Opener – Copy into Notebook pp. 84

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lincoln-Douglas Debates: Video (2:13)
Advertisements

The Dred Scott Decision
II. Basis of Citizenship
Road to Civil War Challenges to Slavery p
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857). Background: The Missouri Compromise 1803: U.S. purchases Louisiana Territory from France 1820: Compromise allows slavery.
 Dred Scott v. J. A. Sanford (1857).   Who was Dred Scott?  Events Affecting Dred Scott’s fate  Timeline of Events  The Two Sides of the Issue 
A Nation Divided Political Divisions Chapter 15, Section 3 Pages
The Court ruled that Scott's "sojourn" of two years to Illinois and the Northwest Territory did not make him free once he returned to Missouri.
Changing the Law of the Land
Griffin Honeycutt Block 2 October 29,  Official Name- Dred Scott v. John F. A. Sandford  The defendant’s name was actually Sanford, but was misspelled.
By Alexander M. Barker. Born as a slave in the late 1700s Owned by the Blow family Parents are unknown Lived in Southampton County, VA Moved to Alabama;
Bell Work In your notebooks, respond to the prompt: How can differences among students affect the school? What kinds of differences could lead to problems.
Chapter 15, Section 3 Challenges to Slavery.
Objectives Explain why the Republican Party came into existence in the 1850s. Summarize the issues involved in the Dred Scott decision. Identify Abraham.
 By: Kylisha Smith and Hasan Evans.  Dred is an slave who lived in the free state of Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving back.
Dred Scott. Background Scott was the slave of an Army surgeon who took him from Missouri to posts in Illinois and modern day Minnesota. Scott was the.
Fill in your “Describing Historical Event” handout using the following PowerPoint presentation. If you need extra space use the back of your handout. Aim:
Dred Scott v Sandford Facts of the Case: Dred Scott was a slave in Missouri. From 1833 to 1843, he resided in Illinois (a free state) and in an area of.
APUSH – Spiconardi.   In the 1830s, Dred Scott, a slave, accompanied his owner from Missouri to Illinois and later the territory of Wisconsin  Scott.
Dred Scott Decision (1857).
APUSH Review: Dred Scott v. Sanford Everything You Need to Know About Dred Scott v. Sanford To Succeed In APUSH
Dred Scott v. Sandford By Chloe Sturges. Overview Dred Scott, a slave in the 1800s, was taken out of Missouri, a slave state, by his owner John Emerson.
Dred Scott v. Sandford A Supreme Court Decision in 1857.
Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854) 1854 Law that allowed for popular sovereignty in the Kansas and Nebraska Territories Devised by the “Little Giant” Stephen Douglas.
Dred Scott.  I can explain how the Dred Scott Court decision impacted African Americans during the time before the Civil War.
Ch:14 The Nation Divided :3 The Crisis Deepens.
WhoA Missouri slave What When Where Why Concept Development: Dredd Scott was a slave who argued for his freedom to the Supreme Court. Dredd Scott vs. Sanford.
21.6 & 21.7: The Dred Scott Case & Decision Page
Political Divisions Chapter 15, Section 3.
Civil War Causes Quiz Reteach.
Uncle Tom’s Cabin and Dred Scott
Chapter 14 The Nation Divided Section 3: The Crisis Deepens
APUSH Review: Sectional Conflict:
Dred Scott Decision 1857.
Ch:14 The Nation Divided
Objectives Explain why the Republican Party came into existence in the 1850s. Summarize the issues involved in the Dred Scott decision. Identify Abraham.
Slavery Dominates Politics
Pre-Civil War Events Ms.Bean.
Quote The best way to predict the future, is to create it.
Dred Scott.
Changing the Law of the Land
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)
Dred Scott Presentation created by Robert Martinez
The Dred Scott Case and the Election of 1860
Chapter 14 Section 3 Objectives
Chapter 14 Section 3 Objectives
Chapter 14 section 3 The Crisis Deepens.
Background: Who was Dred Scott?
Challenges to Slavery 15-3
Famous Abolitionists.
PART 3.
Happy 800th to the Magna Carta!!!!!!
Mario Lopez Eric Mendez
Review from last week Kansas-Nebraska Act: Kansas is almost ready to be a state- To slave or not? Stephan Douglas looked to avoid more issues so he proposes.
What causes of sectional conflict led to the Civil War?
What makes you an “American” citizen?
The Nation Breaks Apart
The Dred Scott Decision
Events that Helped Spark the Civil War By: Mrs. Andreatta
Political Divisions Chapter 18 - Section 3.
Westward Expansion: Institution of Slavery
Review.
Conflict over Slavery 1850s 2
APUSH Review: Video #32: Attempts To Resolve Slavery In The Territories (Key Concept 5.2, II, B) Everything You Need To Know About Attempts To Resolve.
8X Tuesday Objective: Describe political developments in the US that led to Civil War. Agenda: Do Now: Explain the rise of the Republican Party.
Dred Scott Decision (1857).
Review.
The Freed Man Shall Not Be Free
Review.
Presentation transcript:

Opener – Copy into Notebook pp. 84 Complex – difficult, not simple Roger B. Taney – chief justice of the Supreme Court in 1857.

Objective: Describe how the Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) decision increased tensions between the North and South.

The Dred Scott Decision Issue Effect Citizenship Residency Slavery

Dred Scott v. Sandford, 1857 Dred Scott Slave Belonged to Dr. John Emerson Lived in St. Louis, MO Emerson took Scott to Wisconsin & Illinois. Returned to Missouri – Emerson died. 1846 – Scott sued for his freedom. What reason(s) do you think Dred Scott gave to support why he should be free?

Dred Scott v. Sandford, 1857 Rulings Key Issues: Lower court ruled in Scott’s favor. Missouri Supreme Court overturned this ruling. 11 years later, the case reaches the U.S. Supreme Court. Most of the justices were from the South. Was Scott a citizen? Does his time on free soil make him free? Is it unconstitutional to limit slavery in the Louisiana Territory?

The Supreme Court's Ruling Roger B. Taney Chief Justice Wrote the majority opinion. Came from a slaveholding family from Maryland.

The Supreme Court's Ruling Citizenship Effect Nation’s founders believed that African Americans, “had no rights which a white man was bound to respect”. All African Americans, free or slave, were not citizens. If African Americans are NOT citizens, how does this affect the Dred Scott case?

The Supreme Court's Ruling Residency Effect Scott returned to Missouri. “his status, as free or slave, depended on the laws of Missouri”. According to the Court’s ruling, is Scott to be considered free or a slave?

The Supreme Court's Ruling Prohibiting Slavery Effects Declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional. 5th Amendment – no one could be “deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.” If the Missouri Compromise is unconstitutional and the 5th Amendment states that citizens can’t have their property taken away without “due process”, how does this affect slavery in federal territories?

Reactions to the decision South North Most whites support. “covers every question regarding slavery and settles it in favor of the South.” Northerners are stunned. Republicans very upset. Platform argued Congress held the right to ban slavery. Feared slavery could NEVER be stopped in federal territory. Lincoln warned it may prohibit states from banning slavery.

Video Clip After the video clip, you will need to describe how some northerners and many Republicans reacted to the Dred Scott decision.

2-minutes How did some Northerners and many Republicans react to the Dred Scott decision?

Closure Quiz Explain how the Dred Scott decision added to tension between the North and the South.