PLAN with the PRIORITY GRID

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Advertisements

Foundations of Excellence ® in the First College Year Focusing on Two-Year Colleges Randy L. Swing, Ph.D. Kathleen M. Morley, Ph.D. Policy Center on the.
The Executive’s Guide to Strategic C H A N G E Leadership.
Performance Management Upul Abeyrathne, Dept. of Economics, University of Ruhuna, Matara.
Performance Management
2010 Annual Employee Survey Results
1 ©Copyright Dr G Sieff | IC Growth Group | | ph Strategy Mastery Programmes October 2012.
Performance Assessment Pertemuan 9 Matakuliah: L0074/Psikologi Industri dan Organisasi 2 Tahun: 2008.
1 RISK ASSESSMENT _____________________________________________________ Fort Bend Independent School District.
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
Creating and Maintaining Coalitions and Partnerships Community Tool Box Curriculum Module 1 Part 1.
Board Chair Responsibilities As a partner to the chief executive officer (CEO) and other board members, the Board Chair will provide leadership to Kindah.
Annual Planning Task Force (APTF) Recommendations NOVEMBER 18, 2014.
Module 4 Presented by Strumpf Associates on Behalf of the WDB February 19, 2016.
Don’t Plan to Fail so Start Strategically Planning Justin Camputaro Director of Student Centers and Activities Virginia Tech
Info-Tech Research Group1 Info-Tech Research Group, Inc. Is a global leader in providing IT research and advice. Info-Tech’s products and services combine.
Assessing Teaching Through Critical Reflection and Evidence to Encourage Renewal Phyllis Blumberg - University of the Sciences
Adaptable Leadership. Teaching Method Lecture/DiscussionSelf AssessmentRole Play House (1996) Leadership Quarterly Chapter 9 Inter & intrapersonal skills.
PG-26765: Culture and People
Performance Management Transformation: Cargill’s Case Study
Focusing Performance Reviews On Future performance
Breakthrough School Improvement
Application Systems Health Assessment Summary
Software Risk Management
Service Management World Class Operations - Impact Workshop.
Leadership and Strategic Planning Dr. EzzElarab Elawoor
Facilitation Tool: Team Agreement
Maximizing the Collaborative Structure – Achieving Unity of Purpose
Identify the Risk of Not Doing BA
ITS Strategic Planning Guidelines
Chapter 8: Foundations of Planning
Strategic Positioning and Strategic Planning
TSMO Program Plan Development
HOW TO MAKE YOUR NUMBER IN 2017
Individual Development Plan
MGT 360 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
HCS 370 RANK Lessons in Excellence-- hcs370rank.com.
MGT 360 Education for Service/snaptutorial.com
Accountability and Internal Controls – Best Practices
Key Decision Makers Track
© 2016, 2017 Change Healthcare Solutions, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Org development ORG CHANGE MANAGEMENT HR Graduate Intern
Key Steps in the Culture Change Process
Org development ORG CHANGE MANAGEMENT HR Graduate Intern
EXECUTIVE – LEGISLATIVE AGENDA FORMULATION
TEAM BUSINESS AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Foundations of Planning
Articulate how the practice of management has evolved
Document CWG-SFP-1/4-E brainstorming on ITU Strategic plan open and public consultation November 29, 2018.
Resource 1. Evaluation Planning Template
What Is Planning? Planning - a primary managerial activity that involves: Defining the organization’s goals Establishing an overall strategy for achieving.
: Align Manage Culture Alignment Roadmap
Succession/Replacement Planning
Identifying enablers & disablers to change
GCF business model.
What Is Planning? According to Koontz & O’Donell,
Skills, Strategies, and Tools for Creating a Data-Centric Cultural Shift Adam Czernikowski, All Chicago Kimberly Schmitt, All Chicago.
Performance Management
Designing Reader-Centered Pages and Documents
Highline Community College Assessment Training
Strategic Plan.
Strategic Planning Final Plan Team Meeting
Working Group Review 14/12/11
Roadmap November 2011 Revised March 2012
A student learning objective is an academic goal for a teacher’s students that is set at the start of a course. It represents the most important learning.
Aligning for better results IHP+ Strategic Directions 2014/15
KEY INITIATIVE Shared Services Function Management
Sylvan Hills Middle School
Aligning Assessments for Continued Implementation of an Equitable Multi-Level System of Support
Performance Results What's Your Story?
Presentation transcript:

SP Support Center Presents Working with the Priority Grid With Corina Tracy

PLAN with the PRIORITY GRID ASSESS LEARN ASPIRE ACT PLAN

ASSESS to ASPIRE alone work well with operational variance LEARN ASPIRE ACT PLAN

Start with ASPIRE for Strategic Planning, then ASSESS OPERATIONAL PLANNING STRATEGIC PLANNING

the priority grid A Year-Round Tool Aiding Team Alignment Managing Up and down

Org & PROGRAM-LEVEL Scales up Scales down Pillar-level

Topics Covered What is the purpose of the priority grid? What are the action implications? Mechanics for creating the grid How to force rank initiatives Pillar-specific strategy and metrics  Overall program-level strategy and metrics

Purpose Structure thinking to focus on high impact

The Priority Grid Axes Difficulty Organizational Impact 7.0 and above 6.0 – 6.9 5.0- 5.9 4.0 – 4.9 3.0 – 3.9 Below 2.9 Below 6.0 6.0 – 6.4 6.5 – 6.9 7.0 – 7.4 7.5 – 7.9 8.0 – 8.4 8.5 – 8.9 9.0 and above Organizational Impact

The Priority Grid Quadrants Difficulty 7.0 and above 6.0 – 6.9 5.0- 5.9 4.0 – 4.9 3.0 – 3.9 Below 2.9 Below 6.0 6.0 – 6.4 6.5 – 6.9 7.0 – 7.4 7.5 – 7.9 8.0 – 8.4 8.5 – 8.9 9.0 and above FOOL’S TRAP HIGH HANGING FRUIT TEMPTING DISTRACTIONS LOW HANGING FRUIT Organizational Impact

Priority Grid Steps List Initiatives Force Rank Impact and Difficulty Document Rationale Ground in Change-Sustain Strategy Action Plan

Step 2: Criteria for Forced Rankings Time intensity/difficulty ranking, 1-10 Higher rankings based upon time intensity for key people Higher ranking based on degree of cultural (behavior) change required Higher if this requires resources ($’s, FTEs) not yet approved. Note if item is contingent upon needed resources. 7.0 and above 6.0 – 6.9 5.0- 5.9 4.0 – 4.9 3.0 – 3.9 Below 2.9 Below 6.0 6.0 – 6.4 6.5 – 6.9 7.0 – 7.4 7.5 – 7.9 8.0 – 8.4 8.5 – 8.9 9.0 and above Impact ranking, 1-10 Based on what matters most in the context of a specific grid e.g. the overall vision, or the pillar element within it.

Step 2: What Forced Ranking is 7.0 and above 6.0 – 6.9 5.0- 5.9 4.0 – 4.9 3.0 – 3.9 Below 2.9 Below 6.0 6.0 – 6.4 6.5 – 6.9 7.0 – 7.4 7.5 – 7.9 8.0 – 8.4 8.5 – 8.9 9.0 and above Ranking Individual Items AGAINST EACH OTHER

Step 3: Documenting Rationale each ranking Evaluating Impact and Difficulty of Shifts How important you think an initiative area is

Step 3: Documenting Rationale helps… …organize your thinking and… …encourage great conversations!

Bring Attention to the Level of Strategy you are Affecting Program LEVEL 2 Pillar within a Program LEVEL 3 Strategy within a Pillar