First amendment Charles & Emmanuel.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Al A The tinker case was a very neat case because b the ob the ob the of the of D d Al A The tinker case was a very neat case because b the ob the ob the.
Advertisements

Supreme Court Cases Notes in p. 89 (Right Side)
Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) Summary of Case: Pennsylvania's schools were giving public school money to private schools in the surrounding area. Most of which.
FREEDOM of the student press. CHAPTER 14
BY: Alexis Stern, Mikey Thompson and Hao Pang.  Freedom of Press- Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier. This affects us because it tells us our boundaries on to what.
Expression in Special Places. Schools, military bases, and Prisons  These areas present special 1 st amendment problems.
First Amendment Adapted from “Journalism Matters” Ch. 2.
Controversial Court Appointments and Executive Orders.
Constitution Day The Bill of Rights: Freedom of Speech.
Tinker Sample Law and Ethics.
Supreme Court Cases Aim: Are we really protected by the Bill of Rights? Do Now: Which case is most important to you? HW: Complete Review Sheet.
The Bill of Rights and Teens 5 Landmark Cases from the U.S. Supreme Court.
CALL TO ORDER Make sure your homework is in the upper right hand corner of your desk!!! Do you think that students should be able to say whatever they.
Court Cases dealing with Individual Rights (Bill of Rights) J. Worley Civics.
The First Amendment’s 5 Freedoms
Brown vs. board of education of Topeka 1954 Background: segregation, a girl wants to go to school but she can’t because she’s black. Issue: 14 th amendment;
Your Rights and Responsibilities as a Student Journalist
Rachel Pleasants  In December 1965, a group of students met to discuss plans of wearing armbands to school throughout the holiday season and fasting.
How the Constitution applies to you. Constitution When someone feels that their constitutional rights have been violated, they will usually go to court.
Tinker v. Des Moines Overview
Freedom of Speech Tinker v. Des Moines 1969 Information obtained from:
Should there be boundaries to what students should be able to say to a teacher or other students at school? If so, what are the limits? If not, why not?
Look over all the cases in the powerpoint and select only one of the cases. Open the Supreme Court Cases Reading file on Edmodo and read about the case.
Texas vs. Johnson and Tinker vs. Des Moines By Emily Franklin.
Student and Teacher rights. “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging.
In 1969, in Des Moines, Iowa, students (John F. Tinker, Christopher Eckhardt and Mary- Beth Tinker) wore black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam.
Student rights / School Newspaper Rights
4.04: Creation and Defense of Individual Rights Supreme Court Cases.
QUESTION: “Does a prohibition against the wearing of armbands in public school, as a form of symbolic protest, violate the free speech clause of the First.
FIRST AMENDMENT SUPREME COURT CASES. HAZELWOOD V. KUHLMIER Student newspaper Students wrote an article about teenage pregnancy Principal stopped the.
Analogizing and Distinguishing Fact Patterns. Distinguishing Hazelwood from Tinker Tinker Facts: At a public school in Des Moines, Iowa, students organized.
Journalism Law and Ethics Notes. Freedom of speech and press are guaranteed by the First Amendment. This freedom is not absolute.
Haley Jurbala Derek Hegna Ashley Hitchcock Andrew Howard COURT CASES- GROUP 2.
BAILEY BARTESCHI, RYAN CAVIOLA, ANDRE COLANDONE AND MIRANDA MCDONALD P4 Gitlow v. New York (1925) Argued: April 11, 1923 Re-argued: November 22, 1923 Decided:
Chapter 4 – The Amendments to the US Constitution
Chapter 4 – The Amendments to the US Constitution
The Amendments to the US Constitution
Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) 393 U.S. 503
Freedom of the Press and Student Journalists
Chapter 6 – The Amendments to the US Constitution
By: Lexi Henry, Rachel Sivie & Kiersten Walther
Students’ Rights Cases
Time line Project Ashley Blomgren.
1st Amendment & School (8 cases = 7 revolving around school and 1 NOT)
Freedom of Speech.
Supreme Court Cases Impacting School Policy in the United States
FREEDOM OF SPEECH.
Tinker Sample Law and Ethics.
Chapter 4 – The Amendments to the US Constitution
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Limiting the 1st Amendment in Schools
1st Amendment By Haley & Briana.
Tinker vs. Des Moines Independant School District
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District
Landmark supreme Court Cases
By Ben Reimer and Connor Mundy
Review! Review! Review! What is federalism?
Mary Beth Tinker Welcome to the Lobby Artifact 1 Room One Room Four
Chapter 6 – The Amendments to the US Constitution
Tinker Sample Law and Ethics.
Chapter 6 – The Amendments to the US Constitution
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District
Tinker v. Des Moines Student Speech At School
Freedom of Speech.
Student Freedom of Speech
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent School District
Constitutional Rights: Protections and Limitations
1st Amendment Rights Student Journalists.
Happy Monday! Have your notes out
Presentation transcript:

First amendment Charles & Emmanuel

Tinker vs. Des Moines Tinker vs. Des Moines Independent Community District Three schools agreed to wear black armbands to protest the Vietnam War. But the district had a different thing on mind. They expelled all the students that wore an armband or if they did not take it off. Mary Beth Tinker believed that the action the district had taken was unconstitutional, so she took the case to court which later got taken to the Supreme Court where it was decided that the school district did violate the rights of the students

Hazelwood School Districts vs. Kuhlmeier In this particular case the principal had taken two inappropriate articles of the school newspaper. The school newspaper club thought that what the principal had done was illegal and unconstitutional, so as you probably already know they took this to court. Eventually the case got to the hands of the supreme court where it was decided that the principal was not violating the rights of the students.