Post-Procedure Complications Monitoring Programme 44th Review Meeting Friday, 22 August 2014 4:00 - 6:00pm, 4/F, Arthur K C Li Surgical Library Lui Che Woo Clinical Sciences Building, PWH
Attendance Present Prof. Paul B S Lai (Chairman) Team 1 – Dr. Sunny Cheung & Dr. Ray Hung Team 2 – Dr. Simon K H Wong & Dr. H C Yip Team 3 – Dr. Hon Sok Fei & Dr. Eric Y F Cheung Team 4 – Dr. Micah C K Chan NS – Dr. W K Mak & Dr. Emily K Y Chan PSU – Dr. Peter Y H Tam URO – Dr. Samuel C H Yee CTS – Prof. Calvin Ng & Dr. Micky Kwok Mr. Alfred Chan Ms. Daisy Feng Ms. Eunice Tam
Items discussed Complications report – June 2014 AOB
1. Complications Report – June 2014
June 2014 Summary (case collection progress and Complication rate) PRS NS PSUR URO CTS Dept. total Total cases 58 72 31 52 47 44 57 59 478 Missing cases 1 3 4 Non-Discharged * 2 12 Complication rate and Magnitude Team 1 Team 2 Team 3 Team 4 PRAS NS PSUR URO CTS Total No. of Complication 11 3 4 2 9 5 56 58 72 31 52 47 44 57 59 478 Complication Rate 18.97% 15.28% 8.62% 12.90% 3.85% 19.15% 11.36% 3.51% 15.25% 11.72%
Team 1 – Hepato-biliary and Pancreatic Surgery
Team 1 – Hepato-biliary and Pancreatic Surgery ( Cont’d 2/10)
Team 1 – Hepato-biliary and Pancreatic Surgery ( Cont’d 3/10)
Team 1 – Hepato-biliary and Pancreatic Surgery ( Cont’d 4/10) Culture negative Rare to have same pathology at the same time
Pneumonia (pseudomonas) Team 1 – Hepato-biliary and Pancreatic Surgery ( Cont’d 5/10) Surgical strategy needed to be reviewed for this type of case Need to be proactive in pain control Pneumonia (pseudomonas)
Required re-operation (case 7) Team 1 – Hepato-biliary and Pancreatic Surgery ( Cont’d 6/10) Required re-operation (case 7) Same patient
Team 1 – Hepato-biliary and Pancreatic Surgery ( Cont’d 7/10) Dr. Ray Hung : Review the preparation for patients with anti-coagulants before GS procedure For discussion at Team 1 Meeting M & M
Team 1 – Hepato-biliary and Pancreatic Surgery ( Cont’d 8/10) Pathology : perforated adeno-carcinoma M & M GI leakage
Team 1 – Hepato-biliary and Pancreatic Surgery ( Cont’d 9/10)
Team 1 – Hepato-biliary and Pancreatic Surgery ( Cont’d 10/10)
Team 2 – Upper Gastro-intestinal Surgery
Team 2 – Upper Gastro-intestinal Surgery ( Cont’d 2/9)
Team 2 – Upper Gastro-intestinal Surgery ( Cont’d 3/9) Dr. H C Yip to feedback to Dr. Anthony Fong putting up a drain is not a replacement of proper lavage Pelvic a abscess collection
Team 2 – Upper Gastro-intestinal Surgery ( Cont’d 4/9)
Team 2 – Upper Gastro-intestinal Surgery ( Cont’d 5/9) Feedback to surgeon Patient woke up & aspirate Why retrograde decompression M & M Very Long (4 hours 20 mins)
Team 2 – Upper Gastro-intestinal Surgery ( Cont’d 6/9) anastomotic leakage (rare complication for small bowel) Same patient
Team 2 – Upper Gastro-intestinal Surgery ( Cont’d 7/9) appropriateness of endoscopy setting case selection for doing in endoscopy centre Why not lap repair ?
Team 2 – Upper Gastro-intestinal Surgery ( Cont’d 8/9)
Team 2 – Upper Gastro-intestinal Surgery ( Cont’d 9/9)
Team 3 – Colorectal Surgery
Team 3 – Colorectal Surgery ( Cont’d 2/6)
Team 3 – Colorectal Surgery ( Cont’d 3/6)
Team 3 – Colorectal Surgery (Cont’d 4/6) ( Cont’d 4/6)
Team 3 – Colorectal Surgery ( Cont’d 5/6)
Team 3 – Colorectal Surgery ( Cont’d 6/6) Open & Closed
Team 4 – Vascular Surgery
Team 4 – Vascular Surgery ( Cont’d 2/6)
Team 4 – Vascular Surgery ( Cont’d 3/6) Care from AHNH (Index OT done in May 2014) and discussed - Should not have used the ‘glue’ (feedback to radiologist already)
Team 4 – Vascular Surgery ( Cont’d 4/6) Same patient
Team 4 – Vascular Surgery ( Cont’d 5/6)
Team 4 – Vascular Surgery ( Cont’d 6/6)
Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery
Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery ( Cont’d 2/4)
Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery ( Cont’d 3/4)
Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery ( Cont’d 4/4)
Neurosurgery * Observed a surge in wound infection
Neurosurgery ( Cont’d 2/8)
Neurosurgery ( Cont’d 3/8)
Neurosurgery ( Cont’d 4/8)
Neurosurgery ( Cont’d 5/8) Culture negative Rare
Neurosurgery ( Cont’d 6/8) No mention of post-mortem
Neurosurgery ( Cont’d 7/8)
Neurosurgery ( Cont’d 8/8)
Paediatric Surgery & Paediatric Urology
Paediatric Surgery & Paediatric Urology ( Cont’d 2/6)
Paediatric Surgery & Paediatric Urology ( Cont’d 3/6) 2 Re-implantation will be difficult
Paediatric Surgery & Paediatric Urology ( Cont’d 4/6) 1 2 Post-rep ilea's because of require TPN
Paediatric Surgery & Paediatric Urology ( Cont’d 5/6) worthwhile to track adolescent herncorigly
Paediatric Surgery & Paediatric Urology ( Cont’d 6/6)
Urology
Urology ( Cont’d 2/4)
Urology ( Cont’d 3/4)
Urology ( Cont’d 4/4)
Cardiothoracic Surgery
Cardiothoracic Surgery ( Cont’d 2/9)
Cardiothoracic Surgery ( Cont’d 3/9) + cord palsy known complication Same patient Not counted
Cardiothoracic Surgery ( Cont’d 4/9)
Cardiothoracic Surgery ( Cont’d 5/9)
Cardiothoracic Surgery ( Cont’d 6/9) Should look at the practice of using empirical antibiotics (which is not yet evidence – based)
Cardiothoracic Surgery ( Cont’d 7/9) Challenging case because of redo Bentall still in ICU
Cardiothoracic Surgery ( Cont’d 8/9)
Cardiothoracic Surgery ( Cont’d 9/9)
2. AOB
AOB Nil
THE END