; however it is specifically targeted to Native American, Latino, Asian and African/African American Transition -Age Youth (TAY) who are exiting child service systems. Families of youth (under age 16) with SED or dual diagnosis who are at risk of, or returning from out-of-home placement (DFCS) and on formal Juvenile Probation. Families of Youth (under age 16) with SED or dual diagnosis with multiple Emergency Psychiatric Services (EPS) episodes and/or frequent and extended hospitalizations. TAY with SED or dual diagnosis who are at risk of, or returning from out-of-home placement and have been on formal Juvenile Probation. TAY with SED or dual diagnosis with multiple psychiatric emergency services episodes and/or frequent and/or extended hospitalizations.

FSP Eligibility Criteria (YOUTH) Youth with SED who fall into at least ONE of the following groups: 4.1.1. As a result of a mental health disorder, the Youth has substantial impairment in at least two of these areas: Self-care School functioning Family relationships Ability to function in the community AND Either of the following occurs: A. The Youth is at risk of or has already been removed from the home B. The impairment(s) have been present for more than six months or are likely to continue for more than a year without treatment. 4.1.2 Youth displays at least ONE of the following features: - Psychotic features - Risk of Suicide - Risk of violence due to a mental disorder

FSP Eligibility Criteria (TAY) Transition-Age Youth (TAY) with SED who meet ALL of the following: 4.2.1: They fall into at least one of the groups in 4.1.1 or 4.1.2 4.2.2: They are un-served and underserved AND 4.2.3. They are in one of the following situations: 1. Homeless or at risk of being homeless 2. Aging out of the child service systems (MH/DFCS/JPD) 3. Involved in the criminal justice system 4. At risk of involuntary hospitalization/institutionalization 5. Experience a first onset of mental illness

Eligibility Criteria (con’t) Benefits accepted: Medi-Cal Unsponsored Healthy Families-SED Clients with SEMH can access/maintain FSP services as long as they are Medi-Cal eligible, have no private insurance and meet program eligibility. (FSP Governance: 2/13/08) (Revised F&C Division: 10/07/09)

FSP Providers and Contracted # of slots Starlight Community Services 35 Youth/18 TAY Community Solutions 40 Youth/35 TAY Momentum for Mental Health 17 TAY

Children’s FSP (0-15) Model: Comprehensive program that combines critical core services within a Wraparound Model that incorporates age-appropriate elements from the Transition to Independence Model (TIP). This strength based approach incorporates family-centered service delivery that consists of comprehensive mental health and other services/supports in order to achieve individualized youth and family plan goals. Target Population: DFCS/Juvenile Justice Involved SED African/African American, Native American and Latino youth. Unserved/Underserved SED Youth Youth with multiple episodes of emergency psychiatric services and/or hospitalizations.

Transition Age Youth (TAY) (16-25) Model: The model reflects the core values of the Transitions to Independence Process (TIP). Embedded in these core values is a strength based approach which incorporates the ideals of youth and family engagement and collaboration, cultural and developmental considerations for treatment, assessment, planning and intervention to assist TAY in making the transition to adulthood in each area of the basic life domains. Target Population: TAY who are exiting juvenile probation and dependency systems and are at risk of, or returning from intensive residential placement. TAY with multiple psychiatric emergency services episodes and/or frequent/extended hospitalizations. TAY experiencing a first psychotic episode TAY with multiple episodes of emergency psychiatric services and/or hospitalizations. SED African/African American, Native American, Asian and Latino TAY.

FSP Referral Sources MHRC (Juvenile Probation Department) DFCS (Differential Response Paths 2,3,4) F&C County clinics and CBO’s YATT Adult County clinics 24-Hour Care Adult Probation Internal referrals from FSP contracted providers Drug Treatment Court

MHD FSP Referral protocols MHD has discretion in consultation with the referring party to assess the developmental levels of TAY referrals and place them into a Youth slot if determined more appropriate for their needs. (FSP Governance: 11/07/07) MHD has final authority to triage referrals based on target population criteria (including ethnicity), acuity and date of referral. FSP Contractor initiates contact with the candidate/family and begin engagement activities within 2 business days of assignment. FSP Contractor contacts the referring parties (including the Probation Officer, Social Worker or Public Guardian) or any current MH provider to arrange an initial joint meeting with the candidate/family for the purposes of introducing the candidate/family to the program and of establishing rapport. (Engagement timeline 30 days). If an existing FSP enrollee becomes incarcerated or is not in contact with the provider for more then a period of 60 days, then they are to be disenrolled from FSP services. (FSP Governance:11/07/07) Reenrollment is when a previous enrollee desires to resume FSP services, after either a voluntary/involuntary discharge from the program. The priority of return will be based on original circumstances of the actual disengagement. MHD has the discretion to determine the final outcome of the returning enrollee referral. The determination will be based on the availability of providers and basis for original disenrollment. (FSP Governance: 2/13/08)

Overview by FSP Providers Program Description Success Stories