Generic vs. Oreo The Oreo Challenge America’s Favorite Cookie!™???

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tests of Hypotheses Based on a Single Sample
Advertisements

“Students” t-test.
Significance Tests Hypothesis - Statement Regarding a Characteristic of a Variable or set of variables. Corresponds to population(s) –Majority of registered.
 What is chi-square  CHIDIST  Non-parameteric statistics 2.
Significance Testing Chapter 13 Victor Katch Kinesiology.
Topic 6: Introduction to Hypothesis Testing
S519: Evaluation of Information Systems
Review: What influences confidence intervals?
Introduction to Hypothesis Testing
Evaluating Hypotheses Chapter 9. Descriptive vs. Inferential Statistics n Descriptive l quantitative descriptions of characteristics.
BCOR 1020 Business Statistics Lecture 21 – April 8, 2008.
Chapter 11: Inference for Distributions
Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing.
BCOR 1020 Business Statistics Lecture 20 – April 3, 2008.
Section 7-2 Hypothesis Testing for the Mean (n  30)
Hypothesis Testing and T-Tests. Hypothesis Tests Related to Differences Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter Tests of Differences One.
Choosing Statistical Procedures
 The “4 Steps” of Hypothesis Testing: 1. State the hypothesis 2. Set decision criteria 3. Collect data and compute sample statistic 4. Make a decision.
1/2555 สมศักดิ์ ศิวดำรงพงศ์
Hypothesis Testing: One Sample Cases. Outline: – The logic of hypothesis testing – The Five-Step Model – Hypothesis testing for single sample means (z.
Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing II: two samples Test of significance for sample means (large samples) The difference between “statistical significance” and.
MGT-491 QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH FOR MANAGEMENT OSMAN BIN SAIF Session 19.
6.1 - One Sample One Sample  Mean μ, Variance σ 2, Proportion π Two Samples Two Samples  Means, Variances, Proportions μ 1 vs. μ 2.
Chi-square Test of Independence Steps in Testing Chi-square Test of Independence Hypotheses.
Chapter 9 Power. Decisions A null hypothesis significance test tells us the probability of obtaining our results when the null hypothesis is true p(Results|H.
Biostatistics Class 6 Hypothesis Testing: One-Sample Inference 2/29/2000.
Don’t cry because it is all over, smile because it happened.
The Ultimate Sports Question GATORADEORPOWERADE. Introduction Athletes of all sizes compete every day in various sporting events. Ages range from young.
Lecture 17 Dustin Lueker.  A way of statistically testing a hypothesis by comparing the data to values predicted by the hypothesis ◦ Data that fall far.
1 Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing. 2 Chapter Outline  Developing Null and Alternative Hypothesis  Type I and Type II Errors  Population Mean: Known 
Statistical Inference for the Mean Objectives: (Chapter 9, DeCoursey) -To understand the terms: Null Hypothesis, Rejection Region, and Type I and II errors.
Slide Slide 1 Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley. Overview.
Hypothesis Testing An understanding of the method of hypothesis testing is essential for understanding how both the natural and social sciences advance.
Essential Statistics Chapter 171 Two-Sample Problems.
CHAPTER 15: Tests of Significance The Basics ESSENTIAL STATISTICS Second Edition David S. Moore, William I. Notz, and Michael A. Fligner Lecture Presentation.
Statistical Inferences for Variance Objectives: Learn to compare variance of a sample with variance of a population Learn to compare variance of a sample.
Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. 1 FINAL EXAMINATION STUDY MATERIAL III A ADDITIONAL READING MATERIAL – INTRO STATS 3 RD EDITION.
Chapter 10 One-Sample Test of Hypothesis. Example The Jamestown steel company manufactures and assembles desks and other office equipment at several plants.
Hanover Tap Water Pre-Test
Lindsay Arthur Erin Harker Holly Shaffer Kristin Weekley
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc.
Hypothesis Testing for Means (Small Samples)
Significance Test for the Difference of Two Proportions
Hypothesis Testing: One Sample Cases
Unit 5: Hypothesis Testing
P-values.
Hypothesis Testing: Preliminaries
CHAPTER 6 Statistical Inference & Hypothesis Testing
Data Analysis and Interpretation
Hypothesis Testing: Hypotheses
اختبار الفرضيات اختبارالفرضيات المتعلقة بالوسط
Chapter Review Problems
Stat 217 – Day 28 Review Stat 217.
Review: What influences confidence intervals?
Last class Tutorial 1 Census Overview
Statistical inference
Inference about Two Means: Independent Samples
Comparing Populations
INTRODUCTION TO HYPOTHESIS TESTING
Hypothesis Testing.
Basic Practice of Statistics - 3rd Edition Two-Sample Problems
NONPARAMETRIC METHODS
Chapter 7: The Normality Assumption and Inference with OLS
Essential Statistics Two-Sample Problems - Two-sample t procedures -
Alex Dinn Larry Hedden Scott Kennedy
STA 291 Summer 2008 Lecture 18 Dustin Lueker.
Chapter 9: Significance Testing
Hypothesis Testing for Proportions
The z-test for the Mean of a Normal Population
Statistical inference
Presentation transcript:

Generic vs. Oreo The Oreo Challenge America’s Favorite Cookie!™??? February 19, 2004 Math 5 Marlon Henry, Christin Lathrop, Jonathan Smolian

Goals To determine whether superiority in OREO brand name corresponds to superiority in taste. Compare the taste of OREO cookies to a generic equivalent—Price Chopper Big Stuffed cookies. Compare subjects’ taste preferences to their “social” preferences. Is the perceived OREO superiority warranted?

Pre-Test Beliefs A greater proportion of people would NOT prefer OREOs. Did not perceive ANY taste difference. OR Preferred Price Chopper or had “No Preference” No Difference Generic No Preference OREO OREO VS.

A Generic Success! 55%: A Non-OREO preference was given.

Confounding Factors Initial decision: Taste vs. Experience Time Constraints Smaller sample size Cookie presentation order: Marginal Cookie Utility? Testing Procedure Variability Vague Language Texture/Visual influence BUT…

Not Confounding Enough Still a strong test. Our beliefs are right! Conclusion: We can accept the data.

THE CHALLENGE… VS.

Testing in Novack Procedure: Administer cookie samples using a double blind method Cups 1 & 2; water in between, then… Ask Questions….

Our Questions 1st: Difference in the taste? 2nd: Preference in taste (if any)? 3rd: Determine honest “social” preference.

Data Sheet

Conceptualizing our Statistics Create a statistic for difference in “taste vs. social” preference. Xbefore = 0 if OREO 1 if “No Difference,” Generic, “No Preference” 0 if OREO Xafter = 1 if Generic or “No Preference” D = Xbefore- Xafter

Conceptualizing our Statistics #2 ∑ D D = N D is the average of the differences in taste vs. social preference

Null Hypothesis On average, people will have consistent taste preferences: D=0 The probability of D=0 is p=0.5

Alternate Hypothesis People are more likely NOT to prefer the taste of OREOs while “socially” preferring OREOs. D>0 This was our initial belief.

Statistically Significant Our results are statistically significant at a level of 0.05. This leaves 5% chance of Type 1 Error. Furthermore, D=0.225 +/- 0.15 and falls within our critical region for a significance level of 0.05 in a right-sided normal distribution curve.

Interpretations The majority of people do not prefer the taste of OREO cookies! BUT, for the majority of people, OREO is their “social” preference. Therefore, peoples’ taste and “social” preferences do NOT match.

Larger Conclusions The taste of OREO cookies is not superior to the taste of the generic Price Chopper Big Stuffed cookies. People buy OREOs for more than their taste. Specifically, OREOs financial success is due to extensive marketing and advertising efforts, not because the product tastes any better than generic cookies. People tend to buy brand name products even if the brand name product is strikingly similar to the generic version….

Finally AMERICANS ARE BRAND NAME CONSUMERS- and they love AMERICA’S FAVORITE COOKIE!!!™