Science Education in the United States: An International Perspective Oregon Summer Institute August 2006 William H. Schmidt Michigan State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recommends four years of math, three years of science, no difference in requirements for college-prep and career prep. We are using their K – 8 math standards.
Advertisements

Class of 2015 School year  AP Macroeconomics  Economics  Career & Life Planning  Introduction to Business  Introduction to Financial.
Illinois High School to College Success Report High School Feedback Reporting In Cooperation with ACT, Inc. Illinois Community College Board Illinois Board.
© 2003 Michigan State University The Level Playing Field: An American Myth William H. Schmidt Michigan State University October 8, 2003 Archived Information.
TPHS Choices Night Welcome prospective TPHS science students.
WNC LASER WNC School Systems.  Increase students’ interest in STEM  Improve academic achievement related to STEM  Increase community support.
© 2006 Michigan State University, PROM/SESupported by NSF Cooperative Agreement EHR PROM/SE Science Associates Winter Institute SMART Consortium.
© 2004 Michigan State University PROM/SE: Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Math and Science Education Overview, Fall 2004.
PROM/SE Summer Science Institute © 2005 MSU PROM/SE Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Mathematics and Science Education, Supported by NSF Cooperative Agreement.
Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Mathematics and Science Education PROM/SE Ohio Spring Mathematics Associate Institute April 27, 2005.
Final Session: Whole Group Please sit together with the other associates from your district (as much as possible) April 27, 2005.
0 Professional Development. 1 PD Design: Distributed Expertise Focal unit is District, not individual teachers Goal is to elevate aggregate level of knowledge.
PROM/SE Summer Science Institute © 2005 MSU PROM/SE Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Mathematics and Science Education, Supported by NSF Cooperative Agreement.
Arizona’s Move On When Ready Initiative January, 2011.
Looking Beneath the Surface What we can learn from the Minnesota TIMSS Science Results William H. Schmidt Michigan State University.
© 2006 Michigan State University, Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education Content Standards in an International Context William H. Schmidt.
Education in a Global Context February 28, 2008 William H. Schmidt University Distinguished Professor Michigan State University.
Analyses of West Virginia Mathematics and Science Curricular Objectives in effect July 2008 William H. Schmidt University Distinguished Professor Michigan.
APS Algebra Summit1 Algebra in APS Christina Fritz Franny Dever Mitchell Ross January 31,2008.
Improving Teacher Quality Grants, Cycle 5: External Evaluation Report December 8 th, 2008 University of Missouri Evaluation Team.
1 Comparing International Assessments to NAEP May 30, 2008 Eugene Owen Senior Advisor, NCES International Activities Program This paper is intended to.
Issues in High School Mathematics Oregon Summer Institute August, 2006 William H. Schmidt Michigan State University.
2015 Curriculum Night Presentation.  Earth Science (Honors and Academic)  Biology (Honors and Academic)  Chemistry  Physics  Environmental Science.
1 Conceptual Knowledge and Skills Task Group Chicago Meeting Progress Report April 20, 2007.
United to Make a Difference: Improving the Achievement of Young Men of Color Council of the Great City Schools Fall 2014.
Content and School Effectiveness: Role and Impact December 12, 2006 William H. Schmidt Michigan State University.
Science Course Offerings and Sequences. Choices for 9 th Grade CP Biology CP Biology Accelerated Biology Accelerated Biology.
Science Education in the United States: An International Perspective Oregon Summer Institute August 2006 William H. Schmidt Michigan State University.
SAT, End of Course, SAT, End of Course, & Advanced Placement RESULTS2014 October 14, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson, Superintendent Dr. Kevin O’Gorman, Associate.
What is the Advanced Placement Program? The Advanced Placement Program are courses taught at local high schools, which allow students to participate in.
ACADEMIC RIGOR LEAD 615 – Group Presentation Marcelle Fung, Erin Gehant, Bruce Guttman, Kathryn Stanley, Keisha Warner
Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School District Program Evaluations A summary of recommendations from the completed program evaluations March 6, 2009.
Readable Science Textbooks: An International Perspective Oregon Summer Institute August 2006 William H. Schmidt Michigan State University.
© 2005 MSU PROM/SE Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Mathematics and Science Education, Supported by NSF Cooperative Agreement EHR International Comparative.
An Historical Perspective Tina Cantrell, PhD. Principal John Hersey High School.
Westlake High School Science Department Course Offerings College Preparatory (CP) –Biology –Geoscience –Chemistry –Anatomy and Physiology –Marine Science.
West Campus Science Electives
New Graduation Requirements
Advanced Placement & PARCC Results
FHS Science Department
PROM/SE Summer Science Institute
Assessing Progress Towards Meeting NAUTeach Program Goals
RISING 9TH GRADE REGISTRATION PREVIEW 2017 – 2018 Registration
MANHASSET SECONDARY SCHOOL
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
Council Rock High School North
Welcome prospective TPHS science students
PISA • PIRLS • TIMSS Program for International Student Assessment
Science – Scholar Diploma
Average is Officially Over!
James C. Enochs High School
TPHS Information Night
Course Selection Night
Leading the Way in Science
Welcome Willis Independent school district Pre-Advanced Placement
Gifted and talented education program information night
PROM/SE: Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Mathematics and Science Education February, 2006.
Council Rock High School North
Greenville Central School District
Education in a Global Context April 24, 2008 William H
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
Folsom High School Class: Honors Chemistry Grade: 10-12
Manheim Central high school
HART RESEARCH A S O T E C I AAC&U Members On Trends In Learning Outcomes, General Education, and Assessment Key findings from online survey among 433 Chief.
Manheim Central High School
James C. Enochs High School
Advanced Placement Program®
Advanced Placement Program®
Council Rock High School North
Presentation transcript:

Science Education in the United States: An International Perspective Oregon Summer Institute August 2006 William H. Schmidt Michigan State University

Instructional Content Constructs Curricular Coherence Curricular Structure Curricular Focus Exposure Time (OTL) Curricular Rigor Level of Complexity

Number of Science Topics Intended by Standards for Each Grade © 2005 Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education, Michigan State University

Yearly Science Instruction Time 4th Grade: 100 hours/year ≈ 33 minutes/day

Science Topics Intended by the Top-Achieving TIMSS Countries

Science Topics Intended by the Top-Achieving TIMSS Countries (Part 1)

Science Topics Intended by the Top-Achieving TIMSS Countries (Part 2)

Science Topics Intended by the Top-Achieving TIMSS Countries (Part 3)

Science Topics Intended by 22 U.S. States for Grades 1-8

Science Topics Intended by 2 U.S. States for Grades 1-8 Michigan Ohio

Science Topics Intended by One U.S. State at Each Grade

Science Topics Intended by On U.S. State at Each Grade (continued)

Percent of students taking each type of science course in 7th and 8th grade in the U.S. (TIMSS 1995)   Seventh Grade Eighth Grade General 29.6 (5.2) 28.4 (3.0) Physical 4.0 (2.0) 29.2 (4.8) Life 56.7 (5.3) 7.7 (2.7) Earth 9.7 (3.7) 34.7 (4.2)

LSAY High School Science Course Enrollment

Number of Science Courses Offered in 7 Districts

Number of Course Patterns for Meeting High School Science Requirement in 7 Districts

Diagram of Science Course-Taking Sequences in District F Physics II Earth Science 1 Earth Science 2 Biology 1 Biology 2 Physical Science 1 Physical Science 2 Gen. Life Sci. 1 Gen. Life Sci. 2 Anatomy/Physio. 1 Anatomy/Physio. 2 AP Biology 2 Chemistry 1 Chemistry 2 CP Biology 1 CP Biology 2 AP Chemistry 1 AP Chemistry 2 Physics 1 CP Chemistry 1 CP Chemistry 2 Master Research Master Program Gen. Sci. 1 Gen. Sci. 2 Gen. Sci. 3 Gen. Sci. 4 AP Biology 1

Average Percent Correct on PROM/SE Science Items Types by Type of High School Science Courses

Average Percent Correct on PROM/SE Science Items Types by Socio-Economic Status

Grade International Grade Placement of Curriculum Content Across Districts International Grade Placement (IGP) Grade © 2005 MSU PROM/SE Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Mathematics and Science Education, Supported by NSF Cooperative Agreement EHR-0314866

Average Percent Correct on 1995 TIMSS Science Items © 2005 Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education, Michigan State University

Average Percent Correct on TIMSS 1995 End-of-Secondary Science Literacy Test © 2005 MSU PROM/SE Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Mathematics and Science Education, Supported by NSF Cooperative Agreement EHR-0314866