Radiation Levels in ALICE Andreas Morsch Meeting on ALICE Radiation Tolerance 30/8/2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Photons and Jets from the first year of ALICE A
Advertisements

Charm and beauty with ALICE at LHC
CERN Mar Luminosity and longitudinal density W.C. Turner 1 Luminosity optimization and longitudinal density instrumentation W.C. Turner LBNL.
SNS Spallation Neutrino Source 1 SNS layout GeV proton linear accelerator Accumulator ring Main target Stripping foil.
Beam Composition for Biology
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
P HI T S Exercise ( II ) : How to stop , ,  -rays and neutrons? Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System title1 Feb revised.
RHIC electron cloud and vacuum pressure rise characteristics P.He, H.C.Hseuh, W.Fischer, U.Iriso, D.Gassner, J.Gullotta, R.Lee, L.Smart, D.Trbojevic, L.F.Wang.
1 Introduction to Plasma Immersion Ion Implantation Technologies Emmanuel Wirth.
Plot Approval Yat Long Chan (CUHK) Igor Mandic (Ljubljana) Charlie Young (SLAC)
Hall D Photon Beam Simulation and Rates Part 1: photon beam line Part 2: tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Beam Line and Tagger Review.
Impact of LHCf on BRAN and beam monitoring Y.Itow, H.Menjo (Nagoya University) The 1 st TAN integration workshop Mar10, 2006.
Radiation Exposure, Dose and Relative Biological Effectiveness in Medicine Background Image:
Lausanne, Generator Miniworkshop, March 2001 Massimiliano Ferro-Luzzi, CERN/EP Beam-gas background in LHCb What nuisances for LHCb from p-A background.
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
E-CLOUD VACUUM OBSERVATIONS AND FORECAST IN THE LHC Vacuum Surfaces Coatings Group 03/07/2011 G. Bregliozzi On behalf of VSC Group with the contributions.
JSPS Research Fellow / University of Tsukuba T. Horaguchi Oct for HAWAII /10/15HAWAII
Proposal for Experiment S291: " Residual radioactivity induced by U ions - experimental investigation and longtime predictions" GSI, Darmstadt: G.Fehrenbacher,
Synchrotron radiation at eRHIC Yichao Jing, Oleg Chubar, Vladimir N. Litvinenko.
Beam screens in IT phase 1
Beam Background Simulations for HL-LHC at IR1 Regina Kwee-Hinzmann, R.Bruce, A.Lechner, N.V.Shetty, L.S.Esposito, F.Cerutti, G.Bregliozzi, R.Kersevan,
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
Page 1 Overview and Issues of the MEIC Interaction Region M. Sullivan MEIC Accelerator Design Review September 15-16, 2010.
LCWS2004 Paris 1 Beam background study for GLC Tsukasa Aso, Toyama College of Maritime Technology and GLC Vertex Group H.Aihara, K.Tanabe, Tokyo Univ.
Peter Spiller, GSI, ICFA workshop, Optimization of SIS100 Lattice and Dedicated Collimation System P. Spiller, GSI ICFA 2004 Bensheim
Integrated Radiation Measurement and Radiation Protection of BES Ⅲ Zhang Qingjiang, Wu protection group, accelerator center, IHEP,
ILC-ECFA Workshop Valencia November 2006 Four-fermion processes as a background in the ILC luminosity calorimeter for the FCAL Collaboration I. Božović-Jelisavčić,
Strangeness opportunities at the LHC RIKEN BNL Research Center Workshop - BNL - 15/02/06 1.Strangeness at LHC energies Extrapolations / Motivations 2.Strange.
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
Nucleon Decay Search in the Detector on the Earth’s Surface. Background Estimation. J.Stepaniak Institute for Nuclear Studies Warsaw, Poland FLARE Workshop.
Status of Beam Halo/Gas Simulation A.Stradling(Wisconsin) P. Steinberg(BNL) G. Usai (Chicago) Standard Model Group 6 December 2006 A.Stradling(Wisconsin)
SIGNAL AND BACKGROUND SIMULATION AT THE RECOMBINATION CHAMBER Vadim TALANOV CERN and IHEP, Protvino Joint LHC Machine-Experiments Workshop on Very Forward.
Heavy quarkonia perspectives with heavy-ions in ALICE E. Vercellin Università and INFN Torino – Italy For the ALICE collaboration.
First measurements in Pb—Pb collisions at  s NN =2.76 TeV with ALICE at the LHC M. Nicassio (University and INFN Bari) for the ALICE Collaboration Rencontres.
Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.
September 17-21, 2007Workshop on ILC Interaction Region Engineering Design, SLAC IR Vacuum Systems first thoughts Oleg Malyshev ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory.
IHEP/Protvino for FP420 R&D Collaboration 1 IHEP/Protvino Group: Igor Azhgirey Igor Bayshev Igor Kurochkin + one post-graduate student Tools:
Update on radiation estimates for the CLIC Main and Drive beams Sophie Mallows, Thomas Otto CLIC OMPWG.
Measurement of inclusive jet and dijet production in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector Seminar talk by Eduardo Garcia-Valdecasas Tenreiro.
Radiation study of the TPC electronics Georgios Tsiledakis, GSI.
THIN FILMS FOR CLIC ELEMENTS Outline Motivation The role of MME-CCS DB and MB transfer lines Main beam Main beam quadrupoles Other issues conclusions CLIC.
Prepared by M. Jimenez AT Dept / Vacuum Group, ECloud’04 ELECTRON CLOUDS AND VACUUM EFFECTS IN THE SPS Experimental Program for 2004 J.M. Jimenez Thanks.
1 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Background radiation studies using Geant4.
July 27, 2002CMS Heavy Ions Bolek Wyslouch1 Heavy Ion Physics with the CMS Experiment at the Large Hadron Collider Bolek Wyslouch MIT for the CMS Collaboration.
ALICE sensitivity to background and injection failures with the smaller aperture A. Di Mauro TREX meeting, 31/07/2014.
Estimates of residual gas pressure in the LHC Adriana Rossi AT-VAC Workshop on Experimental Conditions and Beam Induced Detector Backgrounds April.
H. Matis, S. Hedges, M. Placidi, A. Ratti, W. Turner [+several students] (LBNL) R. Miyamoto (now at ESSS) H. Matis - LARP CM18 - May 8, Fluka Modeling.
E.B. Holzer BLM Meeting: Q & A March 20, Questions and Answers.
Benchmarking simulations and observations at the LHC Octavio Domínguez Acknowledgments: G. Arduini, G. Bregliozzi, E. Métral, G. Rumolo, D. Schulte and.
E+/e- Backgrounds at BEPCII/BESIII JIN Dapeng Aug. 22, 2011.
Integration of forward physics detectors into the LSS of the LHC D. Macina (TS/LEA) Technical Support 2004 Workshop.
ICARUS T600: low energy electrons
R.W. Assmann, V. Boccone, F. Cerutti, M. Huhtinen, A. Mereghetti
Heating and radiological
Validation of Geant4 against the TARC benchmark: Testing neutron production, transportation and interaction TARC – experimental set-up and aims Geant4.
M. Migliorati, C. Vaccarezza INFN - LNF
Electron cloud & vacuum pressure observations: 2011 proton run
Summary of hadronic tests and benchmarks in ALICE
FCC-hh Machine Detector Interface
Comparison Of High Energy Hadronic Interaction Models
Open heavy flavor analysis with the ALICE experiment at LHC
How to stop a, b, g-rays and neutrons?
Radiation Backgrounds in the ATLAS New Small Wheel
Quarkonium production in p-p and A-A collisions: ALICE status report
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
in c-tau factory detector
Quarkonium production in p-p and A-A collisions: ALICE status report
FLUKA SIMULATION OF MUON DETECTOR,MUCH,
PERFORMANCE OF THE METAL RADIATION MONITORING SYSTEMS
Background Simulations at Fermilab
Presentation transcript:

Radiation Levels in ALICE Andreas Morsch Meeting on ALICE Radiation Tolerance 30/8/2004

Order of Magnitude of the Problem The ALICE design parameters together with running plans (collision systems, luminosity, running time) determine the order of magnitude of the radiation load. Event related background which is highest in central PbPb mid-rapidity (0.01 – 100) cm -2 muon spectrometer < 0.1 cm -2 determines granularity, distance to IP and shielding However, particles are produced in PbPb but in all planned collisions (mainly from pp and ArAr) particles are produced in beam-gas collisions inside the ALICE experiments (IP +/- 20 m) particles enter as beam-halo

Order of Magnitude of the Problem The number of charges produced at mid-rapidity in 10 years corresponds to a dose of ~0.1 – 1000 Gy in the mid-rapidity detectors. The highest hadron fluence is dominated by primary hadrons (~10 12 cm -2 in SPD) only at higher radii neutrons from secondary interactions dominate. In the Muon Spectrometer the design particle density of 0.1 cm -2 in central PbPb extrapolated to the complete running scenario corresponds to a dose of ~1 Gy. The hadron fluence is dominated by neutrons. Assuming that the ratio n/charged particles is ~100 the highest hadron fluences are of the order of cm -2.

Order of Magnitude of the Problem Electronic racks are located up to 5m from the beam line and shielded by 1-2 m of concrete Dose and hadron (neutron) fluence are expected to be 3-5 orders of magnitude smaller than close to the beam-pipe Gy n/cm 2

Simulations Detailed results can only be obtained from simulations using transport codes Input primary particles simulated with HIJING, Pythia, DPMJET and boundary source for beam halo Transport code: FLUKA Scaling of results performed for 10 years running scenario

10 years Running Scenario

Beam-Gas Interaction ALICE zone (IP +/- 20 m) Assume H 2 -equivalent gas-pressure of molecules/m 3 Most pessimistic molecules/m 3 ALICE requirement molecules/m 3 Beam Halo Use boundary source provided by Protvino Assumes pessimistic gas pressure estimate for LSS approximately valid for the running in phase.

Detector Locations

Rack Locations

Doses and Fluences Dose = absorbed energy / mass [J/kg] = Gy Fluence = track length / volume [cm / cm 3 ] = 1/cm 2

1 MeV n-equivalent Fluence

New since last presentation ALICE Internal Note final Re-evaluation of beam-halo contribution HIP rates have been evaluated for Pb-Pb collisions, but will be (~5 x) higher in high-luminosity Ar-Ar A priory only Muon Spectrometer can participate Which detectors/racks are concerned ? SPD,...

Doses in Mid-Rapidity Detectors SPD1: Primary neutron fluence important

Neutron Fluences in Mid-Rapidity Detectors

Hadron Fluences in Mid-Rapidity Detectors

HIP Rates Mika Huhtinen, CMS Note 2002/11 Highly Ionizing Particles are produces by fragments from inelastic h-A interactions and can be related to the fluence of hadrons with E kin > 20 MeV. 100 Mip

HIP Rates for PbPb MB Compare CMS/ALICE: Luminosity /10 27 = 10 7 Cross-Section0.08/8= Multiplicity 8/2000= 4e -3 Total= r = 22 cm CMS: 2.8MHz cm -2 ALICE 6.5 kHz cm -2

Doses in Forward Detectors

Hadron Fluence in Forward Detectors

Radiation Load at Rack Positions

LHC Gas Pressures and ALICE Residual gas pressures in LHC are important since ALICE will run at low pp luminosity (0.1 – 3) cm -2 s -1 and nominal intensity. Previous estimates give Up to 1 MHz/cm 2 hadron flux inside beam pipe from beam halo 12 kHz/m beam-gas interaction rate inside the experimental region

New Gas Pressure Estimates A. Rossi and N. Hilleret, LHC PR 676 (2003) Changes with respect to previous calculations Parameters of characteristics of TiZrV NEG coating Ion induced desorption using the multi-gas model Beam pumping deriving from gas ionisation and subsequent implantation or sticking to the surface Electron induced desorption is negligible according to Operation Scenario The photon flux on the wall coming from synchrotron radiation is uniformly distributed along the section considered. It is believed that this overestimates the flux.

Operating Scenarios In order to achieve the nominal parameters the unbaked surface of the cold vacuum system must be conditioned to lower secondary electron emission and avoid electron multiplication. It is foreseen to have three operation periods: Machine start-up Conditioning Period After machine conditioning

Operating Scenario Machine Start-Up Operation with beam current below multipacting threshold = 1/3 of nominal intensity Conditioning During conditioning period the beam current is gradually increased to maintain electron multipacting conditions. The electron bombardment will lower the secondary electron emission (electron conditioning). After Conditioning Operation at nominal beam-current Electron multipacting assumed to be neglebible Materials show memory-effect. Only short reconditioning needed after shut-down and venting.

Gas pressure at IP2 LHC Project Note in preparation (A. Rossi) Main conclusion: the density will be lower molecules/m 3, because the beam pipe is NEG coated. Adriana has measured the electron cloud activity with NEG at the SPS and no such activity has been observed.

Conclusions The radiation load in ALICE detectors and electronic racks has been studied. Contributions from interactions at the IP and beam-gas interactions have been taken into account. Collisions for physics are the dominant source of radiation load. However, for more pessimistic assumptions on residual gas pressure the beam-gas contribution could be of equal order of magnitude. Highest doses (several kGy) are reached in the inner SPD layer and at the inner radii of forward detectors (FMS, V0, T0). Hadron fluences up to cm -2 (SPD1). The highest doses in the electronic racks are in the 10 mGy range with n-fluences up to 10 9 cm -2.

Conclusions New calculations for residual gas pressure at IP and in the LSS give ~ one order of magnitude lower values. Reason: No measurable electron cloud activity from NEG coated surfaces at the SPS Cold surfaces will be conditioned (scrubbing) according using an operation scenario that avoids electron cloud activity.