Spectrometry of high energy gamma ray

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Experimental Particle Physics
Advertisements

Particle identification in ECAL Alexander Artamonov, Yuri Kharlov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
Neutron detectors and spectrometers 1) Complicated reactions → strong dependency of efficiency on energy 2) Small efficiency → necessity of large volumes.
Gamma-Ray Spectra _ + The photomultiplier records the (UV) light emitted during electronic recombination in the scintillator. Therefore, the spectrum collected.
Detector systems 1) Anti-Compton spectrometers 2) Pair spectrometers 3) Crystal spheres, walls, complex set-ups of semiconductor and scintillation detectors.
HEP Experiments Detectors and their Technologies Sascha Marc Schmeling CERN.
Particle interactions and detectors
Detection of Gamma-Rays and Energetic Particles
Calorimetry and Showers Learning Objectives Understand the basic operation of a calorimeter (Measure the energy of a particle, and in the process, destroy.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
CERN Summer Student Lectures 2003 Particle Detectors Christian Joram IV/1   Basic principles Interaction of charged particles and photons Electromagnetic.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Particle Interactions
Calorimetry: Energy Measurements
Detecting Particles Martin Gallacher – University of Birmingham.
880.P20 Winter 2006 Richard Kass 1 Energy Measurement (Calorimetry) Why measure energy ? I) Not always practical to measure momentum. An important contribution.
Calorimeters A User’s Guide Elizabeth Dusinberre, Matthew Norman, Sean Simon October 28, 2006.
Stopping Power The linear stopping power S for charged particles in a given absorber is simply defined as the differential energy loss for that particle.
Geant4: Electromagnetic Processes 2 V.Ivanchenko, BINP & CERN
1 Calorimetry - 2 Mauricio Barbi University of Regina TRIUMF Summer Institute July 2007.
First energy estimates of giant air showers with help of the hybrid scheme of simulations L.G. Dedenko M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow,
Radiation Detection and Measurement, JU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Spectrum if all energy is captured in detector. Allows identification.
NEEP 541 Radiation Interactions Fall 2003 Jake Blanchard.
Lecture 1.3: Interaction of Radiation with Matter
Tools for Nuclear & Particle Physics Experimental Background.
Space Instrumentation. Definition How do we measure these particles? h p+p+ e-e- Device Signal Source.
ELECTROMAGNETIC CALORIMETER at CMS EVANGELOS XAXIRIS June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques.
How do we detect photons? Kensuke Okada RIKEN BNL Research Center April 20,
Measurement of Gas Bremsstrahlung at the Pohang Light Source Hyosang Lee Seoul National University, Q2C Pusan National University, HANUL HNP2011.
Summary of PHOS Internal Notes (part I) Rafael Diaz Valdes 10/25/20151.
Calorimeters Chapter 4 Chapter 4 Electromagnetic Showers.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2/2) 3.Collider Experiments.
1 Energy loss correction for a crystal calorimeter He Miao Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing, P.R.China.
Radiation Detectors In particular, Silicon Microstrip Detectors by Dr. Darrel Smith.
Interactions of Particles with Matter
ECAL PID1 Particle identification in ECAL Yuri Kharlov, Alexander Artamonov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
Particle Detectors for Colliders Robert S. Orr University of Toronto.
Validation of EM Part of Geant4
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
1 FK7003 Lecture 17 – Interactions in Matter ● Electromagnetic interactions in material ● Hadronic interactions in material ● Electromagnetic and hadronic.
Learning Objectives Calorimetry and Showers
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Monte Carlo methods in spallation experiments Defense of the phD thesis Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
Ilhan TAPAN* and Fatma KOCAK
PEBS: Positron Electron Balloon Spectrometer Henning Gast
Lecture 8 – Detectors - II
INTERACTION OF PARTICLES WITH MATTER
“Performance test of a lead glass
Calorimeters at CBM A. Ivashkin INR, Moscow.
Objectives To learn the types of radioactive decay
Comparison of GAMMA-400 and Fermi-LAT telescopes
GLAST LAT tracker signal simulation and trigger timing study
Methods of Experimental Particle Physics
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
LaBr3 Ball at HIE-ISOLDE
The Compact Muon Solenoid Detector
Gamma Rays Detection LNF – | INSPYRE school Danilo Domenici
Calorimeters in HEP Add hermiticity CC event - calibration
Detector Configuration for Simulation (i)
Member States HST2000.
A. Gasparian NC A&T State University, Greensboro, NC
RADIOACTIVITY.
Comments on Linear Collider Calorimetry Case for Precision ECAL?
Experimental Particle Physics
Interaction of gamma rays with matter
Simulation study for Forward Calorimeter in LHC-ALICE experiment
Experimental Particle Physics
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Wednesday,March 7, 2012 Dr. Brandt
Particles going through matter
Objectives To learn the types of radioactive decay
Presentation transcript:

Spectrometry of high energy gamma ray Photons with energies of tenths MeV, GeV and higher Creation of electromagnetic shower – it is necessary to determine total energy, direction and time of initial photon arrival Inorganic scintillation detectors are favorable: BGO, BaF2, PbWO4 Combination of convertor (lead, tungsten ..) and track detectors of electrons and positrons (spark chambers, silicon …) Electromagnetic shower Eγ >> 1 MeV photo effect is negligible → gamma detection by means of electromagnetic shower, pair production, bremsstrahlung radiation ... Important quantity is radiation length X0 – high energy electron E → E/e Eγ ~ 100 MeV → detectors with 15 X0 are needed Width of electromagnetic shower Molier radius R0 ~ cm (about 90% of shower energy is inside, it is approximately valid: R0 = 0.0265X0(Z+1,2)

Deepness expressed with radiation lengths X0: t = x/X0 Particle multiplication – increasing number of electrons, positrons and photons Deepness expressed with radiation lengths X0: t = x/X0 Critical energy EC – energy higher it radiation losses start to dominated over ionization t 4 1 2 3 N(t) 1/2 1/4 1/8 ε(t)/E For critical energy EC and radiation length X0 is valid: Energy in EC units: Є = E/EC Number of cascade particles increases geometrically: N(t) = 2t Mean energy of particles ε is: Multiplication continues up to critical energy EC Maximal number of particles NMAX at deepness tMAX tMAX ~ ln Є 3,2 GeV v Pb maximum tMAX = 6, NMAX = 400

Segmented detectors with long crystals (diameter is two times Molier radius Sum of energies from main and surrounding modules: y z Loss of small contributions from modules, where Ei is bellow detection threshold Position of centre is determined: Other types of weights can be used Example from spectrometer TAPS (BaF2) l = 250 mm, d = 54-59 mm: X0 = 20,5 mm R0 = 33,9 mm, EC= 12,7 MeV For Eγ ~ 160 MeV: ΔE/E ~ 16% – only detector with the highest deposited energy ΔE/E ~ 6% - all detectors hit by electromagnetic shower High energies ΔE/E → 3% Position resolution of TAPS spectrometer

Detection of particles using their decay to photons: Determination of particle invariant mass: Uncertainty of invariant mass determination: Inclusion of different number Of neighboring modules Typical TOF spectrum (target distance was 4.3 m), Bi + Pb collisions 1 GeV/n Comparision of mean number of affected modules for photons and neutrons