Grazing-incidence vs. normal-incidence design L. Poletto CNR - National Institute for the Physics of Matter Department of Information Engineering - Padova.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EcoTherm Plus WGB-K 20 E 4,5 – 20 kW.
Advertisements

Números.
1 A B C
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AP STUDY SESSION 2.
1
EuroCondens SGB E.
Worksheets.
& dding ubtracting ractions.
STATISTICS INTERVAL ESTIMATION Professor Ke-Sheng Cheng Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering National Taiwan University.
Addition and Subtraction Equations
Multiplication X 1 1 x 1 = 1 2 x 1 = 2 3 x 1 = 3 4 x 1 = 4 5 x 1 = 5 6 x 1 = 6 7 x 1 = 7 8 x 1 = 8 9 x 1 = 9 10 x 1 = x 1 = x 1 = 12 X 2 1.
Division ÷ 1 1 ÷ 1 = 1 2 ÷ 1 = 2 3 ÷ 1 = 3 4 ÷ 1 = 4 5 ÷ 1 = 5 6 ÷ 1 = 6 7 ÷ 1 = 7 8 ÷ 1 = 8 9 ÷ 1 = 9 10 ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = 12 ÷ 2 2 ÷ 2 =
David Burdett May 11, 2004 Package Binding for WS CDL.
/4/2010 Box and Whisker Plots Objective: Learn how to read and draw box and whisker plots Starter: Order these numbers.
Add Governors Discretionary (1G) Grants Chapter 6.
CALENDAR.
1 1  1 =.
1  1 =.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
I can interpret intervals on partially numbered scales and record readings accurately ? 15 ? 45 ? 25 ? 37 ? 53 ? 64 Each little mark.
The 5S numbers game..
A Fractional Order (Proportional and Derivative) Motion Controller Design for A Class of Second-order Systems Center for Self-Organizing Intelligent.
Media-Monitoring Final Report April - May 2010 News.
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
The basics for simulations
Factoring Quadratics — ax² + bx + c Topic
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
Look at This PowerPoint for help on you times tables
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
1 RA III - Regional Training Seminar on CLIMAT&CLIMAT TEMP Reporting Buenos Aires, Argentina, 25 – 27 October 2006 Status of observing programmes in RA.
Progressive Aerobic Cardiovascular Endurance Run
1..
THROUGHPUT OF A NORMAL INCIDENCE SPECTROMETER DESIGN IN DIFFERENT WAVELENGTH RANGES Luca Teriaca Max Planck Institut für Sonnensystemforschung.
Adding Up In Chunks.
MaK_Full ahead loaded 1 Alarm Page Directory (F11)
Least Common Multiples and Greatest Common Factors
TCCI Barometer September “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
Before Between After.
Subtraction: Adding UP
: 3 00.
5 minutes.
1 Non Deterministic Automata. 2 Alphabet = Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA)
1 hi at no doifpi me be go we of at be do go hi if me no of pi we Inorder Traversal Inorder traversal. n Visit the left subtree. n Visit the node. n Visit.
1 Titre de la diapositive SDMO Industries – Training Département MICS KERYS 09- MICS KERYS – WEBSITE.
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
Fractions Simplify: 36/48 = 36/48 = ¾ 125/225 = 125/225 = 25/45 = 5/9
Converting a Fraction to %
Resistência dos Materiais, 5ª ed.
Clock will move after 1 minute
famous photographer Ara Guler famous photographer ARA GULER.
PSSA Preparation.
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Physics for Scientists & Engineers, 3rd Edition
Select a time to count down from the clock above
Copyright Tim Morris/St Stephen's School
1.step PMIT start + initial project data input Concept Concept.
9. Two Functions of Two Random Variables
1 Dr. Scott Schaefer Least Squares Curves, Rational Representations, Splines and Continuity.
1 Non Deterministic Automata. 2 Alphabet = Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA)
Schutzvermerk nach DIN 34 beachten 05/04/15 Seite 1 Training EPAM and CANopen Basic Solution: Password * * Level 1 Level 2 * Level 3 Password2 IP-Adr.
Optical characteristics of the EUV spectrometer for the normal-incidence region L. Poletto, G. Tondello Istituto Nazionale per la Fisica della Materia.
Grazing-incidence design and others L. Poletto Istituto Nazionale per la Fisica della Materia (INFM) Department of Electronics and Informatics - Padova.
Optical characteristics of the EUV spectrometer (EUS) for SOLO L. Poletto, G. Tondello Istituto Nazionale per la Fisica della Materia (INFM) Department.
Optical characteristics of the EUV spectrometer for the grazing-incidence region L. Poletto, G. Tondello Istituto Nazionale per la Fisica della Materia.
Presentation transcript:

Grazing-incidence vs. normal-incidence design L. Poletto CNR - National Institute for the Physics of Matter Department of Information Engineering - Padova (Italy) EUS Meeting March, 3rd 2006

Normal-incidence vs. grazing-incidence design (1/2) EUS BLOCK DIAGRAM telescope slit spectrometer detector TELESCOPE:two options1) normal-incidence, single mirror 2) grazing-incidence, three mirrors SLIT SPECTROMETERnormal-incidence VLS concave grating DETECTORAPS

Normal-incidence vs. grazing-incidence design (2/2) THE MAIN DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO CONFIGURATIONS IS THE TELESCOPE DESIGN THE SPATIAL AND SPECTRAL RESOLUTIONS OF THE NI CONFIGURATION ARE HIGHER THAN THE GI ONE THE TWO DESIGNS MAY OFFER THE SAME SPECTRAL COVERAGE (NI NEEDS MULTILAYER FOR WAVELENGTHS BELOW 35 NM)

The grazing-incidence Wolter telescope Grazing-incidence telescope two concave mirrors and a plane mirror rastering: rotation of the plane mirror CHARACTERISTICS nm spectral region (I order) nm spectral region (II order) 18 arcmin 18 arcmin field-of-view length <1 m

Grazing-incidence design: characteristics TelescopeWolter II Focal length1200 mm Incidence angles73.5 deg - 79 deg Mirror for rastering Incidence angles84.4 deg - 85 deg Slit Size6 m 6.3 mm Resolution1 arcsec GratingTVLS Groove density2400 lines/mm Entrance arm260 mm Exit arm680 mm Spectral region nm (I order) nm (II order) Detector Pixel size10 m 15 m Format pixel Area21.5 mm 16.8 mm Spectral resolving element 56 mÅ I order (14 km/s) 28 mÅ II order (14 km/s) Spatial resolving element 1 arcsec (150 km at 0.2 AU) Instrument length 1 m

Grazing-incidence design: performance

Grazing-incidence design: layout

NI coatings (1/2) Mo-Si multilayer Au SiC

NI coatings (2/2) Mo-Si mulilayergood reflectivity (0.3) at 20, 60, 100 nm low reflectivity (0.38) in the visible HIGH ABSORBED POWER Auno reflectivity at 20 nm low reflectivity (0.15) at 60, 100 nm high reflectivity (0.80) in the visible LOW ABSORBED POWER SiCno reflectivity at 20 nm high reflectivity (0.40) at 60, 100 nm low reflectivity (0.20) in the visible HIGH ABSORBED POWER THE NI TELESCOPE IS EFFICIENT BELOW 40 NM ONLY WITH MULTILAYER

GI coatings (1/2) Au or Si-Au Au at 80 deg

GI coatings (2/2) Auconstant reflectivity at 20, 60, 100 nm high reflectivity (> 0.80) in the visible LOW ABSORBED POWER Si-Auconstant reflectivity at 20, 60, 100 nm (higher than Au) high reflectivity (> 0.60) in the visible LOW ABSORBED POWER THE GI TELESCOPE IS EFFICIENT AT ANY WAVELENGTH ABOVE 10 NM

Efficiency Total efficiency at wavelength E TOT ( ) = A [cm 2 ] E( ) PS [arcsec 2 ] A EF entrance aperture E( )combined efficiency (telescope, spectrometer, detector) at wavelength PSpixel size CDS on SOHO, NIS2 channelE TOT_CDS (60 nm) = 0.046

Efficiency at 20 nm GI design A EF = 25 cm 2 E grating = 0.15 E detector = 0.30 Si-Au coated opticsR mirrors = 0.55, 0.65, 0.75 E TOT (20 nm) = 0.30 = Au coated opticsR mirrors = 0.40, 0.52, 0.70 E TOT (20 nm) = 0.16 = NI design A EF = 25 cm 2 E grating = 0.15 E detector = 0.30 ML coated opticsR mirrors = 0.30 E TOT (20 nm) = 0.34 =

Efficiency at 60 nm Grazing-incidence design at 60 nmA EF = 25 cm 2 E grating = 0.15 E detector = 0.30 Si-Au coated opticsR mirrors = 0.55, 0.65, 0.75 E TOT (60 nm) = 0.30 = 6.6 CDS EFFICIENCY Au coated opticsR mirrors = 0.40, 0.52, 0.70 E TOT (60 nm) = 0.16 = 3.5 CDS EFFICIENCY Normal-incidence design at 60 nmA EF = 25 cm 2 E grating = 0.15 E detector = 0.30 SiC (ML) coated opticsR mirrors = 0.32 E TOT (60 nm) = 0.36 = 7.8 CDS EFFICIENCY Au coated opticsR mirrors = 0.13 E TOT (60 nm) = 0.15 = 3.2 CDS EFFICIENCY

Efficiency at 120 nm Grazing-incidence design at 120 nmA EF = 25 cm 2 E grating = 0.15 E detector = 0.30 Si-Au coated opticsR mirrors = 0.55, 0.65, 0.75 E TOT (120 nm) = 0.30 = Au coated opticsR mirrors = 0.40, 0.52, 0.70 E TOT (120 nm) = 0.16 = Normal-incidence design at 120 nmA EF = 25 cm 2 E grating = 0.15 E detector = 0.30 SiC coated opticsR mirrors = 0.48 E TOT (120 nm) = 0.54 = 1.5 Au coated opticsR mirrors = 0.16 E TOT (120 nm) = 0.18 = 1.2

Optics degradation at 20 nm Multilayer coating A change of the ML properties (e.g. interdiffusion between adjacent layers, change of period due to thermal expansion) may alter the reflectivity down to 0. THE ML IS A SINGLE POINT FAILURE FOR OBSERVATIONS AT 20 NM. THE STABILITY OF ML AT THE EXTREME THERMAL CONDITIONS OF SOLO HAS TO BE PROVED BY STUDIES AND TESTS, IN VIEW OF THE AO.

Optics degradation at 100 nm Simulation of a C over-coating GI reflectivity (80 deg) Au0.55 Au + 20 Å C % Au + 40 Å C % NI reflectivity SiC0.45 SiC + 20 Å C % SiC + 40 Å C % LARGE DECREASES FOR NI COATINGS

Optics degradation in the visible Simulation of a C over-coating GI reflectivity at 600 nm (80 deg) Au0.92 Au + 20 Å C % Au + 40 Å C % NI reflectivity at 600 nm SiC0.20 SiC + 20 Å C0.21+5% SiC + 40 Å C % SMALL CHANGES

Thermal load: GI (1/2) Grazing-incidence configuration: 5 cm × 5 cm entrance area Input thermal load85 W Au optics Thermal load on 1st mirror85 W 6 solar constants Absorption on 1st mirror17 W 1.2 solar constants Thermal load on 2nd mirror61 W16 solar constants Absorption on 2nd mirror10 W2.6 solar constants Thermal load on 3rd mirror19 W5 solar constants Absorption on 3rd mirror2 W0.5 solar constants Power density on the slit plane17 W on 21 mm 30 mm area (f = 1200 mm) 20 solar constants Comments 29 W absorbed by the optics (two of them have to be cooled) 39 W absorbed by suitable buffling 17 W on the slit plane, to be absorbed by buffles

Thermal load: GI (2/2) Grazing-incidence configuration: 5 cm × 5 cm entrance area Input thermal load85 W Si-Au optics Thermal load on 1st mirror85 W 6 solar constants Absorption on 1st mirror34 W 2.4 solar constants Thermal load on 2nd mirror46 W12 solar constants Absorption on 2nd mirror18 W5 solar constants Thermal load on 3rd mirror10 W2.7 solar constants Absorption on 3rd mirror4 W1 solar constant Power density on the slit plane6 W on 21 mm 30 mm area (f = 1200 mm) 7 solar constants Comments 56 W absorbed by the optics (all are cooled) 23 W absorbed by suitable buffling 6 W on the slit plane, to be absorbed by buffles

Thermal load: NI (1/2) Normal-incidence configuration: 5 cm × 5 cm entrance area, 1 m input boom, 5 cm × 5.6 cm mirror Input thermal load85 W Thermal load on the buffle22 W Thermal load on the mirror63 W16 solar constants SiC optics Absorption on the mirror50 W 13 solar constants Power density on the slit plane13 W on 33 mm diameter (f = 700 mm) 11 solar constants Comments 50 W absorbed by the mirror 22 W absorbed by the entrance buffle 13 W on the slit plane, to be absorbed by buffles Au optics Absorption on the mirror13 W3.4 solar constants Power density on the slit plane50 W on 33 mm diameter (f = 700 mm) 43 solar constants Comments 13 W absorbed by the mirror 22 W absorbed by the entrance buffle 50 W on the slit plane, to be absorbed by buffles

Thermal load: NI (2/2) ML coated optics Absorption on the mirror40 W 13 solar constants Power density on the slit plane23 W on 33 mm diameter (f = 700 mm) 20 solar constants Comments 40 W absorbed by the mirror 22 W absorbed by the entrance buffle 23 W on the slit plane, to be absorbed by buffles

Some considerations on the entrance filter As proposed in the Astrium Payload Integration Study, an entrance filter could reduce to zero the thermal load on the optics. A suitable filter for the 60 nm region is a thin Al foil (200 nm, 0.6 transmission) VERY RISKY SOLUTION: single point failure FEASIBLE ? Grazing-incidence configuration The filter is on the entrance aperture Thermal load on the filter 25 solar constants on the Al foil Normal-incidence configuration The filter is inserted at the end of the entrance tube (0.8 m) 20 solar constants on the Al foil

Conclusions NI DESIGN The NI configuration is more compact and has better optical performance than the GI one. A multilayer coated mirror is required for observations below 40 nm. GI DESIGN No multilayer coated mirrors are required AT PRESENT, NI CONFIGURATION IS THE FIRST CHOICE (GI AS A BACKUP SOLUTION). GIVEN THE EXTREME THERMAL CONDITIONS ON SOLO (34 kW/m2), TESTS AND STUDIES ON COATING DEGRADATION AT NORMAL-INCIDENCE (BOTH CONVENTIONAL AND MULTILAYERS) HAVE TO BE PERFORMED IN VIEW OF THE AO.