CFI Requirements – Benefits to Canadians

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Do we need a GN of NGOs? Yes! (as far as participation in the GN does not reduce/affect involvement in the GP/DRR) The GN should build on existing networks.
Advertisements

Research Excellence Framework Jane Boggan Planning Division Research Staff Forum - January 2010.
Discovery Grants “Delivering on NSERC’s Commitment to Excellence”
Guidelines for completing a proposal Leaders Opportunity Fund.
February 19, 2015 Guelph, Ontario. 1. Advisory Committee on University-Industry Grants (ACUIG) 2. Review Process: Things to Focus On 3. Don’t do the Following.
How to Write Grants Version 2009.
Evaluation Criteria 1.Challenge—The aim and importance of the endeavour (40%) 2.Feasibility—The plan to achieve excellence (20%) 3.Capability—The expertise.
CADTH Therapeutic Reviews
Update from the CFI: Meeting of the Council of Chairs of Canadian Earth Science Departments Ottawa (ON), October
HRB Webinar Health Research Awards Content Objective of the call Scope and Panels Principal Investigator Response to peer-reviewers (rebuttal) Some.
Michele Dupuis, Senior Officer Knowledge Integration SSHRC Knowledge Mobilization: An Overview of SSHRC’s policies and practices March 31, 2014.
Nicole Mihai, OCE, Program Manager Julie Lukkarila, OCE Business Development Manager December 11 th, 2013.
TUTORIAL Grant Preparation & Project Management. Grant preparation What are the procedures during the grant preparations?  The coordinator - on behalf.
Reporting on SD co-benefits using the new CDFM SD Tool and opportunities for monitoring to enhance the profile of CDM projects and CER price: what the.
NSERC has an overview of the discovery grant program on their website:
1 Theme-based Research Scheme Briefing Session 12 April 2010.
1 Framework Programme 7 Guide for Applicants
Writing Impact into Research Funding Applications Paula Gurteen Centre for Advanced Studies.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research New Open Suite of Programs and Peer Review Enhancements University of Manitoba February 14, 2012.
1 Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level Administrative Support for Large- Scale Funding Applications – Session.
10 th Meeting of the UNCEEA, New York, June 2016 System of Environmental-Economic Accounting for Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Development.
Methods, Outcomes, Significance. The obvious.... Check aims and remit Check guidelines, submission dates, additional requirements – Signatures in advance.
Preparing students as effective assessors Enabling learning beyond graduation David Nicol Professor of Higher Education Centre for Academic Practice and.
SSHRC Partnership and Partnership Development Grants Rosemary Ommer 1.
NETWORKS OF CENTRES OF EXCELLENCE 2015 Competition May 29, 2013.
1 NEST New and emerging science and technology EUROPEAN COMMISSION - 6th Framework programme : Anticipating Scientific and Technological Needs.
Practical aspects Dr. Ir Matthijs Soede Senter/EG-Liaison “Practical Aspects of Preparation FP6 projects Poznan - 21 November 2002 Dr. Ir.
Page 1 RCUK : PATHWAYS TO IMPACT WHAT IT MEANS AND WHAT TO DO NOW Professor John Marshall Director Academic Research Development CREDO workshop May 2011.
IES Statistical and Research Methodology in Education Grant Program (84.305D) 2010 Program Meeting.
Evaluating the impact of health research: Revisiting the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Impact Assessment Framework Nicola Lauzon, Marc Turcotte.
Identifying the Impacts of Technology Transfer Beyond Commercialization FPTT National Meeting, June 12, 2007.
1 Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level Administrative Support for Large- Scale Funding Applications – Session.
IDARI Workshop, Tartu, June 2005 NUI Galway Work Package 4 Administration Lorna Ryan The IDARI project is financed under the FP5 Quality of Life and Management.
1 UNEP/IETC EST Initiative Proposed Cooperation Framework 4 December 2003 Otsu, Japan.
Atlantic Innovation Fund Round VIII February 5, 2008.
Practical Aspects of Preparation FP 6 projects Senter/EG-Liaison Nationaal Contact Punt voor het 6de Kaderprogramma Sandra de Wild 11 december 2002.
Research Impact Sarah Hall Research Impact Strategy and Policy Manager.
Experience from H2020 Proposals (a personal assessment)
John Stephanis Managing Director - Selonda S.A. President - FEAP.
Small Charities Challenge Fund (SCCF) Guidance Webinar
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2016
Information Session May 2016
CARER Proposal Writing Workshop November 2004
RAD 202 What Makes a CFI Proposal or Award so “Special”? Research Administration Day, May 31, 2017 “Today’s Research, Our Future” Partnership and Institutional.
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
CFI John R Evans Leaders Fund Assessment Criteria – Training of HQP
CFI Requirements – Institutional Commitment and Sustainability
CFI John R Evans Leaders Fund Construction/Renovation
CFI John R Evans Leaders Fund Budget Development
CFI John R Evans Leaders Fund Digital Data Management
CFI John R Evans Leaders Fund Alberta Alignment Module
Template Guidelines Please use this template to create your LDRD presentation- we highly recommend that you address all aspects of the proposal as outlined.
Impact and the REF Tweet #rfringe17
Research Project Grant (RPG) Retreat R-series
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
CFI John R Evans Leaders Fund Assessment Criteria – Researchers
CFI Requirements – Need for Infrastructure and Budget Justification
Rick McGee, PhD and Bill Lowe, MD Faculty Affairs and NUCATS
BC Knowledge Development Fund Investing in B. C
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2018
CFI Requirements – Research or Technology Development
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2017
WORLD CANADA INNOVATION IN CANADA - the big picture 96% 4%
Civil Contractors Federation ‘2014 Earth Awards’ Submission Template CATEGORIES 1 and 2 ONLY Company Name (NOTE: if an Alliance then the name of the.
Third Meeting of the United Nations Committee of Experts on
Understanding Impact Stephanie Seavers, Impact Manager.
What is your impact pathway?
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2019
Presentation transcript:

CFI John R Evans Leaders Fund Assessment Criteria – Benefits to Canadians

CFI Requirements – Benefits to Canadians “The research or technology development program has the potential to lead to tangible benefits for society, health, the economy and/or the environment. There are measures in place to transfer the research results and outputs of the technology development to potential end users in a timely manner.” Beyond the creation of new knowledge and the training of highly qualified personnel, describe the expected benefits to Canadians and why they are significant. Identify potential end users of the research or technology development results and describe the plans for knowledge mobilization and/or technology transfer. * Ref: John R. Evans Leaders Fund Guidelines – March 2017 version

Suggested Structure for this Section 1. How will Canada benefit from the applicant’s research? Importance of the research topic (e.g. impact of a relevant disease/disorder on Canadians) For applied research: Economic benefits of the research area to Canada Quality of life benefits? Social benefits? Health benefits? Environmental benefits? 2. Identify potential end users and outline plans for knowledge mobilization/technology transfer

Feedback from Reviewer Comments (for UofA JELF Applications submitted Oct 2013 to June 2016) Analysis of reviewers feedback from submitted JELF applications indicated that: A common concern raised by reviewers is that the Benefits to Canadians were unclear At least one reviewer raised concerns about the Benefits to Canadians for 38% of the proposals submitted Among rejected/partially funded proposals, multiple reviewers raised concerns about the Benefits to Canadians for 50% of the proposals submitted

(JELF submissions Oct. 2013 to June 2016) CFI Reviewer Comments (JELF submissions Oct. 2013 to June 2016) All Submitted Proposals (n=60) Research or Technology Development Researchers Need for Infrastructure Training of HQP Benefits to Canadians Sustainability % *For Unaffiliated JELF Stream, CFI request $400,000 or less

CFI Reviewer Concerns Rejected/Partially Funded Applications (n=12) % (JELF submissions Oct. 2013 to June 2016) Rejected/Partially Funded Applications (n=12) Research or Technology Development Researchers Need for Infrastructure Training of HQP Benefits to Canadians Sustainability %

Tips for Success Benefits to Canadians should be specific For basic scientific research: describe anticipated benefits e.g. new treatments if the research is successful How might results be exploited if project is successful? For applied/translational research: a detailed knowledge mobilization/technology transfer plan is critical Research plan must be solid and convincing to enable reviewers to agree that the stated benefits are achievable