In the Promotion and Tenure process David Reed

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Creating Inclusive Laboratories for Lyman Briggs Biology GTAs and UGLAs.
Advertisements

LEVELING THE PLAYING FIELD: GENDER ISSUES AFFECTING STUDENTS Barbara A. Horwitz Distinguished Professor of Physiology Vice Provost – Academic Personnel.
Promotion and Tenure Faculty Senate May 8, To be voted on.
Promotion and Tenure Workshop for MUSM Faculty A Faculty Development Opportunity Mercer University School of Medicine 2012.
NSF ADVANCE Program Workshop March 4, 2013 Brooke Shipley Director of WISEST Professor of Mathematics Implicit Bias Panel This material was supported with.
Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.
Political Correctness.  Language, or behavior, which is claimed to be calculated to provide a minimum of offense, particularly to the racial, cultural,
Improving Recruitment of Women Faculty in Science and Engineering at MU Mizzou ADVANCE STRIDE Committee Spring 2009 This material is based upon work supported.
University of South Florida NSF ADVANCE-PAID # Faculty Recruitment for Diversity and Excellence Best Practices.
Tenure Track Faculty Survey Spring  Population:241 ◦ Female: 79 ◦ Males: 162 ◦ Faculty of Color: 54  Sample:159 (66%) ◦ Females: 52 (66%) ◦ Males:
Senior Appointments Committee J. M. Friedman, MD, PhD.
Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education (COACHE) University of Minnesota.
NSF ADVANCE P.A.I.D. at the University of Delaware: RRR (Resources for Recruitment and Retention) of Women Faculty ADVANCE at the University of Delaware.
Response Rates Overall response rate of 60.3% (N=1340) Women: 68.4% Higher response from female nonwhites 63 URM*, 326 majority, 10 missing data Men:
Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.
Promotion in the Clinical Track Lois J. Geist, M.D. Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Development.
Research on Bias in Hiring Information for Deans, Chairs, and Recruiting Committees.
Task Force on Women Faculty Report for the Advisory Committee on Faculty Well-Being August 28, 2008.
KerryAnn O’Meara Associate Professor, Higher Education Co-PI UM ADVANCE Corbin M. Campbell Research Assistant ADVANCE Research and Evaluation: ARHU Report.
1 The Multicultural Climate at MSU- Mankato William E. Sedlacek University of Maryland
© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Diversity and Your Relationships with Others Chapter 12.
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
Building an Inclusive Faculty: Stakeholders, Standards, and Strategies Luis Ricardo Fraga Associate Vice Provost for Faculty Advancement Russell F. Stark.
ADVANCE: A Bottom Up and Top Down Approach to Diversifying College Campuses Spurty Surapaneni, BA, Lisa M. Larson, PhD, Bonnie Bowen, PhD, Luiza Dreashear,
Diversity in Education
Faculty Well-Being Survey: Reappointment, Promotion & Tenure & Post-Tenure Review Presentation for NC State Faculty Senate February 27, 2007 Nancy.
Promotions on the Physician Scientist/Basic Science Investigator Track Larry L. Swift, Ph.D. Vice Chair for Faculty Affairs Department of Pathology, Microbiology.
Dietrich School Diversity Committee Kathleen Blee - Associate Dean for Graduate Studies and Research & Chair, Diversity Committee Rebecca Roadman - Project.
Avoiding (Un)Intentional Discrimination When Recruiting via Social Media Stephanie R. Thomas, Ph.D. Thomas Econometrics
Managing the risk of unconscious bias in admissions.
Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, & Students 1. Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, and Students Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, and Students (#82) INTENT STATEMENTS 4.1.
What Difference Can Portfolio Make in Radiographer Work Practice
Jo Handelsman Associate Director For Science
COMBATING YOUR OWN BIAS We all have them, so what do we do now?
Christiane Spitzmueller Erika Henderson
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
How do peers affect learning?
Understanding and Implementing the New RTP Policies In Fall 2016
IDEAL–N Kent State University
Dr. Jenna P. Carpenter, Dean School of Engineering Campbell University
Key Diversity Term Definitions
Provost’s Leadership Retreat
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
#2069 Jolenea Ferro, University of South Florida Background
Chapter 12 Diversity and Your Relationships with Others
Janet Kistner VP Faculty Development & Advancement April 2018
Safeguarding Objective Decision making
In the Promotion and Tenure process David Reed
Faculty Development Program Introduction to Gender-Responsive Pedagogy
IMPLICIT BIAS & WELCOMING BEHAVIOR
UNCONSCIOUS BIAS IN STEM
Promotions on the Physician Scientist/Basic Science Investigator Track
Your Career at Queen’s: Merit Review and Renewal, Tenure, & Promotion New Faculty Orientation August 23, 2018 Teri Shearer Deputy Provost (Academic.
Interrupting Bias Deena Pierott iUrban Teen.
Department Chair Selection Process
Review Committee Training – BEST Practices
"Evaluating Students' Evaluations of Teaching: Bias and Beyond"
recognizing personal bias and how it impacts your work
Lecture 06: A Brief Summary
Implicit Bias General Session
UTIA P&T Workshop Overview of P&T Process April 29, 2019.
Implicit Bias General Session
What’s at the Root of Inclusiveness
Promotion & Tenure workshop
Implicit Bias in Faculty Diversification
Stereotypes.
Why hire faculty of color? Students of color experience better academic outcomes when taught by faculty of color Faculty of color: Are.
BIAS: Understanding How it Affects our Patients and our Care of them
College of Business Scorecard
Opioids: Race, Class, and Gender Discrepancies
Presentation transcript:

In the Promotion and Tenure process David Reed Implicit Bias In the Promotion and Tenure process David Reed Professor of Horticulture Associate Dean for Graduate Programs and Faculty Development DW Reed, 2018

Implicit Bias or Unintentional Bias Represents the unconscious mental models we have about social groups. Specifically, refers to the favorable or unfavorable attitudes or stereotypes that affect our unconscious assessment of others. These biases are automatic, normal and natural They have been formulated and emerged from your upbringing and lifetime of experiences. DW Reed, 2018

Areas where Implicit Bias has been clearly demonstrated Gender: male vs female vs transgender; potential (male) vs performance (female) Race/Ethnicity: Caucasian vs. African American vs. Hispanic vs. Asian vs. American Indian Sexual Orientation Age Graduate Admissions DW Reed, 2018

Implicit vs Explicit Explicit Bias Implicit Bias conscious therefore controllable Implicit Bias Unconscious immediate reaction without thought; unavoidable hidden programming ? – like a “virus” ? you may not know you have the bias, so how control Goal today: give you techniques to minimize effect DW Reed, 2018

Remember: weed-out your conscious beliefs Implicit Bias Let’s Reflect Where might you have or have seen implicit bias in the Promotion and Tenure process? Maybe think “Big Picture” Where might you have or have seen implicit bias in developing professional opinions of faculty, here and elsewhere? Remember: weed-out your conscious beliefs DW Reed, 2018

Implicit Bias in Academe and Promotion and Tenure – Mostly Anecdotal Research Approach basic vs. applied scientific method vs. survey vs. case study quantitative vs. qualitative DW Reed, 2018

Implicit Bias in Academe and Promotion and Tenure – Mostly Anecdotal Field of Study biological science vs. physical science vs. social science STEM vs. non-STEM DW Reed, 2018

Implicit Bias in Academe and Promotion and Tenure – Mostly Anecdotal Land grant system faculty teachers vs. researchers vs. extension specialists DW Reed, 2018

Implicit Bias in Academe and Promotion and Tenure – Mostly Anecdotal Rank/Experience junior vs. senior faculty DW Reed, 2018

Implicit Bias in Academe and Promotion and Tenure – Mostly Anecdotal tenure-track vs. non-tenure track* *at TAMU termed Academic Professional Track DW Reed, 2018

Implicit Bias in Academe and Promotion and Tenure – Mostly Anecdotal Publications refereed vs. reviewed vs. non-referred higher tier journal vs. lower tier journal highest tier journal vs. highest tier in my field DW Reed, 2018

Federal vs. State vs. Internal vs. Industry Implicit Bias in Academe and Promotion and Tenure – Mostly Anecdotal Color on Money Federal vs. State vs. Internal vs. Industry DW Reed, 2018

How Reduce Implicit Bias in P&T Process Taken from: Perna, L. W. 2001. Sex and race differences in faculty tenure and promotion. Research Higher Educ., 42, 541-567. Perna, L. W. 2005. Sex differences in faculty tenure and promotion: The contribution of family ties. Research in Higher Education, 46(3), 277-307. Trix, F., & Psenka, C. 2003. Exploring the color of glass: Letters of recommendation for female and male medical faculty. Discourse and society, 14, 191-220 Wenneras, D. and Wold, A. 1997. Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature, 387, 341-343 DW Reed, 2018

How Reduce Implicit Bias in P&T Process Participate in a bias literacy workshop. Research provides evidence that educational interventions lead to a reduction in unconscious bias Recognize and accept that all of us have bias and assumptions, despite good intentions. Avoid considering yourself as “objective” Diversify P&T review committee membership by race, gender, rank, age, etc. Provides committee members with visible reminders of diversity. Increases group members’ motivation to respond equitably DW Reed, 2018

How Reduce Implicit Bias in P&T Process Discuss criteria that your review committee will use before evaluating candidates, and apply the criteria consistently. Develop and USE A RUBRIC: For all or each evaluator may develop their own rubric. Periodically evaluate the criteria and the manner the committee implements the review. Evaluate the entire package - USE A RUBRIC Devote sufficient time/attention to each candidate; minimize distractions; minimize time pressure. DW Reed, 2018

How Reduce Implicit Bias in P&T Process Recognize differential power/status of committee members & how it shapes group discussions; every member is 1/nth vote; facilitate balanced discussion. Use an inclusive rather than an exclusive mind-set. Look for why should be promoted rather than why should be denied. Causes more attention to the merits and less attention other factors Hold committee members responsible for fair and equitable evaluation, for decisions based on concrete information, not on vague assertions or assumptions. Dean will require reason(s) for votes. DW Reed, 2018

Remind all about Implicit Bias in P&T Process At the beginning of the Departmental P&T Meeting Realize the presence of Implicit Bias Maybe distribute Implicit Bias handout Remind all to Use a Rubric DW Reed, 2018

Remind all about Implicit Bias in P&T Process If you like, I would be willing to meet with your Departmental P&T Committee to heighten awareness of Implicit Bias in the P&T process. DW Reed, 2018