Another Planned Permanent Living Arrangement (APPLA)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Using Data to Plan Waiver Strategies and Drive Improvements: Key Indicators and Trends April 11, 2012.
Advertisements

Subsidized Guardianship Permanency Initiative. SG Introduction Focuses on improving permanency outcomes for children in out-of-home care through a comprehensive.
“Yes We Will”: From Placements to Permanency – The 2020 Vision Catalyst for CARE 9 th Annual Child Placement Conference November 12-14, 2008 Dr. Page Walley,
Permanency Backlog Update As of 4/28/10  Temporary Court Ward (TCW) Baseline: 5,017 children 3,444 closed cases or 69% (65%) 85% by 9/30/10 or 4,264 closed.
Child Welfare Services Family centered services to achieve well- being through ensuring self-sufficiency, support, safety, and permanence. Dual tracks-
Return to Parent (Reunification) AdoptionPLC Fit and Willing Relative APPLA
How do Macon County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Macon/Piatt Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement14833%
Permanency Values & Roundtable Orientation Florida PRT Initiative 1.
How do Coles County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Clark...Shelby Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement7136%
How do LaSalle County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? LaSalle County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement20755%
How do Morgan & Scott County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Morgan and Scott Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total.
Who lives in Rock Island County? Rock Island County Demographics by Race and/or Ethnic Group, 2009 estimate N = 148,826 White113, % Black or African.
How do McLean County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? McLean County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement23350%
How do Peoria County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Peoria County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement19235%
How do Champaign County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Champaign County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement22548%
How do Sangamon County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Sangamon County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement21638%
Child Welfare Practice Model
Findings From the Initial Child and Family Service Reviews
Program Staff Presentation 1 Program Staff Presentation.
Services and Resources Available for Families & Children.
Kansas Communities Helping Find Forever Families A presentation to support adoption and foster care services of the Kansas Department for Children and.
Contra Costa County Disproportionality – Examples and Changes Ray Merritt; Dorothy Powell; Children and Family Services Research and Evaluation.
Measuring a Collaborative Effort a Child Welfare – Drug & Alcohol Family Preservation example Family Design Resources, Inc.  Fawn Davies  Deborah W.
1 G-FORCE MEETING Division of Family & Children Services September 25, 2009.
Creating Racial Equity in Child Welfare: What Do We Know? Judith Meltzer, CSSP Jim Casey Youth Opportunities Initiative Fall Convening November 16, 2010.
Connecticut Department of Children and Families Agency Overview.
940: Concurrent Planning for Resource Parents. The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Resource Center Learning Objectives Participants will be able to: Define.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
When permanency remains elusive: A longitudinal examination of the early foster care experiences of youth at risk of emancipating Joe Magruder, MSW Emily.
Trends in Child Welfare Outcomes CA Blue Ribbon Commission May1, 2013 The Performance Indicators Project is a collaboration of the California Department.
Concurrent Permanency Planning. Concurrent Permanency Planning (CPP) The process of working towards reunification while at the same time planning an alternative.
Permanency Planning in Juvenile Court The options GALs have in finding a safe, permanent home for our kids.
Kamala H. Shugar Assistant Attorney in Charge Oregon Department of Justice Child Advocacy Section.
1 CHILDREN SAFE AND THRIVING WITH FOREVER FAMILIES, SOONER DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES Isabel Blanco, Deputy Director of Field Operations September.
Permanency.
“A half-century of research demonstrates convincingly that children’s well-being builds upon meeting first their primary needs for a stable and lasting.
The Child and Family Services Review (CFSR) February 2008 Update.
Case Planning Jeopardy! Tick-Tock The Main Course It’s the Law Practice Paradise GO TO FINAL OUTCOMES JEOPARDY!
Child and Family Services Reviews Onsite Review Instrument.
Child Welfare Permanency and Racial Equity Efforts in Illinois Angela Baron-Jeffrey Center for Child Welfare and Education Child Welfare Advisory Council.
LA County Department of Children & Family Services
Overview of Foster Care
Federal Updates on Kinship Care
Care into practice: the legal framework
Group Care in Florida’s Child Welfare System
CCWIP Data Analysis Training Using the CCWIP Website to Answer Questions about Key Child Welfare Outcomes Wendy Wiegmann CCWIP August 19, 2016.
LA County Department of Children & Family Services
Congregate Care in Ohio
SSIS V13.1 Release Training
Hon. Karen R. Carroll February 12, 2018
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
Every Child Every Month
Presented by Hill Country CASA
The Current State of Foster Care in Virginia
CCWIP Data Analysis Training Using the CCWIP Website to Answer Questions about Key Child Welfare Outcomes Wendy Wiegmann CCWIP January 19, 2016.
NEXT STEPS IN DEVELOPING CULTURALLY-COMPETENT
Placement Stability & Permanence
Removal and Placement FSFN
4 Domains Child Welfare, Juvenile Education and Mental/Health
Ongoing Assessment and Permanency
Removal and Placement FSFN
National Population and Subpopulation Estimates of Homeless Youth
Broward Quality Performance Review
BARBARA NEEDELL, MSW, PhD
Permanency Planning Modified Manual
Georgia DFCS Performance-Based Contracting
Tracking Adoption Rate of Children “Available for Adoption”
Overview of Public Facing ODJFS Child Welfare Dashboards
Title IV-E.
Florida’s New Guardianship Assistance Program
Presentation transcript:

Another Planned Permanent Living Arrangement (APPLA) Leadership Briefing November 1, 2010

APPLA is 3rd Most Common Primary Goal Primary Permanency Goal (N=18,157) Number of Children Percentage (%) Reunification with parent(s) 7,920 43.6 Adoption 4,266 23.5 Missing Data 2,394 13.2 Another Planned Permanent Living Arrangement 1,433 7.9 Goal Not Yet Established 1,084 5.9 Permanent Guardianship 457 2.5 Maintain and Strengthen placement 443 2.4 Permanent Placement with a fit and willing Relative 155 0.8 Permanent Custody to Relative 5 0.0 Total 18,157 100.0 Note: Permanency goals are extracted from the FSFN Legal Module. Population is all children in Out-of-Home Care on July 12, 2010.

What Do We Know About APPLA? Who has APPLA as their primary goal? African American children Children removed from home as teens Children in out-of-home care at older ages, regardless of age at removal What are their child welfare experiences like? Have long and unstable care episodes Are disproportionately in Group Homes / Congregate care rather than family-based care 74% do not have parental rights terminated

Family Safety will Produce an APPLA Monitoring Report Purpose: Provide DCF and CBC leadership with a report to track: trends in the use of APPLA as a primary goal and outcomes for children with the goal of APPLA Provide information at state and CBC level updated quarterly Report will track data from July 2009 forward Format: Excel Trend report 5

Monitoring Report: Selected Measures Trends in Use of APPLA: Number of children with goal of APPLA Percent of children in out-of-home care who have goal of APPLA Number of children with goal of APPLA, by age group Number of children with goal of APPLA newly established in the quarter Percent of children with goal of APPLA newly established who have parental rights terminated

Monitoring Report: Selected Measures Outcomes for Children with Goal of APPLA: Track a cohort of children with primary goal of APPLA on July 1, throughout the year to see percent who: Are still in out-of-home care with the goal of APPLA Are still in out-of-home care but had their goal changed from APPLA Age-out Achieved permanency

Supporting Charts The following provides additional details about: Who has APPLA as their primary goal What their child welfare experiences are like Charts compare children with the primary goal of APPLA on 7/12/2010 to children who do not have the goal of APPLA.

9

Children with the Goal of APPLA are Disproportionately Black

…And Older

However, Many APPLA Children Entered Young & Stayed in Care

Children with Goal of APPLA Often have Unstable Care Episodes

…And Long Care Episodes

Children In Care Longer Are Likely to Have the Goal of APPLA

Children with Goal of APPLA Are Less Likely to be in Family-based Care, Especially Relative Care

…Even When Compared to Non-APPLA Youth of the Same Age

In Addition to Adoption, Establishing Family Connections Should Be Pursued Population is all children in Out-of-Home Care on August 5, 2010.