SDD in February ‘08 cosmic run

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Peter Chochula CERN-ALICE ALICE DCS Workshop, CERN September 16, 2002 DCS – Frontend Monitoring and Control.
Advertisements

MICE CM Berkeley 9-12 Feb February 2005 Edda Gschwendtner 1 Control/Monitoring and DAQ for PIDs Edda Gschwendtner.
The first testing of the CERC and PCB Version II with cosmic rays Catherine Fry Imperial College London CALICE Meeting, CERN 28 th – 29 th June 2004 Prototype.
Octal ASD Certification Tests at Michigan J. Chapman, Tiesheng Dai, & Tuan Bui August 30, CERN.
Andrea Giammanco CMS Tracker Week April DS ROD Prototype: “final” optohybrids “final” CCUM integrated in the rod with new FEC_to_CCUM adapter (Guido.
CFT Calibration Calibration Workshop Calibration Requirements Calibration Scheme Online Calibration databases.
SSD offline status Offline week CERN, 7 July 2008 Enrico Fragiacomo on behalf of ALICE SSD.
SSD Status P. Christakoglou (NIKHEF-UU) for the SSD collaboration Thanks to: Marco vL, Enrico, Mino, Marek and Massimo.
Vladimir Frolov for Torino group. Experimental activities: The system for testing the MRPC in the Torino INFN laboratory has been fully mounted and checked;
1 HBD Commissioning (II) Itzhak Tserruya HBD group meeting November 28, 2006 Progress from October 3 to November 28, 2006.
06/03/06Calice TB preparation1 HCAL test beam monitoring - online plots & fast analysis - - what do we want to monitor - how do we want to store & communicate.
TOF Meeting, 9 December 2009, CERN Chiara Zampolli for the ALICE-TOF.
Real data reconstruction A. De Caro (University and INFN of Salerno) CERN Building 29, December 9th, 2009ALICE TOF General meeting.
DC12 Commissioning Status GOALS: establish operating conditions, determine initial calibration parameters and measure operating characteristics for the.
ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Monitoring & Data Quality Jessica Levêque Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter.
108 Mar 2007L. Musa TPC Commissioning ALICE Technical Forum, CERN, 8 th March 2007 L. Musa Outline Pre-commissioning above ground (2006) Preparing for.
Offline Wek, CERN, April 2008 Andrea Dainese 1 Status of ITS tracking A. Dainese (INFN Legnaro)
Clara Gaspar, March 2005 LHCb Online & the Conditions DB.
1 Behaviour of the Silicon Strip Detector modules for the Alice experiment: simulation and test with minimum ionizing particles Federica Benedosso Utrecht,
4 th Workshop on ALICE Installation and Commissioning January 16 th & 17 th, CERN Muon Tracking (MUON_TRK, MCH, MTRK) Conclusion of the first ALICE COSMIC.
1 ITS Quality Assurance (& DQM) P. Cerello, P. Christakoglou, W. Ferrarese, M. Nicassio, M. Siciliano ALICE OFFLINE WEEK – April 2008.
ALICE Pixel Operational Experience R. Santoro On behalf of the ITS collaboration in the ALICE experiment at LHC.
D0 Status: 01/14-01/28 u Integrated luminosity s delivered luminosity –week of 01/ pb-1 –week of 01/ pb-1 –luminosity to tape: 40% s major.
1 SDD: DA and preprocessor Francesco Prino INFN Sezione di Torino ALICE offline week – April 11th 2008.
All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov Week of July 7 to July 15 Summary  Delivered luminosity and operating efficiency u Delivered: 1.4pb -1 u Recorded:
SSD status report Marek Chojnacki, Panos Christakoglou, Enrico Fragiacomo, Marco Van Leeuwen, Massimo Venaruzzo
LM Feb SSD status and Plans for Year 5 Lilian Martin - SUBATECH STAR Collaboration Meeting BNL - February 2005.
Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL
1 Checks on SDD Data Piergiorgio Cerello, Francesco Prino, Melinda Siciliano.
1 SDD offline status Francesco Prino INFN sezione di Torino ALICE offline week – March 15th 2010.
Pixel DQM Status R.Casagrande, P.Merkel, J.Zablocki (Purdue University) D.Duggan, D.Hidas, K.Rose (Rutgers University) L.Wehrli (ETH Zuerich) A.York (University.
1 Calorimeters LED control LHCb CALO meeting Anatoli Konoplyannikov /ITEP/ Status of the calorimeters LV power supply and ECS control Status of.
Page 1 of 18 Bjorn S. Nilsen, ALICE November 16 ITS Software meeting ITS Alignment Status Plus other things By Bjørn S. Nilsen The Ohio State University.
Database David Forrest. What database? DBMS: PostgreSQL. Run on dedicated Database server at RAL Need to store information on conditions of detector as.
1 The status of the SDD detector - OFFLINE - Francesco Prino INFN Sezione di Torino ALICE CLUB – October 14th 2008.
Summary of User Requirements for Calibration and Alignment Database Magali Gruwé CERN PH/AIP ALICE Offline Week Alignment and Calibration Workshop February.
HBD Report Craig Woody BNL DC Meeting January 7, 2009.
1 HBD Commissioning Itzhak Tserruya DC meeting, BNL December 13, 2006 Progress from October 3 to November 28, 2006.
1 SDD offline status Francesco Prino INFN sezione di Torino ALICE offline week – October 20th 2008.
SSD STATUS Enrico Fragiacomo – INFN Trieste. Outlook  MC-data comparison  Cluster finder  dE/dx  Material budget in geometry ITS alignment&offline.
PHOS offline status report Yuri Kharlov ALICE offline week 7 July 2008.
Calorimeter global commissioning: progress and plans Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay & CERN, 25 jun 2008.
Calibration algorithm and detector monitoring - TPC Marian Ivanov.
Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /1 Performance of BIL tracking chambers for the ATLAS muon spectrometer A.Baroncelli,
DT calibration software: tentative release schedule S.Bolognesi & S.Maselli & G.Mila Alignement&Calibration Meeting, 25 January 2008, CERN.
D. Elia (INFN Bari)Offline week / CERN Status of the SPD Offline Domenico Elia (INFN Bari) Overview:  Response simulation (timing info, dead/noisy.
Sergio Vergara Limon, Guy Fest, September Electronics for High Energy Physics Experiments.
AliRoot survey: Calibration P.Hristov 11/06/2013.
MAUS Status A. Dobbs CM43 29 th October Contents MAUS Overview Infrastructure Geometry and CDB Detector Updates CKOV EMR KL TOF Tracker Global Tracking.
10/8/ HMPID offline status D. Di Bari, A. Mastroserio, L.Molnar, G. Volpe HMPID Group Alice Offline Week.
DB and Information Flow Issues ● Selecting types of run ● L1Calo databases ● Archiving run parameters ● Tools Murrough Landon 28 April 2009.
Calibration: preparation for pa
The GOOFIE detector as a Ternary Mixture Monitor
Peter Chochula Calibration Workshop, February 23, 2005
Marian Ivanov TPC status report.
Massimo Masera INFN sezione di Torino
Injectors BLM system: PS Ring installation at EYETS
TPC Commissioning: DAQ, ECS aspects
The Silicon Drift Detector of the ALICE Experiment
SDD Quality Assurance (& DQM)
Commissioning of the ALICE HLT, TPC and PHOS systems
Francesco Prino INFN – Sezione di Torino
Alexandre Rachevski, Francesco Prino
Maki KUROSAWA VTX Group 2014 Feb 20
Francesco Prino INFN – Sezione di Torino
BESIII EMC electronics
CMS Pixel Data Quality Monitoring
DQM for the RPC subdetector
Pierluigi Paolucci & Giovanni Polese
Analysis Drift velocity of the SDD Detector
Presentation transcript:

SDD in February ‘08 cosmic run Davide Falchieri Universita’ e INFN, Bologna Francesco Prino INFN Sezione di Torino Commissioning workshop – April 1st 2008

Summary SDD running conditions in Feb08 cosmic run Calibration runs and data in OCDB PEDESTAL and PULSER Baselines, Noise, Gain INJECTOR Drift speed Cosmic hits on SDD Outlook

SDD running conditions

ECS/DCS/HLT DCS ECS HLT Operated and controlled via PVSS SW Experienced quite frequent blockings of the user interface DCS Finite State Machine integrated in the ECS ECS Operation sequence: DAQ initialization (reset RORC, DIU, SIU) – Send JTAG commands Initializes TTC (resetting TTCrx  requires extra initialization procedures done by the CARLOSrx acquisition cards) PULSER and INJECTOR runs types (used for SDD calibration, see next slide) correctly implemented (i.e. with proper DA launched at EOR and limitation on number of events) starting from March 5th HLT Not used

ECS run types and SDD config STANDALONE No DA launched at the end of run PEDESTAL To measure baselines and noise (using ITSSDDBASda) No zero-suppression and no baseline equalization PULSER To measure gain from test pulse (using ITSSDDGAINda) Turn on PASCAL test pulse INJECTOR To measure drift speed from injectors With baseline equalized and zero-suppression active Switch on pre-pulse trigger PHYSICS Baseline equalized and zero-suppression active Masking of noisy anodes not activated Output written in OCDB in directory CalibSDD Output written in OCDB in directory DriftSpeedSDD

Ladders used Cooling available only on the top half of the SDD layers # of modules: 36  coverage: 0-155˚ Layer 4 Ladder used: 1-12 # of modules: 96  coverage: 0-196˚

DDLs used

Excluded modules Some modules gave problems when running at high trigger rate (> 500 Hz) Data synchronization is lost after short time Acquisition is blocked Problem affecting 37 modules, presently under investigation These 37 modules have been removed from the configuration used in February run Other 3 modules of ladder 4 of layer 3 are dead Resulting module statistics: Total number of modules with cooling 132 Modules excluded for various problems 40 Total number of modules in DAQ 92 88 of them supplied at the nominal HV of 1800 V

SDD geometrical coverage

Problems with BUSY Starting from Feb 27th we observed the SDD go in busy and block the acquisition after few minutes with the ACORDE trigger (95 Hz) in the global partition Problem appears only when SDD are slowest detector in the global partition No problem when running with in the global partition with TOF trigger (rate 1 Hz) Everything OK in standalone mode In order to be able to take data in the global run on March 5th we increased the busy time from 407 ms to 2025 ms, to be sure that AMBRA chips work in single buffer mode In this configuration data taking was stable for the following days also as slowest detector in the partition Under investigation (together with synchronization problems)

Calibration Runs and data in the OCDB

CalibSDD objects in OCDB Baselines, noise and gain for each anode extracted by DAs from PEDESTAL and PULSER runs PULSER runs (with DA automatically starting at EOR) implemented and correctly working starting from March 5th Previous calibration runs were taken as standalone (no DA) Should be analyzed offline DA+preprocessor for baselines noise and gain properly working starting from run 25410 Results checked offline for few runs and are ok Conclusion: OCDB/ITS/Calib/CalibSDD files are ok for first reconstruction pass for runs > 25410 To-do: Offline analysis of calibration runs < 25410 Complete validation of DA output

Example plots: PEDESTAL run 23665 Noise distribution for good anodes Baseline distribution for good anodes

Example plots: PULSER run 23668 Gain from test pulse signal to pre-amplifier input Anode statistics: Total number of anodes in DAQ 47872 Number of noisy and bad anodes (from PEDESTAL) 337 (0.7 %) Number of dead anodes (from PULSER) 110 (0.2 %)

Zero suppression thresholds Thresholds for zero suppression kept low in the first part of the run (i.e. before March 4th) For few anodes with larger noise, all time bins pass the thresholds and are recorded Typically occurring on anodes 0 – 64 – 128 – 192 which stay on chip edges and are more affected by common mode noise

DriftSpeedSDD objects in OCDB Drift speed for each module extracted by DAs from INJECTOR runs INJECTOR runs (with DA automatically starting at EOR) implemented and working starting from March 5th BUT problems with: Modules with injectors not working Threshold for injector cluster finding (optimized for non zero suppressed data) Solution (OK for first reco pass): Calibration object produced offline by analyzing run 25411 and put in the OCDB with validity from run 25000 to run 999999 Drift speed for modules with bad injectors set to the average value To-do: Offline analysis of all injector runs Extrapolate drift speed for modules with bad injectors according to the observed ladder dependence

Drift speed from injectors 33 (1 each 8 anodes) x 3 injectors on each half module Drift speed depends on anode number Drift speed depends on temperature vdrift = meE with meT-2.4 Heat sources on detector edges Fit with 3rd order polynomial Fit parameters stored in OCDB

Drift speed vs. ladder position Drift speed depends on temperature vdrift = meE with meT-2.4 Heat goes up Top ladders: higher T, lower drift speed temperature Drift Speed (mm/ns) Module number LAYER 3 LAYER 4

Drift speed stability From run 24906 collected with muon trigger about 5 triggers/minute, 200 analyzed events from 1 raw data file Drift speed constant on a time scale of 1 hour of data taking Timestamp=1204588292 Mon, 03 Mar 2008 23:51:32 GMT Timestamp=1204592726 Tue, 04 Mar 2008 01:05:26 GMT

Cosmic hits on SDD

Strategy Start from SPD points (global coord. provided by Henrik) Perform a simple tracking (linear fit) and calculate (with simplified geometry) which modules are hit on SDD layers Run22252 012.2990 ev 31 (32 online)

SDD raw data (I) Look at SDD data on the modules pointed by SPD track Run22252 012.2990 ev 31 (32 online) Layer 4 – Ladder 9 – Det 4 Low momentum particle (≈3 MIP) Cosmic Hit

Reconstructed cluster (I) Calculate cluster coordinates using an average value of drift speed and no correction for time offset Plot with EVE

Reconstructed cluster (II) Other 2 golden events from run 22252 Run22252 019.420 ev 84 (85 online) Run22252 001.3630 ev 100 (101 online)

Outlook

Cooling development (F. Tosello) 78 pressure sensors (mounted as near as possible to the detector) calibrated and installed but not yet electrically connected (new PLC not yet available) 52 flow meters All calibrated 34 out of the 52 : calibrated and mounted, the remaining ones will be delivered this week. Planning proposed by A.Tauro wk 15 (or 16): Plant in stop mode; cutting of SSD(16) & SDD(5) lines in C-side and connection to the new tubes (18mm return lines) wk 16 (April 14): the 'detector' PLC installation in the pit wk 17 (April 21): cabling of the 'detector' PLCs; cabling of the HW interlocks wk 18 (April 28): plant in RUN mode, debugging. wk 19 (May 5) : plant (hopefully) available

DCS development (J. Kral) J.Kral tried to install the new ISEG OPC server (HV). It has more stability problems than the old one. J.Kral is in contact with Lionell Wallet (CERN) to understand were the problem can be. The old OPC server has still to be used for the next weeks.

Data Analysis Implement a method for noise suppression in the cluster finder to reduce the number of noise clusters due to the use of low zero-suppression thresholds Include SDD points in the ITS tracking Tune time offset Parameter to be used to convert from measured drift time to drift coordinate (accounts for trigger and electronics delays) To be tuned from the residual between track reconstructed from SPD (and SSD) and cluster position Extract (if possible) some info about alignment (at least for the z coordinate measured by anodes) Tune ADC to keV charge conversion constant To be tuned from the charge deposit by a cosmic muon (MIP)

Backup

Injector status