February 2007Federal Regulatory Improvement Commission.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WTO - TBT Committee Ana Maria Vallina, PhD Coordination Among Regulatory Bodies: The Chilean Experience Ana Maria Vallina PhD Head of Foreign Trade Department.
Advertisements

Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION 1 EGTC regulation EGTC regulation ESF and EGTC regulations Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Legislative Process in Bosnia and Herzegovina
FEDERAL TRANSPARENCY AND PUBLIC GOVERNMENT INFORMATION ACCESS ACT (FTPGIAA) José Luis Marzal Ruiz Federal Institute of Access to Public Information and.
OECD’s GfD in Arab countries Initiative Tunis February 2007 OECD’s GfD in Arab countries Initiative Tunis February 2007 Regulatory Impact Assessment.
Auditing, Assurance and Governance in Local Government
Online Government June/2002 Public FTAA.ecom/inf/141/Add.3 June 4, 2002 Original: Spanish Translation: FTAA Secretariat.
MULTI-LEVEL REGULATORY GOVERNANCE Jacobo Garcia Villarreal OECD Regulatory Policy Division
Unified Carrier Registration (UCR) Update August 24, 2006.
April Amman, Jordan DoHoon KIM Senior Research Fellow Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade.
“Reform of the Child Care System: Taking Stock and Accelerating Action” South East Europe 3 – 6 July 2007, Sofia.
1 The Regulatory Authority for electricity and gas:, The Regulatory Authority for electricity and gas: objectives, tasks, independence, accountability.
1 FOREIGN INVESTMENT IN CUBA Republic of Slovenia October 15, 2013.
Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into the Turkish Legal Framework Prime Minister’s Office, Better Regulation Group The Project Implementation Team.
ICC Ukraine Ukrainian National Committee of the International Chamber of Commerce.
PART FOUR – COMMERCIAL LEGISLATION in the UAE Legislative Structures affecting business in the UAE: An Overview Ch 16.
February 2007Federal Regulatory Improvement Commission.
Eurasian Corporate Governance Roundtable
The Italian Institutional Design for Administrative Simplification HIGH LEVEL REGIONAL SEMINAR ON “STRATEGIES, TOOLS AND CAPACITIES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE.
DAB LAW FIRM. INTRODUCTION This publication has been prepared for informational purposes only. None of information contained in this publication shall.
Simple, Effective, Transparent Regulation: Best Practices in OECD countries Cesar Cordova-Novion Deputy Head of Programme Regulatory Reform, OECD.
PUBLIC-PRIVATE DIALOGUE IN THE STATE OF AGUASCALIENTES, MEXICO Armando Jiménez, Ph.D Paris, 1 February 2006.
Tools for Simplification – Lessons from the Mexico Experience Dr. Manuel Gerardo Flores Senior Economist Regulatory Policy Division OECD OECD-Israel Conference.
MEXICO AND COMPETITIVENESS. Mexican Federal Labor Law of 1970 Obsolete It was characterized by its inflexibility Discouraged growth and productivity Lack.
Fast-disbursing Credit Auditing 1. In Mexico, the contracting and use of resources stemming from public debt transactions are ruled by the Political Constitution.
The State Procurement Agency of the Republic of Azerbaijan Welcomes the participants of the 11 th Public Procurement Knowledge Exchange Forum “Procurement.
Summary of the main concerns of the proposed language for Article 33 of the maquila decree and the limitations of the existing tax benefits Western Maquila.
Technical Regulations – U.S. Procedures and Practices U.S.-Brazil Commercial Dialogue Digital Video Conference Series August 22, 2006 Mary Saunders Chief,
Presented by Professor: Salwa Elgharib General Secretary of Supreme Council of Egyptian Universities
Romanian Court of Accounts years of existence.
Supervision and regulation of banking system duty is given to a autonomous organization called Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency. BRSA is public.
Workshop on the Legal Framework of EU Structural Funds’ Management for the Period Riga – Latvia, 4 & 5 December 2006 Head of Division, Preben.
RIA and the case of Mexico Dr. Manuel Gerardo Flores Senior Economist Regulatory Policy Division OECD OECD-Israel Workshop on Improving the Design and.
A.ABDULLAEV, Director of the Public Fund for Support and Development of Print Media and Information Agencies of Uzbekistan.
International Workshop on Public-Private Dialogue CASE STUDY 4 – MEXICO Is it possible to institutionalize a public-private dialogue.
Regulatory Impact Analysis – Lebanon Working Group IV: Focus Group on Public Service Delivery, Public-Private Partnership and Regulatory Reform Amman,
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN LEGISLATIVE PROCESS. The regulatory framework in Romania allows the civil society to impact public decision making. There are.
Building Sustainable Inspection Reforms Jordan Coordination Model Wafa’a M. Aranki June 2014 Amman – Jordan.
The Social Labour Dimension of MERCOSUR. MERCOSUR  In 1991 Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay sign the Treaty of Asuncion which formally creates.
Regulation and the Governance Agenda in the 21 st Century Josef Konvitz, Public Governance Directorate.
1 Information Sharing Environment (ISE) Privacy Guidelines Jane Horvath Chief Privacy and Civil Liberties Officer.
Ministry of Enterprise, Energy and Communications Sweden Small Business Act – Think Small First in Sweden Håkan Hillefors Division for Entrepreneurship.
State Nuclear Regulatory Committee of Ukraine Development of Regulations Development of Regulations School for Drafting Regulations on Nuclear and Radiation.
PRESENTATION TO THE NCOP ON THE CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL INTERESTS IN MOBILE EQUIPMENT BILL, MARCH 2007.
Federal Regulatory Improvement Commission Mexico’s Federal Regulatory Improvement Programme: Experience and Future Priorities Singapore, February 2001.
Experience of Moldova in implementing structural reforms Eugen Osmochescu Head, RIA Secretariat Geneva, 23 October 2007.
PPP Legal & Regulatory Framework. PPP Policy In July 2008 GOK approved the PPP policy directive through which: PPPs are identified as a method for investing.
APEC-OECD CO-OPERATIVE INITIATIVE ON REGULATORY REFORM February 2001 Experience and best practices in achieving regulatory efficiency and open markets.
‘ By Abdou Karim LO Minister of State for Reform and Technical Assistance AfCoP/MfDR Co-Chair.
SFP September 21, 2010 Projects of the Ministry of Public Administration Viceminister Rogelio Carbajal Tejada.
Impact analysis during the harmonisation process with the EU and effects on Lithuanian economy Giedrius Kadziauskas, Senior Policy analyst 23 rd Fabruary.
A Regulators Perspective on U.S. Trade Policy Coordination 1.
Special Meeting on Procedures for Information Exchange November 7, 2007 Geneva Session 1 Anne Meininger United States USA WTO TBT Enquiry Point.
Lecturer: Lina Vladimirovna Zhornyak, associated professor.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 3 – Freedom to provide services Bilateral.
Local economy – social economy = sustainable development.
SPANISH LAW on SOCIAL ECONOMY 5/2011 Miguel Ángel Cabra de Luna, PhD Member of the European Economic and Social Committee, Spanish Enterprise Confederation.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 19 – Social Policy and Employment.
April Amman, Jordan DoHoon KIM Senior Research Fellow Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade.
Roadmap for Health in All Policies in Sudan
Agenda Study tour ARMENQA University Politehnica of Bucharest
Cesar Cordova-Novion Deputy Head of Programme Regulatory Reform, OECD
European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority Introduction
Head, Federal Regulatory Improvement Commission
Steering Policy and Steering Systems
Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) in the Republic of Uzbekistan Geneva, April 12, 2017.
Building organic expertise within the public sector
Ad hoc Group of Experts on Better Regulation
General Bureau of Standards (DGN, by its Spanish Acronym)
REPUBLIC OF CROATIA MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMANTAL AND NATURE PROTECTION
Presentation transcript:

February 2007Federal Regulatory Improvement Commission

February 2007Federal Regulatory Improvement Commission

February 2007Federal Regulatory Improvement Commission Policies to improve Regulatory Quality: the Mexican case Federal Regulatory Improvement Commission (COFEMER), MEXICO Good Governance for Development in Arab Countries Initiative: Working Group IV Tunis, Tunisia. February, 2007

February 2007Federal Regulatory Improvement Commission ¿What is COFEMER? COFEMER is Mexicos Federal Regulatory Improvement Commission. COFEMER was created in year 2000, through a reform to the Federal Administrative Procedures Law. COFEMER is an autonomous agency of the Ministry of the Economy. COFEMER is supported by the Federal Regulatory Improvement Council which is comprised by five ministries, a number of government agencies, as well as representatives of the private and social sectors, and scholars. COFEMERs personnel: 60 professionals, mainly experienced on fields such as Economics and Law.

February 2007Federal Regulatory Improvement Commission Ensuring transparency in the regulatory process Promoting that regulations benefits exceed its costs Federal Regulatory Improvement Commission Achieving, through good regulation, the greatest benefit for society and not just for certain groups COFEMER's Mission

February 2007Federal Regulatory Improvement Commission Public-Private Dialogue within its Council Federal Register of Government Formalities and Services Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) and the Presidential Order for Regulatory Quality Collaboration Agreements with States and Municipalities, and the Rapid Business Start-up System COFEMER COFEMERs main tools for Regulatory Improvement

February 2007Federal Regulatory Improvement Commission RIA and the Presidential Order for Regulatory Quality RIA is an ex-ante analysis which facilitates knowing what effects, in terms of expected costs and benefits, a regulation will create when implemented. It also helps to analyze regulatory alternatives to the original project of the regulator. In principle, all federal ministries and agencies are obliged to send their draft regulatory instruments and their respective RIA to COFEMER, in order to obtain the latters opinion. No regulatory instrument might be published in the official Gazette, and therefore enter into force, without obtaining firstly COFEMERs opinion.

February 2007Federal Regulatory Improvement Commission RIA and the Presidential Order for Regulatory Quality In addition to the RIA process mentioned before, a new instrument to reinforce Regulatory Quality was issued by President Felipe Calderón on February 2, 2007: the Presidential Order for Regulatory Quality. The Presidential Order establishes a procedure that federal ministries and agencies must fulfill before COFEMER, previous to submitting the RIA. The Presidential Order's goal is to oversee: i) that the draft regulation has a positive effect on citizens and productive activities; and ii) that no regulation is enacted if it hinders investment, job creation and, in general, the competitiveness of the Economy.

February 2007Federal Regulatory Improvement Commission RIA and the Presidential Order for Regulatory Quality Federal agencies may issue new regulation, only when the latter complies, subject to COFEMERs decision, at least with one of the following criteria: 1. The draft regulation derives from an emergency situation. 2. The federal ministry or agency is complying with either an obligation established in law or in regulations issued by the President. 3. The draft regulation is complying with an international obligation. 4. The regulation has to be up-dated periodically due to its nature. 5. The benefits of the proposed regulation are superior to its compliance costs.

February 2007Federal Regulatory Improvement Commission Rapid Business Start-up System (SARE) SARE is a permanent program, created in year 2002 by the Federal Government, that promotes, in a joint manner with state and municipal authorities, the establishment and start-up of new businesses in 72 hours (comparable to the best practices in this subject in OECD countries). SARE is a one stop shop in which all relevant federal, state and municipal procedures (7-9, depending of the city in which the business intends to open) can be fulfilled. As of January, 2007 there are 110 SARE offices working throughout the country (in those municipalities 46% of the total gross production is located). For year 2007, approximately 20 additional SARE offices will be opened.

February 2007Federal Regulatory Improvement Commission Federal Register of Government Formalities and Services (RFTS) The RFTS was created on year 2000 and is run by COFEMER. It took a three year period for the Registry to be totally integrated. The objective of the Registry is to bring certainty and transparency to all individuals and businesses with regard to federal formalities and services. The RFTS is a public online catalog available at with information regarding the specific steps, authorities involved, terms for responding, legal grounds, applicable formats, etc., of most federal folmalities and services Federal ministries and agencies are obliged by law to inform COFEMER of the creation of a new formality or service or the modification of an existing one, in order to reflect the relevant situation in the RFTS, keeping the latter updated.

February 2007Federal Regulatory Improvement Commission Public- Private Dialogue within the Federal Regulatory Improvement Council The Public-Private dialogue has built a new vision of regulatory improvement, achieving: 1. Improvement of 63 high impact formalities in specific sectors of the Economy. 2. Establishment of a Regulatory Moratorium from 2004 to 2006, which reduced the issuing of regulation with compliance costs in around 23%. 3. Development of a Systemic Approach to define 36 regulatory improvement priorities to promote competitiveness by analyzing complete regulatory systems, in order to propose and implement solutions to the detected situations.

February 2007Federal Regulatory Improvement Commission Public- Private Dialogue within the Federal Regulatory Improvement Council Due to the positive results obtained with the Public-Private dialogue, federal authorities and the private sector agreed to formalize their work relationship. As of August, 2006 the Council's Rules were modified to create two new levels of work with public-private participation: the Executive Committee and the Working Groups. The objective of creating such new levels is to have an agile structure to promote discussion, definition and implementation of regulatory changes to foster competitiveness.

February 2007Federal Regulatory Improvement Commission PPD in Mexico: Future Tasks Transportation Regulatory Improvement Council (High level political decisions). Minister level and its equivalent in the private sector COUNCIL ECONOMY FINANCE COMPTROLLER GENERAL LABOR COMPETITION CONSUMER PROTECTION COFEMER PRIVATE SECTOR ACADEMY Executive Committee Working Groups Executive Committee (High level technical decisions). Underminister level and its equivalent in the private sector. Working Groups (Technical Work) Director General level and its equivalent in the private sector. Foreign Trade and Customs Energy Technical Standards FinancialMigrationTelecommunications Social Security Labor Business Start-Up Health

February 2007Federal Regulatory Improvement Commission