SEQRA as a Tool to Review Energy Projects

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Notebook Ref 3.5. Tier 3: No Degradation in ONRWs Applies only to waters classified as Outstanding National Resource Waters (ONRW) This classification.
Advertisements

General Information on Permitting Electric Transmission Projects at the California Public Utilities Commission June 2009 Presentation created by the Transmission.
Geology Matters 2013 Presenter: Robert Federico, Principal November 14, 2013 Donkin Coal Mine Environmental Assessment Case Study.
Wetland Planning Requirements, Tools & Processes.
(c) 2009, Sterling Environmental Engineering, P.C. 1 A PROACTIVE MUNICIPAL RESPONSE TO NATURAL GAS DEVELOPMENT December 2, 2009 Mark P. Millspaugh, P.E.
Plant Revitalization Task Force November 19, 2012.
Permits. The Process Plans are developed by an Architect or Engineer and presented to the Municipality – State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) declaration.
DMME RAP Meeting September 24, EIA Regulation – Outline 9VAC15-20 “Guidelines for the Preparation of Environmental Impact Assessments for Oil or.
SOUTH COAST RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN REVISION BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Palm Springs-South Coast Field Office California Desert District.
Forest Plan Revision Using the 2012 Planning Rule Process Overview Steps and Expectations (I don’t know….but I’ve been told…if the horse don’t pull….you.
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Experimental Permits COMSTAC Stacey M. Zee October 25, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
Community Development Department DEVELOPMENTS OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DRIs) Summary.
Rural Development Water and Waste Projects: Environmental Requirements John Helgren, P.E. – State Environmental Coordinator Madeline Crowe – Assistant.
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
Washington State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council Region 10 Regional Response Team Northwest Area Committee Seattle, WA February 12, 2014 EFSEC.
Fish and Wildlife Service Mission Conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American.
Freeport Generating Project Project Description Modernization projects at Power Plant #2 Developers – Freeport Electric and Selected Development Company.
State of Oregon New Hydroelectric Projects Mary Grainey October 2008 Oregon Water Resources Department.
1 Overview of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  Objective: Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated Rulemaking Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated.
State Permitting Issues for Wind Developments Southeast and Mid-Atlantic Regional Wind Summit 19 September 2005 Jennifer A. DeCesaro Energy Policy Specialist.
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT MAJOR COMMUNITY ISSUES RELATED TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Board of County Commissioners/ Local Planning Agency Joint Meeting.
Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) Final Environmental Impact Report Amendment of SMUD’s Sphere of Influence and SMUD Yolo Annexation.
Washington State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council Jim Luce, EFSEC Chair Port Of Vancouver Presentation Vancouver, WA June 27, 2013 EFSEC These Slides.
ODOE Presentations and EFSC Standards Presented by Max Woods and Sarah Esterson September 18, 2015.
1 DESTINATION 2030 Update KRCC TransPol and TransTac Meeting Scoping Results Criteria Alternatives May 22, 2008.
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
Number of Copies Agency Submissions & Comments. Coordination ESRs are reviewed by OES and coordinated with resource agencies as part of the NEPA review.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision Authority l All permit decisions, scope of analysis, 404(b)(1), mitigation, alternatives, jurisdiction -- Corps.
Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area Dominguez Canyon Wilderness Resource Management Plan Scoping Meetings August 30 and 31, 2010.
APPLICATIONS OF WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS Module 22, part c – Applications.
Environmental Decision Making SC.912.L Why have environmental laws?  To regulate activities that are harmful to the environment. a. E.g., Clean.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 24 Environmental Law.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Local Officials.
CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW (33 CFR Part 320) August 12, 2005.
CALENDAR ITEM 101 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) S A N F R A N C I S C O B A Y A N D D E L T A S A N D M I N I N G P R O J E C T STATE CLEARINGHOUSE.
1 Completing the CEQA Checklist Terry Rivasplata.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
©2001 West Legal Studies in Business. All Rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 25: Environmental Law.
Rulemaking by APHIS. What is a rule and when must APHIS conduct rulemaking? Under U.S. law, a rule is any requirement of general applicability and future.
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Flow Standard Amendment to New York’s Water Quality Standards Regulations Scott J. Stoner Chief, Standards.
Environmental Scoping Meeting April 9, Meeting Outline Overview of the Proposed Project Purpose of the Scoping Meeting Environmental Review Process.
Presentation Two September  Land Use – Travis Miller  Housing Density – Emi Randall  Environmental Resources – Margo Lindahl Today’s Presentation:
Regulating Shale Gas Well Development in New York State Libby Ford, QEP Sr. Environmental Health Engineer * Photo from
Proven Management – Proven Gold Districts – Safe Jurisdictions Symbol:PG Exchange:TSX Hardrock Project Environmental.
OPEN SPACE/ CONSERVATION
The Plaza at Santa Monica Project PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING
1828 Ocean Ave & 1921 Ocean Front Walk PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING
HB 328 SITING OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMNT FACILITIES
Scoping Meeting April 20th 6:00 pm
First in Service First in Value
Overview of the Draft EIR
Public Meeting For Scoping Of An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) For The Perham Resource Recovery Facility: Introductions Agenda Good evening, my.
Willow Meadows Civic Club Meeting September 13, 2011
La Mesa Climate Action Plan Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Scoping Meeting May 31, 2017.
Environmental Impact Reports
BACWA Air Issues & Regulations ● Wednesday, June 15, 2016
Overview What is the CEQA environmental review process?
Fifth Standard Solar Project Complex
MPO School Transportation Working Group
Agriculture and Land Stewardship Planning
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in New Brunswick
IS YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT PREPARED
Environmental Requirements and planning grants
Public Scoping Meeting May 3, 2010
Final Environmental Impact Report
Pre-Proposal Conference March 27, 2019, 1:00 p.m.
Environmental/Energy policy
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Camarillo Springs Project Draft EIR Scoping Meeting
Presentation transcript:

SEQRA as a Tool to Review Energy Projects SEQRA’s mandate: Agencies must choose alternatives which, consistent with social, economic and other essential considerations, to the maximum extent practicable, minimize or avoid adverse environmental effects, including effects revealed in the environmental impact statement (EIS) process.

Project Description Hybrid 20 MW gas fired power plant and battery storage facility “Peaking” plant located on ~4 acres of a ~120 acre site Will operate based on the needs of the electric grid but will be available to the grid 24 hours a day Includes exhaust stack up to 80 feet tall and 50,000 diesel storage tank Specifics of the proposed project are subject to change as a result of SEQR

What’s at Risk? Climate change and air emissions Visual impacts Water quality and wetlands Cultural resources Threatened/endangered species

SEQRA Process & Ways to Get Involved

Approvals Required: Federal – U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (endangered species consultation), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (wetlands disturbance permit) State –Department of Environmental Conservation (SPDES general permit for stormwater discharges; petroleum bulk storage permit; air emissions permit, waste oil storage permit); OPRHP (consultation on historic and archeological resources) Local – Town of Ulster (SEQRA lead agency, site plan approval); Town of Ulster Planning Board (lot line adjustment (consolidation)

Lincoln Park Grid Support Center: Regulatory Review – who’s in charge? The Town of Ulster is the SEQR Lead Agency and has jurisdiction over the Site Plan approval for the project. However, multiple approvals and permits are required, including from 2 Federal and 2 state agencies. Before any permits can be granted, a full environmental review of all of the project’s environmental impacts is required, pursuant to SEQRA. SEQRA creates the record on which every permitting agency’s decisions must be based.

Where we are now “[T]he Town Board . . . has identified several potentially significant adverse environmental impacts related to the Proposed Action, that needed to be thoroughly evaluated and mitigated, before taking any action;” Step 4. Positive Declaration Issued (February 1) Scope Environmental Impact Statement (Public meeting Feb. 22; Comments due March 22) Step 5. Prepare Draft Environmental Impact Statement

Next Steps in the SEQR Process Draft scope (the detailed table of contents for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement) released February 1. Public scoping session on February 22; Comments due by March 22. Because the opportunity for public input on the scope is limited, it is important to get ready to comment now. Identification of local impacts of concern to your town, its businesses and residents will be particularly important.

Scoping Identify potential impacts of concern YOUR chance to identify potential local impacts & community resources that the lead agencies may not be aware of. Identify potential impacts of concern Water/air quality, wetlands, open space, recreational resources, climate change, fish and wildlife, culture, economics, and public health. Describe the significance And define the breadth of study necessary to address the impact’s significance in terms of time, geography and populations affected. Identify alternative(s) to the project Include different locations, size or technologies and other courses of action.

Focus on Local Impacts That You Think Should be Studied Scoping Comments Focus on Local Impacts That You Think Should be Studied Potential impacts to wetlands and principal aquifer Impact of carbon and other emissions on global climate change, NYS policy and local air quality and public health Stormwater runoff impacts Visual impacts locally and within the Hudson River National Landmark Historic District and Estates District Scenic Area of Statewide Significance Potential impacts to threatened and endangered species Cultural resource impacts, including Native American archeological sites Potential inconsistency with Town Comprehensive Plan

Where do we go from here? The Environmental Review Process - SEQR: Stay involved in the environmental review process. Attend the public scoping session on February 22 and submit written comments on the draft scope by March 22, emphasizing what local, as well as regional and global, impacts must be considered and alternatives that should be evaluated. Contact your county and state officials and ask them to prepare for the environmental review process and submission of their own comments State Dept. of Environmental Conservation permits: Comment on draft permits when released by DEC

More ways to get involved… Sign Up for Updates Kingston Citizens, Scenic Hudson, Riverkeeper , Citizens for Local Power , Catskill Mountainkeeper & the Coalition Against Pilgrim Pipelines-NY Attend Public Meetings and Public Scoping Session on February 22 Submit Comments to the Town of Ulster by March 22 Contact Elected Officials

Questions?