Coordinate system for the GIF as defined for CMS RPCs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Frame design Status TB-SWG May 2005 Presented by K. Ioki Prepared by M. Morimoto VV and Blanket Division, ITER Garching ITER.
Advertisements

Gable Roof BCGCA3007B.
Orthographic Projection
Chapter 12: Static Equilibrium Conditions for equilibrium  First condition for equilibrium When a particle is in equilibrium (no acceleration), in an.
Simulation of the CALICE Test Beams with MOKKA Fabrizio Salvatore Royal Holloway University of London.
1 Status of infrastructure MICE Video Conference, August 17, 2005 Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division, Engineering and Instrumentation Department.
1 13 Oct 2006 Small Wheel Phase 1.9 Logistics C. Weaverdyck N. Nation 13 October 2006.
RD51 Common Test Beam: Status RD51 collaboration week Kolymbari, June 2009 Yorgos Tsipolitis NTUA.
The linear algebra of Canadarm
Octagonal Roof.
SCIENCE JOURNAL 10/24/ st PAGE MY SCIENCE JOURNAL BY __________________.
HPS Test Run Setup Takashi Maruyama SLAC Heavy Photon Search Collaboration Meeting Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, May 26-27,
Computer Graphics World, View and Projection Matrices CO2409 Computer Graphics Week 8.
Preparation of wall position Alignment of A and C side in closed position Creation of reference system Translation of reference system to open position.
Monte Carlo Comparison of RPCs and Liquid Scintillator R. Ray 5/14/04  RPCs with 1-dimensional readout (generated by RR) and liquid scintillator with.
FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION Dorothea Pfeiffer Dennis Haasler GIF++ User Meeting
Notes After TIG 17/7/08 HF+ Move out of garage: Aug 15* Platform+table+collars+racks+BP support (jack up for platform) = 3 days Controls for motors = 1.
CMS Muon Chambers Long term studies at GIF++ Andrey Marinov On Behalf of Long Term Studies of the CMS Muon Detectors 1.
Undulator Orientation & Electron Beam Spacing Should the undulator frames be toward the central aisle or the tunnel walls? What is the optimum spacing.
Precision Layout Unit 21.
Tariq J. Solaija, NCP Forward RPC EDR, Tariq Solaija Forward RPC EDR The Standard RPC for low  regions Tariq J. Solaija National Centre for.
BEPCII Prealignment Installation Survey and Alignment Accelerator Center of IHEP Xiaolong Wang
8/3/2006 Cellular Wire Chamber Modeling Christine Middleton FNAL.
Structural Drafting Connection Details and Gages.
GIF in EHN1- layout, construction and schedule Adrian Fabich, EN-MEF-LE GIF users meeting, 12 th February 2014.
G. Pugliese RPC requests for GIF++ G.Pugliese, N. Zaganidis and I. Pedraza on behalf of the RPC group 1.
M. Bianco On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration
Structure Update Installation & Building Update Revisions Outlined Costs Revisited (since given to Gina) Jeff Nelson Fermilab.
Givi Sekhniaidze1 CERN, 25 March Givi Sekhniaidze2 The angles for the chambers are: LM1 – ° LM2 – 7.224° SM1 – ° SM2 – ° Do we.
LHCb Experimental Area Meeting V. Bobillier1 Earth network in UX85 experimental cavern.
12/24/2015 A.Aruna/Assistant professor/IT/SNSCE 1.
Progress on the beam tracking instrumentation Position measurement device Tests performed and their resolution Decision on electronics Summary.
Simulation of the CALICE Test Beams with MOKKA Fabrizio Salvatore Royal Holloway University of London.
Services in GIF++ A pictorial record of the work HV Cables LV cables DCS cables Signal Cables Ian Crotty 17 Dec 2014.
Ian Crotty HPL (Bakelite) Up-Scope 27 Aug 08 HPL for the Up-Scope of the RE in CMS Contents Specification Contingency Supply Chain Purchasing QA & QC Packing.
Hall D infrastructure and integration Elton Smith Hall D Collaboration Meeting September 9-11, 2004.
Additional muon stations for the Upgrade of the Elevator Regions in the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer. Installation scenario, status on the installation tools.
Jean-Christophe Gayde CERN-EST/SUEDMS Id: Juin 2003 ATLAS TILE CALORIMETER PRE-ASSEMBLY SURVEY DATA ANALYSIS CO-ORDINATE SYSTEM DEFINITION 11.
GIF ++ ambient condition The Prep. area outside Tent and its gradient CSC area Geneva meteo station Ian Crotty6 Oct 2015.
VELO Integr - Jan06Jean-Christophe GAYDE TS/SU EDMS n° SURVEY FOR VELO INSTALLATION 1.SURVEY AT GROUND FLOOR - FIDUCIALISATION 2.SURVEY FOR INSTALLATION.
Interaction Region Design and Detector Integration V.S. Morozov for EIC Study Group at JLAB 2 nd Mini-Workshop on MEIC Interaction Region Design JLab,
GIF++ gas system Outline:  Beam and cosmic trigger  Gas distribution panels  Gas detection (present and final layout)  Conclusions 14/1/2015R. Guida,
Emulsion Test Beam first results Annarita Buonaura, Valeri Tioukov On behalf of Napoli emulsion group This activity was supported by AIDA2020.
FGT Magnet C Assembly metric tons (59 US tons) -100mm thick steel plates -6.6m high x 3.1m wide x 1m deep (outer dimensions) -5m high x 2.25m wide.
RPCs with Ar-CO2 mix G. Aielli; R.Cardarelli; A. Zerbini For the ATLAS ROMA2 group.
Datums and Datum Feature References Chapter 6 Copyright Goodheart-Willcox Co., Inc. May not be posted to a publicly accessible website. Objectives Define.
Francesco Cerutti, Andrea Tsinganis WP10 Energy deposition & R2E
A 3D design model of the apparatus for the Laser Wakefield Acceleration of electrons at ELI-NP S. Balascuta1 , R. Dinca1 1) “Horia Hulubei” National.
RPC built a new plastic (peek doped with CB)
Gas for World wide RPCs Ian Crotty 12 Feb 2015.
Additional muon stations for the Upgrade of the Elevator Regions in the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer. Integration issues Denis Diyakov, Alexander Seletskiy,
GRPC activity for EuDHCAL in IHEP-Protvino
G. Carboni for the Muon Group
Chamber Design and Integration RE3/1 and RE4/1
ORTHOGRAPHIC PROJECTION
HPL DG d=1.4mm/e= mm.
CMS RPC Endcap RE1 Status Report
Drawing Triangles.
Magnetic gap calculation
PRINCIPLES OF STIFFNESS METHOD FOR BEAMS AND PLANE FRAMES
ORTHOGRAPHIC PROJECTION

RPC SYSTEM LAYOUT and DIMENSIONS
BCM Overview Placement such that system is sensitive to all types of beam accidents. => 2 independent subsystems Halo losses inside the Pixel volume ie.
IKON 15 Talal Osman & Iain Sutton
SHLC INFN Road Map Working Group 11/01/2006
Shielding requirements for the baseline bunker shielding (current CATIA version ) Günter Muhrer
Test Beam models in Mokka
Basic Assembly Constraints
RE3/1 & RE4/1 Parameter Space Services
Presentation transcript:

Coordinate system for the GIF as defined for CMS RPCs Nicolas and Ian 13 Oct 2015

Aims Establish 2 measured parameters to readily keep up to date the diagram of the chamber positions in the GIF++. Establish the coordinates of the chamber position with respect to the source and nominal beam positions. Contents Defining the coordinate systems Base Bunker diagram ( no details, gas panels etc) Trolley specification, with present chamber position.

Our chambers have potentially 6 degrees of freedom. We will only deal with translations and no rotations

Steps to defining the strip position Measurement of each trolley position (X,Z) within the Bunker volume. Definition of each chamber in the trolley, (X,Y,Z) Definition of each strip or eta division within the chamber structure. Nota the case of the rolling chambers in T0/3 must be defined wrt the trolley and or the Jura wall for each “X” position.

Diagrams and Referentials Diagram defining the possible positions of the trolleys within the bunker, constrained by cable trays, Gas PP, rails for TGC shielding etc. First establish base diagram of Bunker & infrastructure for establishing chamber position wrt the beam and source . Second referential points on the trolleys wrt the source centre. Third the location of the chambers wrt ref point on the trolleys. Fourth the position of the strips wrt the trolleys.

Final strip spacial definition with respect to Source in X,Y & Z. (0,0,0) Ian Crotty 1 Oct 2015

Bunker parameter Space capital X,Y & Z. Measure “X” Source Measure “Z” Down Stream Wall Jura wall Ian Crotty 1 Oct 2015

2nd Co-ordinate definition Chamber positions on T0 2nd Co-ordinate definition Small “y” coordinates Small “z” coordinates Small “x” coordinates

Strip positions on chamber 3nd Co-ordinate definition Small “z” coordinates Small “y3” coordinates Small “x” coordinates

Final strip spacial definition with respect to Source in X,Y & Z. (0,0,0) Ian Crotty 1 Oct 2015

Base diagram of facility X = 0 @ Centre of source positive values are towards Jura with the source at 2748 + 530mm = 3278mm from Jura wall. Y = 0 @ Centre of source positive values upwards. Z = 0 @ Centre of source positive values are down stream. Nominal Beam and source are 1640mm above steel floor (LHC ref 2060mm above 887 hall floor). Source aperture open angle = 74degrees. Bunker height upstream 4386mm Bunker height down stream 5183mm

Base diagram +X +Z 12025 2748 4825 6177 BEAM Source 730 1545 2800 1530 2748 4825 6177 BEAM Source 730 Nominal Beam Line

Trolley T1 specifications and ref points Y=0 from surface of PTFE plate X=0 Z=0 Y X Z

T1 zero ref points and chamber positions 1045 360 2197 1383 1378 Represents (0,0,0) Position in Z ?? Height 282

Values in Z for T1 Represents (0,0,0) 165 166 270 ± 3mm 120mm 530 487 Gap 2 317mm

Trolley T0 specifications and ref points (1) Z=0 T1 Y=0 X T0 X=0 Z Ref points at base of trolley T0

T0/3 Represents (0,0,0) 160 Nota. The horizontal chambers can roll in “x” so must be specified for each new position. 1650 ± 1 Height = 353 410

Z values of T0/3 16 Sept to 22Oct 2015 +X Represents (0,0,0) on Trolley base plate. RE type 2 in Z = 28 + 21 = 49mm +Z 225mm RE1/1 Korean in Z is 27 + 30 = 57mm Ref. to Down stream wall = 10266mm

Positions Trolley 30Aug to 16 Sept 2015 Ref point to Jura wall 2770mm Ref point to upstream wall 2509mm Ref point to Saleve wall 2856mm. T0 Korea chambers from Jura wall 3104mm Front Korea chambers to source 3229mm Korea chambers occupy a Z space of 194mm

Positions Trolley 16 Sept to 22 Oct 2015 Ref point to Jura wall 1507mm Ref point to upstream wall 1529mm Saleve wall to trolley edge 1292mm. T0 RE vertical chamber from source 4447mm RE vertical chamber from Down Stream wall is 10266mm Korea, front, chamber from source 4185mm Korea chambers to Saleve wall 2846mm Korea chambers to Jura wall 1731mm Ref point to Jura wall is 1878mm Ref point to Saleve wall is 3730mm Glass RPCs frame from source 1892mm

Glass RPC 24 Sept 2015 Glass RPC closest to source centre ( not the frame) is 2129mm in Z. X and Y are not known/measured. 13 Oct 2015 Ref point on frame to Jura wall 3047mm Ref point on frame to Saleve wall 2072mm Ref point on frame to source centre = 1489 + 452 = 1941mm 22 Oct 2015 Ref point on Frame to Jura wall XXXXmm Ref point on frame to source centre = XXXX + 452 = XXXXmm

Positions Trolley 22 Oct 2015 Ref point to Jura wall 2282mm Ref point to upstream wall 1677mm T0/3 Ref point to Jura wall 3272mm Ref point to Source 3610mm Korea chambers from Jura wall 3345mm Scintillator CL to alcove 1574mm Scintillator CL to steel floor is 1289 + 353 = 1642mm MDT scintillator to alcove 1587mm MDT scintillator to steel floor 1575mm

Coordinate table to convert Bunker wall measurements to trolley coordinate system. 30 Aug to 16 Sept 2015 Source to down stream wall = Zs   Source to Jura wall 3278 T1 = 282 above floor 282 Source Upstream 6177 Source to Saleve wall 1545 T0 above floor 353 Source to Alcove wall 2350 Zm Zs [+]Zf Xm (+)Xf Ym Yf Down stream wall Upstream wall Down stream Upstream Jura wall Saleve wall Floor Trolley 30Aug to 16 Sept T1 2509 NA -3668 2770 508 -1358 2856 506 T0 Korean chamber 3229 -3681 3104 174 -1287 16 Sept to 8 Oct 1529 -4648 1507 1771 1292 253 Vertical Chamber 4447 Korean Front Source 1/2 valu in Z 452 Source 1/2 valu in X 530 Source above floor 1640 DRAFT Version Document is here; http://rpc-cms-re4-upscope.web.cern.ch/rpc-cms-re4-upscope/RPC/GIFPlusPlus/Installation/Coordinates/CoordinateGIF05Oct2015.xlsx

Position of chambers within Trolley. Base of RE type 2 is 355mm above steel floor. Base of RE type 2 is 415mm from ref point. Centre of RE type 2 is 764mm from ref point. Front face of RE2 is 10266mm from down stream wall. Korean chambers above steel floor are 1650 ±1mm. Horizontal rails (L>1.6m) above steel floor are 1250mm. Dimension between uprights is 1390mm. T1 RE type 2’s Centre Line are 1665mm above steel floor.

Available space to manoeuvre Trolleys in Bunker Hand rail to far end of alcove is 3620mm. End of alcove to down stream wall less shielding rail for TDC is 1400mm. Gas panels are 250mm from wall. And 100m for piping.

Source and hand/guard rails Nominal Beam line. 905 730 Distance to Saleve wall = 1545 1060 1940 Distance to Jura wall = 2308 1665

Subdetectors occupation in “Z” T1 1100mm T0 800mm Glass 800mm MDT 1400mm Micromegas 500 or 600mm.

Conclusion The base diagram by Fabiola should be done to scale in mm. The reference points for the trolleys works well except for the Korea chambers, and others that translate in x, where their distance from the walls will be given. There is a mixture of the above two systems as this is the first attempt. The spread sheet has to be improved in clarity. Position of chamber structure can be defined in all 3 coordinates using the spread sheet. The diagram defining available space in the bunker is not yet done. The method to calculate the strip/eta division is not done. The other detectors in the bunker are not noted. The available space with respect to infrastructure is not done. This document is here; http://rpc-cms-re4-upscope.web.cern.ch/rpc-cms-re4- upscope/RPC/GIFPlusPlus/Installation/Coordinates/CoordinateSystemGIF24Sept2015.pptx.

Additional material

Trolley T1 Measurements and ref points

Trolley T1 Measurements and ref points Saleve side