Leadership Compensation Alignment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1.
Advertisements

Paul B. Ginsburg, Ph.D. Presentation to The Rising Costs of Health Care: What Can be Done, Alliance for Health Reform, June 12, 2012 Policy Support for.
Using Baldrige to Create Organizational Alignment & Integration
AMERICAN STEEL CORPORATION Next class: Formosa Plastics.
Using the LEM to Drive Results at OU Physicians
Developing Our Leaders – Creating a Foundation for Success
Radford Surveys + Consulting Preparing for An IPO – A Total Compensation Approach N.A.C.D. September 27, 2005 Ed Speidel
Leadership May 29, 2013 Scotland
Aspirus Core Values Defining who we are.. Aspirus Core Values Defining Who We Are Values clearly define the behaviors we choose. –They are what we hold.
How to use variable and other incentive pay for the purpose of enhanced employee retention in a fiercely competitive labor market  2005 Elena Kozlovskaya.
Understanding Health Care Reform and MassHealth Communities of Color The Massachusetts Health Disparities Council Tom Dehner, Medicaid Director April 27,
Introduction Organizations have a relatively large degree of discretion in deciding how to pay. Each employee’s pay is based upon individual performance,
1-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Human Resource Management Gaining a Competitive Advantage Chapter 12 Recognizing.
Values and At Our Best tools to guide us Collaboration – We work together Integrity – We build confidence and trust in all interactions.
Designing an Effective Total Rewards Strategy Michael F
21 st Century Maricopa Review of Process Human Resources Projects Steering Team Meeting May 12, 2010.
Creating Sustainable Organizations The Baldrige Performance Excellence Program Sherry Martin HIV Quality of Care Advisory Committee September 13, 2012.
Non-Academic Staff Compensation Program Employee Presentation 2013.
Program Manager Product Manager Grainger Sr. Marketing Manager Marketing Manager Intermatic Director B2B Marketing Director Marketing General Binding Corp.
Recognizing Employee Contributions with Pay
The Challenges of the Medicaid Modernization Mandate – Part 1 Joel L. Olah, Ph.D., LNHA Executive Director Aging Resources of Central Iowa Iowa Assisted.
South Carolina Association for Healthcare Quality Using Data to Drive Organizational Improvement July 11, 2008 Bryan Bowles, Client Executive Premier Healthcare.
2013 AIM Hospital Marketing Conference How to Build Physician Leaders AIM Annual Conference April 13, :00 – 1:45 p.m. BUILDING PHYSICIAN LEADERSHIP:
Wednesday 10 June 2015 Carrie Marr Executive Director Organisational Effectiveness WSLHD Mobilising People and Leading Sustainable Change.
Children’s Health System 2009 Strategic Plan. Vision To be nationally recognized as a comprehensive regional and national pediatric healthcare center.
Maryland Quality Incentive Program (QuIP) JUNE 25, 2013 Presented by: ValueOptions Maryland.
Engagement at The Health Trust Presented by Quantum Workplace 2014 Executive Report - The Health Trust.
Strategic Framework C-1. Strategic Plan Our Mission: “Improving the health of our community in all we do.” C-2 Our Core Values: The organization’s core.
The Value Driven Approach
Incentive Plans Redesign-Finance Collaborative June 22, 2005.
Human Resources Strategy
Catholic Charities Performance and Quality Improvement (PQI)
Learning Objectives Consider a common attribute of organizations that achieve their Vision and Strategy Discuss the development and use of a Physician.
University of Alabama Birmingham Funds Flow Model Issues for Discussion AASA Annual Meeting October 6, 2015.
Leadership Development MANA 5350 Dr. Jeanne Michalski
RGRTA OVERVIEW Presented by: Mark R. Aesch, CEO. Transit Organization Performance Scorecard TOPS TOPS is compromised of 4 major indices; each index ties.
Compensation Philosophy & Goals Philosophy: –Competitive Pay with Markets in which we compete (Local, Regional, National) ‏ –Competitive Pay with Market.
Shareholder Update November Agenda 2 Microsoft |3.
HEALTH WEALTH CAREER April 28, 2016 STRICTLY PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL The information included in this report is strictly confidential and is proprietary.
Vision, Mission and Values Presented by Sam Davis & Nicola Blake.
Page 1 University of Alabama Birmingham Funds Flow Model Society of Surgical Chairs American College of Surgeons Kirby I. Bland, M.D. UAB Department of.
South Huron Hospital Association Presentation – Intended Solely for Council Presented by: John McNeilly – SHHA Board Chair Todd Stepanuik – SHHA President.
UMHS Definition of Leadership Leadership at UMHS is the ability to achieve exceptional results by transforming the organization and developing people to.
Using HFMA’s MAP App to Improve Practice Management Daniel J. Marino Health Directions 10/28/2012.
Merit-Based Incentives Advocacy Leadership to Shape Change.
Approve a Market Adjustment to the City of Southlake Employee Compensation Program Item 9B.
City of Southlake Strategy Map The City of Southlake provides municipal services that support the highest quality of life for our residents and businesses.
DRIVING GROWTH THROUGH LEADERSHIP Justin Dunn
The Impact of Accountable Care Organizations in Radiology
Today’s Agenda The importance of a conversation
Feedback/Performance Review and Compensation Process
Todd Baker, Chief Executive Officer
Associate Changes Policy: Manager Training
The Women’s Council of REALTORS® Chapter-to-Network Project
Trends and Business Cases of :
Hospitals and Care Systems of the Future
Compensation Committee 2017 Goals – Updated
Overview Daneen Calvin, Director
Creating & Administering your Variable pay strategy
St. Mary’s General Hospital Orientation
High Performance Accountable Care: What Do We Need to Do?
Click to add date.
Making Healthcare Affordable
Jewish Social Service Agency
GMHC Board of Directors November 14, 2016
Total Quality Management in Engineering Part II – Continues from the previous Slides Sir. Eng. R. L. Nkumbwa™ © 2010 Nkumbwa™.
FY <xx> Presented <date>
Core Competencies of a World Class Customer Advisory Board
Departure View Glossary
2019 FPHRA Academy Jeffrey Ling, PhD Evergreen Solutions, LLC
Presentation transcript:

Leadership Compensation Alignment Chad Aduddell and Aaron Austin December 7, 2016

As we continue our Living Our Mission journey, we have talked about the need to transition our organization from lots of activity, to results. This is consistent with the shift we have seen in the Health care industry over the past 7 years, especially in the reimbursement environment with government and commercial payors – the move from volume to value. For the past year and a half, at CHI St. Vincent we have been measuring our Living Our Mission metrics. This year, we are implementing a systematic approach with the LEM to ensure that every leader has the right goals and the right prioritization (weighting) of goals to hold us all accountable and ensure that everyone is focused and contributing to us delivering on our commitment to be a great place to work, practice medicine, and deliver excellent and compassionate care. Similar to the changes in the healthcare industry, we have to ensure that incentives are aligned so that we reward and reinforce high performance vs rewarding activity.

Incentive Compensation Tools to impact Merit Increase Components Base Salary Incentive Compensation Tools to impact Merit Increase Market Adjustments Equity Adjustments Last month, Aaron and I had our annual meeting with the Compensation Committee of our Board and we discussed compensation philosophy. There are multiple components of overall compensation – for leaders, managers and above, the two biggest components are: base salary and incentive compensation. Aaron is going to talk about Incentive Compensation in a few minutes, but I note that Incentive Compensation is a team sport rather than individual, meaning that the incentive is based on System Light Switches and System results rather than individual results, which does not allow us to incentivize or reward an individual So that leaves us with Base salary as an area that we can impact for individuals. For Base salary - our Executive team and our Board really have two tools (two levers that we can pull) to reward our leaders and to keep our salaries competitive. Merit Increases and Market Adjustments The Board approved the FY17 2% across the board increase for leaders. Even thought this was called a Merit Based increase, it really was an across the board increase, as all leaders were treated the same in terms of the increase, regardless of performance. The Board has mandated that we move from across the board salary increases to Merit Based Increases. So, I am going to outline how that is intended to work. Keep in mind, the Board and HR will still review Market Compensation Data and make Market Adjustments where we need to in order to remain competitive.

LEM Performance 70% + Leadership Competencies 30% Merit Increase LEM Performance 70% + Leadership Competencies 30% 5 Significantly Exceeds Expectations Challenge ?? 4 Exceeds Expectations Exceeds Target 2%+ 3 Meets Expectations Target 1-2% 2 Does Not Meet Expectations Minimum 1% 1 Significantly Below Expectations No Increase 0% Our philosophy is shifting for FY17 to move to results based Merit increases versus across the board increases or subjective increases So, next October when the Compensation Committee of the board meets, if the board approves an increase in salary based on our financial performance– Merit increases will be performance based. Performance will be based on 2 things – LEM performance will be 70% and Leadership Competencies will be 30% LEM is the objective, the results; the WHAT Leadership Competencies are Who you are -your leadership style – HOW you get results - are you exhibiting our core values and consistent with achieving results Amount of the increase will depend on financial situation of CHI St. Vincent.

Example LEM Performance 70% 30% People 2 0.6 20% Quality 0.4 10% Safety 5 0.5 Patient Experience 1 0.3 Financial 0.2 100% LEM Score is 2.0

Example Leadership Competencies 30% 12.5% Integrity and Spirituality 4 0.5 Inspirational Leadership 5 0.625 Innovation Change Leadership Accountability 3 0.375 Coaching and Development Collaboration and Teamwork Managing Performance Outcomes 100% Leadership Competency Score 3.88

LEM + Leadership Competencies Example LEM + Leadership Competencies LEM Performance 70% 2.0 1.4 Leadership Competencies 30% 3.88 1.16 Total Performance 100% 2.56 Does Not Meet Expectations Minimum 1%

Incentive Compensation Plan for FY17

FY17 Light Switches Light Switch #1: Mission Metric: 80% of the budgeted payer mix of charity care, uninsured, and Medicaid as a % of gross revenue. Light Switch #2: Operating EBIDA 50% of budget turns the plan ‘on’, but payout will be pro-rated based on results 80% of budget is required for a full payout of opportunity based on goal performance. Decision by PC on 3.25.16

Incentive Goal Performance Areas FY17 Potential Payouts Incentive Goal Performance Areas Threshold Target Maximum Local/Mkt Manager 2.5% 5% 7.5% Local/Mkt Director 10% 15% **Must be in eligible position at time payment is made (Typically Nov/Dec) and in good standing **Must be employed in eligible position prior to Jan 2017 to be eligible for FY17 Decision by PC on 3.25.16

Example – Manager Scorecard Divisional Results   Goal Measurement and Opportunity Percent  Goal Category Goal Weighting Threshold Target Maximum Measurement Result Level Achieved Percentage Achieved STEWARDSHIP Operating EBIDA 67 M 20% 0.50% 1.00% 1.50% QUALITY Index (Quality, Pt Experience, and Safety) 61st% 25% 0.625% 1.25% 1.875% PEOPLE Physician Satisfaction TBD 15% 0.375% 0.75% 1.125% Organizational Engagement GROWTH Primary Care  Total  100%  2.5% 5% 7.5%  Divisional Total Earned Divisional Financial Light Switch Adjustment (if applicable) Total Percentage Earned

Questions