Preparation of Fine Particulate Emissions Inventories

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Session VII: Fugitive Dust Area Sources Paved and Unpaved Roads.
Advertisements

1 Estimating On-Road Vehicle Emissions Using CONCEPT Alison K. Pollack Ralph Morris ENVIRON International Corporation.
Emission Factor Modeling Graciela Lubertino, HGAC.
1 Travel Model Application for Highway Vehicle Emission Estimation Ho-Chuan Chen, Ph.D., P.E. King County Department of Transportation Seattle, Washington.
Modelling Motor Vehicle Emissions
Mobile Source Inventories for SIPs Matt Laurita Air Quality Modeling and Transportation Section EPA Region 4.
COPERT 4 Training 3. Activity Data – Beginner’s Guide.
PM Control Strategies for Mobile Sources Presentation for PM2.5 Implementation Workshop June 21, 2007 Gary Dolce U.S. EPA Office of Transportation and.
B.H. Baek and Catherine Seppanen Institute for the Environment-UNC at Chapel Hill Allison DenBleyker, Chris Lindhjem and Michele Jimenez ENVIRON International.
COG DTP/DEP Staff Eulalie Lucas and Erin Morrow DTP Sunil Kumar DEP Testing of EPA’S MOVES Model Travel Management Subcommittee May 26, 2009 MOVES: Motor.
Air Quality and Conformity Issues James M. Shrouds, Director Office of Natural and Human Environment Federal Highway Administration AASHTO SCOE Meeting.
Recent Developments in the Community Emissions Model CONCEPT 5 th Annual CMAS Model User Conference Tuesday October 17, 2006 Mark Janssen LADCO.
Igor Trpevski University of St. Cyril and Methodius Skopje,
1 MOBILE6 -Input and Modeling Guidance -SIP and Conformity Policy North American Vehicle Emission Control Conference Atlanta, April 4, 2001 Gary Dolce.
Recent Developments in Transportation Conformity Beverly Chenausky Multimodal Planning Division – Air Quality Breakout Session: Transportation Conformity/Air.
MOVES Briefing for NACAA EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality March 3, 2009.
MOBILE6 On-Road Motor Vehicle Emissions Model 5-Day Training Course Presented in Seattle the week of September 10, 2001 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Emission Inventories and EI Data Sets Sarah Kelly, ITEP Les Benedict, St. Regis Mohawk Tribe.
Presents/slides/alison/awmapaper1.ppt Alison K. Pollack ENVIRON International Corporation Novato, California Rich Wilcox U.S. Environmental Protection.
Missoula Air Quality Conformity Analysis Required by Federal and Montana Clean Air Act – Transportation-specific air quality requirements enacted in Federal.
Transportation Conformity Overview H-GAC Conformity Workshop May 30, 2007.
COG/DTP Staff Eulalie Lucas and Erin Morrow Comments on Draft MOVES 2009 International Emission Inventory Conference April 16-17, 2009 Baltimore,Maryland.
Class Project Report, May 2005 ME/ChE 449 Sustainable Air Quality Highway Transportation: Trends from 1970 to 2002 and Beyond By Scott Kaminski Instructor.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Arkansas July 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review North Dakota July 2013.
Class Project Report, May 2005 ME/ChE 449 Sustainable Air Quality Highway Transportation: Trends from 1970 to 2002 and Beyond By Scott Kaminski Instructor.
1 Session IV: Onroad Mobile Sources Laurel Driver US EPA.
Importing NEI Data From EIS Into TEISS Angelique Luedeker, ITEP/TAMS Center.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review New Hampshire July 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Idaho July 2013.
1 Air Pollution Automobile Emissions: An Overview Emissions from an individual car
Use of IM & NEI Data Trends to Improve Vehicle Emissions Models IM Solutions Salt Lake City April 2014 Jim Lindner.
Kanok Boriboonsomsin, Guoyuan Wu, Peng Hao, and Matthew Barth
PM Control Strategies for Mobile Sources
Jeff Vukovich, USEPA/OAQPS/AQAD Emissions Inventory and Analysis Group
4. Activity Data – Beginner’s Guide
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
SMOKE-MOVES Processing
Overview of FHWA CMAQ & System Performance Measures
Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone in 2025
EPA Tools and Data Update
Overview of Emissions Processing for the 2002 Base Case CMAQ Modeling
Andrey Khlystov and Dave Campbell
Development of 2016 Alpha Onroad Mobile Emissions
Actuaries Climate Index™
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
TransCAD Vehicle Routing 2018/11/29.
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Impacts of hydrogen pathways vs
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Importing NEI Data From EIS Into TEISS
SMOKE Improvements in version 2.0
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Sensitivity Analysis Update
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Presented By: George Noel – Volpe Mark Glaze - FHWA 1/13/2014
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
George Noel and Dr. Roger Wayson
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Presentation transcript:

Preparation of Fine Particulate Emissions Inventories Chapter 3 – Onroad Mobile Sources After this lesson participants will be able to: describe the EPA’s MOBILE6 model, the National Mobile Inventory Model, and the new MOtor Vehicle Emissions Simulator (MOVES) model understand the acceptable uses, advantages, and disadvantages of these models for the development of PM inventories explain how vehicle mileage is used to calculate emissions from onroad vehicles.

EPA’s Onroad Models – Overview MOBILE6 Current official model for SIP emission inventory development NMIM Incorporates MOBILE6 VMT is an input to model Can be used to calculate emission inventory, not just emission factors MOVES Significant departure from MOBILE model series Released in draft form April 2009 Not acceptable for SIP inventories until final version is released by end of 2009 EPA’s Office of Transportation and Air Quality or OTAQ (pronounced O-TAK) has developed onroad emission models MOBILE6 (and previous MOBILE models) is FORTRAN-based and require the user to develop a text file input file Both NMIM and MOVES can be accessed via a Graphical User Interface (GUI) which takes the place of the MOBILE6 input file and are both written in Java. NMIM included the development of a National County Database with default information by county. MOVES expands on the database concept by including all data in databases that can be revised by the user; this includes not just local information, but also information on emission rates, driving cycles, etc.

MOBILE6 Overview Use MOBILE6 model for emission factors PM2.5, SO2, NOx, NH3, PM10, VOC, and CO PM2.5 and PM10 emission factors are for primary emissions (PM2.5-PRI and PM10-PRI) Use VMT data for activity Map VMT data to corresponding MOBILE6 emission factors OTAQ developed MOBILE6 to estimate emissions from mobile sources. The MOBILE6 model: includes emission factors for PM2.5, SO2, NH3, PM10, VOC and CO. can be downloaded with its User Guide from www.epa.gov/otaq/m6.htm. uses PM2.5 and the PM10 emission factors to represent primary emissions. VMT estimates should be developed by vehicle type and speed (to represent specific road types) and the VMT should then be matched to the corresponding MOBILE 6 emission factors for the same vehicle type and speed, and representing the same time period, to form the basis of emission calculations.

MOBILE6 Modeling Inputs PM inventories are annual Contrasts with seasonal ozone or CO inventories MOBILE6 runs should represent multiple seasons Generally either 12 sets of monthly inputs or 3 to 4 sets of seasonal inputs Some MOBILE6 inputs will be same as those used for ozone or CO modeling: Registration distribution Control programs Seasonal (or monthly) inputs are needed for a PM inventory to capture differences in ambient conditions and fuel programs that would affect emissions. In the case of using 3 seasons, the seasons are generally summer, winter, and spring/fall. Local registration distributions are important for PM inventories, just as the are for ozone inventories, as these will affect the rate at which new emission standards get incorporated into the fleet. Differences between the MOBILE6 default distribution and actual distributions from local areas can lead to significant differences in the resulting emissions.

MOBILE6 Modeling Inputs (cont’d) Some data needs to correspond to month/season being modeled Ambient conditions Fuel parameters Speeds/speed distributions (may not change by season) VMT mix (may not change by season) PM2.5 emission factors fairly insensitive No temperature or speed correction factors applied in MOBILE6 No deterioration with age in PM emission factors One additional data input required for MOBILE 6 modeling that was not required in the past is the diesel sulfur content expressed in parts per million. Also, there are additional commands needed for generating PM2.5 inventories in MOBILE 6. The commands are described in the MOBILE user’s guides developed by OTAQ. Note that when you develop a PM inventory, you cannot do a PM2.5 and a PM10 inventory simultaneously. As a result, it is necessary to specify just one particle size per each run.

MOBILE6 Modeling Inputs (cont’d) Additional data required for PM modeling in MOBILE6 Diesel sulfur content (in parts per million [ppm]) Additional commands needed for MOBILE6 Described in MOBILE6 User’s Guide PM2.5 and PM10 emission factors cannot be calculated in same scenario – particle size must be specified in each scenario One additional data input required for MOBILE 6 modeling that was not required in the past is the diesel sulfur content expressed in parts per million. Also, there are additional commands needed for generating PM2.5 inventories in MOBILE 6. The commands are described in the MOBILE user’s guides developed by OTAQ. Note that when you develop a PM inventory, you cannot do a PM2.5 and a PM10 inventory simultaneously. As a result, it is necessary to specify just one particle size per each run.

National Mobile Inventory Model (NMIM) Creates emission inventories at the national level or for any combination of states/counties Consolidated emissions modeling system Combines a graphical user interface, MOBILE6, NONROAD, and a county database Database contains most recent information used in the NEI National Mobile Inventory Model: a tool developed by OTAQ to create national or sub-national emission inventories for any calendar year uses county-specific input parameters a consolidated emissions modeling system for EPA’s MOBILE and NONROAD models combines a graphical user interface, MOBILE6, NONROAD, and a database with modeling information for each county in the United States. Currently this database contains the most recent information (e.g., fuel parameters, registration data, temperatures, etc.) used by EPA to generate the default National Emission Inventory estimates for each county. EPA has used NMIM to prepare historical and projection year emission inventories for a number of recent rulemakings.

National Mobile Inventory Model (NMIM) (cont’d) Calculates criteria pollutants and HAP emissions (whereas MOBILE6 only calculates emission factors) All estimates based on same input parameters Used to generate 2002, 2005, and draft 2008 NEI Optional for states Available for general use in 2004 Produces same results as MOBILE6 and NONROAD NMIM: can calculate both criteria (including ammonia) and HAPs for the source categories included in the MOBILE6 and NONROAD models. consolidates all the model inputs into a single data base such that all the estimates are based on the same input parameters in each county (e.g., fuel programs, inspection/maintenance, humidity, temperatures). is an optional tool for states to use in estimating mobile source inventories by organizing and automating emission inventory development for highway vehicles and NONROAD categories. is not a substantively different approach than directly using MOBILE 6 and NONROAD. This tool was developed to make creating inventories easier and does not change the answers that are obtained from running MOBILE or NONROAD individually. State use: States may wish to customize all or part of their own inventory generation process to the NMIM model approach. This will allow them to take advantage of its efficiency and transparency, and to align the NEI inventory results more closely with their own inventory estimates. State and local agencies will be able to use the database to view the county-level default values and to replace them with data that better represents their geographic areas.

Sources of VMT Data State Department of Transportation Metropolitan Planning Organization 2002/2005 NEI VMT Data based on: State-provided VMT FHWA HPMS data summaries By roadway type and State By roadway type and Urban Area Nationally by Vehicle Type State departments of transportation typically provide VMT data. Metropolitan planning organizations track these data for certain areas. However, VMT data should be used from whatever source it is available. MPO transportation modeling generally validates local VMT estimates against FHWA’s Highway Performance Modeling System VMT data. State DOTs are required to submit VMT data for certain road types to FHWA annually. Summaries of the annual FHWA HPMS data can be found online in FHWA’s Highway Statistics publications

VMT Approach Distributions of VMT by roadway type, vehicle type, by hour of day can be applied directly to VMT or included within MOBILE6 input files Also need to have speeds matched to roadway types either as average speeds or as speed distributions by speed ranges In the case of the NEI, the VMT data was developed for use in conjunction with MOBILE 6 by using the distributions of VMT by roadway type and vehicle type. In some cases this activity data may be available by hour of the day. Regardless of the format, these fractions can be applied directly to the total VMT, or they can be included within the MOBILE 6 input files in order to generate a weighted emission factor in MOBILE 6. It is important to have speeds matched to the roadway types, either as an average speed or as speed distributions by speed ranges. This latter approach is the approach needed for link-based VMT development and some transportation demand models.

Level of Detail of VMT Data By county By roadway type (or link level) By vehicle type Appropriate time period Ideally, the level of VMT data that should be used is by county and by the various roadway types or link level if modeling at that level is planned. Using data by vehicle type is important since emission rates can vary greatly among the different vehicle types. Using vehicle type data will allow the adjustments to be made to the national defaults that are typically used. It is important to match the VMT data (daily or hourly) to the appropriate time period for modeling.

Calculating Onroad Emissions Match VMT to corresponding MOBILE6 emission factor Map according to speed, roadway type (RT), vehicle TYPE (VT), time period Emis = VMT  EF  K Emis = emissions in tons by RT, VT VMT = vehicle miles traveled on RT by VT in miles EF = emission factor in grams/mile by RT, VT K = conversion factor VMT data should be matched to a corresponding MOBILE 6 emission factor and mapped according to speed, roadway type, vehicle type, and time period. Emissions are calculated by multiplying the VMT data by an emissions factor as shown in the equation on this slide.

MOVES MOVES is a completely new model New data, structure, capabilities New fleet and activity defaults Updated emission rates based on recent test data Significant PM testing of light-duty gas vehicles through Kansas City Study 2004-2005 496 light-duty gas cars and trucks tested from model years 1968-2005 Vehicles tested in summer and winter conditions Results of study indicate that MOBILE6 underestimated PM, particularly at cold temps MOVES is not a carry-over from MOBILE6. It was built from the ground up. Other new test data have also been included in MOVES Because MOVES is database-oriented, it can easily be updated by EPA (or others) as additional new testing data become available.

Preparing for MOVES Can be run at a national, county, or project level of detail Converters and importers available with draft MOVES2009 Can be used to convert MOBILE6 inputs to MOVES-formatted data (e.g., for age-based registration distributions) in near-term For long-term use, states should collect data that better maps to MOVES MOVES can be run either through the GUI or via a batch mode using run scripts. The databases are in MySQL, which is free and non-proprietary. State agencies and MPOs should develop staff capabilities in using MySQL and the associated query language. This is the easiest way to customize MOVES output to the needs of an individual agency, for both importing local inputs and manipulating model outputs. EPA has prepared several converters to convert data in MOBILE6 format to MOVES format: registration distributions, speed distributions Agencies should learn to use the County Data Manager in MOVES in order to easily pull in local data into the MOVES database. When run at the county level, data sets for each county that an area needs to model must be imported separately, but there are ways to automate this process somewhat. MOVES includes several scripts for developing reports. Users can develop their own customized scripts which can then be run on any MOVES output database. Agencies should plan to attend one of EPA’s MOVES training sessions.

Preparing for MOVES National trends Local inputs important PM emissions substantially higher than MOBILE6 NOx emissions generally higher than MOBILE6 HC, CO emissions similar to or lower than MOBILE6 Local inputs important Fleet mix, fuels, activity Temperature significantly affects PM EPA performed an analysis of 3 metropolitan areas, comparing MOVES results to MOBILE6 results. Each area was modeled using 1 county within the area as a surrogate for that area. Emissions were calculated for January and July monthly conditions with each result multiplied by six and then summed together to represent annual conditions. Results were analyzed separately for light-duty and heavy-duty vehicles. Results are shown on the next 3 slides.

City-Specific PM2.5 Emissions Source: EPA, 2009

City-Specific NOx Emissions Source: EPA, 2009

City-Specific HC Emissions Source: EPA, 2009

MOVES Schedule Draft MOVES2009 released April 2009 No official uses for this model Official MOVES2009 to be released by end of 2009 Use will be required for Next round of SIPs (due 2012 and 2013) Regional conformity analysis following conformity grace period of 3-24 months Project level conformity following grace period NEPA analysis (e.g., air toxics)

Additional Resources MOBILE6 website: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/m6.htm MOVES website: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/models/moves/index.htm There are a number of online resources to consult when developing an emissions inventory for onroad sources. The above sites include available background documents. Information on MOVES training sessions is available at the MOVES web site above. It also contains the materials from the EPA training course, which can be a valuable resource in getting started in running MOVES.