Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages e8 (October 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2011)
Advertisements

Structural Basis of Substrate Methylation and Inhibition of SMYD2
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
A Non-Stem-Loop CRISPR RNA Is Processed by Dual Binding Cas6
Marcel Zimmermann, Julian D. Hegemann, Xiulan Xie, Mohamed A. Marahiel 
Natalie Zeytuni, Raz Zarivach  Structure 
Hierarchical Binding of Cofactors to the AAA ATPase p97
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages e2 (November 2017)
An FAD-Dependent Pyridine Nucleotide-Disulfide Oxidoreductase Is Involved in Disulfide Bond Formation in FK228 Anticancer Depsipeptide  Cheng Wang, Shane.
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Messenger RNA-Programmed Incorporation of Multiple N-Methyl-Amino Acids into Linear and Cyclic Peptides  Takashi Kawakami, Hiroshi Murakami, Hiroaki Suga 
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Redesign of a Dioxygenase in Morphine Biosynthesis
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Insights into the Generation of Structural Diversity in a tRNA-Dependent Pathway for Highly Modified Bioactive Cyclic Dipeptides  Tobias W. Giessen, Alexander M.
Phospho-Pon Binding-Mediated Fine-Tuning of Plk1 Activity
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
A Non-Stem-Loop CRISPR RNA Is Processed by Dual Binding Cas6
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages (October 2012)
Nicholas J Skelton, Cliff Quan, Dorothea Reilly, Henry Lowman 
A Subdomain Swap Strategy for Reengineering Nonribosomal Peptides
Raf-1 Cysteine-Rich Domain Increases the Affinity of K-Ras/Raf at the Membrane, Promoting MAPK Signaling  Shuai Li, Hyunbum Jang, Jian Zhang, Ruth Nussinov 
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages e4 (February 2018)
Combining Mutational Signatures, Clonal Fitness, and Drug Affinity to Define Drug- Specific Resistance Mutations in Cancer  Teresa Kaserer, Julian Blagg 
Semisynthetic Src SH2 Domains Demonstrate Altered Phosphopeptide Specificity Induced by Incorporation of Unnatural Lysine Derivatives  Satpal Virdee,
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages e5 (December 2017)
A Drug-Drug Interaction Crystallizes a New Entry Point into the UPR
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Surface-Induced Dissociation of Homotetramers with D2 Symmetry Yields their Assembly Pathways and Characterizes the Effect of Ligand Binding  Royston S.
One Enzyme, Three Metabolites: Shewanella algae Controls Siderophore Production via the Cellular Substrate Pool  Sina Rütschlin, Sandra Gunesch, Thomas.
Mark Del Campo, Alan M. Lambowitz  Molecular Cell 
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Crystal Structures of the BAR-PH and PTB Domains of Human APPL1
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
DNA Synthesis across an Abasic Lesion by Human DNA Polymerase ι
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Characterization of Structure, Dynamics, and Detergent Interactions of the Anti-HIV Chemokine Variant 5P12-RANTES  Maciej Wiktor, Oliver Hartley, Stephan.
Cracking the Nonribosomal Code
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Figure 4. In vitro mo5U forming activity of TrmR
Peter Man-Un Ung, Rayees Rahman, Avner Schlessinger 
Structural Basis for Ligand Recognition and Activation of RAGE
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e4 (April 2018)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages 1216-1227.e8 (October 2017) Total Biosynthesis of the Pyrrolo[4,2]benzodiazepine Scaffold Tomaymycin on an In Vitro Reconstituted NRPS System  Alexander von Tesmar, Michael Hoffmann, Jan Pippel, Antoine Abou Fayad, Stefan Dausend-Werner, Armin Bauer, Wulf Blankenfeldt, Rolf Müller  Cell Chemical Biology  Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages 1216-1227.e8 (October 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.08.001 Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Cell Chemical Biology 2017 24, 1216-1227. e8DOI: (10. 1016/j. chembiol Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Chemical Structures of the Fourteen Tested Anthranilic Acids as well as the Five Tested Proline Derivatives, Including a Schematic Overview of the Applied Methodology Derivatives, which could serve as potential substrates based on the results of the respective methods are highlighted with colored frames. Based on in vitro loading assays with TomA and subsequent LC-MS measurements on intact protein level, ten derivatives would be conceivable (blue frames). Only incorporation of five derivatives could be observed by performing in vitro reconstitution assays with respective LC-MS measurements on small-molecule level (yellow frames). In vitro assays with TomG with respective small-molecule analytics showed that only one derivative is processed (purple frames). Cell Chemical Biology 2017 24, 1216-1227.e8DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.08.001) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Steps of the Tomaymycin In Vitro Reconstitution Including the Respective Deconvoluted Mass Spectra for Each Protein Species to Confirm the Substrate Binding and thus Monitoring the Complete Biosynthesis The observed mass deviation in the case of the dipeptide-loaded TomB is attributable to overlapping MS signals of the occurring species due to incomplete conversion. Hence, the limits of maximum entropy deconvolution algorithm is reached leading to inaccurate mass detection. Cell Chemical Biology 2017 24, 1216-1227.e8DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.08.001) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Scheme Showing the Workflow of TomA Loading Assays, Including the Results of Loading Attempts with Different Available Anthranilic Acid Derivatives The top panel shows exemplary LC-MS results obtained for loading assays of TomA. Charge state distributions were typically found to be in the range of 800–1,200 m/z and deconvoluted mass spectra allowed to obtain the respective protein mass typically within <10 ppm. Mass shifts shown in the lower panel are given as delta masses with respect to holo TomA. Cell Chemical Biology 2017 24, 1216-1227.e8DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.08.001) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Approaches toward the Analysis of Substrate Specificity of TomA by Competitive Loading Assays with Pairs of Anthranilic Acid Derivatives in Equimolar Ratio Detected delta masses are related to holo TomA and showed which substrate is preferred. Cell Chemical Biology 2017 24, 1216-1227.e8DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.08.001) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Structural Analysis Identifies TomG as Class I O-Methyltransferase (A) Overview of the dimeric crystal structure of TomG (monomer A, yellow and orange; monomer B, blue) with the bound cofactor S-adenosyl methionine (SAM) (stick presentation in green). (B) Proposed binding modes of 4,5-dihydroxy anthranilic acid (4,5-dihyd-AA; in light gray) and 4,5-dihydroxy-PBD (4,5-dihyd-PBD; two binding modes in stick presentation in light and dark blue) to the TomG monomer (Mg2+ ion shown as orange sphere; molecular surface colored by electrostatic potential); figures were prepared using PyMOL (The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.8.2.3 Schrödinger, LLC). Secondary structure elements were assigned with the aid of the STRIDE webserver (Frishman and Argos, 1995). Electrostatic potential was calculated using the APBS 2.1 plugin (Baker et al., 2001) under PyMOL and the PDB2PQR webserver (http://nbcr-222.ucsd.edu/pdb2pqr_2.0.0/; Dolinsky et al., 2007). Cell Chemical Biology 2017 24, 1216-1227.e8DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.08.001) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Tomaymycin Biosynthesis Comprising Hydroxylation of 5-OH Anthranilic Acid by TomE and TomF, Methylation by TomG, and Subsequent PBD Assembly by TomAB According to our data, tailoring of anthranilic acid likely takes place either online while tethered to TomA or prior to NRPS assembly. Cell Chemical Biology 2017 24, 1216-1227.e8DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.08.001) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Scheme 1 Synthesis of the Tomaymycin Derivatives Cell Chemical Biology 2017 24, 1216-1227.e8DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.08.001) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Cell Chemical Biology 2017 24, 1216-1227. e8DOI: (10. 1016/j. chembiol Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Cell Chemical Biology 2017 24, 1216-1227. e8DOI: (10. 1016/j. chembiol Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Cell Chemical Biology 2017 24, 1216-1227. e8DOI: (10. 1016/j. chembiol Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Cell Chemical Biology 2017 24, 1216-1227. e8DOI: (10. 1016/j. chembiol Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Cell Chemical Biology 2017 24, 1216-1227. e8DOI: (10. 1016/j. chembiol Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Cell Chemical Biology 2017 24, 1216-1227. e8DOI: (10. 1016/j. chembiol Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Cell Chemical Biology 2017 24, 1216-1227. e8DOI: (10. 1016/j. chembiol Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Cell Chemical Biology 2017 24, 1216-1227. e8DOI: (10. 1016/j. chembiol Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Cell Chemical Biology 2017 24, 1216-1227. e8DOI: (10. 1016/j. chembiol Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Cell Chemical Biology 2017 24, 1216-1227. e8DOI: (10. 1016/j. chembiol Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Cell Chemical Biology 2017 24, 1216-1227. e8DOI: (10. 1016/j. chembiol Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Cell Chemical Biology 2017 24, 1216-1227. e8DOI: (10. 1016/j. chembiol Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Cell Chemical Biology 2017 24, 1216-1227. e8DOI: (10. 1016/j. chembiol Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions