Volume 26, Issue 10, Pages (May 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Journal of Vision. 2012;12(12):18. doi: / Figure Legend:
Advertisements

Biological Bifocal Lenses with Image Separation
Blur and Disparity Are Complementary Cues to Depth
Circular Polarization Vision in a Stomatopod Crustacean
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (March 2017)
Flying Drosophila Orient to Sky Polarization
Animal Vision: Rats Watch the Sky
Communicative Signaling Activates ‘Broca's’ Homolog in Chimpanzees
Volume 26, Issue 13, Pages (July 2016)
Kevin Mann, Courtney L. Gallen, Thomas R. Clandinin  Current Biology 
Pre-constancy Vision in Infants
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Pattern and Component Motion Responses in Mouse Visual Cortical Areas
Jamie L. Baldwin Fergus, Sönke Johnsen, Karen J. Osborn 
X-ray micro computed-tomography
Sexual Dimorphism in the Hoverfly Motion Vision Pathway
Biological Bifocal Lenses with Image Separation
Volume 21, Issue 24, Pages (December 2011)
Optic Flow Cues Guide Flight in Birds
Masayuki Haruta, Yoshio Hata  Current Biology 
Polarized Light Helps Monarch Butterflies Navigate
Johann H. Bollmann, Florian Engert  Neuron 
James H. Marshel, Alfred P. Kaye, Ian Nauhaus, Edward M. Callaway 
Depth Affects Where We Look
Volume 87, Issue 6, Pages (September 2015)
A Novel Vertebrate Eye Using Both Refractive and Reflective Optics
Real-Time Visualization of Neuronal Activity during Perception
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 22, Issue 14, Pages (July 2012)
Reconstitution of Amoeboid Motility In Vitro Identifies a Motor-Independent Mechanism for Cell Body Retraction  Katsuya Shimabukuro, Naoki Noda, Murray.
Organization of Actin Networks in Intact Filopodia
Nathan F. Putman, Katherine L. Mansfield  Current Biology 
Comparative Vision: Can Bacteria Really See?
Box Jellyfish Use Terrestrial Visual Cues for Navigation
Yukiyasu Kamitani, Frank Tong  Current Biology 
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (March 2017)
Blur and Disparity Are Complementary Cues to Depth
A Map for Horizontal Disparity in Monkey V2
Rémi Bos, Christian Gainer, Marla B. Feller  Current Biology 
Target Detection Is Enhanced by Polarization Vision in a Fiddler Crab
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Christopher B. O'Connell, Anne K. Warner, Yu-li Wang  Current Biology 
Volume 22, Issue 20, Pages (October 2012)
Jennifer L. Hoy, Iryna Yavorska, Michael Wehr, Cristopher M. Niell 
Optic Flow Cues Guide Flight in Birds
Volume 28, Issue 16, Pages e4 (August 2018)
Reconstitution of Amoeboid Motility In Vitro Identifies a Motor-Independent Mechanism for Cell Body Retraction  Katsuya Shimabukuro, Naoki Noda, Murray.
Volume 27, Issue 21, Pages e3 (November 2017)
Perception Matches Selectivity in the Human Anterior Color Center
Volume 26, Issue 13, Pages (July 2016)
Jamie L. Baldwin Fergus, Sönke Johnsen, Karen J. Osborn 
Comparative Vision: Can Bacteria Really See?
Parametric Functional Maps of Visual Inputs to the Tectum
Pattern and Component Motion Responses in Mouse Visual Cortical Areas
Peng Zhang, Min Bao, Miyoung Kwon, Sheng He, Stephen A. Engel 
Visual Scene Perception in Navigating Wood Ants
Facial-Expression and Gaze-Selective Responses in the Monkey Amygdala
Volume 87, Issue 6, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 58, Issue 4, Pages (May 2008)
Visually Mediated Motor Planning in the Escape Response of Drosophila
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (March 2017)
Fig. 4 Pupil shape and image quality in the model sheep eye.
Variation in the Dorsal Gradient Distribution Is a Source for Modified Scaling of Germ Layers in Drosophila  Juan Sebastian Chahda, Rui Sousa-Neves, Claudia Mieko.
Inhomogeneous Encoding of the Visual Field in the Mouse Retina
The Anterior-Posterior Axis Emerges Respecting the Morphology of the Mouse Embryo that Changes and Aligns with the Uterus before Gastrulation  Daniel.
Visual Optics: Remarkable Image-Forming Mirrors in Scallop Eyes
Basal bodies Current Biology
Long-Wavelength Reflecting Filters Found in the Larval Retinas of One Mantis Shrimp Family (Nannosquillidae)  Kathryn D. Feller, David Wilby, Gianni Jacucci,
Arabidopsis PLETHORA Transcription Factors Control Phyllotaxis
Martin Müller, Rüdiger Wehner  Current Biology 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 26, Issue 10, Pages 1319-1324 (May 2016) The Dual Function of Orchid Bee Ocelli as Revealed by X-Ray Microtomography  Gavin J. Taylor, Willi Ribi, Martin Bech, Andrew J. Bodey, Christoph Rau, Axel Steuwer, Eric J. Warrant, Emily Baird  Current Biology  Volume 26, Issue 10, Pages 1319-1324 (May 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.038 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Current Biology 2016 26, 1319-1324DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.038) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The Prominent Ocelli of Euglossa imperialis (A and B) The head and ocelli viewed externally with scanning electron microscopy (A, inclined frontal view; B, dorsal view). (C–E) A 3D-rendered view of the ocellar structure from segmented computed tomography (CT) volumes (C; an orthographic projection of the ocelli from the direction of the aquamarine arrow in B; with inclined sections as indicated by the aquamarine lines in B; note that the right lateral ocellus is a mirrored copy of the left) and histological sections (D and E; vertical sections as indicated by the orange lines in B). Similar structural details can be seen in images from both CT and histology (color labels). Abbreviations: C, center; D, dorsal; L, lateral; M, median; O, outer; V, ventral. See also Figures S1 (for an interactive version of C) and S2 and Table S1. Current Biology 2016 26, 1319-1324DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.038) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The Focusing of Light onto the Ocellar Retinae (A) By looking through excised lenses of the lateral and median ocelli, we determined that the focal plane (at the back focal distance [BFD]) falls largely behind the retinae (upper and lower insets, respectively). Central areas of both retinae were predicted to be at the correct distance from the lens to receive focused light (dotted magenta lines, within BFD ± 10%), and additional areas were predicted to form a trinocularly overlapping visual field (orange lines; see Figure 3). The retinal color indicates the distance of the retinal surface to each lens’s rear surface. (B) Local distance of the front and rear (upper and lower lines, respectively) of each retinal surface to the rear surface of each lens, plotted along a transect beneath the midline of each ocellus, indicated by the black lines in (A). The intersection of the optical axis of each lens with its retinae is labeled with a colored dot in (A) and colored bar in (B). The asymmetry of distances beneath the lens of the median ocellar retina around its midline (and accompanying slight asymmetry of the focused retinal area and visual field) may be an artifact of the retina becoming slightly distorted during dissection. Abbreviations: C, center; D, dorsal; L, lateral; M, median; O, outer; V, ventral. See also Figure S3 and Table S2. Current Biology 2016 26, 1319-1324DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.038) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Mapping the Extensive Visual Field of the Ocelli (A–C) Ray tracing using 3D models predicts that the complete ocellar visual field is approximately hemispherical (solid lines denote borders of each ocellar field of view [FOV]; dotted lines denote where the focused areas of the retina receive light as in Figure 2, as mapped onto a sphere around the head in its approximate orientation during flight). (D) The visual fields overlaid on an upward facing panoramic image of a rainforest environment. The optical axis of each ocellus is denoted by dashed lines (A and B) or a dot (D). Note that the visual fields of the right lateral ocellus are mirrored copies of those predicted for the left lateral ocellus. See also Tables S3 and S4. Current Biology 2016 26, 1319-1324DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.038) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Evidence for Polarization Sensitivity in the Ocellar Retinae Transverse (A) and longitudinal (B) sections show that the rhabdoms of the ocelli have a straight rectangular cross section (4.4 μm long) that does not twist along the cell’s length. Photoreceptor rhabdoms have a similar orientation within individual ocellar retina (median ± SD in C), while each of the three ocelli has a different average rhabdom orientation relative to the head (D). Dotted extensions from the circles in (C) indicate the average orientation of rhabdoms in each ocellus, whereas the colored arrows indicate the average axes of polarization sensitivity (PS) for each ocellus. Current Biology 2016 26, 1319-1324DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.038) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions