The Flavor of a Little Higgs with T-parity

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE FINE-TUNING PROBLEM IN SUSY AND LITTLE HIGGS
Advertisements

What do we know about the Standard Model? Sally Dawson Lecture 4 TASI, 2006.
TeV scale see-saws from higher than d=5 effective operators Neutrino masses and Lepton flavor violation at the LHC Würzburg, Germany November 25, 2009.
Chiral freedom and the scale of weak interactions.
The minimal B-L model naturally realized at TeV scale Yuta Orikasa(SOKENDAI) Satoshi Iso(KEK,SOKENDAI) Nobuchika Okada(University of Alabama) Phys.Lett.B676(2009)81.
Compelling Questions of High Energy Physics? What does the future hold? Persis S. Drell Physics Department Cornell University.
Higgs Boson Mass In Gauge-Mediated Supersymmetry Breaking Abdelhamid Albaid In collaboration with Prof. K. S. Babu Spring 2012 Physics Seminar Wichita.
May 25, 2004Kakizaki, Mitsuru1 Flavor structure in supersymmetric models Kakizaki, Mitsuru (ICRR, University of Tokyo) May 25, 2004 We proposed a new alignment.
Oct. 25, 2004Mitsuru Kakizaki1 Flavor structure in supersymmetric models Mitsuru Kakizaki (ICRR, University of Tokyo) Oct. 25, Ochanomizu University.
Chiral freedom and the scale of weak interactions.
Richard Howl The Minimal Exceptional Supersymmetric Standard Model University of Southampton UK BSM 2007.
Higgsless Theories, Electroweak Constraints, and Heavy Fermions Carl Schmidt Michigan State University July 18, 2005 SUSY 2005 Based on hep-ph/ ,
The Top Quark and Precision Measurements S. Dawson BNL April, 2005 M.-C. Chen, S. Dawson, and T. Krupovnikas, in preparation M.-C. Chen and S. Dawson,
Chiral freedom and the scale of weak interactions.
Chiral freedom and the scale of weak interactions.
Aug 29-31, 2005M. Jezabek1 Generation of Quark and Lepton Masses in the Standard Model International WE Heraeus Summer School on Flavour Physics and CP.
 Collaboration with Prof. Sin Kyu Kang and Prof. We-Fu Chang arXiv: [hep-ph] submitted to JHEP.
Minimal SO(10)×A4 SUSY GUT ABDELHAMID ALBAID In Collaboration with K. S. BABU Oklahoma State University.
What do we know about the Standard Model? Sally Dawson Lecture 2 SLAC Summer Institute.
A Composite Little Higgs ZACKARIA CHACKO UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK Puneet Batra.
2. Two Higgs Doublets Model
Wednesday, Apr. 23, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #24 Wednesday, Apr. 23, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu Issues with SM picture Introduction.
1 Supersymmetry Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) January 14, 2005, at KEK.
Twin Higgs Theories Z. Chacko, University of Arizona H.S Goh & R. Harnik; Y. Nomura, M. Papucci & G. Perez.
1 Determination of Dark Matter Properties in the Littlest Higgs Model with T-parity Masaki Asano (SOKENDAI) Collaborator: E. Asakawa (Meiji-gakuin), S.
WHAT BREAKS ELECTROWEAK SYMMETRY ?. We shall find the answer in experiments at the LHC? Most likely it will tells us a lot about the physics beyond the.
Family Symmetry Solution to the SUSY Flavour and CP Problems Plan of talk: I.Family Symmetry II.Solving SUSY Flavour and CP Problems Work with and Michal.
Flavor induced EDMs with tanbeta enhanced corrections Minoru Nagai (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) Aug. 4, 2007 Summer Institute 2007 In collaborated with: J.Hisano.
QFD, Weak Interactions Some Weak Interaction basics
X ± -Gauge Boson Production in Simplest Higgs Matthew Bishara University of Rochester Meeting of Division of Particles and Fields August 11, 2011  Simplest.
Neutrino mass and DM direct detection Daijiro Suematsu (Kanazawa Univ.) Erice Sept., 2013 Based on the collaboration with S.Kashiwase PRD86 (2012)
Parity Symmetry at High- Energy: How High? Xiangdong Ji U of Maryland In collaboration with Zhang Yue An Haipeng R.N. Mohapatra.
Higgs boson production at LHC as a probe of littlest Higgs models with T-parity Lei Wang ITP LW, J. M. Yang, PRD77, (2008)
Monday, Apr. 7, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #20 Monday, Apr. 7, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu Super Symmetry Breaking MSSM Higgs and Their.
The Importance of the TeV Scale Sally Dawson Lecture 3 FNAL LHC Workshop, 2006.
BEYOND MFV IN FAMILY SYMMETRY THEORIES OF FERMION MASSES Work done with Zygmunt Lalak and Graham Ross Based on existing ideas but, hopefully, contributing.
Introduction to Flavor Physics in and beyond the Standard Model Enrico Lunghi References: The BaBar physics book,
Measurements of the model parameter in the Littlest Higgs Model with T-parity 1 Masaki Asano (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) Collaborator: E. Asakawa ( Meiji-gakuin.
Hunting for Hierarchies in PSL 2 (7) MICHAEL JAY PEREZ PHENOMENOLOGY 2015 MAY 5, 2015 ARXIV : /
1 Quark flavour observables in 331 models in the flavour precision era Quark flavour observables in 331 models in the flavour precision era Fulvia De Fazio.
and what we unsuccessfully tried to explain (so far)
Takaaki Nomura(Saitama univ)
125 GeV Higgs and BSM physics
Classically conformal B-L extended Standard Model
The Flavor of the Composite Twin Higgs
Radiative Flavour Violation in the MSSM
Radiative Flavor Violation
Andreas Crivellin Right-handed effects in Vub (and Vcb)
Phenomenology of Twin Higgs Model
PHYS 5326 – Lecture #19 Wrapping up the Higgs Mechanism
NMSSM & B-meson Dileptonic Decays
The Flavour Problem and Family Symmetry
Minoru Nagai (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo)
Flavor changing amplitudes in the littlest Higgs model with T-parity
Implications of D-Mixing for New Physics
Phenomenology of Twin Higgs Model
Phenomenology of Twin Higgs Model
The MESSM The Minimal Exceptional Supersymmetric Standard Model
The Graduate University for Advanced Studies Masaki Asano hep-ph/
Searching for SUSY in B Decays
Search for new physics beyond the SM
Flavour and Non-universal Gauge Interaction
Phenomenology of Twin Higgs Model
Methods of Experimental Particle Physics
Yasuhiro Okada (KEK/Sokendai) October 18, 2007
岡田安弘(KEK/総研大) 2007年10月26日 KEK 第三回 J-PARC遅い取り出しユーザー加速器連絡会
Physics beyond the SM in Kaon decays --Theory--
Searching for New Physics in muon lepton flavor violating processes
Split Two-Higgs Doublet and Neutrino Condensation
Can new Higgs boson be Dark Matter Candidate in the Economical Model
Presentation transcript:

The Flavor of a Little Higgs with T-parity PHENO 06 The Flavor of a Little Higgs with T-parity Seung J. Lee Cornell University With Jay M. Hubisz and Gil Paz

Outline T-Parity and the Littlest Higgs model T-odd Flavor Mixing Neutral Meson Mixing Results and Constraints Conclusions

Little Higgs Model (Arkani-Hamed, Cohen, Georgi) Addressing “Little hierarchy problem” Hierarchy problem: Radiative corrections to the Higgs mass become divergent at one-loop, but the Higgs mass should be light. New physics should be introduced at around ~1 TeV. At energies below the cutoff scale of new physics, the effective theory contains a set of higher-dimensional non-renormalizable operators made up of SM particles, i.e. or But these operators have been constrained by experiments, which indicate that there should be no new physics up to L ~5 TeV However, this constraint is in conflict with the naturalness requirement that new physics must enter ~1 TeV. “little hierarchy”

Little Higgs Model Idea: The Higgs as a pseudo-Goldstone boson. -This idea has been pursued for ~30 years. -Problem: To give a mass to the Higgs, explicit symmetry breaking terms are necessary, but quadratic divergences at one-loop are reintroduced. -Solutions: “Collective symmetry breaking” Written in the language of a non-linear sigma model: -New particles appear around the global symmetry breaking scale f~1Tev, but the cutoff of the model can be as large as L ~4f~10TeV . Two or more explicit symmetry breaking terms are needed to break all symmetries protecting the Higgs mass. No quadratic divergences at one-loop.

The Littlest Higgs(Arkani-Hamed, Cohen, Katz, Nelson) Based on an SU(5)/SO(5) non-linear sigma model. Symmetry breaking by the VEV of a symmetric tensor : describes GSB. Structure of gauge symmetry breaking: g1: g2: Higgs is an exact GSB under either SU(3)1 or SU(3)2. It gets mass only when both g1 and g2 are turned on (two copies of SU(2)  U(1) are gauged ) to break both SU(3)1 and SU(3)2.

T-Parity and Littlest Higgs Cheng & Low hep-ph/0308199 hep-ph/0405253 Low hep-ph/0409025 Little Higgs models have stringent EWP bounds. (In most models, the symmetry breaking scale, f, needs to be ~4TeV to satisfy EWP constraints.) Analogous to the role of R-parity in the MSSM, T-parity is a discrete symmetry added to solve the problems of the original Little Higgs model. There are other models that solve these problems by extending gauge/global symmetry structures. Introducing a discrete symmetry (T-parity) provides a weak scale dark matter candidate. Except for the T-even top partner, all other BSM particles (i.e. WH, ZH, AH,…) introduced in the model are odd under T-parity.

T-Parity and the Littlest Higgs T-parity exchanges the two gauge groups, [SU(2)  U(1)]1 and [SU(2)  U(1)]2 WL ~ (W1+W2) (T-even), WH ~ (W1-W2) (T-odd) T-parity enforces relations between couplings. (i.e. g1 = g2) However, to implement T-parity consistently in a phenomenologically viable way, we need to enlarge the fermion sector. (in order to cut off otherwise large four-fermion operators constrained by LEP and Drell-Yan processes) A consistent and phenomenologically viable littlest Higgs with T-parity requires the introduction of “mirror fermions” Opens up a new flavor structure in the model.

T-Parity and Littlest Higgs T-parity Eigenstates SU(2)1 SU(2)2 T-even T-odd Royal SU(3) triplet New fermion partners of top quark Hubisz & Meade Hubisz, Meade, Noble, Perelstein T-odd “mirror fermion” mass has an upper-bound due to compositeness constraints. (in order to cut off dangerous four-fermion operators arising at one-loop.)

T-odd Flavor Mixing Interactions Gauge basis T-parity basis Yukawa for T-odd fermions Dirac masses function of SU(5) Goldstone modes

T-odd Flavor Mixing: Mass eigenbasis Diagonalization of new Yukawa terms introduces new CKM-like matrices: In analogy with the CKM transformation, the mass matrix is diagonalized by two U(3) matrices. VH =UH, since SU(2)L symmetric In the mass eigenbasis, interactions of SM fermions and T-odd fermions involve another T-odd gauge boson: Recall: New CKM type matrix: These matrices are related through the SM CKM matrix:

Relevant Feynman rules T-odd Flavor Mixing: Relevant Feynman rules

T-odd Flavor Mixing: New Parameterization Beyond SM, there are three new rotation angles, and one new CP violating phase: - 2 unitary matrices, VHu and VHd: 3 rotations each, and 6 phases each. - 6 quark fields which transform under SU(2)1, and 6 under SU(2)2. Each set of 6 quark absorb 5 phases. - 2 unobservable overall phases (1 for each sector) - 1 combination of VHu and VHd gives the SM CKM matrix, which has 3 rotations and 1 phase.

T-odd Flavor Mixing: Summary T-odd fermion masses have an upper limit from four fermion operators- could be light. (MTeV <4.8 TeV) New flavor physics. Interesting phenomenology. Many new parameters. BSM, there are 3 new rotation angles, and one new CP violating phase. Model dependent.

Neutral Meson Mixing Two different mass scales: -Electro weak scale v: MWL=gv/2, v=246 GeV -LH global symmetry breaking scale f: MWH=gf, f=TeV New interactions involving T-odd fermions lead to effective Hamiltonians for processes such as neutral meson mixing and rare decays. We first focused on neutral meson mixing. (Taking account of rare decays and EDM is under preparation now.) s d Integrate out heavy particles Effective Hamiltonian d s

Neutral Meson Mixing SM contribution to the Heff that governs neutral meson mixing: Inami-Lim function-gauge dependent where and the mi are the masses of the quarks in the loop When summing over the different flavors, the gauge dependence cancels due to the unitarity of the CKM matrix. QCD correction gauge-independent In the limit of quark mass degeneracy, Heff=0 (GIM). Expect GIM for T-odd fermions from flavor constraints. -Take T-odd Yukawa eigenstates to be nearly degenerate.

Neutral Meson Mixing Box diagrams involving T-odd gauge bosons and scalars that contribute to the neutral meson mixing.

Neutral Meson Mixing T-odd sector contribution to the Heff that governs neutral meson mixing (using unitarity): Gauge-independent function QCD correction Since off-diagonal CKM elements are extremely small, this can be large compared to the SM contribution Naively suppressed Heff for the neutral meson mixing is basically the same for the D, K, and B meson mixing. From Heff , can be calculated, so that comparison with experimental data can constrain the T-odd fermion masses.

Results and Constraints Too many unknown parameters compared to the number of observables we have from neutral meson mixing. Instead of VHd or VHu, Vd and Vu are physical in the T-parity model, while in the SM their combination is physical. For the case that Vd and Vu are nearly diagonal, one universal feature is that GIM mechanism is working for the first two generations: Their masses are nearly degenerate, but neutral meson mixing is nearly independent of the mass of the third generation T-odd fermion due to the smallness of off-diagonal elements. For the case of having large off-diagonal elements, the entire T-odd vector-like quarks must be degenerate within a few percent. In the absence of any guiding mechanism, no particular texture is preferred.

Results and Constraints m12 is the average mass of the first two generations of T-odd fermions m12 is the mass splitting of the first two generations In order of the darkest contours to lightest, m12 =500, 1000, 2000, 3000 GeV Vu=1, Vd=VCKM , f=1 TeV All constraints arise from neutral K and B mixing, while D system is unaffected. Experimental constraint: for B and K system, contribution from T-odd fermions not exceed 30% of the SM contribution to the mass splittings and K. m3 is not constrained. (due to smallness of Vti.

Results and Constraints Vd=1, Vu=VCKM f=1 TeV The only constraints arise from D system mass splitting. Experimental constraint: m12 < 4.6 10-14 GeV

Results and Constraints Going away from the diagonal: One large angle d13= 0, put CP phase entirely into up-type relax the constraint. d13= SM13 , degeneracy for all three generations.

Results and Constraints Going away from the diagonal: all angles large d13= 0, put CP phase entirely into up-type relax the constraint. d13= SM13 , sharp degeneracy for all three generations.

Results and Constraints f=1 TeV, after taking BS mixing bound into account: become more constraining f=1 TeV, d13= 0, before BS mixing bound was imposed

Conclusions The Littlest Higgs with T-parity necessarily introduces new fermions. (It becomes more like SUSY) These fermions add a new flavor structure to the model. CP violation is a major source of constraints For order one mixing parameters, we found that the T-odd fermion spectrum must be degenerate to within a few percent. In certain cases, this constraint can be alleviated for the third generation. However, a more detailed study taking into account flavor changing processes such as rare decays would be necessary to confirm that these regions of parameter space are indeed allowed. (under preparation now)